Speaker Pelosi to meet with Pope Benedict XVI.


Oh, to be a fly on that wall.

It’s always exciting when a notorious heretic meets the Pope. Particularly this Pope, who is quietly gearing the Church up for a long-delayed showdown with American Catholics over abortion:

Pope Benedict to meet Pelosi

In a move likely to stoke more controversy about whether Catholic politicians who support abortion rights are in line with the church, Pope Benedict XVI has granted an audience to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

The Catholic News Agency confirmed Monday that Pelosi (D-Calif.) is to meet Wednesday with Pope Benedict XVI, who has said supporters of abortion rights should not receive Communion.

Pelosi, a staunch supporter of abortion rights, is on an official trip to Italy. The news agency said there have been contradictory reports about whether the Pope would receive her. The agency said the Vatican’s press office confirmed today that the audience would take place Wednesday. The Vatican reportedly made clear that the Pope is meeting with her as a head of state, since she is third in line to the presidency.

It’s going to be fascinating to see whether she gets a private audience with Benedict XVI: if she does, she won’t enjoy it in the slightest. Conversations with the head of your religion which prominently feature the terms “heresy,” “denial of the Sacraments,” and “excommunicate” rarely are enjoyable, particularly when you’ve already publicly proven to his satisfaction that your mastery of The Catechism of the Catholic Church is every bit as bad as the stereotypes have it.  If it is strictly public, then it means that Holy Mother Church has decided that FOCA isn’t going to be visited this year… unless it means that the Church has decided that FOCA is going to be visited, and that trying to explain matters to a woman who can degrade the sacrament of the Eucharist down to “Communion is the body of the people of the church coming together” (read this if you’re wondering what the problem with that is) is only going to waste Benedict XVI’s valuable lifespan.  That’s one thing you always have to remember about the Roman Catholic Church: it’s subtle.

Until it isn’t.

Moe Lane

PS: It also hates abortion on an elemental level not really understood by outsiders.  Which, thanks to certain past policies, these days includes a not-trivial percentage of American Catholics…

Crossposted at Moe Lane.

Category: , , , ,

RSS feed | Trackback URI

32 Comments Leave a comment

Maybe Pelosi can lecture Pope Benedict....

St_Louis_Conservative Monday, February 16th at 10:59PM EST (link)

….on the REAL Catholic position on abortion, as she did to the Bishops here in the U.S.

“…..women and minorities hardest hit”

I'm not sure she's not ballsy enough to do exactly that.

itrytobenice Monday, February 16th at 11:17PM EST (link)

But I am certain that he wouldn’t hesitate to tell her she’s out of the shrine.

The problem with America is stupidity. I’m not saying there should be capital punishment for stupidity, but why don’t we just take the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?

 

Perhaps Nancy will explain to the Pope, that as a ranking Democrat...

6eorge Jetson Tuesday, February 17th at 12:25AM EST (link)

the laws of God don’t apply to her. As to Moe’s question

if you’re wondering what’s the problem with…[snip]..trying to explain matters to a woman who can degrade the sacrament of the Eucharist down to “Communion is the body of the people of the church coming together”

Might it be this from this?

1415 Anyone who desires to receive Christ in Eucharistic communion must be in the state of grace. Anyone aware of having sinned mortally must not receive communion without having received absolution in the sacrament of penance.


Hold off on that Mammogram for 10 years

Real Presence

jerry38 Tuesday, February 17th at 10:16AM EST (link)

“if you’re wondering what’s the problem with…[snip]..trying to explain matters to a woman who can degrade the sacrament of the Eucharist down to “Communion is the body of the people of the church coming together”

Catholics believe in the real presence of Christ in the Eucharist (Communion) - body blood soul and divinity. Its not about the “body of the people of the church coming together.” You might get all mystical and make that analogy, as an additional benefit of Communion, but Pelosi was not getting all mystical, she was denying the real presence of Christ in the Eucharist.

“Justice is always naive and self-confident; believing that it will immediately win once recognized. That is the reason why the forces of Justice are so poorly organized. On the other hand, the Evil is cynic, sly and fantastically organized. It never ever has the illusion of the ability to stand on its own feet and to win in a fair competition. That is why it is ready to use any kind of means without hesitation. And of course it does - under the banners of the most noble ideas.”

–Vladimir Bukovsky

The CCC references 1 Cor 11:27 on this point...

Read Chesterton in New Improved Jersey Tuesday, February 17th at 11:10AM EST (link)

Wherefore whosoever shall eat this bread, and drink this cup of the Lord, unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and blood of the Lord. (1 Cor 11:27 - KJV)

Of course, if she doesn’t know her catechism, her bible knowledge is probably limited to Charlton Heston and Richard Harris. caricatures

“Nature is not our mother: Nature is our sister. We can be proud of her beauty, since we have the same father; but she has no authority over us; we have to admire, but not to imitate.” - G. K. Chesterton, “Orthodoxy,” Chapter VIII.

 
 
 
 

It's longggg past time for the Catholica Church to excommunicate the murderous politicians

AHALgal Monday, February 16th at 11:07PM EST (link)

The Church loses credibility by not taking actions. Let the abortion-loving Democrats become unitarians and then they cn have all the abortions, gay marriage, and legalized drug use they want.

I'm a Catholic, and I'd be happy if our leadership

Tim_Schieferecke Monday, February 16th at 11:30PM EST (link)

could just convince a simple majority NOT to vote for the liberals a simple majority of my faith always seem to support. It makes absolutely no sense! That whole camel through the eye of the needle passage has been purposefully misconstrued for eons to read as an affirmative defense for the forced charity only government can demand. My faith has a long, long way to go towards correcting this.

Trust me, the church put out generic statements EVERYWHERE last year that warned against voting for politicians that support abortion, but it didn’t add up to a majority of Catholics supporting pro-life candidates. The camel in the eye of the needle trumped the intrinsic evil argument of supporting pro-choice candidates.

Fortunately Father Sirico of the Acton Institute is spreading the good word that ties fiscally conservative policy with church doctrine by teaching parish priests basic economics and how to then teach it to their flocks. Until basic economics is better understood and espoused by Catholic leadership, Catholics will continue to support the outright evil politicians they should instinctively oppose.

Tim Schieferecke

"Majority of Catholics support abortion" is a media canard...

Read Chesterton in New Improved Jersey Tuesday, February 17th at 11:16AM EST (link)

Trust me, the church put out generic statements EVERYWHERE last year that warned against voting for politicians that support abortion, but it didn’t add up to a majority of Catholics supporting pro-life candidates.

According to the Catholic League, that campaign was very effective for church-going Catholics. It was the self-identifying non-church-going “catholics” who are rolled together in all published statistics with the faithful Catholics by the MSM that make it look like the RCC in America is on the hairy edge of collapsing. It’s frustrating as even the conservative pundits fall for the canard that the majority of all catholics support abortion rights.

“Nature is not our mother: Nature is our sister. We can be proud of her beauty, since we have the same father; but she has no authority over us; we have to admire, but not to imitate.” - G. K. Chesterton, “Orthodoxy,” Chapter VIII.

I never said that a majority of Catholics support abortion rights.

Tim_Schieferecke Tuesday, February 17th at 3:52PM EST (link)

What I did say was that even though they knew Obama’s stance on abortion, a majority of my Catholic brethren voted for him anyway. Abortion took a back seat in their minds to economic liberalism. The camel through the eye of the needle that speaks of the need of PERSONAL charity is grossly misunderstood by the majority of Catholics. Please reread my post.

Tim Schieferecke

The majority of church-going Catholics voted for McCain...

Read Chesterton in New Improved Jersey Friday, February 27th at 12:02PM EST (link)

by anywhere from 1 to 16% depending on which poll you consult. There seems to be a lot of mischief in the MSM w/r/t this particular statistic. I tend to believe the higher number as it would be more in line with those of the church-going protestant voters.

I suspect that as the older boomers move on to their reward the numbers will improve for conservatively voting Catholics.

“Nature is not our mother: Nature is our sister. We can be proud of her beauty, since we have the same father; but she has no authority over us; we have to admire, but not to imitate.” - G. K. Chesterton, “Orthodoxy,” Chapter VIII.

 
 
 
 
 

I'm Not Catholic...

tsquare Monday, February 16th at 11:14PM EST (link)

so I take no position on her faith or lack thereof…

But Pelosi’s meeting with the Pope… can we get it on Pay For View?

I mean come on… if they test her to see if she’s a witch… I’d pay 60 bucks.

Burned at the stake? 80 easy…

As long as she weighs the same as a duck. -nt-

Brian Simpson Monday, February 16th at 11:21PM EST (link)

The Minority Report | Twitter | Facebook | Digg | Politics4All | Missouri Matters | Rebuild the Party
Important principles may and must be inflexible. ~ Abraham Lincoln

well played.

Crowe Monday, February 16th at 11:29PM EST (link)

“It’s a fair cop”

“We sleep soundly in our beds only because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence upon those who would do us harm Dear Leader Obama gives us leave to do so.”

 

She turned me into a newt. :-)

Lammo Tuesday, February 17th at 6:27PM EST (link)

n/t

ACORN: Association of Criminals Obama Represented in the Nineties. (jupitersuite)

Don’t be so open minded that your brains fall out. (Fr. John Corapi, SOLT)

Crime never takes a holiday. (Dennis J. O’Shea, R.I.P.)

Unlawful is against the law. Illegal is a sick bird. (Ooold joke)

Outside of a dog, a book is a man’s best friend. Inside of a dog it’s too dark to read. (Groucho Marx)

Got better

civil_truth Tuesday, February 17th at 6:58PM EST (link)
 
 
 

I'm confident enough of it will be public.

Crowe Monday, February 16th at 11:20PM EST (link)

Regensburg was no miscalculation. Benedict is brilliant in ways initially (and for a long time) opaque to the vast majority of Americans. But the reverberations of his movements will shake history. Pelosi has no clue what she’s about or what she’s dabbling with. She reminds me of Miss Hardcastle in That Hideous Strength.

“We sleep soundly in our beds only because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence upon those who would do us harm Dear Leader Obama gives us leave to do so.”

 

to see him

sdan Monday, February 16th at 11:55PM EST (link)

excommunicate her publicly would be great. Or do they do it that way I haven’t been Catholic in a long time.

Not the style.

Crowe Tuesday, February 17th at 12:05AM EST (link)

This isn’t done nearly often enough…



But Pelosi would be a great start…

THAT’S how to do it.

“We sleep soundly in our beds only because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence upon those who would do us harm Dear Leader Obama gives us leave to do so.”

strange title on the last.

Crowe Tuesday, February 17th at 12:06AM EST (link)

I started with one idea, then totally changed the body without changing the title… ah well.

“We sleep soundly in our beds only because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence upon those who would do us harm Dear Leader Obama gives us leave to do so.”

 

Amen

sdan Tuesday, February 17th at 12:10AM EST (link)

to that.

 

I hope he will be able to educate her on when life begins.

antisocial Tuesday, February 17th at 1:00AM EST (link)

—— excerpt ——-
On Meet the Press, 24 August 2008, Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi, was asked about her divergence from the Catholic Church on the issue of when life begins. She responded that “as an ardent, practicing Catholic, this is an issue that I have studied for a long time. And what I know is, over the centuries, the doctors of the church have not been able to make that definition. And Senator—St. Augustine said at three months. We don’t know. The point is, is that it shouldn’t have an impact on the woman’s right to choose.”
——————

If she is excommunicated that would be GREAT.

Pope Benedict is Brilliant. Nancy Pelosi is in dangerous territory.

No you can’t - Moe Lane
——————————
The Emperor has no clothes!!!
——————————
Republicans who lost the Crap-and-Raid fight in the House -
Mary Bomo Mac (CA-45)
Mike Castle (DE)
Mark Kirk (IL-10)
Frank A. LoBiondo (NJ-02)
Chris Smith (NJ-04)
Leonard Lance (NJ-07)
John M. McHugh (NY-23)
Dave Reichert (WA-08)

Pope Benedict did tell Nancy Pelosi

antisocial Wednesday, February 18th at 11:02AM EST (link)

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D96E13500&show_article=1

excerpt
————–
Pope Benedict XVI on Wednesday told U.S. Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, a Catholic who supports abortion rights, that Catholic politicians have a duty to protect life “at all stages of its development,” the Vatican said.

The Vatican released remarks by the pope to Pelosi, saying Benedict spoke of the church’s teaching “on the dignity of human life from conception to natural death.” That is an expression often used by the pope when expressing opposition to abortion.

Benedict said all Catholics—especially legislators, jurists and political leaders—should work to create “a just system of laws capable of protecting human life at all stages of its development.”
————————–

No you can’t - Moe Lane
——————————
The Emperor has no clothes!!!
——————————
Republicans who lost the Crap-and-Raid fight in the House -
Mary Bomo Mac (CA-45)
Mike Castle (DE)
Mark Kirk (IL-10)
Frank A. LoBiondo (NJ-02)
Chris Smith (NJ-04)
Leonard Lance (NJ-07)
John M. McHugh (NY-23)
Dave Reichert (WA-08)

 
 
 

Excommunication is not a dramatic as it should be...

Read Chesterton in New Improved Jersey Tuesday, February 17th at 11:34AM EST (link)

Actually, any well shepherded orthodox denomination, be it Catholic or protestant, will tell an errant member to refrain from participation in communion until such time as they are back on the rails and have publicly confessed the error of their ways to church leadership.

Cowardly and silent Catholic bishops notwithstanding, Pelosi, the Kennedys, and the rest of the self professed Catholic Democrats have self-excommunicated via their words and actions. 1 Corinthians 11:27 takes care of the rest.

“Nature is not our mother: Nature is our sister. We can be proud of her beauty, since we have the same father; but she has no authority over us; we have to admire, but not to imitate.” - G. K. Chesterton, “Orthodoxy,” Chapter VIII.

Yes, and there is also scandal* in presenting themselves for Communion...

Crowe Wednesday, February 18th at 2:28PM EST (link)

Of course, if you’re not in communion with the religious community to which you connect yourself on the matters that community considers non-negotiable, then you ought not act as though you are in communion in the outward practices and ceremonies.

In the Catholic Church, the doctrinal communion and sacramental communion are both instances of adhering to the Person of Jesus Christ since Christ is at once the very substance of the Truths the Church teaches and the very substance of Communion. And neither of these in a figurative, merely spiritual, or any other way that reduces dissension on non-negotiables to anything but a violence to Christ Himself.

*scandal, in Christianity, is a technical term. From the Catechism:

2284 Scandal is an attitude or behavior which leads another to do evil. The person who gives scandal becomes his neighbor’s tempter. He damages virtue and integrity; he may even draw his brother into spiritual death. Scandal is a grave offense if by deed or omission another is deliberately led into a grave offense.

2285 Scandal takes on a particular gravity by reason of the authority of those who cause it or the weakness of those who are scandalized. It prompted our Lord to utter this curse: “Whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in me to sin, it would be better for him to have a great millstone fastened round his neck and to be drowned in the depth of the sea.”85 Scandal is grave when given by those who by nature or office are obliged to teach and educate others. Jesus reproaches the scribes and Pharisees on this account: he likens them to wolves in sheep’s clothing.86

2286 Scandal can be provoked by laws or institutions, by fashion or opinion.

Therefore, they are guilty of scandal who establish laws or social structures leading to the decline of morals and the corruption of religious practice, or to “social conditions that, intentionally or not, make Christian conduct and obedience to the Commandments difficult and practically impossible.” This is also true of business leaders who make rules encouraging fraud, teachers who provoke their children to anger, or manipulators of public opinion who turn it away from moral values.

2287 Anyone who uses the power at his disposal in such a way that it leads others to do wrong becomes guilty of scandal and responsible for the evil that he has directly or indirectly encouraged. “Temptations to sin are sure to come; but woe to him by whom they come!”

“We sleep soundly in our beds only because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence upon those who would do us harm Dear Leader Obama gives us leave to do so.”

 
 
 

Popes have a long history of dealing with

Tbone Monday, February 16th at 11:58PM EST (link)

the Devil’s Advocates. However, seldom does one get to deal with his Mother-in-law.

Envisioning when all that is Left is the Right.

555

JoeG Tuesday, February 17th at 12:49AM EST (link)

Oh man that was good….

 
 

Pray for the Pope

jerry38 Tuesday, February 17th at 12:05AM EST (link)

The Catholic Church in the US was infected with the 60’s as much as the rest of the country. Our schools, our seminaries, our parishes, and our priests. Kennedy threw his faith and the faith of a generation under the bus when he gave his speech about religion. Of course, the pro-choicers used Catholics and specifically the Pope, as their strawman to keep the evangelicals off their back for over a decade. They fostered the notion that the Pope was telling them they couldn’t let their daughters have abortions, and pride won out.

The difference is that while Catholics were affected, Church teaching was not. Liberalism’s impact can be made permanent in some institutions, but not the Catholic Church. Because our principles never really changed, we are getting better bishops, priests, seminaries and teachers. The tide is turning inside the Church at all levels, but it is a very slow process. I don’t know if we will get through to the jesuits in our lifetime, and they set the standards at the university level.

Despite the clear directions of the bishops and unflinching teaching of the Church, huge numbers of Catholics believed they could vote for an extreme abortion supporter in good conscience. I think the Pope knows he has a chance here to make a huge statement. Still, he may be more charitable than we can imagine. He may try to convert instead of punish. Maybe he will convert. He may feel he cannot step on the feet of the bishop, who should be doing the ex-communicating. He may not be as policitically brilliant as his predecessor, and misinterpret the opportunity.

There are a lot of ifs, but I am saying my prayers for the Pope.

“Justice is always naive and self-confident; believing that it will immediately win once recognized. That is the reason why the forces of Justice are so poorly organized. On the other hand, the Evil is cynic, sly and fantastically organized. It never ever has the illusion of the ability to stand on its own feet and to win in a fair competition. That is why it is ready to use any kind of means without hesitation. And of course it does - under the banners of the most noble ideas.”

–Vladimir Bukovsky

He was his predecessor's right-hand man. And he outpaces JPII.

Crowe Tuesday, February 17th at 12:17AM EST (link)

I love JPII. I believe he is singing with the choirs eternal. But he wasn’t perfect and was more focused on broadening the base of the Church than on catechesis of the faithful (strange, considering he called for and approved the new Catechism, but true).

Your statement: “He may not be as policitically brilliant as his predecessor, and misinterpret the opportunity.” Show how much you don’t know Benedict XVI.

JPII did almost nothing without consulting Ratzinger, and refused to allow Ratzinger to return to Germany more than once when Ratzinger tried to retire.

Benedict XVI outpaces his predecessor in some key ways, especially in dealing with recalcitrant children like Pelosi and American liberals.

He excels at doing the exactly proportional, brilliant thing to have a measured, calculated immediate impact, but also to have a long-term impact that is obvious in parts, but not so obvious in others. The brilliant, and much reviled-because-willfully-misunderstood speech a Regensburg is one example of this, as is the motu proprio Summorum Pontificum. Both have layers of meaning and key phrases that initially set people through the roof, but are so deep that they will be the subject of discussion and understanding for generations.

JPII was awesome, but I prefer BXVI in this meeting with Pelosi.

“We sleep soundly in our beds only because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence upon those who would do us harm Dear Leader Obama gives us leave to do so.”

 
 

I wonder what the odds are...

jarrod21 Tuesday, February 17th at 12:21AM EST (link)

…for spontaneous human combustion? I know it’s infinitesimally small, but c’mon. Maybe the earth opens up and swallows her whole? Pillar of salt? Locusts?

There’s got to be a bookie somewhere that’s taking action on this.

If we are going with the

sdan Tuesday, February 17th at 12:39AM EST (link)

plagues I think I’d go with boils or lice. Of course the boils would probably improve her looks.

 
 

Prayers from a lutheran, fellow-Christian...

Just_Saying Tuesday, February 17th at 1:49AM EST (link)

… please attempt to knock sense into that botoxed-brain, or else excommunicate her. Please, for the good of the church, the U.S., the world, and God’s Kingdom.

Please.

 

I even argued the Anti-Obama vote

Deskpilot Tuesday, February 17th at 5:32AM EST (link)

to my mother, a member of the lay ministries in her parish, Alas, to no avail. She couldn’t get past the “terrible position” that Bush had put her in. And this, coming from a Reagan to G.W. Bush retired Sailor who acknowledged all of the faults of the Republicans.

If you can read this, thank a teacher. If you can still read it in English, You’re Welcome
Deskpilot, AM(H)1 (AW), USN (Ret)

 

Leave a Comment

 

Be respectful, or be banned. No Profanity.