« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Lieberman looking for baby steps on health care.

Vicious revenge optional. Fun, but optional.

There’s not much that I can add to this…

Lieberman says many health care changes can wait

WASHINGTON – An independent senator counted on by Democrats in the health care debate showed signs of wavering Sunday when he urged President Barack Obama to postpone many of his initiatives because of the economic downturn.

“I’m afraid we’ve got to think about putting a lot of that off until the economy’s out of recession,” said Connecticut Sen. Joe Lieberman. “There’s no reason we have to do it all now, but we do have to get started. And I think the place to start is cost health delivery reform and insurance market reforms.”

…except to note three things:

  1. Sen. Lieberman’s not, strictly speaking, against health care rationing per se; he’s just worried about what will happen to the Democrats and this administration if the House leadership keeps screaming-and-leaping on the issue.  Which is a very reasonable worry, but it’s not a particularly conservative-friendly one.
  2. That being said: if ‘health delivery reform and insurance market reforms*’ can be extended to include Rep. Shadegg’s (R) ‘allowing customers to buy personal insurance across state lines‘ and Rep. Ryan’s ‘meaningful tort reform” (neither are negotiable, of course)… sure, those two features are excellent things with which to assemble a workable health care bill around.  A pity that House Democrats didn’t think things through from the start, but that’s life.
  3. I imagine that not a few members of the netroots ground their teeth at the sight of, once again, Senator Lieberman… actually, that sentence works just fine as is.

Moe Lane

PS: I’m wrong: there was a fourth thing.  There was another Democratic Senator on that panel with Lieberman, and that Senator had a prime opportunity to stand up for progressives, liberals, and everybody else in favor of health care rationing. But because that Senator was Ben Cardin, he instead fell all over himself to both agree with Lieberman, and to keep repeating the same line about cutting costs at every possible opportunity.

No surprises, in other words.

*There’s a bit of uncertainty on what those two things mean, actually.

Crossposted to Moe Lane.

COMMENTS

  • http://charlemagne-the-hammer.blogspot.com/ DerKrieger

    send the man a Constitution and ask him where the federal government has the authority to create an Obamacare or any manifestation thereof. These people need to be reminded of the legal, Constitutional limits on federal power and why those limits exist. They can’t simply do whatever the heck they want.

    If we can’t box them in with the Constitution then we all know they will simply regroup and keep moving their Progressive agenda forward. They’re absolutely relentless in their drive for total government control of everything and if we can’t make solid arguments as to why they can’t do what they want to do then their strategy of incrementalism will continue apace inexorably consuming all liberties in their path.

  • http://www.nighttwister.com NightTwister

    Lieberman is worth much more to us caucusing with the Democrats than he ever would be caucusing with us. Not to mention that fact that it has great entertainment value as well.

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    90% of the time we don’t notice him.
    10% of the time we feel great.

    If he came to us…

    90% of the time we’d be infuriated at him
    10% of the time we wouldn’t notice him

  • roylofquist

    I’ve been following Lieberman for many years. When I lived in Connecticut he was the Attorney General. He has always been somewhat liberal, and a bit fuzzy, about economic principles but so is 90% of his constituency.

    He is a man of high integrity and good humor. You can’t ask for any better as an opponent. Reminds me very much of Daniel Moynihan.

  • beanerecmo

    No universal healthcare; not now, not ever. Fix Medicare/Medicaid now. Our government has done such an outstanding job of managing Social Security, Medicare/Medicaid, Fanny/Freddie, USPS, energy, TARP, Cash for Clunkers, etc., we should give the government dominion over everything. There is insurance for people with pre-existing conditions. Is it expensive; yes, it’s higher risk. It’s just like auto insurance and homeowners insurance; the higher the risk the higher the premium; you make the decision. The insurance companies, big pharma, AMA, etc. are in cahoots with BHO, and they are going to be making the money for Reid, Pelosi, Axelrod et al. Co-ops are just another name for the public option, which is no option when policies must be converted to government run insurance ‘option’ after 5 years.

  • Marcus_Traianus

    I suppose, in a huge leap of logic, that means every once and a while you vote for proposals from BOTH sides. Otherwise the whole image of being, mmm, a free thinker, absent political philosophy or party ties becomes a bit opaque.

    I know this is really hard for Joe and I sympathize with his vexing and heart pangs, NOT.