« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

NEW GALLUP POLL: NUTJOB RON PAUL ONLY GETS 7% OF THE TEA PARTY VOTE

In other words, 93% of tea party members wisely reject this anti semitic loser as a presidential candidate.

 

Republican Presidential Nomination Preferences, by Ideology and Tea Party Support.
(Based on Republican and Republican-leaning independents who are registered to vote)

TEA PARTY SUPPORTER %:

Newt Gingrich              47%
Mitt Romney                 17%
Michele Bachmann        8%
Rick Perry                       7%
Ron Paul                         7%
Rick Santorum                4%
Jon Huntsman              <1%
Other/Any/None            11%

Gallup Daily Tracking. Dec 1-5, 2011

http://www.gallup.com/poll/151355/Gingrich-Romney-Among-GOP-Voters-Nationwide.aspx

 

In fact, Tea Party Fort Lauderdale, America’s longest running tea party, recently held a straw poll for it’s members asking for our choice of candidate as POTUS, and also the man or woman we thought would make the worst president. And unlike the usual straw polls that the delusional paulbots spam up, this poll was only open to actual group members.

And our straw poll numbers validated the Gallup poll numbers. Ron Paul finished with Jon Huntsman as THE ONLY TWO PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES to pull in less than 5% support from our group. However, the left wing cancer that Paul spreads was not appreciated by our conservative members as career politican Paul overwhelmingly won as the candidate we least wanted to see as president, winning that dubious honor by a huge margin over our second place loser(Huntsman).

Tea Party Fort Lauderdale Presidential Straw Poll

The question was asked;

Who would you least like to receive the Republican nomination to run against Barack Obama?

1st Place

Ron Paul 38%

Jon Huntsman 16%

Mitt Romney 13.5%

Rick Perry 12.5%

Undecided 9.5%

331 people participated in this straw poll that ran from 10/13 – 10/21

Tea Party Fort Lauderdale, America’s Longest Running Tea Party   www.TeaPartyFortLauderdale.com

 

These numbers also fall in line with Wrong Paul’s performance in the last presidential elections. As I recall, he won a bunch of straw and internet polls. And his delusional paulbot followers claimed this represented reality. Of course, us sane people knew that he had no real life political support. And that was proven in the 2008 when the nutjob only got 5% of the primary vote. That means 19 OUT OF 20 REPUBLICAN PRIMARY VOTERS REJECTED HIM AS A PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE LAST ELECTION!!!

And of course his followers are the dirtbags of society. Conspiracy loons, anti war leftists, and anti semites. That is why the Republican Jewish Coalition banned him and his paulbots from the presidential debate they moderated. And that is why most sites, including this one, have policies banning paulbots. I say they are a cancer to the conservative movement and we should treat them like lepers and shun them.

COMMENTS

  • mikeymike143

    Ron Paul supporters are angry at his exclusion from the Republican Jewish Coalition presidential forum, despite Dr. Paul himself not publicly even caring. Supporters of the Klan do not get angry when they are excluded from NAACP banquets. Go on Ron Paul message boards, read the anti-Semitism, and then understand why nobody wants these miscreants anywhere near respectable events.

    The Republican Jewish Coalition recently held their 2012 Presidential Candidates Forum in Washington, DC. Ron Paul did not attend, which of course resulted in his supporters going ballistic. Because Ron Paul supporters have a habit of shouting down speakers and disrupting events, anything that minimizes their attendance improves Republican events.

    These events are for people to listen to the candidates and make an informed choice. Supporters of Dr. Paul already have their mind made up. There is no reason for them to attend a single event. They know who they are voting for.

    Yet the problem with Ron Paul supporters goes deeper than just bad behavior. There is a cancer in the Ron Paul movement. It is called anti-Semitism, and it is pervasive among his followers.

    Dr. Paul himself may not be one, but his outreach to the Jewish community has been non-existent. His supporters are angry that he was excluded from a Jewish event, but he never asked to be included. He has not said a single word about his exclusion. His supporters care. He doesn’t. In all of his years in office, he has never truly reached out to the Jewish community. Therefore, when a Jewish forum takes place, it is reasonable to understand why neither side would want to interact.

    Dr. Paul has never at any time condemned anti-Semitism, even in the most perfunctory of ways. He has never weeded out the anti-Semitism among his supporters. Those supporters will make the same argument they always make, that a few rotten apples should not spoil the whole bunch. This argument would be valid if the anti-Semitism was not so widespread. The bad apples are not the exception. They are much of the bucket.

    It took only several minutes of searching on Ron Paul forums to find pure Jew-hatred, with desperate attempts to insist that anti-Semitism was not so because they said so.

    The first comment was the stereotypical linking of Jews and money, which is every bit as awful as making remarks about black people involving chicken and watermelons. After the “Jews and money” link, the commenters got much worse.

    Some tried to claim that they liked Jews but hated Zionists, as if that is not the most pathetic and tired excuse of anti-Semites.

    One commenter compared Ron Paul to Jesus. Another accused Jews of using the Holocaust for political gain.

    (I am sure my Holocaust survivor dad and grandparents, while they were fleeing for their lives, had other considerations besides how being nearly shot to death could benefit them politically several decades later.)

    These comments were not “cherry-picked” to skew the data. They are the data.

    These are Ron Paul supporters. They judge everyone else. Now it is time for them to be judged.

    “Yes, but it will generate the most donations.

    Submitted by YumYum on Thu, 12/01/2011 – 18:25.
    $$$$$$$$$!!!!”

    “Real Jews love Dr.

    Submitted by Charlie’s Angel on Thu, 12/01/2011 – 18:20.
    Real Jews love Dr. Paul…..these are just ZIONIST sOB’s!”

    “what’s wrong?

    Submitted by jblackpost on Thu, 12/01/2011 – 18:44.
    what’s wrong with criticizing Zionism? Considering they were a bunch of warmongering left-wing atheists and communists who only cared about establishing the state of Israel and nothing else (not even Jewish life), I think separating this horrible movement (which I hate) from the Jewish people (whom I like) is a pretty good idea.”

    “Most Jews are pretty cool aka not Zionista -look at my hero

    Submitted by sharkcity on Thu, 12/01/2011 – 18:45.
    Milton Friedman
    Isreal[sp] wouldn’t be much more than just another country if it were not for the apocalyptic Christian lobby aka the neocons..
    Not much difference in the right wing be it neocon, taliban, or zionist -Their all bizzacko in my book”

    “At least in this post

    Submitted by ANCAP_REASON on Thu, 12/01/2011 – 19:22.
    you differentiated between atheists and communists…
    The biggest warmongers are monotheists, specifically those of the Abraham tradition, by the way.”

    “Makes sense to me

    Submitted by Smudge Pot on Thu, 12/01/2011 – 19:59.
    in as much as “the Jewish lobby” represents the modern state of Israel. Ron never pretended to represent the 51st state in the union.”

    “Well….

    Submitted by JFEJ004 on Thu, 12/01/2011 – 18:08.
    It wouldn’t be the first savior they’ve killed.”

    “Samaria? You mean the

    Submitted by AtlantaIconoclast on Thu, 12/01/2011 – 23:39.
    Samaria? You mean the Occupied remnant of historic Palestine. There is no such thing as Samaria any more.”

    “This is absurd and the height

    Submitted by AtlantaIconoclast on Thu, 12/01/2011 – 23:34.
    This is absurd and the height of irony. It is the Zionist who is extreme, and that includes Christian as well as Jewish Zionists. They have bullied and use the Holocaust to scare everyone into speaking out against Israel’s policies.
    So sick of this. I don’t want us to give another penny to either Israel or its enemies.
    Why can’t be let go of the religious thing?”

    “Be Careful

    Submitted by Gary Patridge on Thu, 12/01/2011 – 21:53.
    any criticism will be construed as “Anti-Semitic”.
    When will the World figure out that Zionists are not Isrealites? Pretty sure that Zionists are not God’s chosen people…”

    “One can dislike Israel, but

    Submitted by AtlantaIconoclast on Thu, 12/01/2011 – 23:38.
    One can dislike Israel, but not have a problem with Judaism. Why would anyone, but a Jewish supremacist, or Christian Zionist LIKE the apartheid state of Israel? This is not about anti Jewish sentiment. I have no problem saying it, for I truly do not care about someone’s religion.”

    “I’m shocked!

    Submitted by BigT on Thu, 12/01/2011 – 20:54.
    You mean that rabid socialist zionist Jewish Neocons are working against freedom again??Who’da thunk it???!!
    News flash folks.?That’s all they do is work against freedom.?They are the enemy within.”

    The real challenge was finding one Ron Paul supporter willing to stand up for what is decent and right. Among a bunch of ranting, raving, Jew-hating bigots disguised as reasonable people, one person named Toledana tried to reason with the mob.

    “It doesn’t help us

    Submitted by toledana on Thu, 12/01/2011 – 18:39.
    when RP supporters make negative statements about Israel, Zionism, or the Jewish people. I have heard some Jews say they have been turned off to Dr. Paul because of what his supporters have said.
    It’s not surprising that Ron Paul has been banned from a Jewish debate when people like you are making negative statements about them as a people. We need to open our arms to everyone, and instead of talking badly about them as a group help to educate them about Ron Paul’s platform.
    To much of the world, America is seen in a very bad light. Do you appreciate it when people make blanket statements about American citizens saying all of us are evil and bloodthirsty?”

    Toledana’s next comment was even more insightful, especially the last line.

    “It is name calling

    Submitted by toledana on Thu, 12/01/2011 – 19:20.
    not constructive criticism. Rarely do people who use this terminology give any kind of explanation, and it comes off as angry and hateful.
    Terming people “Zionist” is collectivist thinking and polarizes our movement from Jewish people who see Israel as their homeland. Whether or not you agree with that belief is up to you…. but throwing hate their way is not helping us get any votes. Instead we are turning even moderate Jewish supporters away in disgust.
    I’ve never heard Dr. Paul use the term “Zionist” or speak the way many of the people in this thread are doing.
    Raging against the “religious right,” “Left wing extremists” and “neocons” doesn’t do us any favors either. If we want to expand the movement we need to work on being inclusive… promoting education, not name calling. We need more votes, not more enemies.
    Otherwise we are going to end up on a little life raft mumbling to ourselves.”

    Toledana is the aberration. As for the rest, this is what is infecting the Ron Paul movement. There are tons of things Dr. Paul could say or do. He has said nothing. He has done nothing.

    Silence is acquiescence, and Dr. Paul will not stand up and condemn pure evil in written and spoken form. While his followers are spouting noxious garbage, he stays silent. Therefore, when it came time to hold a Republican Jewish forum, it was perfectly appropriate for Dr. Paul to remain silent far away from the event. His supporters will speak up for him, but not for anybody else.

    This is why when his supporters complain, Jews everywhere should tune them out. They have spoken enough, and the words were pure ugliness.

    When an anti-Israel, anti-Zionist, anti-Jewish presidential forum is held, the Paul supporters can all get together and rail about Neocons, moneylenders, bankers, merchants, Paul Wolfowitz, Wall Street, and other blood libel conspiracies.

    Actually, these forums are being held on a daily basis. They are called Internet message boards.

    Dr. Paul may wish to drop the willful blindness and see what his supporters really believe. Then he may wish to reach out to Republican Jews with any kind of outreach.

    Most likely, he will not.

    http://communities.washingtontimes.com/neighborhood/tygrrrr-express/2011/dec/8/republican-jewish-coalition-2012-presidential-cand/

  • lizzie

    which made me think of this video classic:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uJDhS4oUm0M&feature=related
    “Reagan Campaigns for Truman in 1948″

    Today’s GOP needs to keep an open mind about how people can evolve.
    Through most of the 1920′s-1940′s, the GOP was isolationist.

    btw, mikeymike, glad to know I am not the only one who thinks Code Pink/Free Gaza has hooked up as Paulbots. He really has to know this.

  • mikeymike143

    93% of the tea party does not want this aging anti semite as POTUS

  • Common_Cents

    Since he recently bashed Gingrich about Tea Party support. Does Rand Paul think tea party folks are dumb for supporting Newt?

    • sticktotheconstitution

      Ron Paul has more contributions from active duty military than all other republican candidates combined. That is the one statistic that means the most to me

      • JSobieski

        And Newt did well by that measure.

        Accomplishments mean more than words

        • sticktotheconstitution

          like, receiving more campaign contributions from active duty military than all other Republican candidates combined? There really is nothing you guys can say to that, besides, “we don’t care about the opinions of the troops who want Ron Paul as Commander in Chief”

          Please, one of the anti-RP group, give me a reason to belittle the voice of our own military.

          If you reply to this I expect a reason, not name-calling and silly insults

          • JSobieski

            Accomplishments are evidenced by changes in government policies. Reducing government spending as a percentage of the economy is an accomplishment.

            Accolades are evidenced by the the support of people. Receiving political contributions is not a policy accomplishment, it is a sign of political support.

            Paul has lots of accolades and no accomplishments.

            On the domestic front, government spending as a percentage of GDP is probably the best single indicator of the direction the country is going in.

            P.S.providing a link for your proposition would make me take it more seriously.

          • JSobieski

            and if you want to include “political” accomplishments in the equation, Newt leading the Republicans to take control of the House for the first time in 50 years was a pretty big accomplishment.

            Rand Paul would be a much better candidate than Ron Paul.

            Rand Paul actually puts together actual budgets that are scored and discussed.

          • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

            Guess what? I got told I still get to ban Ronulans.

          • acat

            Cheshire grin

          • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

            No size limit either, good thing given the tiny brains on these.

          • acat

            (null)

  • mikeymike143

    RON PAUL WAS OVERHEARD TALKING AT HIS CAMPAIGN HEADQUARTERS

    I guess Ron Paul

    • http://edgeinducedcohesion.wordpress.com nathanalbright

      …and hilarious…..

  • sticktotheconstitution

    What’s in it for this one guy to see Dr. Paul not get the nomination? If he actually believed this crap polling, then there would be nothing to worry about on his part!

    • gekster

      About 90% of us are that way.
      Oh, and use reply to this.
      It is a measure of inteligence around here.

    • tomatin

      His full disengagement around the world would put America back before WWII on the world stage.

      • gekster

        It eventually led to two wars on two different fronts.
        That is a really great idea.

        • archie77

          was a case Ron Paul would have gone to war.

          Had we stayed out of World War One, there would have been no World War Two in the first place. Yeah, that’s right Wilsonian interventionism, gave us the Holocaust, World War Two, the Cold War, etc.

  • mikeymike143

    1. His foreign policy ideas are simply the same recycled bad ideas that Jimmy Carter had. A foreign policy of

    • daveoconnor

      Really? Can you name one who strongly supports the 10th amendment? Can you name one who wants to cut a trillion dollars from the fed budget in 2013?
      I’m not a Ron Paul voter, but you lose credibility when you admit you can’t tell the difference between a liberal democrat and Paul.
      In #5 you actually violate Reagan’s so-called eleventh commandment by attacking and name-calling a Republican.
      Your constant use of “nut-job” is puerile. You call him an anti-semite. I’ve seen other of your posts where you quote some of his supporters, but I’d like to see some evidence that he is anti-semite. And not supporting Israel in the way some may want doesn’t mean he is anti-Semitic. Israel is a political entity, a soverign country. Is Israel anti-American when for example its armed forces attack a US Navy ship and cause many deaths and injuries? (USS Liberty-1967-34 dead-172 wounded)

  • After Seven

    Obviously the Gallup definition of Tea Party is not well aligned with the Tea Party definition of Tea Party.

    • http://www.nighttwister.com NightTwister

      these people don’t fit perfectly into the mold into which you’ve placed them.

  • mort

    It was “who would you least like?”
    Not who would be the best president.
    Of course I would also put Paul and Huntsman at the top of the list if the criteria was who has the worst chance of winning the presidency.
    What is more alarming is that 13 – 12% respectively give Mitt and Perry not much better odds.
    Curious why Newt’s numbers were not listed. I guess no one thinks he could lose?
    Always we need to be careful when looking at results of such a small sample and actually realize what question was asked.

    • mikeymike143

      Tea Party Fort Lauderdale is proof the tea party movement is alive and well!!! Next week will be the 140th CONSECUTIVE WEEK that our group has held some kind of public demonstration or event.

      And let

  • roccus3

    To write an article, and post it publicly, and proudly?… Stating that “Paulbots” are routinely Banned from posting on Conservative Websites…

    Aren’t you even a little ashamed of the Censorship criticism associated with such remarks?

    Alright, it’s true, that Most people don’t really Think…when they read something…but if you are running a website…and you want it to be successful….

    One of the best definitions of success that I have ever heard is to be respected by intellegent and accomplished people….

    If you want a successful blogsite,, and respect..you should probably reconsider blanket banning of any group…especially one that is somewhat at least remotely related.

    • Bill S

      Not ashamed in the least. And you get the standard instruction: if you have issues with Redstate moderation policies, email the Contact link. Discussion of said policies are off limits here.

    • johnnyredstate

      are like locusts, they must be held at bay. Unfortunately, that means that they must be sidelined or they will rapidly takeover. LOL

  • archie77

    Ron Paul is a Nut! Big Friggin Deal! Cut the Crap!

    This thread is an outright political hit piece reminiscent of of the juvenile drivel seen on site such as Daily KOS and should have no place on a serious blog site such as Redstate. Second, by using the name “Tea Party” and spewing hatred, only damages to Tea Party. Finally, blind and openly sewing your hatred of Ron Paul will turn him into a victim and a martyr. Nothing so quickly attracts support than a martyr. The best thing is to ignore them. Ron Paul is his own worst enemy, he does not need your help. Try doing something constructive, like promoting your choice for the nominee.

    • mikeymike143

      but i did notice you have a new profile here and just coincidentally happened to decide to post in defense of ron paul. LOL.

  • archie77

    Ron Paul is a Nut! Big Friggin Deal! Cut the Crap!

    This thread is an outright political hit piece reminiscent of the juvenile drivel seen on site such as Daily KOS and should have no place on a serious blog site such as Redstate. Second, by using the name

    • seanl

      when has speaking the truth become dirty pool? Believe me, voters won’t care about your pearl clutching. They’ll care about the truth.

  • JFiore83

    Man, you got a lot of info to back up your assertions. I sincerely doubt Ron Paul will ever even get the nomination. Can you imagine the uproar thatv would happen at the convention? Not good at all. Bump!

    • mort

      that any nominee is chosen. It would not be an uproar, but a consensus.
      Elect smart delegates – they decide.

      • mort

        run to be a delegate – then you will have a say

  • Scope

    Paul told Blitzer on Wednesday “I’m not looking forward to anything long and protracted. So I hope it ends rather quickly and we do well in the beginning of the year. The organization is fantastic. The question is: am I going to hold up if I keep doing all this.”

    Beside the obvious facts that even if Paul miraculously won the nomination, the General election is still almost a year away, and a presidential term is 4 years long, but what would Paul doing real well in the beginning of the year mean, that he could sit back then and not bother to campaign in all of the other states, because he won the first few primaries?

    Watching Paul wibble and wobble on the debate stage, and find it necessary to hold himself up with the lecturn, it has been painful to watch at times. I’ve suggested that he be given a chair so he could rest when he is not being questioned. Paul would be 80 years old on election day in 2012. If Paul has already been showing the signs of strain, and has admitted that he doesn’t think he could “hold up” just during the primaries, which many think will in fact be long, do we really want an elderly feeble old gent for the president? How about that 3AM call? I remember seeing much younger presidents age dramatically through their terms, the stresses and strains are incredibly harsh. Can we really afford to have a president who is already physically weak and feeble?

    Whatever are people thinking that have put him in 2nd and 3rd place in many state polls?

  • Pingback: Arhiva pentru decembrie, 2011-Iran, news… partea a IV-a | gerulia

  • mikeymike143

    If he were alive today, Ronald Reagan would STRONGLY OPPOSE Ron Paul. Reagan believed in spending generously on our national defense and certainly had an interventionist foreign policy. And according to the Ron

  • mikeymike143

    http://www.redstate.com/mikeymike143/2011/09/08/why-ronald-reagan-would-strongly-oppose-the-candidacy-of-ron-paul/

  • avagreen

    It certainly puts into plain language for all to see what RP (and his rabid followers) are all about, although it’s not news to anyone following his career.

    He truly is a neo leftist.

  • mikeymike143

    those delusional losers also think that spending hours spamming presidential internet polls while living in their parents basement equates to their candidate having real political support. LOL