« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

A thought regarding the 2010 elections (House edition).

Just on the off chance that somebody out there is still not on-board with the notion of taking back the House, please contemplate the table below:

Committee Chair Born Age Elected
Ways & Means Charles Rangel 1930 79 1970
Appropriations David Obey 1938 70 1969
Energy & Commerce Henry Waxman 1939 69 1975
Rules Louise Slaughter 1929 79 1987
Financial Services Barney Frank 1940 69 1981
Judiciary John Conyers 1929 80 1965

Those are, generally speaking, the six most powerful committees in the House of Representatives – and if you’ll note carefully, you’ll see that the chairs of them that aren’t pushing seventy are the ones who are pushing eighty* (the average age of Representatives in the 111th Congress is 57).  You’ll also note that the least amount of time-in-Congress for any of them is twenty-eight years; in fact, all but two of them have been in Congress for longer than I’ve been alive, and I’ll be forty next year.  This is not really unexpected (except, of course, by people silly enough to believe that Democratic control of Congress meant a “fresh start,” or some other nonsense): seniority counts for a lot in determining committee assignments.  So what?

‘So what’ is that each one of these Members of Congress personally remember the shock and horror of 1995, when the Republicans took control of the House for the first time since the 1950s.  Most of them had been in office for at least two decades by then (one for three), and all of them must have been accustomed to the notion that Democratic control of Congress was simply one of those things that existed.  To have it suddenly go away - while leaving them secure in their own seats – was probably a very traumatic experience.  But they kept on, moved up the internal party seniority ladder; and now that the Democrats are in control again, they are in positions of authority, with the power to bind and to loose.  Getting there was grueling, though, and they are old.  They have the prize that they seek, but they are old.

What do you think will happen if we take that prize away from them?

Again?

I don’t know either – but I know some people who are as eager to find out as I am.  Not that they can do it on their own.

Moe Lane

*No, it’s not actually important for the purposes of discussion how old their replacements would be on the GOP side: I haven’t even bothered to look it up.  Focus.

Crossposted to Moe Lane.

COMMENTS

  • bobojake

    20 years combine House and Senate will stop the Mafia style elcrapo that is going on. This is true for all elected officials in Washington DC.
    Kerry, Schummmmmmmmmmmmer, Kennedy, Hatch, Mccain, Reid, peloski, color them gone.

  • paulincolo

    to remember, the state legislators. These will be the people responsible for the partitioning of congressional districts after the census and 2010 election. It is imperative we have as many republican state legislatures that we can get. Otherwise, the dems will continue to have the gerrymandered advantage for congress.

    Work, work, work, volunteer, volunteer, volunteer, support, support, support.

  • Aaron Gardner
  • clement

    For instance, Louise Slaughter has downtown Buffalo and downtown Rochester and not much in between for her district. That is one of those battles that would be nearly impossible to flip.

  • http://janicecantore.com Janice Cantore

    is eactly what you have stated, that the congress flip back in 2010 but only because I would LOVE to see queen nancy have to give up her speakership. Not enough botox in the world to fix her pinched face after that

  • http://impudent.blognation.us/blog kyle8

    He has never shied away from the worse sort to name calling and race baiting. And he is fairly close to being a Bolshevik on policy matters.

  • IJB

    There was a Congress, I don’t remember which one, that actually saw a slew of deaths throughout the term, enough that the control of the House actually flipped from one party to the other.

    Obviously, there’s aren’t enough oldster Democrats to overcome a 30-seat hole.

    But looking at the ages of these guys, you’ve got to figure that some of them aren’t long for this world. (For example, Waxman was taken to the hospital just *today*.) When you look at that, and then the illnesses that have already altered the terms in the Senate, you have to wonder how much issues with age are actually going to handicap the Dem agenda over the next 18 months.

    My guess is that it will not be an insignificant factor…

  • JoeG

    Then we will add a R seat even though it’s a D state.

    They have very carefully crafted lines to lump as many Rs in one district to make the other 4 safe D. No way can they do it for 5 of 6, so I suspect they’ll keep the 4 safe Ds.

    What would be nice is if we could win the House, Senate and Goobner so that we could split them 3/3

  • scarlos

    where something like 8 Republicans died between the November elections and the start of the session, which flipped control to the Dems.

  • http://impudent.blognation.us/blog kyle8

    but if something like that happened now in days the conspiracy theories would be off the wall.

    Of course I suppose that it is possible that it was a conspiracy.

  • pharos

    Great observation with this post, but next time, could you perhaps leave the person’s actual age out of the table?

    It was unsettling to see the words “Barney Frank” and “69″ in such close conjunction to one another .

  • Russ Martin

    How about 12. No retirement. No health care. And they must return to live in their district with their former constituents. This would solve a HUGE percentage of problems in this country.

  • bk