<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>RedState</title><link>https://redstate.com/moe_lane/2012/02/27/hill-poll-american-electorate-apparently-not-addicted-to-soaking-rich/feed/</link><description>Conservative News &amp; Politics</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 01:35:00 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>Hill poll: American electorate apparently *not* addicted to soaking rich.</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[The most immediate thing to take away from this Hill poll is what the article on the subject leads with: which is, that something like three-fourths of the American electorate thinks that that the tax rate for the wealthy should be lower than it actually is (about the same proportion has a similar attitude towards similar tax rates for corporations). So far, so good &amp;#8211; but then there was this frankly laughable paragraph from the Hill article:]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 20:00:59 -0500</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Moe Lane]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://redstate.com/moe_lane/2012/02/27/hill-poll-american-electorate-apparently-not-addicted-to-soaking-rich-n42377</link></item></channel></rss>