« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Do we need an investigation into the Massa/Hoyer thing?

Full disclosure: I regret Eric Massa’s resignation solely because I was looking forward to seeing his concession speech on Election Night, seeing as he’s an opportunistic progressive sycophant who last year spouted off bizarre nonsense about ‘treason’ to other progressives equally ignorant of the Constitution. Michelle Malkin has two posts nicely summarizing precisely why embracing this guy is a poor life choice for conservatives; my only change is that I prefer the term ‘suckweasel.’  Less likely to get caught by web-blocker software.

All that being said, this sounds like an allegation:

Massa slammed House Maj. Leader Steny Hoyer for discussing a House ethics committee inquiry, accusing Hoyer of lying in an effort to eliminate an opponent of health care. Hoyer said last week he heard in early Feb. about allegations against Massa, and that he told Massa’s office to report the allegations to the ethics committee.

“Steny Hoyer has never said a single word to me at all, never, not once,” Massa said. “Never before in the history of the House of Representatives has a sitting leader of the Democratic Party discussed allegations of House investigations publicly, before findings of fact. Ever.”

Somebody is lying, here.  Either Massa, or Hoyer: and if it’s Hoyer, it doesn’t matter whether Massa was or was not sexually harassing his staff.  The House Majority Leader does not get to abuse the public trust by lying about what he did in a particular investigation.  It’s not so much this specific case as it is what happens in less public ones.  There’s a word for having two standards of behavior, based on how much media coverage one is expecting: it’s called ‘hypocrisy.’

Fortunately, this is easy to check: all Steny Hoyer has to do is release the documentation showing that he followed House procedures with regard to ethics investigations.  Presumably, that includes the kind of notification that he claims and Massa denies, and will stop this potentially disquieting development cold.  In fact, I’m kind of surprised that it’s not available yet; which is something that can be fixed, later…

By the way: did you know that Hoyer has a GOP challenger this year?  Charles LollarWe’ve talked: good guy, solid fiscal conservative, and if I lived just a little bit east of where I live now I’d be voting for him in both the primary and the general election.

Moe Lane

Crossposted to Moe Lane.

COMMENTS

  • karenlee

    Beck will interview Massa for a full hour this evening at 5PM EST.

  • antisocial

    Since we are spectators this should be fun.

  • Ausonius

    toward a man!

    I can see, therefore, how Massa would find it hard to focus on politics in the locker room. :)

  • antisocial

    Mock. Ridicule. Sneer. Snark. Derision. Jeer. Condescension. Laugh. Smile. Wink.

    This IS FUN.

  • majorkong

    We won’t know without an investigation. If there was a violation why should an individual be allowed to simply resign and walk away? If it is an unfounded allegation we need to know that too. Unfounded allegations which serve to remove duly elected representatives undermines the democratic process and nullifies the will of the governed. There must be an investigation.

  • joayn

    While I disagree with his opinion that Massa has conned conservatives (Beck, Limbaugh and Drudge), the rest of the article is pretty much right-on. The guy’s a crapweasle.

    “And so it is that Eric Massa, who fled the Congress out of fear of what Ethics Committee investigators would find out about him, has wrapped himself in the robes of a patriot martyr.”

    http://www.boblonsberry.com/writings.cfm?go=4

    Then, read “WHAT I HAVE KNOWN ABOUT ERIC MASSA” – from Lonsberry’s blog. Wowee.

    http://www.boblonsberry.com/writings.cfm?story=2823&go=4

    After reading this, I tend to believe Steny Hoyer’s account (as much as I can believe any fool Democrat).

    The real issue for an investigation should be Hoyer discussing the specifics of the allegations which should be kept confidential/private until resolution of the investigation occurs. Even crapweasles deserve “innocent until proven guilty” … or something.

  • http://www.dcworksforus.com Kenny Solomon

    Something’s bugging me and I figured out what………

    My gut feeling smell test reaction is that this is another staged distraction from the administration – a total set up.

    I can’t get past that he’s been basically a leftist slug and all of a sudden he’s got honor for an almost nothing event ?

    Why ?

  • Whitesands

    I don’t expect the guy on TV to lay out the smoking gun but he is either smoking pot or a plant with the calling names comment. There is one thing Americans can take away from this. The federal government is incapable of micro management of the economy and above all health care. Instead of distributing wealth distribute power back to the states and then to the locality’s. It is scary that these people are in Congress.
    .

  • Sundayjack

    Pro: Glenn Beck recognized that Eric Massa blew through and hour of air time and said absolutely nothing useful.

    Con: It took Beck 45 minutes before he realized how awful his show was this evening, and too late to do anything about it.

    I would have enjoyed it if he stopped 15 minutes into the show, announced that he wasn’t going to waste his audience’s time any longer, and then tossed Massa off the set.

    I had no high hopes, so this wasn’t a letdown. Still. . . .

  • Scope

    Beck wants so much to uncover actual crime, and, he wants someone, anyone in Congress that is willing to name names, and, give actual instances. It was pretty obvious that Massa was using his time on Beck to try to say, whatever comes out, I didn’t do it. What a piece of horse manure. It’s obvious he is protecting “his party.” I can’t even imagine what Beck is going to have to say tomorrow, especially when he had a tiff with Malkin today about having this piece of crap on his show.

  • http://www.veronicaestrada.com/ Veronica Estrada

    And Messa bombed his show.

    He deserved every point drop in ratings after this.

    To gamble your integrity, fight a strong voice of conservativism for what turned out ot be a sham.

    You should be able to find the broadcast here eventually:
    http://www.therightscoop.com/

    Something I wrote about it here (shameless plug):
    http://veronicaestrada.com/blog/2010/03/09/glenns-integrity-in-question-is-conservativism-just-another-now-controversy/

  • merryj1

    And, Beck apologized to his audience for wasting their time.

    As far as I’m concerned, Beck handled it as well as anyone could have (although I have no idea about a dispute with Malkin – if she tried to warn him off being “suckered in” by Massa, I think he did the right thing by sticking with his own instincts even though it turned out there was no “there” there).

    Beck must’ve had a solid reason to believe the interview would produce facts; he did a telephone pre-interview, and thought Massa had something substantial to say. That suggests, to me, that Massa had second thoughts between yesterday and this afternoon — whether due to his own reconsideration, or due to a little nudge (“If ya ever wanna see da wife ‘n kids again…”) from a 312 area-code phone call, I have no idea.

    In any event, thumbs down on any “profile in courage” award for the former congressman.

  • Scope

    between yesterday and today. Was Beck asking him to put his life/family on the line? I don’t know. From other info, I think the guy is a total jerk. He had to have said something to Beck on the phone yesterday to lead Beck to believe that he could out something.

    As to the Beck/Malkin radio spot today, the transcript has to be available either on Beck’s website, or Malkins.