« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Rendition and The Doug Feith conference call.

I had the opportunity today to participate in a conference call with Doug Feith, whose book War and Decision: Inside the Pentagon at the Dawn of the War on Terrorism will be available in a paperback version on Tuesday. Doug Feith is, of course, a controversial figure among the antiwar movement – which is to say, he’s the subject of some truly disturbing, quasi-sexual “rendition” fantasies originating from them; no word yet on whether that will change, now that it’s been reported that rendition will be resumed to Clinton-era levels under the new administration – so I looked forward to the call.

My question, as you might guess, involved the LA Times article on rendition, plus HRW’s rolling over for the Democrats on this one: I wanted his reaction on both. His general position on Obama’s detainee policy was that while the new administration is very concerned about distinguishing itself from the previous one, it was mostly via symbolic gestures and changes in tone. In terms in substance, however, expect more continuity. Then there was the fact that administration critics tended to seriously misrepresent the motives and objectives of the people running the programs; expect that the Obama administration will end up doing pretty much the same things that the Bush administration did, for much the same reasons. Campaign rhetoric or no.

He doesn’t expect the antiwar movement to ever admit that, by the way, given that they’re projecting their own close-mindedness and indifference to the facts on their opponents.

Regarding the book itself: Feith – who doesn’t make any money off of it, by the way; he donated the hardcover royalties to charity, and will do the same for the paperback version – didn’t write it to change people’s minds; he wrote it to provide what he feels is a balanced look at the situation, thus giving people the opportunity to make up their minds on their own. He feels that the record has been grotesquely distorted, and thinks that his book will be one of the first steps towards correcting that.

There were a variety of other things discussed in the conference call, but I’ll let the bloggers who asked them cover them: I do think that you should seriously contemplate picking up War and Decision if you haven’t already. Even if you’re the sort who hates the neoconservatives for being right on Iraq when you were so comprehensively wrong.

Actually, especially if you’re that sort…

Moe Lane

PS: Really, rendition is not my hot-button topic. Savagely mocking the antiwar movement is my hot-button topic, and I’ve been merely saving up for unloading on this particular facet of it for several years now.

Crossposted at Moe Lane.

COMMENTS

  • GreyCloak

    Yemen and Pakistan (even Britain and Australia) may have freed some of our former detainees (and several, at last report, had returned to their formers ways). But why not let other countries deal with terrorists in their own ways:

    Saudi Arabia beheaded 16 Kuwaiti Shiites by sword in public today in the Islamic holy city of Mecca in connection with bombings and other terrorism during the annual Muslim pilgrimage in July.

    The executed Kuwaitis were part of a group of 29 men accused of terrorism during the pilgrimage. … Nine of the men were acquitted; four others received long prison sentences and 1,000 to 1,500 lashes of the whip.

    –New York Times, 9/22/89

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    Because closing Guantanamo Bay’s camp was more important to them than keeping A-rabs from getting tortured.

  • icbm

    to our president, and to the Three Musqueteers in the Senate who saw us through to victory.

    I don’t think we will ever see a victory parade, which is a calamity for the nation and especially for the troops. We deserve to celebrate our achievement, especially because after prosecuting the war wrong for several years we refused to retreat and instead grasped hold of victory and hoisted ourselves up.

    We lost a lot by not fighting the war correctly from the start. Above all, we failed to deal strongly with Iran, partly because we felt that we did not have the capacity and, even more, the political will to reckon with them.

    But we still fought the right war, and we are winning it – or perhaps have won it. The hard, long work of building a nation is what confronts us now – and there are many reasons to believe that the Iraqis and we together will fully succeed.

    (These comments were inspired by Moe’s remark at the end of his post: “Even if you?re the sort who hates the neoconservatives for being right on Iraq when you were so comprehensively wrong.”)

  • senorninja

    apparently you missed the crucial distinction (and all the media reports noting it) between “rendition” (in which we return someone to their country of origin as long as they have no threat of harm from that state) and extraordinary rendition (in which we fulfill your “24″ neocon fantasies by returning them knowing they will be tortured).

    In simple english you might understand: obama’s policy is absolutely and exactly what he said it would be in the campaign and the only thing “tortured” here is your logic and the only thing “extraordinary” is your foolishness

  • http://moelane.com/ Moe Lane

    Nobody need ever know that you voted for a pro-torture administration.

    Now scram. This is a website for decent people.