<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>RedState</title><link>https://redstate.com/moe_lane/2010/05/31/i-sort-of-agree-with-eleanor-clift/feed/</link><description>Conservative News &amp; Politics</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 14:05:24 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>I sort of agree with Eleanor Clift.</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[(H/T: Hot Air Headlines) On at  least one passage, at least.  She wrote an article for Newsweek (yeah,  it&amp;#8217;s still publishing! Good show, that) where she assured her  readers that of course they don&amp;#8217;t need to worry about the 2010 election  shellacking that the Democrats will be getting in the Senate, because a  lot of those  elections will be one-offs:]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 12:30:47 -0400</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Moe Lane]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://redstate.com/moe_lane/2010/05/31/i-sort-of-agree-with-eleanor-clift-n34918</link></item></channel></rss>