« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

‘The front fell off.’

I’d like you to test your ability to detect something. Watch this video (via Dan Riehl):

Quick: at what point did you realize that it was a comedy routine? If the answer is anything except “I didn’t realize that it was a fake,” congratulations: you passed. Although if you didn’t pass, don’t worry: it’s very well done. The giveaway is simply that news interviews typically do not demonstrate the same kind of rapid-fire banter that is more properly associated with stand-up comedians. But that’s kind of subtle, so there’s no shame in not catching on right away.

On the other hand: if you take the opportunity to use it as an chance to do some Palin-bashing and not check it out first… well. Then you’re as dumb as Andy Sullivan, and there’s just no help for you.

Moe Lane

Crossposted to Moe Lane.

COMMENTS

  • RJD

    nt

  • The_Gadfly

    ‘know’ in the sufficient to convict for murder in a court of law sense, or ‘know’ in the something fishy might be going here and I should pay sufficient attention so I don’t look foolish sense?

    In order:
    1. Never, philosophers have never been able to know any positive facts.
    2. About 17 seconds into the video I was prepared to convict with minimal deliberation.
    3. Hairs on the back of my neck went up at “you mean where the front fell off” although just being posted by you is sufficient to be watchful.

  • VinceP1974

    It’s done just in this style… something I saw a a year ago or so… it’s hilarious