« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Passage of the Day.

And Friday afternoon open thread.

As suggested to me: something to think upon for your weekend.

Cowardice, alone of all the vices, is purely painful—horrible to anticipate, horrible to feel, horrible to remember; Hatred has its pleasures. It is therefore often the compensation by which a frightened man reimburses himself for the miseries of Fear. The more he fears, the more he will hate. And Hatred is also a great anodyne for shame. To make a deep wound in his charity, you should therefore first defeat his courage.

Now this is a ticklish business. We have made men proud of most vices, but not of cowardice. Whenever we have almost succeeded in doing so, the Enemy permits a war or an earthquake or some other calamity, and at once courage becomes so obviously lovely and important even in human eyes that all our work is undone, and there is still at least one vice of which they feel genuine shame. The danger of inducing cowardice in our patients, therefore, is lest we produce real self-knowledge and self-loathing with consequent repentance and humility. And in fact, in the last war, thousands of humans, by discovering their own cowardice, discovered the whole moral world for the first time. In peace we can make many of them ignore good and evil entirely; in danger, the issue is forced upon them in a guise to which even we cannot blind them. There is here a cruel dilemma before us. If we promoted justice and charity among men, we should be playing directly into the Enemy’s hands; but if we guide them to the opposite behaviour, this sooner or later produces (for He permits it to produce) a war or a revolution, and the undisguisable issue of cowardice or courage awakes thousands of men from moral stupor.

This, indeed, is probably one of the Enemy’s motives for creating a dangerous world—a world in which moral issues really come to the point. He sees as well as you do that courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point, which means, at the point of highest reality. A chastity or honesty, or mercy, which yields to danger will be chaste or honest or merciful only on conditions. Pilate was merciful till it became risky.

Open thread.

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • Stinger808

    Oh, goody.

    Does the McCain campaign still owe money?

    Is there any way the GOP can discipline the Senator by telling him they won’t help him out with his debts if he gets Maverick-y?

    Hm, I wonder if this meeting is about Obama paying the bills somehow?

  • Socrates

    Virtue, as I have come to understand it, is giving up a desire in exchange for a chance at a goal we must take on faith to be better.

    For instance, it takes courage to remain chaste until marriage, give to those in need, confess to an error, and to do all manner of things requiring integrity.

    But if there is a likelihood that we get to keep the desired thing, or if we know that we will achieve our goal, or if we know that the goal will be better, then I’m not sure we show virtue. I believe it takes all three.

  • Oz

    Will all the netroots who proclaimed the need for a conservative challenger or no challenger to Boehner step up and back Lungren or is he too much of an unknown.

  • birdmojo

    Much like honesty.

    Where you find the virtues, you will find their handmaidens.

    But just because you see a handmaiden, it doesn’t mean that a virtue is nearby.

  • Psychedelic_Santa

    [Particularly for chickenhawking, which is just downright sad in its lameness these days. I mean, three out of four of the people running for President/VP had kids in Iraq. - Moe Lane]

  • birdmojo

    He’d be a member of the Prince Albert lodge, right?

  • NightTwister

    All you have to do is look at what the No on 8 supporters are doing in California and elsewhere

    Whatever you do, don’t let them know you’re a Christian.

  • streiff

    chickenhawking, especially by people involved in “apparel and fashion” from San Francisco (you know I’m not making this up), is never in fashion.

    Often courage is supporting something that is right and unpopular while having slobbering mouthbreathers in paper-m?ch? puppets scream at you.

  • jonreagan

    I realize that he’s declined so far…but he’s been on CNBC three times this week giving interviews. For openers, he definitely knows how to use TV, which in the new Obama-age, will be critical.

    More importantly, he has a way of outlining true conservative principles of pro-growth and lower taxes, better than anyone I’ve heard all year. And he does it concisely and forcefully.

    In one of the interviews, he followed Joe Sestack (D-PA), and just blew him away. Ryan made it clear that Democratic “stimulus” packages don’t work, and that above all, rebate checks are NOT tax relief. That will only come with a permanent reduction in tax rates. He showed pretty convincingly that one stimulus which won’t cost the treasury a dime would be a cut in (or elimination of) the Capital Gains Tax.

  • RichChatfield

    Good stuff.

    Cowardice is the ultimate conclusion or by-product of moral relativism.

    Might I recommend also “How Should We Then Live” by Francis Shaffer. I highly recommend the 10 part video series along with the book.

  • Marcus_Traianus

    I know it is somewhat vogue to state one is a conservative in the right company. However, Paul Ryan is a person who actually lives the values he represents in Congress, unashamedly I might add.

    It’s time to move the old party acolytes and appeasers out of the way for some true philisophical integrity. I am tired of those who profess a conservative stature while appealing to everything we stand against as a matter of principle when the blinds are closed.

    That strategy is not divisive, it is called leadership. We will accept all who are dedicated to our shared interests, not look for certain demographics to which we will adjust our basic principals.

    I can think of very few other times in history where the consistent promotion of fundamental ideals could have such a strong impact on our country. There is a longing for strong leadership based on sustainable, sagacious ideas and wise problem solving. Paul Ryan is part of that equation.

  • posterposter

    When will we know ours? The fundraising will have to be MASSIVE. I feel like we need to know who we’re picking now and get started! And of course I look to RS for direction…

  • mbecker908

    “A lot of anger and a lot of hate on both sides…”

    Good catch Mr. Anchorman. I had to go back and watch it again before I picked up on the “hate” from the “No on 8″ folks. They were just exercising their right to free speech and free assembly before they were assaulted by the old lady. I should hope the police have enough information to charge her with inciting a riot. This kind of stuff just can’t be allowed.

  • Fotones_de_Akba

    Interesting video. I usually ignore anything I see on TV that involves political demonstrations (be they in Jerusalem or here in the States), because I think fervent people on both sides play to the cameras. And the media loves that. But the anger towards the woman from the anti-Prop 8 people did seem severe.

    I think anybody participating in political rallies should do some soul-searching beforehand — and decide how they intend to go about controlling their emotions. We all have hot buttons which can be easily pushed (in the case of the anti-8 guy, that large wooden cross surely pushed him over the line).

    Sometimes, it’s best just to say to oneself, “Life isn’t always fair.”
    (I visited your blog last night, NT)

    Anyway, the fact of the matter is that eventually there will be gay marriage in California. Definitely, by 2015.

    Cheers! Enjoy your weekend.

  • civil_truth

    The CA trendlines are certainly towards acceptance of gay marriage. I oppose gay marriage, but if those in favor gain a majority to legalize it in a future initiative, them’s the rules.

    What I don’t agree with is the courts imposing gay marriage. And if the CA Supreme Court invalidates the initiative, then I will vote for recall – on the grounds of cowardice, for delaying their decision in the hope that a rejection of the initiative would save their hides.

    I am very loathe to recall judges, having voted against the last CA judicial recall, but this is one of those rare circumstance where recall is the only recourse for an imperial court.

    Oh,

  • 29Victor

    explains a lot about the “anti-war” movement of the ’60s (and beyond).

    The movement began in earnest when Nixon removed several draft deferments and college students who had previously been “safe” from being compelled to serve could now be called up.

    The “anti-war” rhetoric quickly turned to hatred of the U.S., the president and the courageous troops who went and fought.

    The cowardices of draft dodging and protesting from behind the skirts of the First Amendment were rebranded as “courage” while truly courageous were seen as fools or savages.

    The shame is that many of the courageous lost their lives for their courage while thousands of the cowards (because of the deferments that still remained) went into education or the clergy. The courageous were silenced and their courage was not celebrated while the cowards became the teachers of America’s youth and the leaders of our churches.

  • Alberta

    Monday or Tuesday? Or maybe in Jan?

    Ive heard Monday but I have no contacts whatsoever

    Other open topics Ill throw out…

    Livni is going to lose the Israeli election, which Im down with. Anybody who is down with Olmert is somebody I can do without. Plus she is an idiot. Mossad agent, musician, whatever, she lost a war to a bunch of jokers in Lebanon.

    While Im talking Israel, go to jpost.com and they may still have the story up, it was up yesta, about how Israel wouldnt allow Iran to go nuclear. Which is great, because Alberta (the province) likes high energy prices :) !

    Palin!Palin!Palin! and oh yeah, the current President gave an awesome speach yesterday that I think somebody (directors) should have front paged. Its good for moral. The Financial Post (canadian) reprinted it so its probably up on its website if you didnt hear GDub.
    He (GDub) even used the Kudlow Creed (I believe free market capitalism is the surest path to prosperity.)

    Oh yeah to conclude, a big F* You to Jim Hendry, GM of the Cubbies, for letting Wood go, even though Tribune says Wood said he would have stayed on a one year deal. Hendry, your paying Marquis De Suck 10 million and Kosuck Fukudome 13 million to play like dogs but cant poney up to get a lifetime Cubbie. You sir, suck. Suck hard.

  • Raven

    They’re pissing people off. It’s only going to make opposition to gay marriage that much stronger (and might very well alienate certain portions of the Dem voting bloc)…

  • Raven

    It’s one of 2 things that’s on the news today (the other being Obama’s transition). The bailout has failed to do anything but waste taxpayer dollars and increase fears that the US may just bankrupt itself with the continuing roll of bailouts.

    First it was Wall Street. Then it was various States. Now it’s Circuit City and the Big 3 Auto makers and Philly. Where does it stop? And how long till the politicians figure out what mainstreet already has?

  • RborisT

    In this on CNSNews:
    Senator Bingaman Says Conservative WTNT, WMAL Can Keep Their Talk Show Line-Ups
    Thursday, November 13, 2008
    By Josiah Ryan,

    Writer Ryan uses the term we all should adopt: “censorship doctrine”.

    Nice. His Highness Bingaman hath proclaimed “They may speak”. For now…

  • borts

    [I've noticed a certain resurgence in Iraqi/Arab-haters lately, presumably because the election results encouraged them. Their hatred of life itself six months from now should be satisfying, in a not-very-nice sort of way. - Moe Lane]

  • mbecker908

    hb

  • Neil_Stevens
  • jonreagan

    I’ve always liked Ryan as well. It’s actually pretty rare that you get a politician who is forceful–stating their principles without equivocating or weaseling–and likeable at the same time. Reagan obviously had that combination, more than anyone I’ve ever seen.

    As much as Obama is being hailed as some kind of transformational figure, his approach to popularity is to take several sides to every issue. This will catch up with him eventually; the truce between the loony left and centrists in the Democratic party is already showing signs of stress…elements like the Daily Kos will likely be calling for his impeachment sometime around March or April. On our side, I felt that Gov. Romney was the “weasel” during the primaries, almost in an Eddie Haskell kind of way….everyone’s entitled to a change of heart, but not as many times as Mitt has. At least not if you’re running for President.

    Paul Ryan as Minority Leader and Eric Cantor as Whip would be an incredibly fresh and dynamic team for our House Leadership.