<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>RedState</title><link>https://redstate.com/moe_lane/2010/08/06/why-the-white-house-needs-to-worry-about-proposition-c/feed/</link><description>Conservative News &amp; Politics</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 17:00:58 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>Why the White House needs to worry about Proposition C.</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[Read up on reports of the results of Tuesday&amp;#8217;s vote on Missouri&amp;#8217;s Proposition C* and you&amp;#8217;re going to notice what James Taranto did: there&amp;#8217;s an urge to declare the vote &amp;#8216;largely symbolic&amp;#8216; (amusingly, this includes Taranto&amp;#8217;s own Wall Street Journal, or at least the portions of it that aren&amp;#8217;t part of the opinion section).  This is generally political-speak for &amp;#8216;the voting public just kicked our rears on a policy issue:&amp;#8217;  &amp;#8216;largely symbolic&amp;#8217; votes where you agree with the results are instead &amp;#8216;stunning reproofs&amp;#8217; or something else equally evocative of the Will of the People.]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 09:00:58 -0400</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Moe Lane]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://redstate.com/moe_lane/2010/08/06/why-the-white-house-needs-to-worry-about-proposition-c-n35782</link></item></channel></rss>