[...] Find More Informations here: redstate.com/moe_lane/2012/06/06/did-the-white-house-make-bill-clinton-recant-opposition-to-job-killing-tax-hikes/ [...]…

Clinton is intentionally sabotaging O and there is no one that can convince me otherwise. Heck, he may be planting a seed for Hill in 2012, which I doubt but from what we’ve seen lately one never knows.

O comes down with a terrible case of gray hair and is in the hospital with some terrible disease? Been known to happen when they have to exit for extaneous reasons

…and like me swarming to a roadside market, ‘Free Stuff’ on the overhead banner is not to be ignored.

The entire time Bill was mouthing this tripe, I wondered how many Boo-Boos and Band-Aids he had on his Royal Rear.
Maybe he found an Intern to rub them and make them feel better…..

A thought: Is he still paying penance for the Dress Episode?
“Thank you Ma’am, can I have another…?”

Makes me think of that scripture that says “pride comes before a fall.” We have been repulsed by the left’s arrogance and especially Obama’s for the last three years and now we are watching them fall big time. And watching Bubba help is just plain hilarious.

He actually claimed he spoke before knowing the tax cuts expiration dates. That he assumed they expired Before The Election.
How as that even remotely possible, even for a Progressive?
That Bill does not have any briefers, flacks or script reviewers right by his side?
The previous extention’s expiration dates, were year-to-year, shouted from the rooftops and *TaxMaggedon* is everywhere you look.

So which is it;
1) Bill is a brainless clod, par-excellance ?
2)Machiavelli has been reborn, and lives in Arkansas?
3) He’s a wall, not a door ,nor a window.

No matter, I for one want him to jest keep talkin’ that trash.

Never thought you could have so much fun, watching something disintegrate……….

At the same time, his comments did tend to give the Dem Party some cover it needs, and it still leaves the question open as to why he walked any of it back.

But I disagree that Bill Clinton wants O to win this go ’round for Hill in 2016. If O wins now, once again the public will want a change after 8 years, in this case chomping at the bit for a change like never before, and Hill will have no chance in 2016. The Dems will be tarnished if not vanished for many years to come, so he’s trying to protect the brand of a centrist Dem party (not that it exists anymore but he can try with the folks loved me nonsense that Dems used to buy).

On the contrary, I think he wants Romney to win now so Hill WILL have a chance in 2016. It’s her last chance.

Again, if he wants Obie to lose, why walk any of it back? The Dimocrat Party is ripe for an overthrow of King Barack, as there are many of them who would love to be able to distance themselves from what they know are ridiculous policies and a foolish leader. Bill could do it with just a few well-chosen words. And the words would be oh, so reasonable.

If Bill wants O. to lose, only the fear of failure could be holding him back. Which could also explain the passive-aggressive behavior. Perhaps these off-the-reservation statements are a sort of feeler, a finger in the wind, a test of possible support.

We shall see.

If it is the latter, my comment was an attempt to make some sense of it beyond an attempt to get revenge on Obama. If revenge were the goal, why walk it back?

Add the IG’s that were fired for doing their job.

Add the Obama campaign’s building of an enemy list.

You would easily get the picture of a thin skinned narcissist, more about his own appearance and self-adulation than anything or anybody else.

“Clinton?s team was as aghast as Obama?s at how the boss had wandered blithely into remarks that left even sympathetic listeners wondering what exactly he was getting at. He also gave gleeful Republicans an opening to skewer Obama with a popular Democrat?s own words.

“Clinton, in a ritual that would be familiar to anyone who has worked for him during the past 20 years, protested that his words were being wrested from context and blamed a manipulative news media for stirring up trouble to satisfy its own lust for chaos and conflict.

“But his own team, and eventually Clinton himself, agreed there was no choice but to issue embarrassing what-the-former-president-meant-to-say clarifications, which were crafted in close consultation with senior Obama aides at the White House and campaign headquarters in Chicago, according to people involved in the negotiations.”

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0612/77147.html

Clinton is just the latest Democrat to blurt out the truth about the Obama policies and campaign–only to be promptly muzzled by an increasingly desperate Obama campaign. (Cory Booker, Ed Rendell, Deval Patrick, etc.)

But the effect of what Obama is doing is to muzzle moderate Democrats who are more popular with moderate and Independent voters than he is. It’s just going to add to the perception that Obama is a candidate only of the hard Left.