To evoke Terry Pratchett, what I’m going to be looking for is a candidate who I think will actively try to ensure that tomorrow is going to be pretty much like today.
Liz Cheney (via Gateway Pundit) has some thoughts about whatever person we stick with the 2012 cleanup job is in for:
I’m personally not all that interested in talking 2012 until we’re done with 2010, but if I had to make a decision right now I’m going to take the position that ‘boring’ would be a nice default quality to have in our next candidate. So does ‘dull:’ it’s been just over a year since we started to live in interesting times, and I’m pretty much done with the sensation, thanks.
Moe Lane
Crossposted to Moe Lane.
Depends what the definition of boring is.
redneck_hippie Sunday, November 15th at 3:43PM EST (link)If it’s McCain boring, no thanks. I actually agree with your post. I’m sure that most here would find a conservative candidate anything but boring or dull. I just typed a comment stating the case against groupies being the determining factor in elections.
“We must not lose our faculty to dare, especially in dark days.” - Churchill in March, 1942.
Remember NY-23.
I think she means Pawlenty boring
redtillimdead Sunday, November 15th at 5:03PM EST (link)No superstar quality, but can keep you interested.
Nancy Pelosi can kiss my asstroturf.