« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Charles Freeman: And I would have gotten away with it, too…

…if it wasn’t for those meddlesome Jews:

I have concluded that the barrage of libelous distortions of my record would not cease upon my entry into office.  The effort to smear me and to destroy my credibility would instead continue.  I do not believe the National Intelligence Council could function effectively while its chair was under constant attack by unscrupulous people with a passionate attachment to the views of a political faction in a foreign country.  I agreed to chair the NIC to strengthen it and protect it against politicization, not to introduce it to efforts by a special interest group to assert control over it through a protracted political campaign.

Speaking as one of the aforementioned unscrupulous, passionate people, I offer this response to Freeman – and, indeed, everybody who shares in his, ah, particular ethical stance:

Geh kak afen yam. When I want moral judgments on my motivations I’ll get them from somebody who doesn’t think that the Chinese government should have stepped down on its dissidents harder, thanks.

Moe Lane

PS: Ed’s right, Gray Lady: you mucked up the reporting on this one something fierce. Didn’t want to admit that the President had a catastrophic error on this one, huh?

Crossposted to Moe Lane.

COMMENTS

  • http://andrightlyso.com/ civil_truth

    Our nation has dodged a major bullet with Freeman’s withdrawal from the NIC chair position.

    However, the Obama administration has a track record of rehabilitating some of those it was forced to throw under the bus once the publicity fades, and doubtless others are advising behind the scenes, confident that the worshipful media will not blow their cover.

    Thus the question is this: what behind-the-scenes role will Freeman now be recruited to play in advising the Obama administration, and will we be able to identifiy his fingerprints?

    Disastrous as his ascension would have been, there is some truth to better the enemy you can see than the one you can’t. Hqw can we keep him under surveillance.

  • Rod_Patrick

    And I second the question.

  • http://impudent.blognation.us/blog kyle8

    who didn’t happen to be in such a high profile position.

    Anyone who knows anything about the radical left in recent years and the radical Black churches will know that anti-semitism comes naturally to them.