« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Did Mexican drug money help subsidize the Democratic Convention?

No, seriously. Did it?

(H/T: Glenn Reynolds) I know, I know, it’s a heck of a thing to contemplate on a Thursday morning, but check out this story on heavy Democratic donor (and current fugitive) R. Allen Stanford:

Accused Financier Under Federal Drug Investigation
Authorities: Stanford May Have Laundered Drug Money for Mexican Cartel

The SEC’s fraud charges may be the least of accused financial scammer R. Allen Stanford’s worries. Federal authorities tell ABC News that the FBI and others have been investigating whether Stanford was involved in laundering drug money for Mexico’s notorious Gulf Cartel.

[snip]

The federal investigation, however, did not stop Stanford from using corporate money to become a big man at last year’s Democratic convention in Denver.

A video posted on the firm’s web-site shows Stanford, now sought by U.S. Marshals, being hugged by Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi and praised by former President Bill Clinton for helping to finance a convention-related forum and party put on by the National Democratic Institute.

Can we show you video footage of said hug and praise? YES! WE! CAN!

I assume that we’re going to be hearing a lot of people pounding the table and screaming about the fact that Stanford threw money the Republicans’ way, too: but with a two-to-one ratio in general and a decidedly lopsided recent contribution history (thanks to him helping to subsidize the Democratic Convention) you can treat that as the quietly frantic attempt to change the narrative that it is.  What I find truly fascinating is what this says about the DNCC’s fund-raising committee’s operating methodology. We were aware that they were in a severe financial hole last year (as I exceptionally sarcastically, if ultimately futilely, kept pointing out), so they may not have been too critical about where they were getting their money from. Still. A simple Google search gets the result of Stanford being accused in 2003 of buying foreign politicians (“Stanford speaks out on bribery allegations“) in an area where he was expanding his influence.

You think that they might have brought that up before they endorsed the check for deposit.

Moe Lane

Crossposted to Moe Lane.

COMMENTS

  • JadedByPolitics

    campaign finance reform that takes corporate money out of the politics and truly puts it back to the people. This is would be the perfect example of the impact of McCain’s stupid bill that did nothing but place elections into the hands of the powerful!

  • wsmith

    There’s plenty of Stanford slime to go around.

    News has just broken that John Cornyn went on a junket to Antigua with Stanford. Maybe that wasn’t as bad as the DNC taking a check, but it sure looks really bad. I wouldn’t get too excited about the upcoming developments in this story.

  • Martin Knight
  • http://moelane.com/ Moe Lane

    You must be worried about this.

  • JadedByPolitics

    You Immediately had a taker…

    “I assume that we?re going to be hearing a lot of people pounding the table and screaming about the fact that Stanford threw money the Republicans? way, too:”

    Fast too!

    So wsmith why don’t you do the legwork and tell us exactly how tight and how much money the Republicans got from Stanford….it’s only fair since you were the first to make Moe’s assumption correct!

  • Rod_Patrick

    These people think that we tolerate corrupt practices. If what this Dem ‘s saying is true… then Sen. Cornyn will be in lots of troubles with the conservatives.

    I wonder if this Dem can do the same to Mr. Former President Thank You, Mrs. Speaker Hugger , , , , , and last but not the least…..the DNC ‘s Topnotched Democrat, President “I Won” Obama.

  • JadedByPolitics

    well he did it too NO we stand by those who go about their jobs ethically and DO NOT STAND with those who do not!

  • http://moelane.com/ Moe Lane

    Which was his intent.

  • bs

    Man, that was one heck of a sleeper cell.

  • janis

    save it for this one situation. Amazing self-control, don’t you think? His self-control is only exceeded by his delusions of giving us a really big “Gotcha!”

    What a shame.

  • The_Gadfly

    Or are they the ones who aren’t sure what the definition of ‘is’ is? It gets so hard to keep track of all these things. I think the talk radio guy was right the other day: the Dems are trying to hit us with so many things they are doing so wrong so fast that we get fatigued and just give up trying to be outraged at their hideous behavior.