« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

North Korean nuclear test successful?

Well, they’re claiming that it was, and there’s evidence that it happened in the form of an earthquake,so that’s how everyone is betting.  Japan is calling for an emergency UNSC meeting; South Korea, dealing simultaneously with this and the suddenly-more-murky suicide of its former President, is doing the same.  The White House hasn’t put up the President’s official statement on this yet, but you can read it here – it differs from the White House statement in 2006 most notably in its unconscious reliance on the UNSC to resolve this situation.  Also missing is any indication that the President has personally consulted with our allies in the region, but no doubt he’ll address that when he holds a press conference this morning on the North Korean crisis.  Note that I am merely assuming at this point that there will be one, and that it will take place before noon.

Meanwhile, John Bolton predicted that this test was going to happen last week; he also noted last week that the administration wasn’t taking the possibility of a second test all that seriously.  Compare the White House statements from today and 2006 again and ask yourself, Which one sounds like it was written by people taken by surprise? Also ask yourself, Is Bolton right when he suggests that not taking even a soft line on this will merely encourage North Korea – and Iran – to proceed?

Please also note that we are in a situation where two of the biggest current, active, and intractable threats to world peace are rogue nations simultaneously pursuing nuclear weapons and missile technology.  Successful creation of both will put at immediate risk our regional allies; allies that we have spent a lifetime cultivating; and who are genuinely alarmed at the activities of their neighbors.  And in both cases, the enemies of said rogue nations were picked for essentially irrational reasons, meaning that normal rules of deterrence may or may not work.

Meanwhile, President Obama wants to gut missile defense programs*.

Um, no.  That’s stupid.

Moe Lane

*Via FullosseousFlap’s Dental Blog, via Michelle Malkin.

Crossposted to Moe Lane.

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • djemi

    Distraction.

    China doesn’t want to discuss anything but national security with that group of Congress critters that are on a week long trip to talk about Climate Change, i.e Energy Costs, not to mention the not talking about human rights.

    As for a ‘press conference this morning’ MOE, not enough time to get any polling data, and it being a holiday and all, maybe by the middle of next week we’ll get that.

  • bk

     

  • Jack

    Now that the messiah has stamped his little feet and shaken his fist at his blackberry I guess everything is ok. I mean he has set up the US that by the end of his administration we will be nothing more then a third world lackey.

    We have a coward for a President.

  • red4ever

    That’s what we are calling it these days? What is the punishment? A timeout?

    You cannot negotiate with a crazy person. It only leads the crazy person to think he is not crazy and is right in his actions.

  • djemi

    What else can you say

  • red4ever

    Don’t forget the teleprompter probably got a long weekend too. So, the President has no idea what he is supposed to say.

  • Jack

    Nobama not just condemned the North Korean actions he “strongly” condemned them. I bet that made Kim wet his pants and dive under his bed.

  • ocleverone

    give North Korea the answer they need. He’s not going to do anything.

    He just will wait and “hope” for the best.

    I remember Reagan and the Achilles Largo incident – the action spoke.

  • johnt

    Axelrod is insulting Miss California, Emanuel is either stabbing a table or fixating on a radio personality, we’re in good hands.

    There had better be some adults in the back room somewhere, otherwise we are in trouble.

  • 6eorge Jetson

  • 6eorge Jetson


    Fife Security Agency

    Taken straight from a Google search for Barney Fife material.

  • 6eorge Jetson

  • Alberta

    And South Korea and Taiwan too. Let them act as a check on China. Id tell China that if they didnt get a controllable regime in NK then we will let their neighbours get the Bomb, period.

  • rbdwiggins
  • rbdwiggins

    an amendment to Japan’s constitution.

    Reply To This is my friend.

  • http://www.ssce.net/Web-Articles/Web-articles-indexed-authors.html#authors-l JLenardDetroit

    or atleast begin the discussion as pressure to Russia and China to get their s— together and get on NoKo.

  • red4ever

    I think that Amendment would sail through faster than porkulous.

  • red4ever

    your pics are fantastic. Thank you.

  • 6eorge Jetson


    Hope (left) and Change (right)

  • 6eorge Jetson
  • reaganiterepublicanresistance

    Somehow all the talk of how Kim is a crackpot eccentric, while Obama is portrayed as fatherly, all-knowing, and wise doesn’t quite square with reality when the “crackpot” is running circles around our flawless messiah.

    This is the same Obama that was apparently busy with his puppy-vetting process or playing basketball while the Russians where nabbing our Afghan supply air-base in Kyrgizstan.

    Obama is endangering our national security, a failure of his most primary duty as president… maybe we should draw a line here?

    Living in a celebrity-driven/liberal/MSM fantasy world is not a right of Obama supporters to cling-to indefinitely, as it’s both the voters and the press’ duty to make informed, good-faith decisions… not waste power making a hollow fashion statement instead.

    It’s rapidly getting to the point where this kind of willfully-ignorant “thinking” is not just irresponsible, but dangerous. Obamania’s sheeple are deeply delusional, and as Obama’s enablers, these fools are going to get us killed.

    http://reaganiterepublicanresistance.blogspot.com/

  • azletx

    Interesting article / editorial, that I agree with as to to whom is enabling North Korea’s nuclear program.

    If it weren’t for Beijing, Pyongyang would be impotent……..(more at Forbes)

    http://www.forbes.com/2009/05/25/kim-jong-il-nuclear-china-obama-hu-jintao-opinions-columnists-north-korea.html