This sounds like the wild, wild west. Having the police ‘sponsored’ by business or individuals sounds like “Guns for Hire”.
Who will the “police” serve? The People? The Town/County/State?
OR, their benefactors?
Let’s just take a ‘for instance’.
If a drug lord were to “sponsor” a police department with a LARGE sum of money, will that department necessarily ‘ignore’
the large shipments of Heroine entering the city?

How about Illegal Alien Trafficking? Could ignorance to that be ‘bought off’?

If they get large donations from many different ‘street gangs’ would they start to play favorites based on
the volume of money coming in?

This is a BAD idea. Even if it were to stay as only an idea, those who thought of if should be thrown in
jail. If it were to be enacted, well, Heaven help The People.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/01/23/panetta-opens-combat-roles-to-women/

In my opinion this is the most backward action to take.
All activity on the front lines can lead to death or disfigurement.
A civil society cannot exist if we are willing to sacrifice our women to the battle field
where capture, torture, and death is likely.

From my point of view, when a man dies, a man dies
When a women dies, countless generations fall.
It just does not make any sense to me why we would put women
in harms way, on purpose. This thought is ludicrous and irresponsible.

Even our very distant ancestors knew, that unless death of the tribe were
imminent, one did not sacrifice those that carry and give life.

This is a sad, sad day for humanity.

I propose that we start pushing our congress’People’ to start reforming
the voting process. Voter ID Now (VIN).

We have admission by the courts and the left that that there should be some
sort of Voter ID. The last election, we were right on the cusp of success,
but time was against us. We were told that it was too late to implement any
new infrastructure.

WELL!? We have two years!
Let’s get it done! Let’s get it done NOW.

VIN for the entire U.S. Voting public. If a person cannot afford the $15 or so
that a municipality will charge, we can just tack it onto one of the 100 or
so welfare programs we have.
If a person cannot get to a location to get the I.D., we can go to them.
It is a small price to pay, (much smaller than unemployment, food stamps,
farm subsidies, Sugar tax, Green Energy, etc, etc, etc)

So, Let Us get this thing started so we can get it done by Nov. 2014.

The same day, as we find out this morning, the FEMA rescue centers in New York were
‘Closed, due to the weather’. This, folks is an indoor assistance center. What’s up
with that?!

Anyway, this is a stark view of Government VS. Private Sector help and dedication.
Government does what they do, with our money on THEIR terms.
Private Sector does with their money on OUR terms.

I pray every night for my children that they may experience a life as free and
rewarding as I had.
BUT, when I see this, reality strikes with a hard fist. All I can do is hope that
the tools I gave them, my education and morals, and any financial assistance in my
power, will ease the toil which they are about to experience.

U.S. Move to Give Egypt $450 Million in Aid Meets Resistance

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/29/world/middleeast/white-house-move-to-give-egypt-450-million-in-aid-meets-resistance.html

US Embassy issues terror warning for Americans in Egypt

http://www.timesofisrael.com/us-embassy-issue-terror-warning-for-americans-living-in-egypt

Have our leaders absolutely lost their minds? I mean, this is like being robbed by your neighbor,
knowing that he did it, and then giving him your house.
We have lost all touch with reality. I can only believe that in about 1 hour I will wake up
and find that the last four years was just a bad dream (ala Bob Newhart), because if this really
was reality, I don’t know if I should laugh hysterically as this joke, or cry desperately for the
insanity that is occurring before my eyes

We need tort reform, reduced regulation and cross state competition.
We KNOW that pre-existing conditions are a plan for failure.

Someone has to re-educate Mr. Romney or we are doomed.

What about Jobs, Oppressive Government Regulation, the Value of the Dollar, our Military and Borders, people taking their money and denouncing their citizenship from the U.S.A……….?
Wholly Cow!?

Do we really NEED to be dancing to the song being played by Obama!?
He is conducting the band, and our numskull candidates are dancing happily along, thinking that they will be selected “King and Queen” of the prom.

WE NEED to talk about the real problems of the U.S. to the REAL economy drivers, the young and the middle class worker.

Please, please, Gov. Romney, if you care at all about this country, get OFF the Medicare Merry-Go-Round!

The impetus behind the government’s proposal to create a
‘Guaranteed Retirement Account’ for all Americans is the
need/desire to get their greedy little hands on the $18 Trillion
That Americans have in Stocks, IRA’s, 401K’s, Pensions, and savings.
That money, The Government believes, is really theirs. They
just don’t know how to get at it.

Well, thanks to some ‘slight of hand’, it appears that they have
come up with a simple, non-law, end-around, Constitution avoiding
plan to get at it.
They are suggesting that the Banks buy The Government Debt, in
return for an IOU, to be paid back some time in the future, with
some (most likely fake) interest on principal.

The BANKS own everything. Your salary, your job, your investments,
your property, in effect, your person. Because, the economy is
money, and the banks control the flow of money. AND now the Banks will
be converting some of that money from private ownership to Government
debt.

Guaranteed Retirement Accounts were too specific. The Government is
going, directly, after the people and ALL of their private property.

They are also laying down a long term plan for private business (Banks)
takeover. When the Government BOND debt reaches a certain percentage of
the overall holdings of the BANK, they will be deemed unstable. At that
point, as we have seen recently, The Government WILL declare the bank
unfit for business, and they will shut it down or take it over.

This is NOT a good plan, for the people, the banks or the county. We MUST,
in this election cycle, extract all progressive players (Dems AND Repubs)
from office. Sweep clean The House, The Senate and The President.

Add this to the expected outcome of today’s presentations of Severability,
which most likely will stand as All or Nothing, and you will find
the answer is clear.

The Supreme Justices will, as a majority, declare that, with respect
to Health Care, the mandate is allowable by The Constitution, and
ObamaCare will stand as is.
They will also present the opinion that in no other aspects of Governing
the minions of the U.S. of A., is The Government allowed to demand
entrance into commerce just because a person exists.

http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/valerie-jarrett-people-who-receive-unemployment-check-go-out-and-spend-it-and-help-stimulate-economy_631716.html

This is a totally absurd thought. Take this to a logical example. If a 3rd party, say a government, extorts a dollar from me, since I am a worker who own my own business. Let’s say I make pizza, and sell it for a dollar.
So the government takes a dollar from me and gives it to someone who is not working because, well, they aren’t working.
OK, so now that person spends it at my pizza shop to by a large cheese pizza.

According to V. Jarrett, that is stimulating the economy.
According to my accountant, I just sold a large cheese pizza for zero dollars.
My profit, zero. Which means that I must now either raise the cost of my pizza and risk going out of business
OR
I can just go out of business.
So now, instead of a pizza shop employing workers, accountants, energy suppliers, delivery trucks, and suppliers of raw materials,
I am on unemployment asking for that dollar to buy a pizza for a dollar.

And the people I employed and the suppliers all feel the pinch.

So to say that the theft of a dollar is stimulating is Ignorance in it’s most basic format.

Perhaps all government employees and elected officials should be compelled to read
‘Economics in One Lesson’. Originally written in the ’40s it is amazingly relevant today.