« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Hi, Sasha, Malia. Got a second?

I hope that you're enjoying the White House, by the way.

It’s a pretty cool place for people your age, from what I’m told.

Anyway, I just thought that you should know: do you know Sarah & James Parker? They go to your school.

Yeah, them. Are they nice? I’ve never met them, so I don’t know. I do know that their parents really can’t afford to send them to your school without assistance; it’s called the DC Opportunity Scholarship Program, and it lets over 1,700 poor kids in DC get scholarships every year. It’s often called a “voucher” program, although people who like school choice wouldn’t agree: they want everybody to have the chance to pick the best schools for their kid, instead of just a small number. Still, this program is helping people who are usually making about half of much as the federal poverty level; it’s hard to dispute that it’s a good one. I’m sure that Sarah & James think that it’s a good program.

Unfortunately, Senator Dick Durbin (D, IL) wants to throw them out of your school.

William McGurn of the Wall Street Journal is ready to punch through a wall on this one, and I don’t blame him one bit:

Dick Durbin has a nasty surprise for two of Sasha and Malia Obama’s new schoolmates. And it puts the president in an awkward position.

The children are Sarah and James Parker. Like the Obama girls, Sarah and James attend the Sidwell Friends School in our nation’s capital. Unlike the Obama girls, they could not afford the school without the $7,500 voucher they receive from the D.C. Opportunity Scholarship program. Unfortunately, a spending bill the Senate takes up this week includes a poison pill that would kill this program — and with it perhaps the Parker children’s hopes for a Sidwell diploma.

Known as the “Durbin language” after the Illinois Democrat who came up with it last year, the provision mandates that the scholarship program ends after the next school year unless Congress reauthorizes it and the District of Columbia approves. The beauty of this language is that it allows opponents to kill the program simply by doing nothing. Just the sort of sneaky maneuver that’s so handy when you don’t want inner-city moms and dads to catch on that you are cutting one of their lifelines.

…because it’s something that should make people angry.  It’s unfortunately true that Durbin hates school choice, and has for years; and he’s also very much liked by the National Education Association, which completely hates vouchers.  So we really can’t trust that he’s doing anything except trying to kill the program without anybody noticing.  The thing is, though, that he probably doesn’t hate Sarah & James; in fact, once he hears about the article above he’ll probably pull some strings and make sure that nobody from your school loses their scholarships.  But you two don’t go to every school that has kids who’ll be affected by this.  The ones that don’t go to yours will lose their scholarships, and they’ll go back to the public schools that their parents have moved heaven and earth trying to save them from.

No, this isn’t really fair.

Yes, I know that he was very nice to you two.  Your father is the President of the United States; and before that he was one of Durbin’s coworkers.  That means that Durbin sees both of you as people.

Moe Lane

Crossposted to Moe Lane.

COMMENTS

  • 6eorge Jetson
  • slimjimbim

    But I think we both know Obama’s children only read entries posted by Warner Todd Houston

  • tankertodd

    (Thanks to Kanye for the sentiment.)

  • Praying

    Tricky Dick Durbin, who sponsored the infamous Durbin Amdt. No. 591; To encourage and promote diversity in communication media ownership, and to ensure that the public airwaves are used in the public interest. Not only is Dick Durbin against kids like Sarah and James getting a first quality education in Washington DC, and maybe breaking out of the welfare/poverty state the Democrats created 50 years ago, he’s ALSO OPPOSED TO FREE SPEECH. This amendment was attached to S. 160 As Amended; District of Columbia House Voting Rights Act of 2009 (to get a House of Rep. seat for Washington DC ), and the amendment was approved by the senate 57 to 41 with 1 not voting. It all but negated another amendment to the senate bill, DeMint Amdt. No. 573; ?To prevent the Federal Communications Commission from repromulgating the fairness doctrine.? DeMint’s amendment passed with an overwhelming bipartisan support of 87 to 11. But we know that this administration won’t be transparent and up-front about re-imposing the Fairness Doctrine, they will sneak in through the back door, and that door has been opened wide by Dick Durbin. Classy Guy.
    Roll Eyes 4Roll Eyes 4

  • Mike gamecock DeVine

    for 2 weeks either.

  • Mike gamecock DeVine