<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>RedState</title><link>https://redstate.com/moe_lane/2010/08/04/the-epithet-and-the-redistricting-knives/feed/</link><description>Conservative News &amp; Politics</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 12:06:29 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>The [epithet] and the redistricting knives.</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[If you do political blogging or reporting for a while, you end up hearing this question a lot: Why should I bother to come out and vote for the [insert epithet here meaning &amp;#8216;not as ideologically sound as I am&amp;#8217;]? This would be normally responded to with a polite &amp;#8220;That&amp;#8217;s a good  question&amp;#8221; and a variable-length stream of blather before the question is actually  answered, but let&amp;#8217;s cut to the chase.  You bother to go out and vote for  the [epithet] because:]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 09:30:13 -0400</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Moe Lane]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://redstate.com/moe_lane/2010/08/04/the-epithet-and-the-redistricting-knives-n35743</link></item></channel></rss>