« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

In an ideal world, this post would start a duel.

Because in an ideal world a man would rather be *killed* or *die* than tolerate being called a would-be Communist apparatchik.

[UPDATE] I’m fronting this because I just read the letter – also, did you know that the courts have just ruled that “the government has no anti-corruption interest in limiting contributions to an independent expenditure group”?  Translation: a group that wants to simply let people know , say, that Henry Waxman and Bart Stupak aspire to the level of East German rubberstamp apparatchiks can now spend as much money as they like to do so.

Hint, hint.

It seems that Volkskammer Energy Chair Henry Waxman will be investigating various capitalist entities for right-deviationism, sabotage, creeping defeatism, and of course general counter-revolutionary behavior*:

Perhaps that explains why the Administration is now so touchy. Commerce Secretary Gary Locke took to the White House blog to write that while ObamaCare is great for business, “In the last few days, though, we have seen a couple of companies imply that reform will raise costs for them.” In a Thursday interview on CNBC, Mr. Locke said “for them to come out, I think is premature and irresponsible.”

Meanwhile, Henry Waxman and House Democrats announced yesterday that they will haul these companies in for an April 21 hearing because their judgment “appears to conflict with independent analyses, which show that the new law will expand coverage and bring down costs.”

In other words, shoot the messenger. Black-letter financial accounting rules require that corporations immediately restate their earnings to reflect the present value of their long-term health liabilities, including a higher tax burden. Should these companies have played chicken with the Securities and Exchange Commission to avoid this politically inconvenient reality? Democrats don’t like what their bill is doing in the real world, so they now want to intimidate CEOs into keeping quiet.

No doubt the crypto-fascist wreckers on the Wall Street Journal‘s editorial board (and the capitalist running dogs of The National Review) will be the next brought in to answer to Parliamentarian Waxman, and his fellow-agents of the righteous anger of the People.

Moe Lane

PS: Hey, the Democrats can stop acting like this any time that they like.  Then I can stop, too.

*Otherwise known as ‘large companies required to announce large, immediate losses via increased taxation as a direct result of the new health care legislation.’  Why, the nerve of those… those… those capitalist stooges, and their primitive devotion to bourgeois truth and the technical letter of the law!

Crossposted to Moe Lane.

COMMENTS

  • EagleWatcher

  • http://www.hopeychangemas.com VizBiz
  • weatherford

    Some of us have been wasting time fretting over the O’s sell-out to Putin in gutting our nuclear detterent. (And hoping the WH would be dumb enough to submit to Senate treaty procedures.)

    I guess not. His boot-licking Oneness is going for the gold, it appears.

    We really have work to do now — facing our own civic club types, Mitch, and McCain — all in likely concert with the WH and at once.

    Obama, as feared, knows his rule cannot continue past November unless the illegals are incorporated in the electorate.

    J.D. Hayworth will arrive too late.

    We have a real problem that reduces the arms treaty to relative insignificance. If Obama is not crippled in November and is allowed to hijack our country with the aid of foreigners, we are are going to be in nightmare instead of the American dream.

    Is it possible Fox is wrong? Are there any democrats who will help us defend our heritage?

  • mschmitt
  • wbf

    I think I read that at Newsmax. I wondered if it could be true. Graham said the senators would be risk averse to the Immigration Bill. He challenged Obama to write the bill himself and try to pass it in the House.

  • jdw4america

    He better mean that the Repubs in the Senate are going to fight it as long as they have breath. Otherwise, those of us who vote might be risk adverse to re-electing them

  • SteveLA

    Moe

    And when business run the numbers and determine that it’s cheaper to pay the fines than provide health care, what will happen then? How will Liberals blame that turn of events on Bush?

  • SteveLA

    JD is in negotiations with a Chinese company to supply all the trucks for his “Round them up, send them home”, immigration plan. I wonder if he’ll get a special deal and get the uniforms and badges along with the trucks for one special price?

    Snark OFF

  • izoneguy

    Obama is acting like a dictator. Perhaps the republican opposition is finally & fully awake. They had better understand that Obama will have to try to ram everything he can from now until November.
    This will be the siege on America. They better Gird their Loins.

  • usadying

    Stupak’s committee, too. Not only did he sell his soul (If he had one), but he has been elevated to Newspeak enforcer.

  • izoneguy

    Will be SOL….

    They will have to go into the govt. pool…..
    I hope they can swim. And if you have a family…
    Well, hell – you might have to get a 2nd job to pay for
    your O care…..or get fined…..have no insurance at that point
    and get run over by a truck? Who pays then? The govt.? Good
    luck suing the govt. pal.

    Hmmmmm, that evil capitalist health insurance does not look so bad heh????

  • renny

    Have they been issued subpoenas?

    Gandhi fought the entire British Empire by simply not complying. Do you think little o or Holder is going to haul in the head of AT&T or John Deere in handcuffs?

  • weatherford

    A so-called knowledgable source on the Hill, just told me we dont have the votes in the Senate — at least not yet. I pray she is wrong.

    Blanche Lincoln probably could save herself on this one. If so, any port in a storm.

  • Scope

    can only prove his “manliness” by “demanding” appearances from CEO’s of major companies. They have called the Oil Co. execs., Toyota execs., and any others they must squelch. Where in the law does it demand that these people must comply? Isn’t it time that these companies start sending their attorney’s, and to question the legality, and purpose, of the marxists? Why do these companies comply, when they know they have the American people behind them?

    Please will someone explain to me why/where these Congress goons have the authority to do this.

  • http://pocketchangeproductions.net/ anotherindyfilmguy

    if the O thought it would score a few extra political points etc he just might… except that would take some spine to issue the order… so Rahmbo would probably have to issue the order…

  • http://pocketchangeproductions.net/ anotherindyfilmguy

    and their stock plummets and they can’t sell more stock to raise more capital and/or have less for capital reinvestment does this mean that people working for those companies are going to lose their jobs at a higher rate?

    Just asking… It doesn’t matter much since they all get their share of Obamamoney later on right?

  • avgjo

    Repeat.

  • Scope

    and sent it to the O for his opinions. O supposedly liked what he saw. Gramnesty said that if Obamacare passed, he would not support the amnesty legislation. Righto Lindseo. Now, he is backing away from the immigration legislation, that he backed, supposedly. McCain won’t back the tough illegal legislation, about to be passed, by the AZ legislature, in his own campaign in AZ. They never quit, they never give up, they never stop reaching across the aisle to support the Progressives. They are Progressive, big government Republicans. They have a big target on them in November, whichever November it takes to remove them.

    My fondest dream is to send McCain packing. He is the disease that has ruined the Republican brand.

  • Xasteius

    It just like the 90s when they called in Microsoft (according to Goldberg). Most of these cowardly Congresscritters are just tickled to death that they can exercise this power over their superiors (mentally and morally).

    I’ve got to quit now; I’d get banned otherwise.

  • pilgrim

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NelBNtNm8l0

  • Scope

    OK fine. But your comment implies that illegal immigration, amnesty, should be the law of the land. Living in CA, which I suppose you do, from your posting name, you should know better. Haven’t the illegals more than contributed to the budget woes in your state?

  • Swamp_Yankee

    The altervative and consevative media should do to these hearing what the MSM did to HUAC. We shouldnt take this lightly. We should embrace it and report it to the world, and we should use Cold War communism nomenclature.

    The persecution of administration critics should be outed, exposed and the Dems should drown in the backlash.

  • jdw4america

    I hope everyone of the businessmen they are threatening with these obvious goose-stepping games looks them straight in the eye and spits. Put them on the defensive. Tell ‘em – we don’t play with monopoly money you morons, we pay our bills with real dollars. Maybe if you goons got real jobs you’d understand how the economy works!

  • http://moelane.com/ Moe Lane

    …trying to bully companies out of obeying the law?

  • dsmurf

    the equities rally on Monday, March 29, 2010, if I’m wrong like the professionals I’ve been reading up til now, so what?
    But if the rally does end Monday, the Unions will be demanding that the House vote against this shiznet after they voted for it.
    Remember, some of this crap was pushed because the Unions pensions looked like dog du-du after the bear market bottom and they needed to shore up their health bennies. So another down leg that takes out last March’s low will make them scream like _______________ .

  • loupgarou1317

    She has already hurt her chances too much with the “health care” vote, if she votes for this she will have to move out of state after November!

  • loupgarou1317

    downward they will be crying about the eeeevvviiiillll conservatives and their bully tactics causing them to loose money…

  • Jack_Savage

    The more the corporate worls allows itself to get pushed around, the more they deserve it.

    It’s about time they grew some stones and put Waxman and these idiots in their place. First of all, they should ask how they know so much about business and accounting practices when none of them have worked a day in their lives.

  • Scope

    It is about nostrils Waxman, the commie.

  • earlgrey

    I have been fuming for over a year now. Clearly I dont’ see things the way the average Joe sees them.

    These guys are laughable in their absurd thinking and frightening in their reckless abuse of power. When do the “folks’ start to wake up.

    They got their way, and now they are whining because they don’t like the way it turned out. This sounds eerily familiar . . .oh that’s right it is like dealing wtih a 4 year old. Of course I like to think my 4 yr old is smarter.

  • dsmurf

    about unions actually helping to repeal Obamacare,

    Consider what the admin did to the anti green jobs report from Spain by squelching that and continue to pursue their way of PRAVDA and attacking oil companies by not allowing them to drill off shore.

    My apologies for such a ridiculous, preposterous, oxymoronic thought. Truly, my mea culpa

    PRAVDA and Chicago politicians like Stupak and infanticide.

  • Jack_Savage

    The people who have the perfect opportunity to stand up to these thugs simply won’t do it. I am sure that each corporate head who is called to the stand will scrape and bow to Waxman almost as much as Obama scrapes and bows to tyrants.

    Hmmmm….funny how that is working these days.

  • bobmontgomery

    ….publish a running tally of entities that O and his henchmen have told to shut up?

  • earlgrey

    Although, I think Steve Wynn made some comments during a call with shareholders. Rush was talkihng about it. I would really like for them to subpoena him. I might have to stay home to watch it if they did that.

  • rbdwiggins
  • Common_Cents
  • redneck_hippie
  • weatherford

    If you wait to a recess, a committee or subcommittee chairman can do it without a vote. Leastwise, that’s how it used to be. Otherwise, majority vote in a meeting with a quorum.

    However, Congress deprived itself of its own enforcement power (Sergeant-at-Arms of each body). Now it takes a federal court.

    Surely, AT&T’s lawyers know that.

    Bottom line: there is no rush to comply until a court issues an order.

  • janis

    enterprise they DO know about solidly into the ground. On our money. Oh, how I’d love to see someone with the economic sense of Paul Ryan, the forceful and clear speaking style of Sarah Palin, and the incisive wit of Mark Steyn just totally tear them all a collective new a**hole.

    Which would be redundant.

  • Jack_Savage

    It would take courage, and that is in short supply from those who are on the bad side of Obama’s war on business.

  • earlgrey

    at some point the dam has got to break and wash these losers out.

  • http://charlemagne-the-hammer.blogspot.com/ DerKrieger

    a fascist. The man thinks that just because he’s a member of Congress that he can haul anyone he wants before him for the mere act of disagreeing with him. He is trying to use his office as a weapon if intimidation. I want to see someone in the GOP challenge him on his abuse of power. Waxman is a disgrace. He serves his ideology, not the American people. He is one of about 50 old bulls that really need to be retired by voters. Unfortunately his district will probably reelect his corpse.

  • http://charlemagne-the-hammer.blogspot.com/ DerKrieger

    Where is the backbone these days? I’d tell Waxman to go to He!! if I were a CEO. I want to see corporate America go on the offensive so they aren’t brought to heel by an out of control fascist government. Of I were a CEO I would ignore Congress’ mandates and dare them to do something about it.

  • http://charlemagne-the-hammer.blogspot.com/ DerKrieger

    …as does anyone that voted for Obama. They have to be made to feel the pain of the consequences of their vote for Obama and the Democrats. I only wish companies would be more proactive in their opposition to Democrat legislation by letting their employees know the consequences of voting for the Democrats. It think it’s a disservice to employees to let them vote, uninformed, for any politician and then to tell them after the fact that their jobs are at risk.
    Companies need to lay it on the line with their employees by simply saying “Hey, you vote for a Democrat and given their agenda you might not have a job. Think about it.”

  • miconservative

    Dr. Dan Benishek. http://danbenishek.mypoliticalsite.com/ He is catching fire and Bart is in deep doo doo. Send him some cash and let’s throw this lacky out. You may have wanted to thin about all this Bart BEFORE you voted YES!!! You sell out piece of trash!!

  • http://vladenblog.tumblr.com Vladimir

    The SEC requires them to assess in detail the speculative impact of Global Warming on the value of the enterprise, but… they dare not make a peep if they think that Congress’s new tax might affect them negatively.

    We have fallen into that rabbit hole.

  • http://www.laborunionreport.comandhttp://www.laborunionreport.blogspot.com LaborUnionReport

    Everyone knows only Right-Wing Wackos (and people who believe in the Second Amendment) lawfully carry firearms. The Left would be at an unfair disadvantage…

    They would have to appoint a czar to oversee the rules and dictate a Fairness Duel Doctrine.

  • weatherford

    I’m sorry also.

  • bobmontgomery

    …then surely they think they can force you to justify an opinion. The statements by the companies were opinions. perhaps backed by documents, which the companies should claim are proprietary, but opinions nonetheless. So that now, the O team feels it can repress any kind of dissent, including opinions. THE BALL IS NOW IN THE COURT OF THE FREE ENTERPRISE SYSTEM. IT CAN NOW UTTER THE WORDS GIVE ME LIBERTY OR GIVE ME DEATH, AND IT CAN DO SO IN CONCERT WITH THE REPUBLICAN PARTY, THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OR MERELY AS A LOOSE CONFEDERATION. BUT THESE PEOPLE, UNLIKE MERE TEAPARTIERS, HAVE MONEY, POWER AND PRESTIGE. THEY HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO JUSTIFY THEMSELVES IN THE EYES OF THE PUBLIC FOR THEIR OWN SAKE, AND FOR THE PUBLIC’S.
    Mr. Waxman, I know not what course others may take, but as for me, my opinion is that the health care reform legislation will cost my company $100 million, and no you may not have my e-mails.

  • bobbymike

    Politicians like Waxman would outlaw the right and march us off into reeducation camps if he could?

  • traversecityconservative

    Publicly tell them to go to Hell, that they are a private company and can say whatever they choose to say and operate their business in whatever way they choose.

    I just got done watching my favorite show “Little House on the Prairie” – you know, the place where there is no unemployment insurance (just starvation and death if you don’t actually work)…the place that people take care of their own families and don’t use Medicare money to warehouse their parents in nursing homes…the place where no one is was forced to buy horse insurance or pay fines if they don’t..the place where if a bridge is out, the people fix it and don’t wait for the government to do it with $1 billion dollars…In today’s episode, they beat out the railroad when the company tried to use the “eminent domain” approach (with the permission of the govt of course). The best part of the show was at the end where the one farmer told the “empire builder” that the good people would always win in the end – they would not give up their property or let anyone destroy their country. It was quite inspiring actually.

    And the finale of the show is my ultimate favorite – when they learn their land is going to be taken over, they blow up the businesses and their own farms. A classic.

  • alpharob1

    They should take a page out of Ryan’s playbook. Lay out the facts and ask
    some tough questions themselves. It really wouldn’t be hard to do. “Here is what it is going to cost and why… Senator if you would turn to page 1975, amendment at the bottom of the page, let me read it..”
    etc.

    Would make for some great C-SPAN. Oh… are they allowed to have this on C-SPAN now that it is passed and we kind of know what is in it now? HA!

  • http://www.laborunionreport.comandhttp://www.laborunionreport.blogspot.com LaborUnionReport

    For public companies, the CEO answers to the Board of Directors who answers to shareholders. If a CEO were to act (in the eyes of the BoD or shareholders) “irresponsibly,” their butt would be on the line.

    Moreover, the way the White House has a tendency to target its enemies, the adverse media coverage from the White House declaring war on a CEO who tries to claim this still to be America and First Amendment rights matter would undoubtedly cause a panic in a boardroom if the stock prices were to fall.

    All of this is a long-winded way of saying: Don’t expect corporate CEOs to grow a pair of brass ones any time soon.

  • http://www.laborunionreport.comandhttp://www.laborunionreport.blogspot.com LaborUnionReport
  • gekster

    The CEO’s are beholden to the shareholders, NOT the government.

  • izoneguy

    Well, it had to pass before we knew what was in it….

    Now we know and filed our SEC report….
    We were following Federal Law…..

    Here is our accountant to explain……

    - Can’t wait for all the videos of retirees that have lost their
    prescription drug benefits.

    - Can’t wait for all the videos of laid-off UNION workers…..

  • izoneguy

    I guess 3M will get a letter from Waxman as well:

    3M To Take $85-90 Million Non-Cash Charge Tied To Health Bill

    http://blogs.barrons.com/stockstowatchtoday/2010/03/26/3m-to-take-85-90-million-non-cash-charge-tied-to-health-bill/

  • WarEagle01

    there would be no Democrats left.

  • merryj1

    …the CEO’s of AT&T & all the others being summoned to DC, simply appoint some Black Panther members as contract “Corporate Listen & Report Officers” or some such, and send them to DC to undergo the Committee harangue. Heh, heh.

  • Doc Holliday
  • merryj1

    Even carefully phrased, a “warning” like that would just about guarantee the company would be sued if any ‘warned’ employee was subsequently laid off.

    If I were an employer forced to downsize, on the other hand, I’d certainly check the D&R sheets in my employees’ precincts, as part of the selection process as to which employees to terminate and which ones to keep on the staff.

  • holystone

    It’s time for a new “Ollie North” show …..full glare camera lights and all ….

  • MikeInOhio

    Private emails should need a subpoena. But can we demand that the Dems provide their analysis that showed something to the contrary? FOIA and all that?

    Oh, you don’t have any analysis to show? Didn’t do your homework? Decided backroom deals were better than committee hearings where these concerns could be raised? Then how dare you question the work of someone else, who actually has responsibility for his/her work?

  • http://thesandsinstitute.org Vassar Bushmills

    I’ve been in the business of trying to counsel senior management for twenty years. Seems Beta-Male Creep, private sector version of RINO-Creep, is winning. CEO’s listen to lawyers and bottom line analyses. The old lions are gone for the most part.

    You can tell them anything but one, and that is how to grow a pair.

    Waxman wouldn’t have called them in if he didn’t already know they’d genuflect.

    We can always pray for one recalcitrant SOB to march in there and stink up the chamber with alpha scent, Just don’t bet on it.

  • blaze422

    I understand and agree to all the reasons to be resisting the evil empire…on the other hand don’t we all agree that the facts ( what these companies are stating) are true? Just like Paul Ryan is the most credible critic (IMO) because of his command of the facts of the bill, these CEO’s will carve up the Dems. And as has been cited earlier,,this could be a Ollie North moment.
    If the reasons why this bill sucks from a business prospective were presented, it might be demagogued but at least the critics could go on the offensive.