<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>RedState</title><link>https://redstate.com/moe_lane/2010/11/15/pass-your-own-line-item-veto-axelrod/feed/</link><description>Conservative News &amp; Politics</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 17:17:31 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>Pass your own line-item veto, Axelrod.</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[Oh, Davey.  I know that it&amp;#8217;s all mean and stuff that his man-god is going to have to run as a mere mortal in &amp;#8217;12, but that  doesn&amp;#8217;t excuse amateur tactics on David Axelrod&amp;#8217;s part, right?  If he wants the line-item veto so badly in order to combat all that nasty pork that the President supposedly doesn&amp;#8217;t want to approve, then Obama should dust off H.R.4890, have it resubmitted to the House, and tell the Senate to pass it this time.  The Democrats have huge majorities in Congress &amp;#8211;]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 14:00:20 -0500</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Moe Lane]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://redstate.com/moe_lane/2010/11/15/pass-your-own-line-item-veto-axelrod-n37018</link></item></channel></rss>