<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>RedState</title><link>https://redstate.com/moe_lane/2011/02/28/right-to-work-coming-to-maine/feed/</link><description>Conservative News &amp; Politics</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 23:56:35 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>Right-to-work coming to Maine?</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[That&amp;#8217;s the plan, at least.  The current situation in Maine is as follows: people don&amp;#8217;t have to belong to a union to work, but non-union employees (both private and public sector) may still have to pay the unions a &amp;#8216;service fee.&amp;#8217; This supposedly represents the recouping of the cost of unions &amp;#8216;representing&amp;#8217; non-union members in labor disputes &amp;#8211; whether or not the non-union members wanted to be part of the labor dispute in the first place &amp;#8211; and it&amp;#8217;s a common feature in contract negotiations in Maine.  There&amp;#8217;s legislation going through the state legislature right now to close that loophole; new Maine governor Paul LePage (R) is enthusiastically supporting it.]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 16:30:34 -0500</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Moe Lane]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://redstate.com/moe_lane/2011/02/28/right-to-work-coming-to-maine-n38125</link></item></channel></rss>