Put this on the list of “I thought people knew this already:” offshore oil platforms are havens for marine life.
The original plan, mandated by federal environmental “experts” back in the late ’40s, was to remove the big, ugly, polluting, environmentally hazardous contraptions as soon as they stopped producing. Fine, said the oil companies.
About 15 years ago some wells played out off Louisiana and the oil companies tried to comply. Their ears are still ringing from the clamor fishermen put up. Turns out those platforms are going nowhere, and by popular demand of those with a bigger stake in the marine environment than any “environmentalist.” Every “environmental” superstition against these structures was turned on its head.
Marine life had exploded around these huge artificial reefs: A study by LSU’s Sea Grant college shows that 85 percent of Louisiana fishing trips involve fishing around these platforms. The same study shows 50 times more marine life around an oil production platform than in the surrounding Gulf bottoms. An environmental study (by apparently honest scientists) revealed that urban runoff and treated sewage dump 12 times the amount of petroleum into the Gulf than those thousands of oil production platforms. And oil seeping naturally through the ocean floor into the Gulf, where it dissipates over time, accounts for 7 times the amount spilled by rigs and pipelines in any given year.
The article compares Lousiana’s offshore marine environment with Florida’s (which has significantly more restrictions), and notes that the former is generally healthier than the latter’s, particularly when it comes to reef development. This should not be particularly surprising, given that oil companies have two positive incentives to preventing pollution around their sites. The first is, of course, that if they don’t the environmental lobby will do their level best to gut them; the second, possibly more important reason is that every drop of oil spilled is one drop of oil that cannot be sold. And oil is valuable, so maintaining a clean rig that doesn’t leak or corrode will maximize one’s oil-extraction potential. At least until you get to a situation where it’s not profitable to keep the site clean, but that only happens when maintenance costs threaten to wipe out profit, and the only real way that this could happen when it comes to oil is if somebody pushed the tax burden too high.
And, really, what nature-hating idiot would think of suggesting that?
Moving along, the author (who, by the way, wrote The Helldivers’ Rodeo, the book mentioned in the article) recounted the story of visitors from The Travel Planet who showed up at a Louisiana oil rig diving site first skeptical of, and then amazed at, the marine life that proliferated there. I don’t think that the below is the video of that visit:
…but it does show that oil rigs are not precisely the Gaia-destroying wasteland that apparently some might expect. See also:
or this:
Pretty, isn’t it? Nothing like seeing the environment enhanced by the hand of Man - and I can’t understand why anybody would be against coral and fish growth…
Moe Lane
Crossposted at Moe Lane.

Correct!
reaganlover Tuesday, April 28th at 3:10PM EDT (link)Interesting point, and not one I have seen elsewhere.
Good information
LibRick Tuesday, April 28th at 3:31PM EDT (link)No different from the routine sinking of ships and autos to create reef environments. It’s unfortunate that so many have not researched the fact that modern drilling does not have the negative impact that occurred 50 years ago and ,as you show, creates some environmental benefit..
This lib is for drilling within US controlled areas. Even if we go green…whatever that ultimately means, we still have to supply uninterrupted energy sources in the interim. That interim is much longer than some would have us believe.. Domestic drilling is safe and essential to sustained American growth.
I’d really like to see a push for much more nuclear production but I think domestic drilling has a better chance .
known for years
Michael DeWeese Tuesday, April 28th at 3:38PM EDT (link)But environmentalist seem to ignore it, go figure. Along with artificical reefs, man made structures in the oceans have been a haven for wildlife and has been common knowledge to scientists since the 70’s.
Brain Dead Republican
Oil must always remain their enemy
Nuclearnerd Tuesday, April 28th at 3:42PM EDT (link)The people I always encountered acted llike Haliburton and Cheney had pump stations set up in the Gulf to fill the blowholes of every passing whale. Hard to claim infinite greed of oil industry and then claim they would flaunt environmental laws at ridiculous costs. I work in oilfield sevices and we have environmental people on full time who actually make global warming videos. Doesn’t make much sense to me.
Join the RedState Strike Force
Sometimes, from a purely selfish POV, I wish he'd impose a Windfall Profits Tax
Vladimir Tuesday, April 28th at 4:28PM EDT (link)The more the gov’t tries to screw with the oil market, the better for the oil producer (which is me). The best year for oil & gas was 1981, on the heels of Nixon’s price controls and Carter’s Windfall Profits Tax.
Then Reagan decontrolled oil & gas. There was actually an oversupply of both & prices were low for 20 years.
But, OTOH, it’s bad policy for the overall economy & the country’s security. So much for greedy, self-interested oil men.
Any fisherman on the Gulf Coast will tell you where the fish are - near “the rigs” (really platforms, mostly). At the end of a platform’s life, they are often “reefed” - sunk in a controlled fashion in a designated artificial reef area, specifically for marine life & diving. If the oil operator saves money by doing so, the savings are split with the state wildlife dept.
If anything’s detrimental to the marine population, it’s agricultural runoff, which causes an annual “Dead Zone” (scroll down for bibliography). And the main culprit there is BIG CORN, heavily subsidized entrant into the energy industry.
Many don’t know, don’t understand, or don’t care that oil moves form offshore platforms primarily in pipelines, the safest method from an environmental standpoint. The worst method to move oil around is in boats, which sooner or later is going to spill. The less domestic oil we produce, the more foreign oil we have to bring in in boats.
Also in the “don’t know, don’t understand, or don’t care” category is the fact that an offshore operator is required to report any spill of oil which causes a sheen on the water - there is no minimum reportable quantity. See this old diary.
Ahhhhh. Don’t get me started, Moe!
There is no opinion, however absurd, which men will not readily embrace as soon as they can be brought to the conviction that it is generally adopted. - Arthur Schopenhauer
There are better, less dangerous, ways to create artificial reefs.
ssm Tuesday, April 28th at 6:40PM EDT (link)The article seems to prove that artificial reefs are benefitial for marine life. But to say that this proves that we need to expand offshore drilling is just rediculous and not a logic argument.
If the objective is to benefit marine life by increasing the amount of artifical reefs, then there are better, safer way to do it. How about just having a program that creates artifical reefs? It is very simple to do. All it takes it just to dump large metal/plastic/composit object in the ocean. For example, I once read an article how in New York they threw old metro cars in the ocean, to create large artificial reefs.
Imagine a program where all the old cars, busses, trucks, train cars are first cleaned up from oils, etc, and then dumped into the ocean so the marine life can form around those artifical reefs.
This would achine the objective of benefiting the ocean life, without building all those oil rigs that could break and leak oil And even, if you argue that the chances of accidents are very small, you must acknoledge that there are absolutely no chances of accidents with the program I described above.
WOOOOOOSH!!!!!!! -nt
E Pluribus Unum Tuesday, April 28th at 6:56PM EDT (link)Carthago delenda est
Right
Pomme Tuesday, April 28th at 7:02PM EDT (link)Absolutely no chances for accidents.
I have a bridge I’d like to sell you, since you’re in the market!
“Liberals claim to want to give a hearing to other views, but then are shocked and offended to discover that there are other views” William F Buckley Jr.
What is your argument, Pomme?
ssm Tuesday, April 28th at 7:27PM EDT (link)Pomme,
Are you saying that oil rigs are just as safe to use as artifical reefs than lowering large metal structures to the bottom of the ocean that will just lay there dormant???
Machinery
Pomme Tuesday, April 28th at 7:32PM EDT (link)No matter how you cherry-coat it, there is always the chance for an accident.
My argument was your use of an absolute.
“Liberals claim to want to give a hearing to other views, but then are shocked and offended to discover that there are other views” William F Buckley Jr.
Kowalski
Pomme Tuesday, April 28th at 7:37PM EDT (link)Also, the topic was that the argument that oil rigs hurt the environment was a pretty flimsy one, not that there weren’t better ways.
“Liberals claim to want to give a hearing to other views, but then are shocked and offended to discover that there are other views” William F Buckley Jr.
Hmm
ssm Tuesday, April 28th at 8:48PM EDT (link)I was talking about how the title of this entry reads “Want to promote ocean biodiversity? Increase offshore drilling. ”
But the article cited does not establish this connection at all. (No surprise, since the claim is absurd.) Instead it only says that having large objects in the water that can server as shelter and a place for shell fish to attach itself can benefit marine life.
There is nothing inherently 'dirty' about an oil platform.
Vladimir Wednesday, April 29th at 8:38AM EDT (link)The tanks and vessels that actually hold the oil are not part of what is reefed.
The main part that is scuttled to make the reef is the large metal truss structure called the “jacket”. It’s not smart enough to know whether it was once part of an oil platform, part of a ship, or part of a bridge; it’s a big, dumb, harmless hunk of steel.
Anything that can’t be made pristine is hauled ashore & cut up for scrap.
There is no opinion, however absurd, which men will not readily embrace as soon as they can be brought to the conviction that it is generally adopted. - Arthur Schopenhauer
It's not my fault that anti-drillers hate marine biodiversity, ssm.
Moe Lane Tuesday, April 28th at 9:15PM EDT (link)But I’m going to have to ask that you stop promoting your life-denying agenda here.
Now say “Yes, Moe. I’m sorry that I did that.” Next post.
Check out my new blog at http://moelane.com/.
http://twitter.com/moelane
My (blogging-related) wish list.
Better ways to create clean reefs...
mbecker908 Wednesday, April 29th at 8:43AM EDT (link)well, for starters we could round up the Left and sink them. I’m sure their bones would make for great reef beds.
Let there be no question about it...
MacAoidh Tuesday, April 28th at 9:49PM EDT (link)…Obama’s cap-and-trade program will destroy Louisiana’s offshore oil and gas sector and put tens of thousands of hard-working Americans out of work.
http://www.thehayride.com/2009/04/scalise-trashes-cap-and-trade.html
Yeah? So?
mbecker908 Wednesday, April 29th at 8:44AM EDT (link)He’ll come in with a gummit program to employ them. After all, New Orleans still needs to be rebuilt.
Plastic
oldtexan Tuesday, April 28th at 10:52PM EDT (link)As long as we make products out of plastic, there will be drilling for oil.
I don’t know of any vehicle that runs on Obungholes unicorn pelets.
Some day this will come back around. hopefully
Fishing?
GreyCloak Wednesday, April 29th at 3:06AM EDT (link)I don’t see any fishermen commenting. There is no better place to tie up or fish off of than an old platform if you want Grouper (or Sea Bass).
the AK pipeline being "bad for Wildlife" myth...
JLenardDetroit Wednesday, April 29th at 4:39AM EDT (link)along those same lines…. Facts go right over Liberal heads!
(RS:Help) (JLD) (Hollyweird) (Brain-deads) (SPIN-cycle) (Obamaocare) (Party of kNOw) (Conservatism) (TEApeats) (respectful) (Reco) (Quotes) (removeRINOs.com)
+ 0bama Lies & your Bank acct will Die! (4/15 Truthers)
+ Heil “O” Hell No Obamao is NOT MY PRESIDENT! “No U won’t”
+ I want “O” to FAIL (here, here, & whole Diary (Ofail) here, is why)
“The first Liberal was Satan” - a Rush caller (other Quotes)
If you want to find wildlife, go any place they can't be hunted.
Achance Wednesday, April 29th at 5:15AM EDT (link)The Trans-Alaska Pipeline right of way and the Haul Road right of way alongside it are areas that can’t be hunted and you can’t hunt within a quarter mile of either side of them. Wild animals really aren’t very smart, but they’re smart about staying alive.
You’ll rarely see a moose in the open country of Alaska, but you’ll see lots of them in Anchorage and Fairbanks subdivisions where they can’t be hunted. Likewise, bears are rarely seen except on the salmon streams and in the cities and city dumps where they can’t be hunted.
In any event, the Producers went to extraordinary lengths to make sure that the TAPS didn’t interfere with caribou migration or other wildlife. If it has had any effect at all, it has increased the number of caribou by providing a safe haven for them where they can’t be hunted and an 800 mile long corridor of flat, open ground where they can browse.
In Vino Veritas
caribou have fun, too
GreyCloak Wednesday, April 29th at 5:31AM EDT (link)Pipeline facts are perverted, but the truth is only kinky:
Fact is: the Alaskan Pipeline only made wildlife more frisky!