<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>RedState</title><link>https://redstate.com/moe_lane/2010/06/27/pundit-theory-vs-activist-practice-acorn-edition/feed/</link><description>Conservative News &amp; Politics</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 08:01:19 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>Pundit theory vs. activist practice, ACORN edition.</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[In 2008, I (and most of the rest of the Online Right) engaged in a  long and unsuccessful fight against the notorious group ACORN.  It was,  honestly, a frustrating one: although you could show, time after time  after time again, that ACORN was routinely involved in election fraud  (including election registration fraud, which was its usual  apologists&amp;#8217; prime excuse/primary distraction) we never could get any  traction from that.  And ACORN knew this, and was insufferably smug  about it as they went on their merry way urinating on the election  process for the eventual benefit of the Democratic party.]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Sun, 27 Jun 2010 09:00:25 -0400</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Moe Lane]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://redstate.com/moe_lane/2010/06/27/pundit-theory-vs-activist-practice-acorn-edition-n35286</link></item></channel></rss>