The decision to keep U.S. personnel in Benghazi with substandard security was made at the highest levels of the State Department by officials who have so far escaped blame over the Sept. 11 attack, according to a review of recent congressional testimony and internal State Department memos by Fox News.
Nine months before the assault that killed Ambassador Chris Stevens and three others, State Department Under Secretary Patrick Kennedy signed off on an internal memo that green-lighted the Benghazi operation.
The December 2011 memo from Jeffrey Feltman -- then-Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs (NEA) -- pledged "to rapidly implement a series of corrective security measures." However, no substantial improvements were made, according to congressional testimony to the House oversight committee from Regional Security Officer Eric Nordstrom.
Make no mistake about this. Fox News is not being leaked this information because the State Department is a hotbed of Republican moles; Fox News is being leaked this information because that network is the only one that can be relied upon to publish damaging information about the State Department under Hillary Clinton. You can see this by the way that they're going after Patrick Kennedy, who was SecState Clinton's assistant (and possibly cutout); and possibly by the way that they're bringing in the paper-trail CYA warnings by Jeffrey Feltman, who in retrospect may have been forced out of his State Department gig last year for not being a good fit with Clinton's New Order. Either way, the implication is that things were not going well for Team Clinton over at State, after all... and while most of the Democratic party might not care for that particular message getting out there's at least one sub-group who would be; anybody who wouldn't get a nice job during the Hillary Clinton administration.
Of course, it is rank speculation on my part that Vice President Joe Biden, or more accurately his team, is playing Leak Wars (my allegation that somebody is, and for crassly political purposes, is merely profound cynicism). But it does fit the profile. Democratic agitprop aside, they are facing headwinds in 2016 as it stands and the only way that it will not get worse for them is if Obamacare works perfectly, the first time. As this will almost certainly not happen, prudent Democrats are presumably considering alternatives this very moment...
Via Hot Air Headlines.
Moe Lane (crosspost)