« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Beldar offers advice to Biden.

Thankfully, it will be ignored. In more ways than one.

First off, go read Dahlia Lithwick’s rather tangled, contradictory, and quite unintentionally revealing advice to Senator Biden about how to debate Governor Palin. Done that? Excell…

Yes, Lithwick really did think that Biden did well against Roberts, which is true, if you define “did well” as “spent all of your alloted time either talking, or complaining that you were running out of time.” Forget it, she was in the moment.

Anyway, excel…

Yes, yes, I noticed too that she didn’t brag about actually winning that Glasgow debate of hers. Can we get on with it? Thanks.

Anyway, Beldar has a great analysis of this advice up, with a great set of advice of his own (which I, like Patterico, hopes that Biden doesn’t take):

In my judgment, the only way that Joe Biden can hope to claim even a draw against Sarah Palin would be to acknowledge her — not just superficially, but genuinely — as a complete equal with different substantive views. He should treat her, in other words, the way he’d probably treat John McCain. From that posture, he could focus on making the best possible case for his and his running-mate’s views, leaving it to the audience to draw the comparison with his opponents’ views and similarly leaving it them to conclude, if they’re so inclined, that his and Obama’s are better. He should probably finish four-fifths of his answers with time left on the clock — something he did exactly once during the Democratic primary debates, in the only moment of success he managed to eek out from the whole series of them.

…and an even better paragraph right after that one that I have been counseled not to front page, usually with giggles involved. So check it out.

Moe Lane

PS: On the one hand, I don’t think that you can get Senator Biden to stop talking with anything less than electroshock therapy. On the other hand, given the sudden suggestion that there may be some sandbagging going on here, the Obama campaign may be prepared to do just that. On the gripping hand, it’s a real shame that the Cheers episode where Cliff Clavin gets wired up to a portable electroshock machine for a little aversion therapy isn’t easily available online: it’s the perfect metaphor for this situation.

COMMENTS

  • aaronbg

    …made it all worth it…;^)

  • PhxG

    I’m kinda hopeful Biden does this if for nothing more then the humor of seeing the netroots blow a gasket.

  • Flagstaff

    I loved this paragraph:

    There is no easy way to tell you this, Joe Biden, but the surest way for Joe Biden to lose a debate against Sarah Palin is by being Joe Biden. If you are windy, pompous, unctuous, or pushy, you will come across as patronizing and condescending?the guy who puts the “boy” into “old boys’ network.” If you flirt and smirk and flatter (Did you truly tell an Ohio crowd you thought Palin was “good-looking”? Did you really introduce us to your wife, Jill, by leering that she is “drop-dead gorgeous”?), you’re going to sound like the creepy guy in the trench coat at the back of the porn theater.

    When your friends tell you that the real you is the worst thing you can be, that you need to be somebody else, it should tell you you’re getting ready to have your clock cleaned.

    It’s clear that Dahlia thinks that the real Sarah beats the real Joe nine times out of ten. What will the real Sarah do to a fake Joe?

    Now, if she can only get him to say, “I knew Teddy Roosevelt, Teddy Roosevelt was a friend of mine. You’re no Teddy Roosevelt!” After all, it worked so well for Lord Bentsen.

  • jimmuy8

    As far as I know the only ones who watch the debate team contests are: debate teams. The only ones who care about debate teams are: people on debate teams. The only people who think debate team offers any real life experience are: people on debate teams. So, I fully expect Obama to, offhand, mention that he was going to be on the debate team.