Elections have consequences: Megan McArdle edition.


How's that Libertarians for Obama thing working out for people? I've already seen how it worked out for all those poor Republicans for Obama...

Before we go any further, let me just note that my sympathies for the people in the video below is currently somewhere between “nil” and “whatever.” This is a blue-on-blue fight, as far as I’m concerned: Wall Street actually has a habit of going against its class interests by funding and supporting Democrats, and God knows that they had their hand in the current banking crisis, so I can root for injuries with a light heart and a clear conscience.

But Megan’s right: Maxine Waters is nuts.


But then I have to say, And?

You see, when I read things like:

I sat here in front of my television and laughed at Maxine Waters, because her apparently random ramblings are a true spectacle. One laughs because one can’t cry. But this woman is sitting on the House Financial Services Committee. She is supposed to help craft the bills that govern our financial system. And she clearly doesn’t have the first shred of an inkling of a clue of how said financial system works. Her questions had the air of someone who couldn’t quite wrap her mind around the complexities of the E-Z Reader consumer activist pamphlets from which she had presumably cribbed them.

…I’m not laughing because the alternative is to cry: I’m laughing because it’s funny to see somebody as smart as Megan – and she’s probably smarter than I am – so honestly surprised at what is such an elementary political consequence to an election. Of course Maxine Waters is going to act like a crazy aunt towards the banking community on national television. That’s what she does. She’s a Democrat from a seat so safe that she doesn’t have to maintain more than the most casual link to Reality Non-Unicorn. And it matters because she’s a member in good standing of the political party that – thanks in part to people like Megan, in fact – now runs two branches of the federal government. So all of this is not what we’d call really unexpected. Annoying and detrimental to the long term prosperity of the country, but not unexpected.

Hey, don’t blame me: I voted for the other guys. All the way down the line. Because, again, I knew back in November that elections have consequences.

Moe Lane

PS: You know what else is inevitable? Being called a racist by a liberal when he or she thinks that he or she can get away with it. As will happen to Megan for her slam of Waters, and never mind her past support of Obama.

And, I suppose, as will happen to me, too, if enough people notice. Doubtful, more’s the pity.

Crossposted at Moe Lane.


RSS feed

11 Comments Leave a comment

Waters vs. Buffet & Gates

Kyle-MI (Diary) Thursday, February 12th at 12:21PM EDT (link)

I would pay to see Waters take on Warren Buffet and Bill Gates. It would be maximum blue on blue violence.

 

If only it was just Waters

Alberta (Diary) Thursday, February 12th at 12:29PM EDT (link)

I watched that entire thing, and she isnt the only totally incompetent person on that committee. None of these people have any idea about how, say, a bank actually works.

In fact, when I was watching said committee talk to Bernanke the other day, I was struck that the only person in the room who could actually talk to him was Paul. Scary. But even then he just railed against fiat and fractional reserve. Productive.

I think we should start a guillotine fund. :)

Sir, my concern is not whether God is on our side; my greatest concern is to be on God’s side, for God is always right.
Abraham Lincoln

 

Dumbest Congressman?

rblack198 (Diary) Thursday, February 12th at 12:36PM EDT (link)

If she’s not the dumbest I don’t want to see those who beat her out for the honor. Is she deluded enough to think since she apparently gave these banks billions they are now working for free?

I wonder if all the government programs she advocates work for free as well since its “government” money.

You have to wonder what Barney said in her ear. Unfortunately it wasn’t “shut up stupid”.

There ought to be a way to remove people from Congress for excessive stupidity

jonreagan (Diary) Thursday, February 12th at 12:59PM EDT (link)

I watched the testimony, and Maxine Waters not only is the stupidest member on the Hill, she is incredibly rude, unprofessional, and an all-round embarrassment. Her questions and ranting were essentially incoherent.

I think all of us can relate to BAC”s Ken Lewis, who looked incredulous as he said, “I have no idea what you’re talking about”…….I’m sure he was thinking, “what planet did this lady come from???”

You’re right—it’s scary that in this (or any) economy, people like this are crafting policy. We have ways of dealing with lawmakers who commit ethics violations; there ought to be some mechanism for removing people who attain this level of stupidity.

High Velocity lead would remove stupidity from government

CarlSchurz (Diary) Thursday, February 12th at 1:02PM EDT (link)

Just saying it is an option…

War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things: the decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling which thinks that nothing is worth a war, is much worse. A man who has nothing which he is willing to fight for, nothing which he cares more about than he does about his personal safety, is a miserable creature who has no chance of being free, unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself.

Oh and There are very few personal problems that cannot be solved through a suitable application of high explosives.

CarlSchurz (Diary) Thursday, February 12th at 1:08PM EDT (link)

Just pointing out options.

War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things: the decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling which thinks that nothing is worth a war, is much worse. A man who has nothing which he is willing to fight for, nothing which he cares more about than he does about his personal safety, is a miserable creature who has no chance of being free, unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself.

Uh... No. A reprimand is in order.

asleep06 (Diary) Thursday, February 12th at 2:09PM EDT (link)

nt

Small is beautiful.

 
 

Don't do that again here. Ever.

Moe Lane (Diary) Thursday, February 12th at 3:44PM EDT (link)
 

There is a mechanism. We call it a vote. And unlike other countries, we use votes over high speed lead and exsplosives. Thats the way we do it here.

gekster (Diary) Thursday, February 12th at 2:01PM EDT (link)

They say Republicans are for the rich, Democrats are for the poor.
If they need more voters,
then they have to make more of who they are for.

We are there in the various Tea Party groups, leaderless, but not rudderless.
We steer always toward the Constitutional principles this nation was founded upon.
Erick Brockway

I’ve gone from
“Hope and Change” to
“Hopeless and Changeless”

 
 
 

Brad Sherman of CA would run a close second

jonreagan (Diary) Thursday, February 12th at 1:09PM EDT (link)

This guy would win the contest for most juvenile.

His repeated ridiculous questions asking for “a show of hands”, was like a bad “Simon Says” contest. What a joke….

No questions about excessive leverage….no questions about what Geithner should do relative to the banks—since Geithner himself clearly has no idea. Just a Soviet-style show trial in a kangaroo court.

All in all, it looked like a bad case of “success-envy” by a committee of fools, most of whom have never held a real job, but just feed at the trough of government.

 

There are a Few Therapy Modalities.........

wolfgang Thursday, February 12th at 7:11PM EDT (link)

…appropriate and available for Ms Waters’ treatment. Electroshock, frontal lobotomy, drawing and quartering.