<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>RedState</title><link>https://redstate.com/moe_lane/2011/09/26/why-is-barack-obamas-re-election-in-2012-only-now-in-doubt/feed/</link><description>Conservative News &amp; Politics</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 01:54:36 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>Why is Barack Obama's re-election in 2012 only *now* in doubt?</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[I should note right from the start that I like Stu Rothenberg as a pundit and a political handicapper: he&amp;#8217;s a pretty bright person and he has a lot of experience. But Rothenberg is also very much plugged into the professional political establishment&amp;#8230; and sometimes, it shows. Case in point: Rothenberg&amp;#8217;s otherwise spot-on analysis about the travails of Barack Obama these days has what I will charitably call a &amp;#8216;howler.&amp;#8217;]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 15:30:34 -0400</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Moe Lane]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://redstate.com/moe_lane/2011/09/26/why-is-barack-obamas-re-election-in-2012-only-now-in-doubt-n40541</link></item></channel></rss>