« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

A RED is a RED is a RED, Even in California

You’ll never hear it on CNN, but today’s REDS are known for being logical. Crazy as it sounds, Conservatives and Republicans still believe 10 + 2 = 12. 

TeaPartyPatriots have another name for this high-falutin’ logic. Most of us are so common, we call it common sense.   

On the other side, Liberal BLUE synonyms for RED logic range from dishonesty and cruelty, to lunacy.

Somewhere in the middle of synonyms lies the state of California. 

RedStateReaders know its Republican Primary’s in June. Thanks also to Fox News, Rasmussen, Liberty Leaders, TeaPartyPatriotset al, more Americans are tuning in to elections across our beloved country, while it still belongs to us.

We have viewed the face of tyranny in America and loathe what we see. 

Our ancestors didn’t have to tell us about this terrifying face. It looks familiar, and 50% of Americans are still smart enough to be afraid.  

Of course we have more to fear than fear itself. Common sense tells us so.  

Which brings us to something else you won’t hear on CNN:

Most California Republicans, TeaPartyPatriots, many Independents, and some Democrats, now share the “bipartisan” goal of defeating Barbara  Boxer, CA’s 3rd Prima Donna and Liberal Tyrantessa.

But how many of these California voters are using the kind of logic that will ensure their desired goal?

How many will have the strength of character to control their conservative pride and prejudice, and to vote for the man assured of achieving their unified aim of defeating the ruinous Liberal, Barbara Boxer?

So far, according to the most respected California polls, the only June 8  primary candidate who can do this is Tom Campbell, Republican candidate for US Senate. 

If TeaPartyPatriots were as smart about California as they’ve been about other states, they’d table their obsession with the charming Conservative, Chuck DeVore.

He seems a good guy, an honest, deserving Conservative whose time will come, but only after a leader like Tom Campbell clears the path.

IfTeaPartyPatriots want to be wise about the BigPicture in California, they’ll throw their support to Campbell and allow him to do what growing numbers of Californians want:

A) First, to defeat Carly Fiorina, a dishonest woman who has demonstrated her lack of integrity, clearly revealing her bad Business/Politics-As-Usual instincts. 

B) Second, to ”arlenize” Barbara Boxer and put California back on the leadership map of solvent, respected American states.

Sure, Massachusetts had its history-making miracle. But common sense, demographers, and  historians confirm that, in a boatload of ways, CA and MA are worlds apart.

In any case, if voters listen up and vote right, Tom Campbell offers California a miracle of its own.

And how about this for a quaint notion, enacted only by a rare, true American patriot: If Chuck DeVore truly cared about California and America more than himself, he would drop out of this Senate race and join forces with Tom Campbell. He’d have everything to gain, just not now.  

A Republican like Tom Campbell is the ace pilot for California’s Emergency Rescue Mission. At a time when the state is bankrupt, common sense tells us we sure can use a brilliant NumbersMan. Even if he is a moderate, a pre-requisite for victory in a state like California. 

Tom Campbell is that person, the necessary middleman with Class A integrity, who knows how to organize the territory and deal with the enemy.

You have to ease into a diverse land like California. With its wild, crazy and now bankrupt side, California’s not yet ready for a pure Conservative Senator…it still feels too much like overnight. 

Put another way: Ellen Degeneres will never take an immediate shine to Harriet Nelson or anyone like her. But she’ll have a better chance of coming around, if the right middleman makes the right introduction.

Tom Campbell is to California, like Mitt Romney is to America. Brilliant men who come in, repair the damage, and reset the stage for a successful, long-running play.  If America wakes up, thinks straight, and votes right.

Like America, California needs to elect an honest, strong, wise NumbersMan, with a proven track record of getting business done responsibly, effectively, and well….the first step towards increased employment and American prosperity.

Like Mitt Romney with America, Tom Campbell offers California its sorely needed Marshall Plan, and can deliver it. 

If California Conservatives andTeaPartyPatriots think carefully and hard, they will realize that Chuck DeVore’s time will come. Stubbornly insisting that time is now brings out the worst in them, defying their good logic and common sense. 

Determined to have it their way or else, these “Highway Conservatives” can unwittingly spite America’s face. It’s how they’ve lost our elections and their noses.

Now both terrifying and ironic, California’s state maxim was once a source of pride: ”As California Goes, So Goes the Nation.” Few envisioned the shame of ”going” to such abject failure and defeat.

California’s Chuck DeVore (and on a national scale, Ron Paul) represent the political equivalent of ”buzz cuts,” fine in some states, but not in all.

CaliforniaTeaParty insistence on these razor cuts will result in their undoing and ours. What works in Florida, Massachusetts, and Kentucky will not work everywhere, and it was rarely intended to.

Love that buzz all you want, but in politics, it’s better to have a good haircut than no hair at all.

COMMENTS

  • eastbaylarry

    and I definitely do NOT want Carly as senator any more than I want another term for Boxer.

    It may be time to switch to Campbell just to keep Carly from being nominated.

    • mollybwizer

      As I tell my Dad…it’s the philosophy we need in there…but I do not add, stupid.

      Thank you for taking the time to comment.

  • mbecker908

    that we have a troll or a trolling campaign worker.

    • renny

      and maybe all of the Reps. have not left for Denver yet.

      I know little of the pol. race, but DeVore is not winning, of the HP chic wins, she should get support–every Rep. in the Sen. challenged Dem. power pols. in holding all the chairmanships and leadership positions, but it Campbell is more viable, more power to him.

      • mbecker908

        Reagan had bigger fights in CA with the leftist legislature than he did in DC. I think that’s where he learned to prioritize his fights.

        Sort of the same for Wilson.

        The legislature controls spending and expansion of government and they’ve been solidly Democrat since gold was $32 an ounce. CA has done exactly one conservative thing in the last 60 years and that would be passing Prop13 to limit property taxes.

        • SteveLA

          mbecker

          1) Passed Prop 8
          2) Way back when, recalled Rose Bird Supreme Court Justice who was against the death penalty
          3) Passed Prop 187, although Grey Dog let it die in court
          4) Recalled Grey Dog, but replaced him with the Governoator, so that’s actually a bullet to the foot.

          CA tends lefty, but it’s not all bad out here.

          • mbecker908

            discounted them – arguably unfairly – for the following reasons:

            1. Prop 8 – still waiting on the courts.
            2. Prop 187 – dead in court and given up on. If you don’t fight these kinds of battles to the last man, you lose. The people of CA lost.
            3. Recall Grey, a good thing but I’m not sure it had any impact on anything.
            4. Rose Bird – I forgot her. A good thing that she was retired by force, but I don’t know that it actually made any difference, see Grey.

            Prop13, OTOH, has somewhat restrained the localities in their spending. Well, actually what it’s done is to drive the designed underfunding of all CA pension systems so $$ could be currently spent. See their model in the SS system.

          • SteveLA

            mbecker

            But just think, all the madness has helped with folks moving out of CA to your fair state….don’t that count for nothing? LOL

            Heck my father in law moved out of CA when he retired and bought two houses, one in Prescott and one down in Peoria, helping out the AZ real estate biz…..:)

          • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens
          • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

            Even the most right-leaning state has activist judges in the federal court system ready to cause trouble.

          • mbecker908
    • tecash

      diaries are you reading? Most have nothing to do with Cambell and are well written pieces.

      Not sure why a few on here use the troll comment on those who state something that does not agree with you, but this is one case it def does not belong.

      Had she written this piece post primary and if Cambell would have won it, she would be correct. Our ultimate goal should be to rid our government of Boxer. She just wrote it a few months too early.

      Try to give others the allowance to have their own opinion without you drooling at the opportunity to call someone a troll. Or at least read the other diaries before trying to use them as an example that does not fit the current piece.

      • mbecker908

        Next, she’s seriously misrepresenting Campbell’s positions. See Josh Trevino’s comment below. And yes, Josh is involved with DeVore’s campaign, but he’s always been totally upfront about it.

        This is nothing more than a shortened version of one of the late “Gary” diaries about Palin.

        Frankly, I don’t give a rip about the CA Senate race. We have our hands full in AZ. What I do care about is the quality of posting here at RS, and this diary is short on all counts. And, if Campbell wins I’ll support him.

      • mbecker908

        is to post a diary, attract some heat and disappear. Until their next diary. So far, we’ve got 13 comments, most critical – and Josh’s very specific comment – and no molly. Gee.

        • Aaron Gardner

          She has been here 5 months and has only commented once, but she has pages of diaries posted.

          Troll.

          • tecash

            there are quite a few on this site that post diaries and do not comment so that is not so strange. There are also many on here who post comments, but never do a diary.

            She very well may be a campaign worker for Cambell, but your comment about her diaries do not prove your assertion. And I agree with your and others assesments about Cambell. If he wins, it will only be a slight improvement and that is why told her in my comment that we as conservative should try to keep him off the ticket in favor of a true conservative until we have no choice. I also told her had she written this post primary, she would have a valid point. I am sure you and I are on the same page. BUT

            The one thing I have grown tired of seeing on so many conservative blogs is the name calling, insulting, pious crap I have see creeping in our ranks. This is how the dems work and we should not act the same. I actually saw a person basically ignorant and stupid the other day on here because someone disagreed with him and then they took it further and insulted his level of intelligence just because of some english and spelling mistakes. Either we are one team focused on one mission or we are still the party of two years ago that failed miserably and allowed Obama and his minions to take over this country.

            She may be a campaign worker and if she is, kudos to her for being involved. But one article on her opinion does not define her as a troll. Misguided…yes, wrong….probally, but not troll. You will make your point much better simply sticking to facts and showing all of us where she is wrong. Quite frankly you made no point with the troll comment and it did not educate a single person about the contest going on there. I can tell you that you are wrong without attacking you or your intelligence and bring more to my side by sticking to issues.

            Like I stated, you and I are on the same page when it comes to Cambell, and probally on the same get rid of McCain page in your own home state. Our differences are that I would rather learn from what you know rather than read a response that held no merit and had no information as to why she was wrong.

          • mbecker908

            interested in “education” or “discussion”.

            You’re right about people who slam in here post diaries and run. And they are trolls too, including and especially the elected politicians who come by and crap on our floor. I’ve called them on it too.

            I’m perfectly fine with people posting diaries promoting Campbell as long as they’re willing to defend their posting. Those diaries are good invitations for discussion and an opportunity to really flesh out a candidate’s position on a variety of issues.

            People like molly contribute absolutely nothing to Redstate and nothing to the debate about who should be the Republican candidate for Senate in CA. I’ve gone nose-to-nose with Josh Trevino several times over the years over candidates he’s supported. To his credit, when he posts a diary supporting a candidate he always notes if he’s working for the campaign (unlike Bob Bennett’s staff who were trolling here) and he defends and clarifies his points. molly should take a lesson from Josh. As it stands, she’s outed as a Troll and if she continues her bad behavior she will find a hot welcome every time she posts another piece of crap like this one.

            Please note that there isn’t one post defending Campbell. I think that probably has to do with a couple of things. One would be there is no substance in molly’s diary and two Campbell is way to the left in his well documented stances on issues that matter.

          • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

            Tom Campbell opposed spending cuts and restrictions on tax increases every time he had a chance, when he was in the House.

            Tom Campbell already got a nomination once and failed to win the Senate seat.

            Tom Campbell opposes our values.

            Tom Campbell is wrong for California and wrong for America. When you’re to California’s left on marriage, then you’re really a weirdo who’s out of step with conservatives and Republican.s

          • IJB

            I’ve been in CA for about 2 decades now, and I CANNOT STAND Tom Campbell. If he’s the nominee, I’ll have real, real problems with him even against Boxer.

            If people are giving up on DeVore, I’d advise they all get on Carly’s boat – whatever problems she has, they’re dwarfed by the many, many problems with Tom Campbell.

            (As it is, I still plan to vote for DeVore, and I doubt there’s anything that’ll change my mind on that…)

          • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

            I’m not giving up on Chuck unless he quits.

            If he does, I’ll understand, and then make a decision accordingly.

            But if he doesn’t, then I’ll stick it out too, because he’s just that much better than the field.

          • mollybwizer

            I do not work for TC’s campaign. I am just a regular TeaPartyPatriot.

            No need to defend any of what I write…the proof is in the pudding.

            But you are clearly looking for a fight and are filled with hatred. Hope you find happiness and health somewhere soon.

      • polaedra28

        Common Red State. You should know better! Conservatives are always being told that we’ll have our time, just not yet as we watch our country slide further and further down the path towards socialism and tyranny. Your arguments are much the same as what was said to Ronald Reagan and he won in CALIFORNIA and then in the entire country. We don’t have time to wait ANY longer. We have to act NOW or all is lost. Tom Campbell is the media’s choice because like McCain he is very beatable. After all, there’s the muslim connection and his tendency to vote for tax increases when it’s “necessary” as if revenue were ever the problem and not their incessant spending. The only person we can count on to do what we actually must do is Chuck DeVore. Get it together folks. Suck it up and grow a spine!

    • SteveLA

      There’s a posting down below that outlines Campbell’s stances on budget issues, he’s been wrong on all and the Tea Party folks are not going to be interested in him at all.

    • mollybwizer

      It seems that for every hateful “‘loser” out there, God blessed us with 3 winners.

      Thank you for being logical, thorough, careful, AND polite. Just happens to add up to wise!

  • tecash

    that the primary goal has to be to remove Boxer from her throne, I disagree that anyone needs to not support a conservative in favor of a moderate just to beat her.

    We are in the primary stage and the goal of all conservative should be to fill the tickets with conservatives. This would mean that we should stand for any conservative running against Cambell. If he wins the party ticket, then and only then, should we bring our support behind him so that Boxer can be sent packing.

    Listen, polls show that conservatives have the largest block of people in the voting process. They put the number somewhere around 42% of the country. Progressives have about 18%, then the rest is divided among moderate repubs, moderate dems(yeah yeah I know this does not excist in reality), and independants. One of the main reasons we lost to Obama is that the core base of republicans despised who represented our party for president. It will happen again this time on many tickets, only this time most of us will vote just to rid ourselves of the dems. But it does not mean we should not push hard to have conservatives fill the tickets. We will vote for the Cambells if they win the primaries, but we will not like it and we will not stop till the end trying to get all Cambells off the ticket.

    • eastbaylarry

      is top priority for THIS election cycle.

      Us conservative Californians pray for DeVore to win, but we’ll take Campbell over Boxer any day.

      Then, if we feel the need, we’ll dump Campbell for a true conservative the next cycle.

      • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens
  • http://joshuatrevino.com Joshua Trevino

    But let’s start with what’s right: Tea Partiers should indeed take a look at Tom Campbell. They’ll especially appreciate his ….

    1) Support for the Prop 1A tax hike.
    2) Support for the Wall Street bailouts.
    3) Support for an even higher CA gas tax.
    4) Support for Islamist radicals.
    5) Support for gay “marriage.”
    6) Support for abortion “rights.”

    Yes, nominating an actual leftist would be a great idea, no?

    Agreed that Carly Fiorina is a fraud, but Tom Campbell is not an acceptable conservative — nor even conservative-ish — alternative. The only conservative in this race is Chuck DeVore, and he’s not going anywhere.

    Except, of course, to the U.S. Senate.

    • proudgop

      he already was nominee for senate before. what type of campaign did he run and was he good in debates any Californians answer?

      thanks

      • mbecker908
        • proudgop

          he was republican nominee against Feinstein in 2000 and he got his clocked clean ( granted 2000 to now is different and Feinstein is more popular then wicked witch)

        • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

          He didn’t move an inch in the polls from January 2000 to November.

          He’s a horrible campaigner statewide and is probably our least electable candidate for that reason.

          Tom Campbell is the Fred Thompson of far-left Republicans. The squishes get hyped but then he fails them by failing to actually raise money and campaign.

          • mbecker908

            my opinion in CA politics. :-)

            I really could have sworn I saw something about him dropping out of the current Gov’s race to run for Senate. Oh well.

          • proudgop

            he was running for Governor but dropped out and switch to US Senate race

            u are correct

            He did raise 1.6 million already since he made switch which is darn impressive. I don’t think he can self finance at all? can he?

  • medamorphus

    DeVore is the only real conservative running, and he has my support. I’m very suspect of both Campbell and Fiorina. That being said, if we cannot get Devore across the finish line, we must not let Boxer win. I will support who I have to with an “R” after their name to get rid of Boxer. I want the most conservative candidate that we can get ELECTED. It’s not always ideal, but we have to fight and claw for progress every inch of the way. Defeating Boxer is the goal. The more Conservative the better, but Boxer has to go down.

  • http://erickbrockway.wordpress.com/ Erick Brockway

    That would be Chuck DeVore.
    Deal with it missy.

  • JSobieski

    Wouldn’t that be a sweet outcome?

    • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

      In the polls I’ve seen (READ MY SITE!), Campbell seems to have captured most of the anti-Carly vote when he entered.

      I’m not sure what to make of it. Are a lot of conservatives backing Carly on account of endorsements like Coburn’s, or that she’s was the CEO of a major company while Campbell is a career academic and politician?

      Are the small-government Republicans fooled by Campbell’s incredibly wrong reputation as a libertarian?

      • JSobieski

        several weeks ago while HCR was still hot, and the was treated like he was a “true fiscal conservative” by a local radio host who is otherwise pretty good.

        It looks like CA in 2010 is mirroring the presidential race in 2008. Maybe the majority of conservatices in California are Eeyore conservatives, just like in 2008 so many thought it was hopeless, so the voted for a Republican nominee who pretty much guaranteed that it became hopeless?

        Campbell and Carly need to be exposed for who they really are.

        What was Coburn smoking?

  • Aaron Gardner
  • polaedra28

    I like the way you think!

  • mollybwizer

    What a scary rude bunch of REPLIERS out there…as vicious and small as some LIBS I know.

    Whoa…I am sorry to see the haters on our side too, but not surprised.

    Take care and hope Campbell defeats Boxer!

  • mbecker908

    You’ve managed two comments in this diary – which does double your previous total – and neither one of them addresses specific issues commenters have with Campbell.

    Let me also note, I don’t give a rip about this race one way or another. I’d prefer DeVore, but I can’t vote for him and my money is going into other races at this point and I will support whoever wins the primary – which I noted above.

    Both Neil and Josh have provide specifics as to why Campbell is less than acceptable in the primary and the best you can do is throw “haters” around. What a pathetic example of stupidity you are. This is not a site where you can drop by and throw stuff against the wall to see if it will stick and not expect to get called on it. Address the issues Josh and Neil – who are both CA residents – have brought up or take a long walk off a short pier.

  • Aaron Gardner

    Probably not. ;)