<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>RedState</title><link>https://redstate.com/moe_lane/2012/02/26/i-predict-that-the-syrian-regime-will-win-the-syrian-referendum/feed/</link><description>Conservative News &amp; Politics</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 00:47:23 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>I predict that the Syrian regime will 'win' the Syrian referendum.</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[Oh, yes: they&amp;#8217;re having a referendum &amp;#8220;to limit the government&amp;#8217;s powers.&amp;#8221;  Those aren&amp;#8217;t literal quotes; those are scare quotes, mostly because I do not particularly believe that the Assad regime has any intention of reducing its power over the Syrian people, and I do not think that you should particularly believe it, either.  Admittedly, I am not entirely certain why the regime is bothering.  Nobody particularly believes that they mean it; and even if the vote was in fact fair and the Syrian people voted for limiting government power&amp;#8230; well, the list of totalitarian states that withered away when the people were ready is a rather short one, and most of those were actually former client states who had engaged en masse in a successful revolt against an imperial power.  Not likely in this case, alas.]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2012 23:34:44 -0500</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Moe Lane]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://redstate.com/moe_lane/2012/02/26/i-predict-that-the-syrian-regime-will-win-the-syrian-referendum-n42365</link></item></channel></rss>