« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Michael Williams examines the cap-and-trade bill.

Michael Williams, current Texas Railroad Commissioner* and candidate for Senate, is doing a multi-part survey of the Waxman-Markey cap-and-trade bill currently before Congress. He’s up to Part III (see also Part I & Part II, of course), and here’s what he’s hoping to accomplish with it:

Democrats in Congress, joined with the Obama administration, are proceeding along parallel tracks to impose CO2 regulations so sweeping as to become the most expensive and expansive environmental reach of government into the lives of American families, businesses and consumers in history.

In May, the House Energy and Commerce Committee approved the Waxman-Markey cap and trade bill that is designed to drastically reduce carbon dioxide emissions blamed for global warming. The full House could complete action on the bill within the next two weeks.

[snip]

The prospect for cap and trade is less certain in the Senate and the EPA, while poised to finalize its landmark finding, has not done so, yet. If enough Americans band together, we can still protect the American economy, jobs, and incomes from undue and unnecessary CO2 regulations.

Michael’s goal here is to walk people through the entire process: Part III for example defines terms and notes the expected costs/revenues that will result in this plan. He’s also providing a helpful household cost calculator from the Tax Foundation in every post that he’s doing on the subject. Michael’s been involved with Texas energy policy for over a decade now, and the information that he’s providing here should be helpful for people trying to fight off the attempt of Beverly Hills and North Boston to dictate how much electrical power the rest of the country gets.

It should also be helpful for people trying to decide who to support for the Senate seat, if/when Senator Hutchison vacates it this fall.

Moe Lane

*A job which these days has nothing to do with railroads, and pretty much everything to do with Texan oil and gas development – which is why it’s an elected position, and why he’s qualified to discuss energy policy.

Full disclosure: I am in regular contact with the Michael Williams campaign, and I endorse him as a replacement to Senator Hutchison, should she resign her Senate seat.

Crossposted to Moe Lane.

COMMENTS

  • izoneguy

    If you?re wondering what to tell your congressperson, here are some points* to bring up. The energy tax would:

    Reduce aggregate gross domestic product (GDP) by $9.6 trillion
    Destroy an average of 1-3 million jobs, every year
    Raise electricity rates 90 percent after adjusting for inflation
    Raise inflation-adjusted gasoline prices by 74 percent
    Raise residential natural gas prices by 55 percent
    Raise an average family?s annual energy bill by $1,500 annually
    Increase the federal debt by 26 percent, which is $29,150 per person

    Remember, we only have until tomorrow.

  • TxCon

    best candidate to replace KBH in the Senate. He is a true conservative. I hope my fellow Texas GOPers realize this when it comes time to cast our ballots.

  • izoneguy

    KBH needs to be put out to pasture.

  • jenest2001

    Your total household expense will go up an average of $200-$250 per month.

  • http://www.skiloveland.com lholsenbeck

    He is a great candidate that even makes Cornyn seem mushy at times.

    I know many ask here about donating for this or that candidate and Micheal definitely deserves that same attenttion.

    I served in the railroad commission under grandma streyhorn. if williams was the commish, i’d probably still be there.

  • izoneguy

    So much for that tax break for 95% of all Americans??

    It might be worth the extra expense to see the democrats in Congress get voted out in droves and thus making Obama the impotent ruler after Nov 4, 2010.

  • jenest2001

    Just think of all the stuff people won’t be able to buy, further draining our economy. Toss in the loss of the mortgage tax credit and a tax on your healthcare benefits, and it is closer to $350 a month in additional household expense. The only way to get people to understand what they are facing is by drilling what it is actually going to cost them into their heads. I personally don’t want to be paying $350 more per month to knock the D’s out on their heads.

    Language in the bill transfers the billions in US carbon taxes collected to the UN after 2025.

  • rmullins

    He will get my vote. I’ve voting for him as chairman of the Texas Railroad commision(I thought they changed the name recently).

  • rmullins

    He will get my vote. I’ve voting for him as chairman of the Texas Railroad commision(I thought they changed the name recently).

  • earthmover

    HR 2454 plans for massive (pg 958) employment as a result of the provisions of the bill and plans for those newly unemployed to be unable to find jobs for three years (pg 973). It also plans for the resultant unemployment and decreased wages having adverse effects on the Social Security and Medicare trust funds, but they will prop up the trust funds to the levels they would have been without HR 2454 (Pgs 1026-7).

    They know darn well that HR 2454 will decimate our economy. This bill must be stopped.

  • larueladue

    Why on earth are they this suicidal???? And determined to take us down with them?

    I just don’t get it… I don’t see how these people even make to the office, they are just that disfunctional and warped… They need to go play in traffiice or something….