Via Instapundit, ‘Agencies stiff-arm GAO on info’:
The investigative arm of Congress has been denied information repeatedly by various government agencies, indefinitely delaying lawmaker-requested probes, according to a letter obtained by The Hill.
The State Department, for example, initially balked at giving the Government Accountability Office (GAO) a list of sex offenders. Senate Finance Committee leaders asked GAO for a study on how many passport holders have not paid their federal taxes…
This really isn’t too surprising: I imagine that most members of this administration have passports.
…or are registered sex offenders.
I take the high road.
This is the usual legislative-versus-executive turf war, of course – it seems to be centered around Senator Grassley (R-NE), who gets awesomely cranky about any administration trying to give him and his (in this case, the GAO) the mushroom treatment on information requests. As you might have noticed from the Democrats being quoted, it’s also a bipartisan turf war: having folks like Rep. Waxman support Grassley and the GAO on this is a very unsubtle hint for the Executive branch. When they get quoted on the record and with their names attached, it’s a sign that they don’t care whether or not you’re going to be upset about it. This is a particularly foolish turf war for the White House to get into, but also an unsurprising one: discipline is… lacking… in the executive branch these days. Too many czars, too much confusion in chains of command, not enough oversight.
And may I say how refreshing it is to be in a new administration that has such a commitment to openness and transparency? Yes, sarcasm:
Even though President Barack Obama has vowed that the U.S. government will become more transparent, some officials interviewed for this article say that his administration has not given much more information to GAO than George W. Bush’s did[.]
That’s Beltwayese for “We had three days of posturing for the cameras, then it was back to business as usual – only more so.” Just to be helpful about it.
Moe Lane
Crossposted to Moe Lane.
Jeff Emanuel
Neil Stevens
I can understand them balking at the request
Michael Dugas (Diary) Wednesday, November 18th at 11:08AM EDT (link)for how many passport holders haven’t payed their taxes given the large number of Democrat legislators that will probably be on that list.
Intro to Federalist Papers; section 5;
paragraph 4.
“…dangerous ambition more often lurks behind the specious mask of zeal for the rights of the people than under the zeal for a firm and efficient government.”
Remember: A Citizen on the dole is a Liberal Vote at the Polls.
END ENTITLEMENTS!
Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum !
Visas, Passports and the Law
spinoneone Wednesday, November 18th at 11:23AM EDT (link)On which “sex offenders” does the Congress want information? State Department employees? U.S. citizen passport holders? Foreigners who apply for or have visas? Does current U.S. law prevent a convicted felon from getting a passport? I don’t think so. If the Congress wants one it just has to do the deed. Convicted felons from abroad are ineligible for a visa, so what’s the beef?
Taxpayers can’t be denied a passport without a court order. IRS can’t share information on individuals with other agencies of the USG without a court order. If Congress wants to require IRS approval for a passport, what are the rules?
Citizens who live abroad are citizens too, with rights of privacy
jackhammer Wednesday, November 18th at 11:40AM EDT (link)There are lots of US citizens who live abroad, and many who have done so for a large part of their lives in countries with higher tax rates than america has. The AMT means that many of us have to pay a couple of thousand dollars a year (on top of 46% income tax rates already paid) just to hold my US Passport.
There are lots of people who have this passport and have never lived in America,a nd have never earned money there and are not really aware that they still have to file a tax return.
Just to be clear, my type also doesn’t really have a home state, so can’t vote anywhere, except for the president. So is one vote every 4 years really the sort of representation that justifies the tax liability.
There should be a tax filing for peopel who live and work abroad, but there should be no AMT tax liability for people who pay a rate fo tax equal to or higher than what it would be in the USA.
I'm not even sure if I can vote for the president
jackhammer Wednesday, November 18th at 11:46AM EDT (link)I never have voted, because I don’t have a home state (the only one I could claim is so solidly democrat it woudl be a waste of time (MA)), and never really figured out how to even register if I wanted to.
so without a home state, I don’t even think I can vote for the president, so I can’t vote, why am I paying the taxes?