<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>RedState</title><link>https://redstate.com/moe_lane/2010/12/22/no-actual-presidential-evolution-on-ssm/feed/</link><description>Conservative News &amp; Politics</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 23:12:57 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>No actual Presidential 'evolution' on SSM?</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[Both Andrew Malcolm and Allahpundit are looking somewhat&amp;#8230; askance&amp;#8230; at President Obama&amp;#8217;s apparent  &amp;#8220;evolution&amp;#8221; on same-sex marriage (SSM).  I put &amp;#8220;evolution&amp;#8221; in scare  quotes because there&amp;#8217;s no real evidence that he&amp;#8217;s actually changed his official opinion on the subject in any way that matters: which should have been  apparent from the fact that precisely zero action towards legalizing SSM  has been proposed by the President.  Congress did pass a DADT repeal*,  but there&amp;#8217;s been no push for SSM.]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 21:46:49 -0500</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Moe Lane]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://redstate.com/moe_lane/2010/12/22/no-actual-presidential-evolution-on-ssm-n37417</link></item></channel></rss>