« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

A graphic demonstration of the perils of a one-party state.

Elections have consequences.

Elections have consequences.

A failed state.

While its electoral history allows it some pretense to claiming a democratic system of government, its current one-party regime has resulted in crumbling infrastructures and drastic budget shortfalls. Its supposedly high-minded ruling caste keeps getting embroiled in scandal after scandal, ranging from ordinary corruption to substance abuse; their highest figures are especially notorious about violating their own (loudly-proclaimed) religious principles when it suits them. When faced with an increasingly-popular and populist movement drawing on a glorious revolutionary past, the regime seems alternatively derisive and frightened – but cannot seem to find an answer past the standard nonsense that everything is all right, despite the evidence of one’s eyes. And ruling above all is an already deeply unpopular leader whose own lackeys privately worry about how he can win a legitimate election.

All in all, the Massachusetts Democratic Party has seen better days.

Welcome to the joys of a one-party state.  It’s been a problem on the federal level for some time (All data via here):

  • Senator Edward M. Kennedy (D- MA): 40 years in Congress.
  • Senator John F. Kerry (D- MA): 25 years in Congress.
  • Representative John W. Olver (D – 01) : 18 years in Congress.
  • Representative Richard E. Neal (D – 02) : 21 years in Congress.
  • Representative James P. McGovern (D – 03): 13 years in Congress.
  • Representative Barney Frank (D – 04) : 29 years in Congress.
  • Representative Niki Tsongas (D – 05) : 2 years in Congress (replaced Democrat with 18 years in Congress).
  • Representative John Tierney (D – 06) : 13 years in Congress.
  • Representative Edward J. Markey (D – 07) : 33 years in Congress.
  • Representative Michael Capuano (D – 08) : 11 years in Congress.
  • Representative Stephen Lynch (D – 09) : 8 years in Congress (Replaced Democrat with 28 years in Congress).
  • Representative Bill Delahunt (D – 10): 13 years in Congress.

…yes, that list really does show that there hasn’t been a non-Democratic party Congressman* from Massachusetts for over a decade.  The state legislature’s even more dominated: the Democrats have had control of it for half a century – and frankly, it shows.  All of this used to be counterbalanced – sort of – by Massachusetts tend to elect Republican governors, but right now they have a liberal Democrat in office – and again: frankly, it shows.  From the above article:

Senate President Therese Murray said lawmakers were close to moving on several pieces of legislation but added that little could be done to prevent the type of corruption [former House Speaker Salvatore F.] DiMasi and [Senator Dianne] Wilkerson[**] are accused of. “It has always been against the law to use your office to line your pockets,” she said. “It’s just like dealing drugs. Everyone knows it’s against the law but they still deal drugs. Everyone knows it’s against the law to take money, but we’ve got two members – one from the House and one from the Senate – accused of doing that.”

Of course, what Senate President Murray avoided saying is that none of this would matter – as much – if times were good.  Generally speaking, the population will tolerate a certain amount of corruption in government if services are maintained and the populace isn’t suffering because of it.  Unfortunately for everybody, times aren’t good right now – and Massachusetts is facing an ongoing budgetary crisis of alarming proportions.  And the Democratic solution – tax hikes and relying on the government to keep bailing out them with ‘stimulus’ money – won’t work forever.  It’s an open question whether it’ll work for right now.

At this point somebody will undoubtedly point out that the Commonwealth of Massachusetts has largely brought this down upon themselves, thanks to their bad habit of electing too many Democrats.  This is true: they have, and until they stop electing too many Democrats, their problems will not abate.  But we can still use Massachusetts as the classic Bad Example:  this is what happens when you’re electing too many Democrats.

So don’t do that.

Moe Lane

*It’s also an impressively old, white male line up for a party that’s supposedly progressive-friendly, but that’s a different issue.

**The woman who got photoed literally stuffing bribe money down her bra.

Crossposted to Moe Lane.

COMMENTS

  • wolfgang

    If you want to see “1984″ style groupthink, or the object of the Apple Computer attacks in their Madison Avenue portrayal of the inflexible monolith IBM go to Massachussetts.
    Out of a group of a thousand Mass blood donors you will nof find one red Republican blood cell. They still live in a November 23rd, 1963 world, pining for the return of their fallen hero, despite the fact that over the years the scion of the family has a long history of having dead females suddenly appear on his doorstep and his protege in the neighboring state keeps getting readmitted to substance rehab.
    If its Liberal and Progressive in Massachussetts, its got to be good, no matter how bad it smells. Hold your nose and take your medicine!

  • smagar

    They wanted Democrats, and they got Democrats. If they’re willing to have their state decay into a cruddy place to live, as the price they must pay for having Democrats in charge…well, then they deserve what they get.

    In democracies, you suffer the consequences of the dumb choices you make at the polling place.

    Take your medicine, Massachusetts.

  • WarEagle01

    (AKA the P.R.M.) and not the US (yet) ;) I find it hard to imagine that anyone would ever actually choose to live in Mass nowadays, other than students. The same with NJ, CA, and MI. The taxes, the oppressive governments. Thank God we still have the right to live where we choose, for the time being. Of course if we continue to elect Democrats that right will disappear as well.

  • SharonR

    I have lived in Mass since 1967, when I decided to go to college here. I vote in every election and have never voted for a democrat. In fact, 40+% vote republican pretty much every time but the majority overrules every possible attempt to reform this sorry state. They voted for higher taxes by turning down the elimination of the sales tax. They over ruled the will of the people on gay marriage. We are one of the few states that allow petition from the people and then the legislature ignores the voters will. I have pretty much given up at this point. As a self employed independent contractor, my income has been reduced almost 60% and they still want more of my money to continue to give state employees the best benefits package money can buy and allowed to retire with a full pension after 20 years(in their 40′s) and then go back to work as a “consultant”. I have given up and as soon as I think I can sell my house, I am out of here. But with Obama, the ability to sell my house may be far downt he road.

  • 6eorge Jetson

    they bring their belief in the bottomless-pockets, something-for-nothing, government tooth fairy with them.

  • 6eorge Jetson
  • http://theminorityreportblog.com David Hinz

    that until I got to your second paragraph I was SURE you were pontificating on Iran?

  • bk

    Here’s a little story of some of your tax dollars at work.

  • 6eorge Jetson

    sorted by percentage of FY2009 general fund revenues

    State Budget Troubles Worsen (updated 5/18/09)

    California 33.50%
    Nevada 31.70%
    Arizona 29.80%
    New York 29.00%
    Illinois 24.70%
    Connecticut 23.70%
    Florida 22.60%
    Washington 22.60%
    Wisconsin 22.50%
    Louisiana 21.70%
    New Jersey 21.60%
    North Carolina 21.40%
    Vermont 20.80%
    Minnesota 18.30%
    Massachusetts 17.80%
    Pennsylvania 16.80%
    Kansas 16.70%
    New Hampshire 16.10%
    Delaware 15.30%
    Georgia 14.50%
    Idaho 13.90%
    Rhode Island 13.70%
    Colorado 13.00%
    Maryland 12.50%
    Iowa 12.20%
    Utah 12.10%
    Hawaii 11.90%
    South Carolina 10.50%
    District of Columbia 10.40%
    Virginia 10.40%
    Missouri 10.30%
    Mississippi 9.40%
    Oklahoma 9.20%
    Tennessee 9.00%
    Kentucky 8.80%
    Texas 7.60%
    Ohio 7.10%
    Michigan 6.90%
    Oregon* 6.60%
    Alabama 6.50%
    Maine 5.80%
    New Mexico 5.70%
    Indiana 5.50%
    West Virginia 5.10%
    Nebraska 4.30%
    Arkansas 3.20%
    South Dakota 2.70%

    *FY2009 number (FY2010 not available)

    Using that sophisticated statistical technique, the eyeball regression, one can easily spot the trend.

  • rbdwiggins

    Sen. Kay Hagan and Gov. Beverly Perdue are proof-positive of the desperate need to counter the infiltration of RTA by the progressives, and requires that many more conservatives relocate to North Carolina before we reach the point of no return.

  • lukematthews

    Such words could have been written about many cities as well. The technocrats in Minneapolis are also such a ruling class. We have a city that hasn’t had a Republican or Independent on the city council for decades. They have built a political machine with so much graft and where a majority of people a sucking on the teat of the city, that electing someone outside the machine is impossible. The opposition party here is the ‘Green’ party which is so socialistic and reactionary it could almost be a fascist party. I long for the day when I can sell my house and move to a democratic area. It is truly a sad state of affairs.

  • Achance

    a young lady lawyer. She stayed just long enough to get her name on some appearance lines to pump up her resume. She absolutely hated Alaska! We’re a pretty socialistic state if you’re at the bottom of the food chain, but unless you just choose to check out, you’re pretty much on your own; the place can be simply heartless in employment terms. She couldn’t stand it; though we were barbarous. We’d have a grievance where we had the guy dead to rights and she’d find something to blame the employer for and want to grant the grievance. Went so far a couple of times as to give it back to me and say I’d have to be the one to deny it.

    Don’t get me wrong, she was smart; gave good memo and all that. But bleeding heart liberal was just imprinted in her genes. So, after a little over a year she went back to Minneapolis, using the experience she got with us to double her salary. She got really twisted when I insisted that she repay the pro rata on what I spent to move her and her family up, but she grudgingly did it.

  • 1stRichard

    As I read your title I was thinking that has got to be Taxachusetts, the Marxist welfare state and yes it was. Those ?Republican governors?, they have clearly tainted the Republican Party here and anyone running against a Democrat knows what a constant reminder they are. How can the Republican Party win if we are constantly reminded if the past?

    As former Governor of Massachusetts Romney he was well known as absent Romney. He always had some other special interest and little interest in the individual. His move to reduce taxes was offset by calling them fees and resulted in bigger government to collect all those fees. Romney?s health care reform how ever well intended let socialist health care get a foot in the door. If we define success as getting legislation passed then Romney is as fiscally conservative as GW Bush. He was for abortion when he ran for governor and then said he was against abortion when he ran for President. How much can you trust someone that uses conservative values as a stepping stone?

    Former Governor Cellucci was fiscal conservative but anti gun and a social liberal. Former Governor Cellucci?s had pattern of naming close political allies to key jobs and not by qualification, one of his most controversial appointees was to Logan and Massport. In 1999, the major airlines at Logan and Massport were fined a total of $178,000 for at least 136 security violations over the previous two years. After some 52 warning of possible terrorist activity we had 9|11. American Flight 11 and United Flight 175 took off from Logan. Within an hour, they had been taken over by terrorists and flown into New York’s twin towers.

    It seems clear you can also use Taxachusetts, the Marxist welfare state to prove how a RINO?s will destroy the Republican Party.

    Welfare, it?s an old problem but what is new is the extra funding at a time we can least afford it. Taxachusetts the Marxist welfare state has a long history of welfare abuse but don?t talk about it or you will be called a racist. One of the local jokes here is what is the most confusing day in Holyoke MA ? Fathers Day. Yes, Holyoke MA was at the top of the list for best welfare. This list was also distributed in Puerto Rico but to the slums and crime ridden areas mostly according to those that immigrated here. A couple of my Puerto Rican friends showed me the list and detailed instruction on how to get the most welfare and where to apply. It was said to me several times that all this had been printed by the local government. Sadly they were sold the notion that the ?American Dream? was entitlement to welfare. I think every cabbage patch doll sold in Holyoke was collecting welfare and the media at the time was downplaying the abuse. Yes, cabbage patch dolls came with a birth certificate. Over the years the GOP here has done little to counter the notion that the ?American Dream? is welfare and still fear the ?Race Card?.

    From my perspective working in the mills of Holyoke I could see the children running up and down the back porches, changing their clothes before they entered the next apartment. It was obvious the welfare department was doing a check. I worked as a millwright so I knew more about the internal workings of the business then most. Back when competition from overseas first started there were many layoffs and the government gracefully expanded welfare and why Holyoke was so highly rated as best welfare. The mills that were trying so desperately to compete got the bill, more regulations and the labor unions obtained more leverage. Then came those that were fooled to believing the ?American Dream? was entitlement to welfare and about the time I was working the mills. The mill that I was working in and many others closed and moved because they could not afford to pay the taxes, the welfare.

    Holyoke Massachusetts was a city built on individual opportunities. Four and a half miles of canals and a dam were dug by pick and shovel. By the 1900s, Holyoke was one of the first planned industrial cities in the world to run on water power and it was named the queen of industrial cities. Holyoke Massachusetts was a city built on the true ?American Dream? and destroyed by a false ?American Dream?. Less then half of old Holyoke remains, it is burnt and rotting and a shame for all to see. This has been a corrupt and dreadful disease in parts of America for too long. Be it welfare to bailouts the cost of this path we are on destroys America and the ?American Dream?. Seems funny that the main stream media here won?t cover this story of Holyoke but it is a big story in Russia?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ugVknJjeWSY

    But there is more, this is known as the five college area that I am in, yes five indoctrination campuses in one small area. Worse is this is not only in the colleges it is also in grade school. In Northampton you can expect to see grade school field trips as a peace march in down town, Stop the War and Down with Bush signs in hand, and this is normal to us up here. And may I remind you that we do not have freedom of speech here as demonstrated by this?

    http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/12/unhinged-at-umass/

    From then to now many don?t realize how much Taxachusetts the Marxist welfare state has lost. We have had a mass exodus of productivity and jobs over many years. We have gone from manufacturing leaders to losers, we had one of the first planed industrial cities in the world to the first automobile manufacturer in the US, and it is all but gone. Springfield once provided the tooling to win a world war but now struggles with its own war on crime. Our jobs and livelihood is being driven out by Taxes, Regulations and Loss of Liberty. You are sadly mistaken if you think the residents of Taxachusetts the Marxist welfare state wants this, the real residents never had a chance.

  • 6eorge Jetson

    Party assigned by vote in 2008 Presidential Election

  • Swamp_Yankee

    Howie Carr is somethig of a conservative talk radio host. He is something of a treasure up here. He broke downs Mass hacks in a Herald articel:

    ?Disabled? hacks – Hackasaurus badbackus
    State House hacks – Hackasaurus felonious
    Lobbyist hacks – Hackasaurus parasitus
    Blue-ribbon hacks – Hackasaurus rubberstampus
    County hacks – Hackasaurus no-showus
    Green hacks – Hackasaurus moonbattus
    Courthouse hacks – Hackasaurus lifetimus
    Double-dipper hacks – Hackasaurus slurpus-trothus
    Milton hacks – Hackasaurus gubernatorius
    MBTA hacks – Hackasaurus sleep-at-wheelus
    Hack-ademics – Hackasaurus phony-jobus
    Community hacks – Hackasaurus bottom-feedus
    Globe hacks – Hackasaurus obsoletus

    You can read about them here:

    http://www.bostonherald.com/news/columnists/view.bg?&articleid=1177274&format=&page=1&listingType=col#articleFull

  • Achance

    that is usually understood to be less income than outflow, which deficit must be made up for by borrowing or program reductions. Because of the vagaries of oil revenue, for SFY 10 Alaska’s spending is predicted to be more than its predicted revenue based on $57/bbl. oil. Since Alaska has various savings accounts and forward funding scheme, the shortfall, should one actually materialize, is simply made up out of savings or by drawing on forward funding. (Forward funding is money appropriated to a function in excess of the projected current year need. That funding can either be drawn on in future years or reappropriated in a future budget.) In any event, if oil stays at current levels, we’ll have a revenue surplus in SFY 09 and 10, though investment losses may eat the surplus in terms of the State’s total asset value.

  • 6eorge Jetson

    The rightmost column on the chart is for Arkansas (AR) & SD got left off (2.7%).

    Alaska, Montana, Wyoming, and North Dakota (all RedStates) are projected to have surpluses in FY2010, according to the linked article.

  • GuyInSD

    Lest we forget that AZ only became a red state with the departure of Napalitano to DHS. Many in the state speculated that she was eager to leave to avoid voter wrath.

    Same can be said for KS — only recently becoming red after Sebelius left.

    As for LA, well, Jindal has some work to do…

  • The_Rebel

    It was the elimination of the income tax that they turned down last November, not the sales tax. Soon, these jokers will repay us for that vote by increasing the state income tax rate, just like they increased the sales tax rate by 25%.

    To use the words of Senate President Murray, “everyone knows it’s against” the principles of economics to tax your way out of a recession, but these legislators are too stupid to realize it. Unfortunately, our voters are also too stupid to effect change. I look for more of the same for a long time to come. Smagar has it right-we get the government that we deserve.

  • 6eorge Jetson

    While the classification of a few individual states could be debated, the presidential election result is a 100% objective and unambigous measure, And likely most ingrained in viewers minds. And easy to find.

    It’s not like I had to play with the classification scheme to produce the obvious, overwhelming result.

  • Achance

    so I just wanted to make sure.

  • Swamp_Yankee

    They are illegal alien destinaton spots.

  • mbecker908

    state for about five months.

  • TNJim

    The link to Michelle’s article also was icing on the cake.

    As far as calling taxes fees I’ve always thought like this:

    If the money goes to government, it is a tax. Be it a local, state, or federal “fee”, if a government entity is collecting it, it is a tax, no matter what the collectors of said fee want to call it. Permits of all types, water bills, regulatory fees, they’re all taxes if government is collecting it. I call my water bill a water tax, because I write my check to the city here. I get some funny looks sometimes when I call it that, but when I explain why most people say “Ohhh, I never thought of it that way.” Only then do they begin to realize just how much they really are taxed. Of course, the more left-leaning people want to argue that taxes have to be paid, fees don’t, to which I reply “You have to have water, don’t you?” I know, some people have wells, but around here anyway if a municipality extends their water service to your area you have to give up that well.

    Words mean things, and sometimes different words simply mean the same thing.

  • http://brockwayfamily.spaces.live.com/ Erick Brockway

    The mere proximity to California ruined my home state Arizona. Now I’m stuck in California trying to fight the seemingly hopeless “Lord of the Rings” final battle until time for the last strategic retreat to The Alamo in Texas.
    There is no educating these people, no waking them up. They’ll stand in quicksand convincing themselves it’s a sidewalk until it covers their heads.

  • IJB

    Nothing bad enough can happen to the voters of MA (and pretty much all of New England), NY, NJ, IL, CA, WA & OR that will ever satisfy me.

    But some real misery on their parts could at least bring a smile to my face…

  • Achance

    ’cause some of them might be brave or desperate enough to come here. Well, come to think of it, if they were brave enough to think of living here, they’d be long gone from most of the Blue states.

  • 1stRichard

    In some towns we have this ?pay as you throw? trash fee, sounds good in that you only pay for what you throw. But fist understand that such services were provided by the government by pooling the purchasing power of a community, a group discount of sorts. This was originally part of our property tax, everyone put there taxes in a ?big pot? to purchase some necessity. Well we had passed two and a half to limit huge tax increases but to get around this everything turned in to a flat rate fee. But now they are pushing this ?pay as you throw? fee and they claim it costs less. What happens is more government, yes trash police. Before it was simple, collect all the trash and here is one payment. With the ?pay as you throw? fee you must first buy a sticker or special bag, but this has to be made then purchased by the town, and then sold to the residents, then the town must handle thousands of individual transactions, and keep track of who is paying and who is not. Then the trash collectors must be supervised to follow all these lists of who paid what when. Well I could go on but this good ?pay as you throw? fee ended up costing three times what it should cost.

    Government fees are a bad, bad thing?.

  • http://impudent.blognation.us/blog kyle8

    Belittling my home in Texas. Our standard of living is much much better, our costs are much much lower, and our state services are better.

    Sure, there are a lot of us ignorant, redneck hicks, bible thumpers, gun nuts, and conservative mouth breathers, but, well, that is exactly why we are such a better place to live.

  • http://impudent.blognation.us/blog kyle8

    If we can get enough conservatives here to offset the Austinites and La Raza, we can just secede.

  • http://impudent.blognation.us/blog kyle8

    Texas is one of the better states and our illegal problem is certainly very very high, The difference is that the benefits we bestow on people for just breathing is much much less than in those other states. (and our tax environment does not discourage business.)

  • bobojake

    All Senators and Congressman who have been in Goverrnment dole work for 20 years should RESIGN in Shame for allowing the obama-ACORN dodd, frank housing scandal occur.
    Color kennedy, kerry, neal, frank and markey GONE.

  • ocleverone
  • molybdanthan

    We’d lose a few good ones, but that would be offset by the vast majority of bad eggs.

    However, the real problem with government isn’t the Congress. It’s the punch-card villains, the government’s union workers.

  • naraht

    There are only five states whose entire house delegation is Republican: Alaska, Delaware, Nebraska, Montana and Wyoming (and Nebraska is the only one with multiple districts). Of those Five States, Alaska and Nebraska have a split in the Senate and Delaware and Montana have two Democratic Senators, leaving the only state with their entire Congressional Delegation Democratic is Wyoming. And Wyoming has a Democratic Governor.

    Conversely for the Dems, there are Nine states whose entire house delegation is Democratic,New England, the Dakotas and Hawaii. Of those Nine, (if you count senators by where they caucus), South Dakota and New Hampshire have one Republican Senator and Maine has two, leaving Vermont(D+S), Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut(D+ID), North Dakota, and Hawaii with entirely Democratic (caucus) Congressional delegations. Vermont, Rhode Island, Connecticut, North Dakota and Hawaii have Republican Governors, leaving just Massachusetts with a Governor and the entire Congressional Delegation of one party.

  • naraht

    Should read

    …leaving the only state with their entire Congressional Delegation *Republican* is Wyoming.