« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Congressional Democrats muck up Congressional insurance coverage.

Not. OUR. Fault.

Via Just One Minute (indeed…) comes your feel-good story of the day: Congressional Democrats have managed to thoroughly muck up Congress’ own health care coverage, particularly for new hires. Both staffers and legislators:

The law apparently bars members of Congress from the federal employees health program, on the assumption that lawmakers should join many of their constituents in getting coverage through new state-based markets known as insurance exchanges.

But the research service found that this provision was written in an imprecise, confusing way, so it is not clear when it takes effect.

The new exchanges do not have to be in operation until 2014. But because of a possible “drafting error,” the report says, Congress did not specify an effective date for the section excluding lawmakers from the existing program.

Under well-established canons of statutory interpretation, the report said, “a law takes effect on the date of its enactment” unless Congress clearly specifies otherwise. And Congress did not specify any other effective date for this part of the health care law. The law was enacted when President Obama signed it three weeks ago.

I would take it as a personal favor if the GOP Senate were to send over a polite note indicating that they intend to filibuster any attempts to fix this. The average salary of a Congressional aide is over twice the federal poverty level for a family of four: let new hires buy their own darn health insurance policies. Not that they have a choice, thanks to the individual mandate…

Moe Lane

Crossposted to Moe Lane.

COMMENTS

  • Aaron Gardner

    Ooops.

  • clintonformccain

    The Federal Employees Health Benefits Plan is, from all reports, an excellent menu of choices. It offers multiple private insurance plans in each state, ranging from fee for service plans like Blue Cross/Blue Shield to various levels of HMO type coverage. Low cost options, high cost options.

    It’s obviously desireable for insurance companies to make competitive proposals and get included in the offerings, since the program has eight million particpants.

    Here’s the irony. The centerpiece of Hillary Clinton’s health care proposal was to open up these plans for purchase by any individual or employer in the United States. So, if you lived in South Carolina and needed to purchase insurance as an individual or as a small business for your employees, you could simply join this pool and purchase any of the options avaiable in South Carolina under the Federal plan.

    It was politically astute for exactly the same reasons Grassley’s admendment was political poision. How could a member of Congress vote not to offer his or her constituents the sam insurance plan Congress gets?

  • Washington_Republican

    So, I guess they try to find a way to fix it . . . again. When you have idiots running the asylum, this is what you get. This would make a great campaign theme.

  • The_Gadfly
  • http://moelane.com/ Moe Lane

    If it’s the latter, well, they’re going to have to ask nicely.

    Really nicely.

  • http://www.FranBaker.com frankieb

    It couldn’t happen to a more deserving bunch of idiots.

  • marie_a

    from Congress. So they can join their constituents in delayed implementation of insurance exchanges to 2014. Wow.

    This lovely Health Care bill reminds me of the classic Tarzanmovie with the quicksand trap and boa constrictor. Only this time we find congressional constrictors caught up with us in the murky trap, without a Johnny Wiesmuller.

  • http://phxg.wordpress.com/ phxg

    The GOP folks, looking to protect “their” staffers will play along and cause no waves.

  • 9th_amendment

    I’m a lefty-lurker who was pleased by HCR passage. But this is great. I’m also self-employed and get my coverage through a business association. I’m happy to hear that congress-critters will be in the same lot as I’ve been cast into.

  • http://biggator5.net/ BigGator5
  • cwb33

    should have had health care coverage until health care reform was passed anyway. They should have been denied coverage like the rest of us until they passed a law that gave the us health coverage. Republican and Democratic lawmakers have had access to government-run health care for decades! We should have had access to the same! And if they’d been denied coverage forever, then we’d have had proper health care reform in the 60s!

  • onyon43

    this gives them added incentive to repeal and replace.

  • mkozikowski

    I guess this is what SHE meant by
    “you’ll find out what is in it once it’s passed”

    And The Prez said, “you will love it once you have it”.

    Are they going to have to sleep in the bed they made?

    I doubt it.
    The slimy eels will just slither their way back to the land of “milk and honey”

  • jaydickb

    I can say that it is an excellent plan. Participants (both active and retired) pay 1/4 to 1/3 of the cost, depending on the plan; government pays the rest. Many plans are available, but many are also similar. I have had the same plan for all 50 years.

    I have long believed that the FEHBP could be cloned and made available to everyone. As a plan participant, I would want a separate risk pool so I would not have to pay for people waiting until they are very sick and then enrolling. Federal employees and retirees can enroll or change plans once a year during “open season”, usually for a month or two near the end of the year.

  • GCBWI

    So just what, exactly, are such incompetents doing writing and passing legislation, in the first place?

    Vote them ALL out…

  • teresakoch

    and this couldn’t happen to a nicer bunch of folks!

  • http://www.suvstrategery.blogspot.com SoFiMil

    Was this an evil trick by Karl Rove? Or done purposefully by Rahm Emanuel?

    If this is “fixed,” the left can then say, hey, there are also a few more small little fixes. If the bill is fixed even just to get staffers decent health care, the precedent will have been set, and the left will push the “fix it-don’t repeal it” avenue.

  • http://www.laborunionreport.comandhttp://www.laborunionreport.blogspot.com LaborUnionReport
  • http://www.thehartlinegroup.com wesley83

    I thought we wanted this from our Legislators. If they are going to shove a program into our faces, then they should also be required to use the same program.

    I realize that this may not apply to the Representatives themselves, but their staff should be furious with them. I’d like to know which staffer for which Rep included the language… It would make for an interesting discussion.

  • davesinsanantonio

    along with repeal? We can only hope.

  • davesinsanantonio

    grow a backbone (or get a transplanted one) in the meantime. Here’s hoping!

  • polaedra28

    Ya gotta love it!

  • conritwng

    and He has a sence of humor!

  • mutantone

    “Congressional Democrats have managed to thoroughly muck up Congress? own health care coverage, particularly for new hires” which means that those already in still have the Cadillac version it is just the new hires or elected that will have the same coverage foisted upon the rest of us, once again they exclude themselves from what they say the public must do.
    ?The truth is more important than the facts.” – Frank Lloyd Wright
    ?Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction.? ? Ronald Reagan
    ID 10 T error in the administration

  • http://phxg.wordpress.com/ phxg

    wise up and see Obama for what he is……..before election day 2008.

    See how far hope got us there. No, I will lay my trust in a decimation of all who have crossed the people. 90 seats lost will be a good starting point.