« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

There He Goes Again

http://www.mlgoodell.webs.com

One of my favorite memories of the Detroit Symphony Orchestra, back before the players transformed Orchestra Hall into a UAW Union Hall, is of Neeme Jarvi conducting “O Fortuna,” at the end of  “Carmina Burana.” Jarvi was a most entertaining conductor, who threw himself into the music with even more enthusiasm than many of the musicians. I will always remember Jarvi reaching up and out to cue the clanging gong and clashing cymbals. Casting thunderbolts, I called it.

Casting thunderbolts is fast becoming a Newt Gingrich specialty as well, as each week he seems committed to making some statement so shocking, so outrageous, so terrifying true that it threatens to cause Rachel Maddow’s head to explode. As certain as the White House obscuring proof of felonies and treason beneath huge dumps of documents each Friday afternoon, Newt is going to say something provocative.

Two weeks ago, it was his Scrooge-like “call for the repeal of child labor laws.” This was Newt’s suggestion of how to instill good working habits among the very poor. Not only did the leftist media misinterpret the gist of his comments, they also condemned him for being racist. Now, to refresh your memories, Newt said “Really poor children in really poor neighborhoods have no habits of working and have nobody around them who works.”

It is instructive that when liberals hear “really poor children in really poor neighborhoods,” they think Black People. Then they condemn the speaker for being racist. “This is not the way Black People live,” they sputter. “You’re using stereotypes.” Uh, right. Let’s move on.

In this week’s Gingrich Answer to the Document Dump, Newt announced that “I think we have an invented Palestinian people who are in fact Arabs and historically part of the Arab community,” sending liberals and Lutherans and Arabs around the world fulminating and gesticulating, and looking for Dutch film makers to murder. Sunday’s talk shows will give off a Fukushimaniacal glow, so impassioned will the condemnations be.

It doesn’t matter that his statement is true, which any serious student of the region’s history will acknowledge, and any honest advocate for peace will concede. The land of Palestine was occupied by Arabs, Jews and Christians. None of these constituted a separate race. Palestinian National Orchestra was formed by Jews in Jerusalem. Jews called themselves Palestinians until they formed their own nation, at which time they called themselves Israeli. So, basically, Newt is right again.

This is why he will not be elected President. He is a conversational saboteur. He delights in making outrageous statements which have the advantage of being true. It’s an endearing quality to have in a dinner guest. It’s a great quality to have in a teacher. But it is a lousy quality to have in a Presidential candidate. The American people don’t want an know-it-all in the White House.

Actually, it’s hard to tell what the American people want. They don’t seem to like the competence and professionalism Mitt Romney brings to the job. Herman Cain has demonstrated that while they may like pizza, but they don’t care for anchovies. Michelle Bachmann has proved that Americans definitely don’t like scary eyes. With Rick Perry we learned that while Americans don’t like people who are too smart, they don’t like them when they’re dumber than a fencepost, either. And Obama has shown that the American people respect a sincere man, no matter how often he lies.

It won’t take long before people get tired of Newt’s smirk, his gotchas, his intrinsic need to turn heads and reduce normally inarticulate TV personalities to sputtering incoherence. Newt would probably make a good HHS Secretary. He would be refreshingly wonky when it came time to start dismantling the atrocity which is Obamacare. HHS would be a good office from which he can cast his thunderbolts. In the meantime, enjoy the flying liberal spittle.

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • http://westernhero.blogspot.com/ silverfiddle

    Newt is an egghead and he says what needs saying, so he is unfit to be president.

    Intellectuals do not make good leaders.

    • avgjo

      Then I begin to think you’re a liberal when you called Gingrich’s plan to re-instill a work ethic in poor kids ‘scrooge-like’.

      Then I read further and find you’re a Romney hack.

      1. Gingrich is smarter than Romney.

      2. Perry, who’s supposed to be out and ‘dumber than a fencepost’ played your boy like a fiddle last night. Mittens lied; his book, as the ‘dumb’ governor pointed out, did state that the mandate of Mass. could be a model for the country. The only way Mitt is telling the truth that HE did not promote that is if he didn’t write his own book. Highly unlikely. And by the way, making a $10,000 bet when you’re being made out to be the face of Wall Street in tough economic times is truly ‘dumber than a fencepost’.

      3. I know that Mitt, the establishment and Mitt’s robot-like followers think that his candidacy is inevitable, but it looks like Conservative Americans are saying otherwise.

      4. Gingrich would make a far better pres than Romney.

      Merry Christmas!

      • http://www.mlgoodell.webs.com mlgoodell

        avgjo,
        You need to relax a bit, and stop lashing out at your allies. We’re on the same side here. Given your serial erroneous judgments about me and my work, I would suggest that you take the time to read something all the way through before leaping to conclusions (said advice not applicable to the NY Times where 1 or 2 paragraphs of any article or column is usually enough to reach a conclusion–said conclusion usually involving crumpling the paper and hurling it across the room).
        Your comment was so heavily reliant on labeling and invective, for a moment I thought I’d strayed into the comments section of DailyKos.
        Cheers,
        Michael

        • avgjo

          Invective? I couldn’t approach Kos on my best day.

          I’m not lashing out. I caught that statement about ‘professionalism and competence’ of Mitt. (I’m not sure either word fits him, esp. as it relates to the presidency. It was embarassing to watch him try to hide behind Anderson Cooper’s figurative skirt when Rick Perry went after him. Making that bet this weekend in this environment doesn’t exactly smack of competence, either.) You also knocked all the other candidates, calling Rick Perry ‘dumber than a post’. That would actually fit right in at the Kos.

          I did read the whole of your post. It was the typical moderate pablum that got us Obama. ‘Truth be damned, Gingrich has got to watch what he says, goshdarnit! Who cares if the Palestinian people and their ‘history’, ‘culture’ etc is contrived? Who cares if the reason inner city kids stay poor is that no one ever teaches them a work ethic? The American people are too stupid to know the truth, they can only be offended by it.’

          It is precisely because of his straight talk and refusal to walk back that straight talk that Gingrich is doing as well as he is. Romney could learn from that. For gosh’s sake, the man changed his position on abortion in the middle of a debate.

          I made a judgement, singular, and that was that you are a Romney hack. And reading your unsubstantial reply, I notice you didn’t deny that. I’ve noticed something about the Romney bots: they try to put on a calm, analytical demeanour, and slip in backhanded (and sometimes not-so-backhanded) insults to other candidates and/or their supporters. That what you did here, and that’s what you tried with me. Perhaps you could try a little harder, and actually cite some conclusions that I ‘leaped’ to, or give some examples of my ‘invective’- after all, if my post is so replete with these qualities, you should have no problem doing so.

          • http://www.mlgoodell.webs.com mlgoodell

            You’re right, my comparing your comments to DailyKos was a low blow. I actually posted there for awhile, well, for about four days. It was breathtaking the viciousness, the hatred, the obscenity and the incoherence of their responses. My last post, before I was banned, was titled “Pearls v. Swine.” In it I mentioned those who taunt and torture animals at the zoo. I said it was the worse form of sadism, unspeakably cruel. Then I said, “I owe all of you an apology.” Then I was banned.

            Maybe I overreacted to your comments, but I assure you, I am not a Romney hack. I am inclined to support Romney right now, though I would dearly love to see someone like Paul Ryan get into the race.

            I do think Romney would be an effective administrator. Perhaps you feel we don’t need an administrator, that what we need is a saboteur, someone willing to blow up the entire framework of the federal government. You may well be right if you do. I’m not sure Gingrich would be your man. He’s got a strong big government streak in him.

            As for Palestinians and poor children, I didn’t say I disagreed with his assessments, rather that they were indicative of his penchant for making the sensational statement, just to stir things up. I’m not sure that is necessarily a Presidential quality.

            Anyway, we are on the same side, and if you can’t see that, you will condemn this nation to at least four more years of Obama (I say at least because, if his work is not finished after another term, it is entirely within his character to simply dispense with elections and rule by fiat).

  • valrobex

    his run is not going to last, but we all have to agree what ever he’s doing — it’s working.

    As long as it works he should stick with it. When it stops working or “flat lines” (say Romney?…) the Newmeister will change. That’s perhaps one of his great strengths. Now he won’t change his conservative message, he’ll change his delivery of that message.

    This was one of Reagan’s great gifts. Reagan could reach the American people while stepping past the MSM. I’m still not sure that Gingrich will pull it off (and I’m certainly not saying he’s a Reagan), but it’s sure fun watching him tie everyone in knots.