« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

The sputtering of the Obama machine.

That’s the word that the Washington Post used, so don’t blame me (H/T: Glenn Reynolds):

Obama’s Machine Sputters in Effort to Push Budget
Grass-Roots Campaign Has Little Effect

When his post-campaign organization was unveiled in January, Barack Obama vowed that the 13 million-strong grass-roots network built during his presidential campaign would play a “crucial role” in enacting his agenda from the White House.

But in its first big test, the group dubbed Organizing for America (OFA) had little obvious impact on the debate over President Obama’s budget, which passed Congress on Thursday with no Republican support and a splintering of votes among conservative Democrats. The capstone of the campaign was the delivery of 214,000 signatures to Capitol Hill, which swayed few, if any, members of Congress, according to legislative aides from both parties.

There’s a problem here, though. It’s not the first big test; it’s the second. The first big test was the attempt to use house parties to generate interest in Obama’s misnamed ‘stimulus’ bill. It, of course, failed miserably, as most of the citizens of the United States apparently have better things to do with their time than to go sit in a room and tell each other how great it is that Democrats are now able to fund any silly notion that comes into their heads. Which the White House should have worked out on its own, except that then it wouldn’t have been able to properly appreciate these marvelous stories about how the Return of the Unicorn Would Redeem the Land.

So they tried again with the budget. End result: no support from the GOP, and no increased support from the populace. Again, not surprising. As the second link shows, the deficit levels that will be generated from this year’s budget will be downright alarming… and the citizenry understands the problems with living above your means; they’re getting a crash course in the consequences, which is one reason why personal saving rates have jumped back up recently. Which is why it’s so exasperating that the administration has gone into permanent campaign mode: it’s not even working, for added waste of time. Those people stuck with reliving Obama/Biden o8′s glory days could be using their time doing something more useful for society.

Like, say, reading The Berenstain Bears’ Trouble with Money. Goodness knows that somebody involved with this administration should.

Moe Lane

Crossposted to Moe Lane.

COMMENTS

  • robmikpet

    model. During the campaign Michele O. was explaining Barack O’s bona fides to a crowd and she said “Barack has seen it all, when he organized a group of pregnant women in Chicago to protest at city hall well…he has seen it all”

    Notwithstanding the intial “What the heck does that even mean” reaction this was all Obama was taught agitate, agitate, agitate.

    I will appluad ANY member of Congress who stands up to these bully tactics. This is not how America works. In fact if you look at any third world fledgling democracy or loose democracy what does the Chavez type leader try and do “call out the people to eliminate or intimidate the opposition”

    That is what makes Obama’s “pitchfork” comment all the more insidious. Deep down he would love to turn “the people” loose and intimidate anyone who opposes his policies. By claiming he is the ONLY thing preventing this accomplishes the same thing, bowing (Saudi King style) to his will.

  • TxCon

    Shuler voted for the budget.

  • TxCon

    Shuler voted for the budget.

  • bobojake

    Every day this week and on we should take the time to email our Senators and Congressman.with a new letter explaining obamas budget and destroying the United States has to Stop. Tthe Senators and Congressman are not doing their job of protecting the United States, if they don’t stop this man now.
    Send a new one not the same letter, expressing your thoughts and the responsiblity of Reid, peloski, and Schummmmer, Dodd, Frank, Rangel,
    Muffa and how all Senators and Congressman are letting down the taxpayers of this Great Nation.

  • Joe_Cor

    The blueprint of the budget passed. Where’s the indication it won’t untimately be passed in final form, even if public support isn’t gung-ho, even without a single Republican vote, even if a few blue-dogs not supporting it? If the budget gets passed anyway, how will it matter if the “machine” didn’t work as well as intended?

  • texas214

    The WaPo, at least from various news reports carrying the WaPo byline, seems to be doing a better job in balancing it’s news coverage as of late. Obama negative stories are starting to appear more frequently.

    Maybe someone over there figured out that p*ss*ng on 50% of the potential readerships leg is not such a good business plan (see NYT).

  • IJB
  • IJB
  • Finrod

    Back during the 1980s, it was the WaPo that was publishing every slam against Reagan that they could find, while the NYT was not so much being fair, but more restrained. Now it seems it’s the other way around.

  • Rich Tandler
  • Adjoran

    The NYT had Abe Rosenthal. He was a liberal, but adamant about fairness and accuracy in the news columns.

    Pinch Sulzberger, not so much.

  • Joe_Cor

    We engage in way too much wishful thinking on the right. Barak’s still highly popular, Republicans are still too scared to crticize him. There should be a long line of representatives and senators fighting for their chance to denounce his European speeches on the House/Senate floor. If that can’t even light a fire under them, what will? Where’s this stinging defeat going to materialize from?

  • Martin Knight
  • bk

    Maybe Obama will replace him for the good of the country if he goes too negative on The One.