BREAKING: Kansas Abortionist Shot, Killed at Church


Promoted from the diaries by Neil Stevens, with a comment: This is apparently not the first time George Tiller has been shot at. He was shot in both arms back in 1993. He also has a history of flouting sensible regulation and oversight on abortion, in a quest to perform as many late-term abortions as possible.

Because of that, combined with the fact that reports say there were steps taken to cut out security cameras, I find it highly likely that this was a politically-motivated shooting. It is entirely the wrong thing to do though, achieves nothing to save lives, and must be prosecuted vigorously. The rule of law matters. After all, how could we even enforce abortion laws if we can’t enforce murder laws?

Abortionist shot and killed in Wichita, newspaper says.

Given the nature of this breaking news event, this post will not exceed the minimum threshold word count or supplemental analysis.

Category:

RSS feed | Trackback URI

334 Comments Leave a comment

The RIGHT needs to get all over this and DENOUNCE it

David Hinz Sunday, May 31st at 1:42PM EDT (link)

this type of violence will be used as a club against us all — because of some whacko

Watch for immediate calls for censorship of “Hate Radio”

They'll use it as a club anyway

bk Sunday, May 31st at 1:56PM EDT (link)

This is one idiot who should get the death penalty and it will be “proof” that all pro-life people are haters and killers, whereas for example dozens if not hundreds of ACORN vote cheaters are called isolated incidents not indicative of the good things the organization does.

Unfortunately, you're right.

INC Sunday, May 31st at 1:58PM EDT (link)

How long has it been since something like this has happened? It’s been quite a number of years I think.

Over ten years since the last murder; only a couple since the last few arsons; only a few months since the last serious property crime.

CrabCakes Sunday, May 31st at 6:33PM EDT (link)

hi bad penny

David Hinz Sunday, May 31st at 6:35PM EDT (link)

Other than that bit of data

CrabCakes Sunday, May 31st at 6:38PM EDT (link)

(which I only provided b/c I keep track of this sort of thing and no one else had bothered to reply), I don’t have anything to contribute to this discussion.

The response by the vast majority of the good folks here is appropriate, and I’d rather not use this sad occasion as an opportunity to debate.

one way to look at that data

bk Monday, June 1st at 3:18AM EDT (link)

Another way to look at it would be that there were about 15,000,000 abortions performed between Tiller’s murder and the last one before that in the US, so it’s not like abortionists are getting mowed down every time they abort a fetus.

Having said that, I must add that the Army of God group are some sickos that have no place in civilized society.

 
 
 
 
 

As predicted, this is the Dkos diary about it

bk Sunday, May 31st at 2:05PM EDT (link)

A sad day for America and for Kansas but I fear many are celebrating this.

With the Limbaugh’s, Beck’s and Hannity’s preaching hate and intolerance this should not come as a surprise.

I’m guessing the comments are along the same line, just with lots of obscenities.

I guess there is something wrong with me

leppard Sunday, May 31st at 2:21PM EDT (link)

I really dont care if it gets used against us.

Do we dismiss what this guy was doing because someone took the law in their own hands? Granted, we shouldnt take the law into our own hands. But if the left is going to paint a picture, then Id like to take the opportunity to paint the picture right back on late-term abortions.

IMHO, Denouncing does no good alone. The left doesn’t play fair.

Concentrated power has always been the enemy of liberty.

Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them.

No government ever voluntarily reduces itself in size. Government programs, once launched, never disappear. Actually, a government bureau is the nearest thing to eternal life we’ll ever see on this earth!

They Don't Get to Define Us

red4ever Sunday, May 31st at 2:41PM EDT (link)

First, if we let the Left label us and form the debate, we are already behind.

Second, shooting someone for disagreeing with you is something that all right thinking people should oppose, whether on the right or left.

Third, I don’t care how the Left plays, I have to look myself in the mirror in the mornings not them.

The hottest places in hell are reserved for those who, in times of great moral crisis, maintain their neutrality.
Dante

We'll have to disagree as

leppard Sunday, May 31st at 3:39PM EDT (link)

That really wasn’t my point. The left will label us whether we denounce or not.

Secondly, I dont think he was shot becuz there was a disagreement; The shooter probably thought of it as a Stauffenberg.

Concentrated power has always been the enemy of liberty.

Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them.

No government ever voluntarily reduces itself in size. Government programs, once launched, never disappear. Actually, a government bureau is the nearest thing to eternal life we’ll ever see on this earth!

 
 
 

dKos says WE preach hate an intolerance?

E Pluribus Unum Sunday, May 31st at 6:18PM EDT (link)

That’s rich.

Carthago delenda est

color me SHOCKED!

David Hinz Sunday, May 31st at 6:29PM EDT (link)

of course, if anyone would recognize hate and intolerance, it would be that guy…

…good thing Dr Tiller wasn’t a “Blackwater mercenary” or a “little Eichmann”

Nappy 'see, that Terrorists watch report was right'

JLenardDetroit Sunday, May 31st at 6:50PM EDT (link)

okay, sure she isn’t going to say that in public, but you can bet amongst her Liberal circles (including the MSM, who will run wild with this) she says it, IMO.

Further, this will NO DOUBT somehow be tied to HATE CRIME statutes (such a joke, yet ANOTHER violation of EQUAL PROTECTIONS)…..

If an Enviro-nut shoots a man chopping down a tree because he HATES those who work in the Foresting industry….. That won’t be considered Hate or even TERRORISM! But, we sure will be hearing Terrorism (which, it is - burning down a Clinic is an act of Terrorism and assassinating someone because of what he does and Political differences is too) but we will also hear the HATE CRIMES aspect played to the hilt. Liberals believe CERTAIN HATREDS are less Criminal than others. A very sorry and sad thing but it does relate in the whole SoSo thing because Hate Crime vs. Equal Protections.

(RS:Help) (JLD) (Hollyweird) (Brain-deads) (SPIN-cycle) (Obamaocare) (Party of kNOw) (Conservatism) (TEApeats) (respectful) (Reco) (Quotes) (removeRINOs.com) (RSmas)
+ 0bama Lies & your Bank acct will Die! (4/15 Truthers)
+ Heil “O” Hell No Obamao is NOT MY PRESIDENT! “No U won’t”
+ I want “O” to FAIL (here, here, & whole Diary (Ofail) here, is why)
The first Liberal was Satan” - a Rush caller (other Quotes)

???

David Hinz Sunday, May 31st at 6:57PM EDT (link)

we were talking about Markos Moulitsas Zúñiga…the purple prince of darkness.

you, no doubt are referring to Homeland Securities Fraud Chief Janet Threeflavors of Ice Cream…

…but your point is noted.

 
 
 
 

The Civilist of Wars?

blesscurse Sunday, May 31st at 10:29PM EDT (link)

Expect Bill O’Reilly to send his goons to ambush anyone writing about his involvement with the environment that made this terrorist hate crime possible and, indeed, probable.

G'Bye (nt)

Neil Stevens Sunday, May 31st at 10:30PM EDT (link)

Want to run for conservatives? Give.
There Is No Crisis

You've been kept busy by this thread Neil. NT

redstatebluestate123 Monday, June 1st at 2:27AM EDT (link)
 

PS: Adjust the tin foil better next time

Neil Stevens Sunday, May 31st at 10:31PM EDT (link)

Maybe then you’ll bypass the Global O’Reilly Zionist Network radar grid.

Wacko.

Want to run for conservatives? Give.
There Is No Crisis

 
 
 

exactly right

JLenardDetroit Sunday, May 31st at 3:14PM EDT (link)

perfectly points out how one incident makes “the norm” according to the MSM spin while ignoring “the actual pattern” of the things the MSM wants to ignore/dismiss….

It backfires to some extent…. This is so rare, the attempts to distort it by the MSM as anything more than a LONE NUTJOB won’t be lost on many folks. It is why Newspapers are dying…. It is why NBC,CNN,etc… ratings FALL…. people are finally awakening to the BIAS…. If you know anyone that has yet to read Bernard Goldberg’s book BIAS. I bought several copies of it on tape and gave them to others. Bernie takes an OBJECTIVE Insider look without the PARTISANSHIP (like, say, Ann’s Slander - which is basically her version with the shock language/quotes)….

Yes it is an older book, but STILL very relevant and in a tone people can/may listen to above beyond his current “Slobbering Love Affair”….

(RS:Help) (JLD) (Hollyweird) (Brain-deads) (SPIN-cycle) (Obamaocare) (Party of kNOw) (Conservatism) (TEApeats) (respectful) (Reco) (Quotes) (removeRINOs.com) (RSmas)
+ 0bama Lies & your Bank acct will Die! (4/15 Truthers)
+ Heil “O” Hell No Obamao is NOT MY PRESIDENT! “No U won’t”
+ I want “O” to FAIL (here, here, & whole Diary (Ofail) here, is why)
The first Liberal was Satan” - a Rush caller (other Quotes)

 

Vote cheating = Murder?

argh Monday, June 1st at 1:09AM EDT (link)

Yes, vote cheaters are the same as murderers. Wow.

hey little buddy.......where did you come from?

$peciallist Monday, June 1st at 1:14AM EDT (link)

you want a treat?

 

G'bye (nt)

Neil Stevens Monday, June 1st at 1:19AM EDT (link)

Want to run for conservatives? Give.
There Is No Crisis

 
 
 
 

Christian Defense Coalition Condemns Shooting of Dr. George Tiller

INC Sunday, May 31st at 1:49PM EDT (link)

This group is on it:

Christian and pro-life leaders will hold a news conference in front of the US Supreme Court on Monday, June 1, at 10:00 A.M…

Rev. Patrick J. Mahoney, Director of the Washington, DC based Christian Defense Coalition is presently available for comment at 540-538-4741

Rev. Patrick Mahoney condemns the shooting of Dr. George Tiller.

From Pro-Life Blogs

INC Sunday, May 31st at 2:19PM EDT (link)

George Tiller was Murdered

I hope you will join me in denouncing this violent act of lawless vigilantism which stands in direct opposition to the mission and vision of all pro-life organizations. My condolences to the victims of this act and my sincere desire that God’s grace would be upon them.

I wanted to mention this group as well.

 
 

Well-handled, Neil. nt

smagar Sunday, May 31st at 2:15PM EDT (link)

“Who will stand/On either hand/And guard this bridge with me?” (Macaulay)

 

Killing Tiller was the ethical thing to do

tankertodd Sunday, May 31st at 2:25PM EDT (link)

I can’t help but to follow the logic. “Doctor” Tiller is committing late-term abortions, which by any sane person’s calculation is infanticide. This is murder. Through perversion of the law, this is permitted, despite it flying the face of the history of civilization. This has been tolerated for two decades, and nothing has happened to stop the killing. He would have continued to commit this crime.

I can’t escape the conclusion that killing Tiller was the right thing to do. I am uncomfortable with this conclusion because it’s dangerous. But nevertheless, it was the ethical thing to do. Tiller would have continued to take numerous lives. Nothing was going to stop him. So someone did stop him. And now fewer lives will be taken.

We celebrate the breaking the laws every time the media canonizes Rosa Parks. She broke the law. There is no question of that. The question is whether it was the ethical thing to do (it was.) We celebrate the Nazi resistance, we celebrate the Tiananmen Square uprising. I’m sure those were all illegal actions, yet were unquestionably the moral things to do. So how would killing a killer, when all options are exhausted, not also be the right thing to do?

You have to wonder if the reason why we have a legal system is in order to steal the oxygen from moral vigilantism. You have to wonder if the legal system breaks down whether vigilantism, when all other options fail, becomes a moral imperative.

———————————
The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race - Chief Justice Roberts

Oh Geesh

Swamp_Yankee Sunday, May 31st at 2:37PM EDT (link)

The MSM is going to have a field day with you guys. Please stop.

Swamp_Yankee -- can you read?

David Hinz Sunday, May 31st at 2:42PM EDT (link)

“…with you guys.”

can you read the ENTIRE thread before painting YOU GUYS with the liberal brush?

Geesh is right! learn to read…

Yeah

Swamp_Yankee Sunday, May 31st at 2:45PM EDT (link)

It’s called the Reply to This button . I use it. You should learn what it means. And no that isn’t the only post with that frame of thought.

I happen to agree with Hinz

Neil Stevens Sunday, May 31st at 3:39PM EDT (link)

Watch your generalizations, sir. The fact that you used Reply To This only means you knew better, and therefore aggravates what you did.

Want to run for conservatives? Give.
There Is No Crisis

Moderating

Swamp_Yankee Sunday, May 31st at 3:41PM EDT (link)

the use of plural versus singular now. Well done.

If you don't like it

Neil Stevens Sunday, May 31st at 3:46PM EDT (link)

You have the choice of using the contact form or finding your way out the door.

Want to run for conservatives? Give.
There Is No Crisis

 
 
 
 
 

Screw the MSM

tankertodd Sunday, May 31st at 3:44PM EDT (link)

nt

———————————
The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race - Chief Justice Roberts

 
 

I cannot agree with you

David Hinz Sunday, May 31st at 2:44PM EDT (link)

had an appropriate court of law found him guilty — which he was — and sentenced him to death, I could agree…

vigilante is not an answer…

 

yea... something wrong with your logic there.

Jewels Sunday, May 31st at 2:56PM EDT (link)

The difference between Rosa Parks and the Tiller’s murder is that Parks didn’t pull out a revolver and shoot the bus-driver. Her resistance was peaceful.

As was the resistance in Tiananmen Square. As was the hiding of Jews from Nazis.

The reason we have a legal system is to keep order. Where do you draw the line between who is ok to kill and who isn’t? The legal system makes that clear.

In the end, this will do far more harm to the prolife cause than it will help. Tiller has become a martyr. Pro-choicers and leftists will point to him and call him noble and the media will make all prolifers something to fear. If people fear you, they will not listen to your message.

And in the end, more children will die because of it.

Allow me to double-down

tankertodd Sunday, May 31st at 3:55PM EDT (link)

Those examples don’t suit? How about the famed Operation Valkryie, where German officers attempted the assassination of Adolf Hitler. These illegal acts are celebrated to this day as a minor bright spot for Germans during those dark days. They are celebrated as the few who stood up while the German people abided genocide.

So if Valkryie was the right thing to do, is it then a question of gradation? Does a guy like Tiller have to hit a tipping point of evil before stopping him is justified? Killing Hitler would have stopped a whole lot more than the deaths of a few hundred babies, so perhaps that is right but killing Tiller is wrong. I would support that - you absolutely can’t have a single murder answered by a vigilante act. Killing O.J. Simpson, for example, would be wrong. One could expect that O.J. won’t reoffend, especially now that he’s in jail.

So then does this all become an exercise in how much is too much for a person to tolerate? As Tiller continues to kill late-term babies (assuming he was still doing that) is it reasonable to expect that for every killed baby, the chance that a vigilante will step up increases? How much is too much for a person to take? Judging from the thread this seems to make sense - many folks still reject the idea, but others are warm to it. I think we can agree that no one relishes the idea of vigilantism. But you have to surmise that over time if someone like Tiller is operating business-as-usual that his life is increasingly at risk.

———————————
The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race - Chief Justice Roberts

I can't agree with you

Jack_Savage Sunday, May 31st at 4:16PM EDT (link)

I think that at the end of the day, in America, the rule of law is the most precious thing we have and the only thing that stands between us and anarchy and tribalism. It is the basic agreement that allows us to come together to help others, both here and abroad.

Is the rule of law in America more precious than the lives of the babies Tiller has killed, and the lives of the babies he would have killed as he continued his work tomorrow? Well, let me put it this way - is freedom worth more than the lives of those who have died for it? They sure thought so.

Is the world better off without Tiller in it? Yes. I also believe that the world would be better off without Keith Olbermann in it, but that certainly does not justify homicide.

This was an uncomfortably close call for me, and as such I am going to firm up some priorities in my thinking.

P.S. - On a side note, it stuns me that he went to church, or that they would have him.

Disagree with half of your P.S.

ss396 Sunday, May 31st at 5:00PM EDT (link)

A Christian church should have him. We are all sinners, and there is no hierarchy or gradation of sin: sin is sin is sin, and we are all guilty. The difference comes in on participating in the Sacraments. Those are works toward forgiveness of sin. But to be forgiven, the sinner (me, you, him) must recognize the sin, be repentant of it, and seek God’s help to overcome it. By being an abortionist, he is not repentant, nor is he seeking forgiveness for the sin. One hopes that the congregation is working on this. Pray for him; you never know how God’s Grace will come.

A couple key passages:
- All have sinned and come short of the glory of God (Rom 3:23)
- There is not a just man upon the earth that doeth good and sinneth not (Eccl 7:20)
- For whosever shall keep the whole Law, yet offend it at one point, he is guilty of it all (Jam 2:10)

If you pay people to sit on their duffs, you cannot be surprised when they do.

This is what he was missing

Jack_Savage Sunday, May 31st at 6:54PM EDT (link)

“…to be forgiven, the sinner (me, you, him) must recognize the sin, be repentant of it, and seek God’s help to overcome it. ”

I agree, and he was doing none of the above. If the church believed what he was doing was wrong, there is a set of actions relating to discipline that is elaborated on in the Bible. It seems to me that neither the church, nor Tiller, is on the right side of any of the teachings of Jesus.

Prayer will not help Tiller now. He stands trembling before the Lord God Almighty.

 

Not only was he NOT repentent, he was

mbecker908 Sunday, May 31st at 7:52PM EDT (link)

a “leader” in the congregation and had apparently been in attendance for quite some time.

CongressCritter™: Never have so few felt like they were owed so much by so many for so little.

I guess the fellow parishioners didn't stand around

olsmithie Sunday, May 31st at 8:48PM EDT (link)

and ask the Doc what kind of week he had, or “how’s business?”

It is really is sick when a major denomination (or several) just look the other way at their members who kill for a living, worse yet, make them leaders in the church and generally don’t have a problem with their profession.

Can’t speak for other churches, but at least that one has a “lot of ’splainin to do .” one day.

Not a judge, just a fruit inspector.

Regards

Yeh, I noted this as well.

jeffreywturner Monday, June 1st at 8:46AM EDT (link)

I am not familiar with this particular denomination, but they are probably the same brand of Christianity as the Anglican Communion, who condones sodomy by ordaining male preists with live-in boyfriends, etc.

These Christians are hurting the cause of Christianity by legitimizing these abominations.

Ever notice that the churches with dwindling memberships (ie: US Catholics, Anglican/Episcipols, etc.) are the ones who don’t take a hard stand on these issues, but the thriving churches (ie: Southern Baptists, etc.) are the ones who draw a clear line in the sand?

“Life is too short, can’t we all just eat pork and kill some terrorists?”

It really was an insult, even without regard to the homosexual issue

Mike gamecock DeVine Monday, June 1st at 9:46PM EDT (link)

for the Episcopal Church to ordain a bishop that had abandoned his wife and children to pursue an affair that started during the marriage.

amazing

Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” - Andrew Jackson

 

This Denomination

ss396 Monday, June 1st at 10:50PM EDT (link)

This particular denomination, the Evangelical Lutheran Church of America (ELCA) is in what is called ‘pulpit fellowship’ with the Episcopalians. That is, they either concur on all substantial matters of doctrine, or they are caught up in the ecumenical movement so thoroughly that, to them, unity trumps doctrine. They can preach from each other’s pulpits. The other main Lutheran Synods - Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod (LCMS) and the Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod (WELS) - are appalled at this, and do not recognize the ELCAs as Lutherans at all just because of issues such as what you mentioned.

Again, it is not a matter of the sin, because we are all sinful: there is no ‘holier-than-thou’; no Christian no matter how zealous is better able to resist Satan’s temptations than is anyone else. Christians are not better people - never have been, never will be. The only difference between us and anyone else is that we ask for, and receive, forgiveness. But it is a very different matter when someone is being unrepentant. That’s where private admonition, public admonition, kicked up to denial of Sacraments, and escalating to excommunication if necessary (all spelled out in Matthew 18), is so urgent: to somehow convey the message that God isn’t kidding.

Perhaps Mr. Tiller repented with his last breaths. He is beyond prayer, so I cannot pray for him. But I can hope that he did.

If you pay people to sit on their duffs, you cannot be surprised when they do.

 
 
 
 

Read 1 Corinthians Chapter 5

FortitudineVincimus Monday, June 1st at 3:22AM EDT (link)

Perhaps we can consider what the bible says directly about sin in the church. Paul talks to this issue directly in his letter to the Corinthian Church.

First, some background. The city of Corinth back in Paul’s day was known for its debauchery. Although likely in ruin by Paul’s time, the city was the location of temple of Aphrodite, which housed its 1000 temple prostitutes. But their kin-in-trade continued to offer their services in this port city where many sailors were willing to spend their money. According to The Biblical World In Pictures, “Even by the Classical age it had earned a reputation for its libertine atmosphere; to call someone a ‘Corinithian lass’ was to impugn her morals.” The name Corinth was a synonym for immorality.

In 1 Corinthians Chapter 5 Paul addresses the Corinthian church. One of the members is having sexual relations with his mother (or step mother) — something that was scandelous even by Corinthian standards (which is saying something!). And the church is proud of its tolerant attitude to this behavior! So Paul rebukes them, saying this person should be put out of the church:

“1It is actually reported that there is sexual immorality among you, and of a kind that does not occur even among pagans: A man has his father’s wife. 2And you are proud! Shouldn’t you rather have been filled with grief and have put out of your fellowship the man who did this? ”

He goes on in verses 9 - 11 to explain that people within the church are treated differently than people outside the church in respect to their sin. And he finally concludes in verse 12 that “12What business is it of mine to judge those outside the church? Are you not to judge those inside? 13God will judge those outside. “Expel the wicked man from among you.”

The Bible describes how to do this in a loving manner in other locations.

Taking these verses into consideration, along with the rest of the Bible, it seems to me that we might say something like this in regards to the matter at hand: There is room in the church for anyone who recognizes the supremacy of God’s law and in recognizing breaches of that law in their own life, acknowledge the error and are repentant of it. Denial God’s law and refusal to repent for trangressions of that law hurt the body of Christ and the church’s testimony, and are grounds for dismissal. As far as I know, most major Christian denominations in the US have policies along these lines.

And just a side note on another comment:
It is certainly true that there is no hierarchy of sin in regards to how it separates us from Christ and that all are equally in need of his grace for salvation. From the tiniest of lies to the most horrific murdur, Christ had to die to reach across that infinite gap of sinful man to perfect God. But it is definitely not true that God sees all sin equally in terms of its degree of earthly destruction or due consequences. This is clearly evident by a simple look at the *principles* of justice given to Ancient Israel (aside: the People’s Law of Ancient Isreal along with Anglo-Saxon Common Law are the pillars upon which the Founding Fathers based the law for their new republic). Certain wrongs, for example, simply required repayment of the damages to the victim, while others called for the penalty of death. (Arguments regarding the old and new covanent aside).

Excommunication

ss396 Monday, June 1st at 8:50AM EDT (link)

Excommunication is still a part of the church, yes, although rarely practiced. You’ve surely seen the storm caused by even the hint that the Sacraments should be withheld from an unrepentant sinner (e.g. famous pro-abortionists). In the face of that, society doesn’t want to hear or learn that the far more dramatic act of excommunication is an act of Love (2 Thes 3:14-15). But the church will never be seen as a moral force, or even a driving force, in society if it cannot or does not hold to its own discipline.

As to your other point about the hierarchy of sin, when dealing with salvation of the soul there is no hierarchy. The rules and orders set down to the Israelites were how to conduct and order their society. They were not laid down as a substitute for God’s judgments about sin, for only God can look into a person’s heart. Indeed, if every violation to Mosaic law merited the death penalty there would have been no to receive Christ’s salvation! Cheers.

If you pay people to sit on their duffs, you cannot be surprised when they do.

Hit the nail on the head

FortitudineVincimus Monday, June 1st at 11:32AM EDT (link)

As I read your comments, we agree and you are exactly right on both points, although I am coming at it from a Protestant perspective. The church should not be concerned with what society thinks, for Christ has said it will appear foolish to the world. “For the message of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God.” 1 Cor 1:18. And “For the wisdom of this world is foolishness in God’s sight.” 1 Cor 3:19

 
 
 
 
 

sadly, I'm going to have to agree

ciscoguy Sunday, May 31st at 5:37PM EDT (link)

It’s funny what our society has become. Some SEAL’s put bullets through the brains of a few pirates, and everyone up the chain of command is lauded as a hero. Yet, this death merchant’s abortion mill has slaughtered multitudes of babies, sometimes a day to term for medical reasons such as “depression” but is able to operate under the law….and the guy who kills him is the murderer.

Of course, under the strict interpretation of the law, this is undeniably true, but who’s really the bad guy here? We all know Tiller is cooking in hell, but how do you think the perp will be judged when he stands before God? Is God beholden to the laws of our land or the laws of humanity, first among them our right to exist? Aren’t these the same laws our republic is supposed to be founded in - that we are endowed by our Creator with unalienable rights: life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness?

They're both bad guys

Neil Stevens Sunday, May 31st at 5:39PM EDT (link)

Just because Tiller was bad, it doens’t make his killer good.

Want to run for conservatives? Give.
There Is No Crisis

Then should those SEAL's be equally damned?

ciscoguy Sunday, May 31st at 7:55PM EDT (link)

If the distinction between a hero and a bad guy is whether or not you’re following orders, I’m having a tough time understanding that logic. Again, letter of the law I see the difference, but I think you get my point. (P.S. - I do believe those guys are heros. I’m just trying to understand the difference here.)

That's odd

Neil Stevens Sunday, May 31st at 7:58PM EDT (link)

You think our troops are heroes, and yet when looking for somebody to compare with a murderer, you think of them as your first example.

First rule of holes.

Want to run for conservatives? Give.
There Is No Crisis

first thing that came to mind

ciscoguy Sunday, May 31st at 10:25PM EDT (link)

feel free to insert your favorite despot and his assassin as a better example

Oh so now the SEALs are equivalent to a despot's assassins?

Neil Stevens Sunday, May 31st at 10:26PM EDT (link)

First rule of holes, seriously.

Want to run for conservatives? Give.
There Is No Crisis

Are you kidding?

ciscoguy Sunday, May 31st at 10:34PM EDT (link)

The idea is protecting the innocent. So, yes, if it’s a SEAL killing some pirate to save 1 person or killing someone like bin Laden to save many more, the purpose is the same. Sheesh. Grab a cup of coffee or go to bed.

10...9...8...7....... -nt-

bs Sunday, May 31st at 10:35PM EDT (link)

Decorum is fo’ suckas

 

Yeah, you're really missing the point

Neil Stevens Sunday, May 31st at 10:38PM EDT (link)

A church is not a battle field.

The Navy SEALs wouldn’t shoot UBL at an innocent church service, either.

You’re missing the point badly.

Not all killing is the same. Murder is murder.

Want to run for conservatives? Give.
There Is No Crisis

I'm pretty sure we would take our shot at bin Laden anywhere we could

ciscoguy Sunday, May 31st at 10:48PM EDT (link)

You keep saying I’m “missing the point” but nowhere do you make any cogent arguments about any of this and misconstrue everything I say.

I would assert that your point is that you want everyone on here to accept that murdering this monster was just as bad as murdering an innocent stranger. Sure, the law says it’s so, and you’re free to belive that if you want. I don’t.

Do you have any evidence to back up this claim?

Neil Stevens Sunday, May 31st at 10:50PM EDT (link)

It’s pretty distasteful that you attack our volunteers overseas, accusing them of holding your views, whent hey conveniently can’t defend themselves against this libel.

Good day.

I advise you to find other threads to post in, and other matters to discuss. The first rule of holes is STOP DIGGING ALREADY.

Want to run for conservatives? Give.
There Is No Crisis

Sorry, I thought this place was for honest discussion and civil discourse

ciscoguy Sunday, May 31st at 10:56PM EDT (link)

I guess I was wrong. It’s clear there’s only one POV permitted in this thread - yours. Good day, indeed.

ahh, the classic Moby line

David Hinz Sunday, May 31st at 11:07PM EDT (link)

do you have any idea how many times we have seen some Moby say, “I thought this place was for honest discussion” yatta yatta yatta

 
 
 

hey criscoguy

David Hinz Sunday, May 31st at 10:51PM EDT (link)

ever hear of a guy named Bill Clinton? He had a couple shots at Osama bin Laden and didn’t take them because of collateral damage [read innocent civilians]

and somehow I do not believe you are arguing in good faith…

TIA…

I think I've been muzzled by the thought police

ciscoguy Sunday, May 31st at 10:58PM EDT (link)

or else I might say something to the effect that had slick willy had a 9/11 crystal ball, he might have acted differently.

Seek help (nt)

Neil Stevens Sunday, May 31st at 11:01PM EDT (link)

Want to run for conservatives? Give.
There Is No Crisis

get a life (nt)

ciscoguy Sunday, May 31st at 11:03PM EDT (link)

No seriously

Neil Stevens Sunday, May 31st at 11:45PM EDT (link)

I know a professional who can direct you to some local counseling.

Want to run for conservatives? Give.
There Is No Crisis

I'm sure you do - I bet you're his #1 customer (nt)

ciscoguy Monday, June 1st at 12:16AM EDT (link)

Seriously? What part of "Stop Digging Already" was unclear. Quick, tell the moderator he's got mental problems! THERE's a good plan! nt

redstatebluestate123 Monday, June 1st at 12:23AM EDT (link)

And to continue bs' countdown....

TNJim Monday, June 1st at 12:27AM EDT (link)

6… 5…. 4…. 3….

“No. You can’t” -Moe Lane

Nah he's not gone for this

Neil Stevens Monday, June 1st at 12:33AM EDT (link)

I gave as well as I took there.

I’m done with this subthread now though.

But be warned cisco: What you’ve said to me could easily get you banned if you say it to others. In a heartbeat.

Want to run for conservatives? Give.
There Is No Crisis

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A hero is a sandwich

molybdanthan Sunday, May 31st at 8:12PM EDT (link)

And there is no logic at work here today.

 

The SEALs you mention were clearly defending a life,

olsmithie Sunday, May 31st at 8:55PM EDT (link)

no comparison to Tiller or his alleged killer.

Regards

all missing the point

ciscoguy Sunday, May 31st at 10:22PM EDT (link)

Those pirates were shot to protect an innocent life. They were ordered to do so, carried out their orders and were rightfully praised for doing their jobs well.

If the motive of Tiller’s assassin was to defend the innocents that Tiller would have ordinarily exterminated tomorrow at work, what is really the difference here besides the legality or illegality of either act? (Assuming that was the motive)

Of course, the abortion advocate will say a fetus isn’t a human, so therein lies the difference. And, in a legal sense, they’re right. I, however, look at science and say the law is wrong - those are humans, so while the act is unlawful, the motives are no more unethical than those who made the decision to drop those pirates.

Put another way, if it were lawful for me to kill Norwegians at my office and someone pops me on the way to store, is my killer the tyrant or me - or both?

You're making no sense at all (nt)

Neil Stevens Sunday, May 31st at 10:24PM EDT (link)

Want to run for conservatives? Give.
There Is No Crisis

Concur nt

olsmithie Sunday, May 31st at 10:27PM EDT (link)

what part are you having trouble understanding? (nt)

ciscoguy Sunday, May 31st at 10:28PM EDT (link)

I happen to like Norwegians, cool accent , pleasant on the ear.

olsmithie Sunday, May 31st at 10:49PM EDT (link)

My wife is guilty of asking two or three questions when one will do in the same sentence. It is not an effective communication tool.

I do not have the advantage of being inside your head when I read your post, so it will help us both if you write from that perspective.

My message is that :

1. The SEALSs were operating from a correct legal and moral standpoint.

2. The Dr. was operating from a sound legal position, but some would say not a sound moral position. (Others would disagree, of course.)

3. The killer is legally wrong in any case, while some argue morally he was right. (Others would disagree, of course.)

I don’t plan to shoot at Norwegians or anyone else, for that matter, tyrant or not, so I will not respond to that question.

No disrespect, but I’m just not sure what you meant.

Regards

Thanks for the reply

ciscoguy Monday, June 1st at 12:13AM EDT (link)

My point was not really anything to do with the current legality of this - obviously, we all know the act of killing Tiller was a crime. We also know our laws are mostly shaped around what we consider moral standards, and you and I can probably both agree our abortion laws are out of wack with that. Of course, others would disagree there.

I know you and Neil are zeroing in on what the law says this type of kiling is - murder, and there’s no need for discussion there from a legal aspect of it. That’s what it is, and it’s wrong. But, what’s wrong from a legal standpoint may have an asterisk on it when looking at it from a moral standpoint. I believe that to be the case here, since I believe fewer people will lose their lives tomorrow on account of this crime (of course, organizations like NARAL would disagree since they don’t believe them to be real humans).

I think we’re pretty much in agreement. I’m just saying, what I think are the motivations are for this (saving others) tells me that morally, this murder is not the same as others whose reasons are entirely selfish, even if they are the same legally.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

If his name had been Mengele

MNConservative Sunday, May 31st at 8:01PM EDT (link)

instead of Tiller, and we were reading about this in a history book, I think most of the comments here would be different.

Sometimes it takes time and distance for people to gain perspective, especially because that perspective condemns us. We’re just like the German public, turning a blind eye to the smoke coming from the camps.

So when are you leaving America?

Neil Stevens Sunday, May 31st at 8:05PM EDT (link)

Please hurry, since you clearly hate us so much.

Want to run for conservatives? Give.
There Is No Crisis

You know I'm right

MNConservative Sunday, May 31st at 8:26PM EDT (link)

because you’re resorting to abuse.

Abuse?

Neil Stevens Sunday, May 31st at 8:31PM EDT (link)

Want to run for conservatives? Give.
There Is No Crisis

It will be more effective to just delete the comments you don't agree with

tankertodd Sunday, May 31st at 8:51PM EDT (link)

Or just delete the accounts. Either way is fine with me. Ad hominem is worse than being stupid.

———————————
The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race - Chief Justice Roberts

But it's fun!

Neil Stevens Sunday, May 31st at 8:57PM EDT (link)

What better time to have fun than with a poster who equates my country with Nazi Germany?

Want to run for conservatives? Give.
There Is No Crisis

I mean seriously

Neil Stevens Sunday, May 31st at 8:58PM EDT (link)

There’s stupid, and there’s stupid.

Want to run for conservatives? Give.
There Is No Crisis

I rest my case.

MNConservative Sunday, May 31st at 9:14PM EDT (link)
 
 
 
 
 
 

You are forgetting something essential

JustLeaveMeAlone Sunday, May 31st at 9:07PM EDT (link)

That God is in charge of history.

We humans were given commandments — including “Thou shalt not kill.”

We weren’t told to be sure no one else kills. Just not to do it ourselves. The rest is in God’s hands. When it comes to the meting out punishment and retribution stuff, He’s much better at it, so let’s leave it to Him.

“To compel a man to subsidize with his taxes the propagation of ideas which he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.” Thomas Jefferson

 
 

God is very clear on this ciscoguy

redstatebluestate123 Monday, June 1st at 12:20AM EDT (link)

1) “Vengeance is mine.”
2) “Thou shalt not kill.”

That would seem to end the discussion.

I think you'll find that the correct expression is

Lammo Monday, June 1st at 1:17AM EDT (link)

Thou shalt not murder. That is, thou shalt not take innocent life. If it’s “Thou shalt not kill” then you cannot have capital punishment, self defense or just war theory. Clearly we have all of the above, despite the best efforts of the Left to the contrary.

ACORN: Association of Criminals Obama Represented in the Nineties. (jupitersuite)

Don’t be so open minded that your brains fall out. (Fr. John Corapi, SOLT)

Crime never takes a holiday. (Dennis J. O’Shea, R.I.P.)

Unlawful is against the law. Illegal is a sick bird. (Ooold joke)

Outside of a dog, a book is a man’s best friend. Inside of a dog it’s too dark to read. (Groucho Marx)

First of all, this guy's a murderer, so my points both still stand.

redstatebluestate123 Monday, June 1st at 2:37AM EDT (link)

I’m actually unclear whether or not it is “thou shalt not kill” or “thou shalt not murder.” I’ve heard both, and rebuttals of both. As to your other points:

1) I’m opposed to the death penalty.
2) As a black belt, I am specifically trained to incapacitate an attacker without killing, but even leaving that aside I would say that killing in self-defense is only justifiable under very rare circumstances.
3) Just war theory is an entire threadjack by itself, so I don’t want to get into it.

My point was

Lammo Monday, June 1st at 3:32AM EDT (link)

that the killings in the other contexts are not “murder”, that is, the unlawful killing of an innocent person (innocent in the sense of generally not having done anything to get themselves killed). No thread jack intended. Just trying to point out examples of killing that do not constitute murder. Looks like you disagree. Sorry to have troubled you.

ACORN: Association of Criminals Obama Represented in the Nineties. (jupitersuite)

Don’t be so open minded that your brains fall out. (Fr. John Corapi, SOLT)

Crime never takes a holiday. (Dennis J. O’Shea, R.I.P.)

Unlawful is against the law. Illegal is a sick bird. (Ooold joke)

Outside of a dog, a book is a man’s best friend. Inside of a dog it’s too dark to read. (Groucho Marx)

Kowalski

Lammo Monday, June 1st at 3:42AM EDT (link)

I guess I’m assuming when you say “this guy’s a murderer” you are referring to the person who shot and killed Mr. Tiller and NOT Mr. Tiller himself. I certainly agree with you on that point but I doubt we would agree on much else. For example, as far as I am concerned, Tiller was a serial killer, no better than Ted Bundy, Gary Ridgway or Jeffrey Dahmer, and he should have suffered the same fate (death, prison and death respectively) at the hands of the law.

ACORN: Association of Criminals Obama Represented in the Nineties. (jupitersuite)

Don’t be so open minded that your brains fall out. (Fr. John Corapi, SOLT)

Crime never takes a holiday. (Dennis J. O’Shea, R.I.P.)

Unlawful is against the law. Illegal is a sick bird. (Ooold joke)

Outside of a dog, a book is a man’s best friend. Inside of a dog it’s too dark to read. (Groucho Marx)

You are correct that I am not referring to Tiller

redstatebluestate123 Monday, June 1st at 12:49PM EDT (link)

As to your point about Mr. Tiller himself, it follows from a logical pro-life position that abortion should be illegal as it takes a human life, and that therefore those who carry out abortions should be prosecuted as murderers. However, as abortion is not illegal, Mr. Tiller cannot be a serial killer in the legal sense, although certainly there is a case to be made for that in a higher context.

That said, the reason for my post about “thou shalt not kill” and “Vengeance is mine” were a response to this question from criscoguy:

“We all know Tiller is cooking in hell, but how do you think the perp will be judged when he stands before God?”

And I think we both agree that the perp violated the laws of God that I specified above, and therefore our answer is obvious. So I’d say that we agree on more than you thought.

Good to know.

Lammo Monday, June 1st at 1:08PM EDT (link)

Thanks!

ACORN: Association of Criminals Obama Represented in the Nineties. (jupitersuite)

Don’t be so open minded that your brains fall out. (Fr. John Corapi, SOLT)

Crime never takes a holiday. (Dennis J. O’Shea, R.I.P.)

Unlawful is against the law. Illegal is a sick bird. (Ooold joke)

Outside of a dog, a book is a man’s best friend. Inside of a dog it’s too dark to read. (Groucho Marx)

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

More to harm than help...

furious Monday, June 1st at 9:21AM EDT (link)

…actually, repeating “more harm than help” over and over again will do more to harm the pro-life cause than help it. The meme becomes its own story.

As for “martyrs”‘, can you name the last abortion provider murdered without googling them? Quickly, now…

I didn’t think so. Frankly, I choose to remember the 1M+ “martyred” every year in abattoirs like Dr. Tiller’s.

–furious

“I find your lack of faith disturbing.” — Darth Vader

 
 

Murder is never ethical

JustLeaveMeAlone Sunday, May 31st at 3:23PM EDT (link)

There were other ways to stop Tiller — such as the non-violent way Rosa Parks chose to point out an unjust situation.

It is illogical to say “I’m against abortion because it’s murder” but then to murder an abortionist.

Situational ethics are either right or wrong. You can’t have it both ways.

“To compel a man to subsidize with his taxes the propagation of ideas which he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.” Thomas Jefferson

The key characteristic of murder is that it is undoable

6eorge Jetson Sunday, May 31st at 3:36PM EDT (link)

Rosa Parks sat in the front of a bus, she didn’t decide to take someone’s life.

Furthermore, until the perpetrator is caught, I wouldn’t rule out a leftie culprit seeking to create a martyr in the wake of polls showing over half of Americans against abortion.


Hold off on that Mammogram for 10 years

 
 

I disagree

BlueLandRed Sunday, May 31st at 3:41PM EDT (link)

An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind.

Mahatma Gandhi

Gandhi was a fool...

furious Monday, June 1st at 10:13AM EDT (link)

…he advised European Jews to submit willingly to their Nazi exterminators, the genocide would shame the Nazis by the enormity of their evil.

Gandhi was also dealing with the Brits. Had he been a contemporaneous Austrian Jew or Ukrainian kulak he (and anyone like him) would have passed unremarked into a shallow grave

–furious

“I find your lack of faith disturbing.” — Darth Vader

 
 

Anarchy is worse than abortion

Neil Stevens Sunday, May 31st at 3:42PM EDT (link)

Let’s state it plainly: Even if the Obama administration is too cowardly to speak of terrorism (though they might now that it’s politically convenient), this was an act of terrorism to kill a man at church for political reasons.

This terrorist is no better than the lefty terrorists who bomb car lots, the Islamofascist terrorists who fly planes into buildings, or the Nazi terrorists who explode trucks.

Most of us, both on the right and here at Red State, oppose terrorism. We’ve argued long and hard that terrorism as a tactic is a danger to all our lives and must be stopped.

Further, anyone who assists a terrorist, is as bad as a terrorist and must be held accountable.

If you are on the side of terrorism, re-think your association with Red State.

Want to run for conservatives? Give.
There Is No Crisis

An act of terrorism?

tankertodd Sunday, May 31st at 4:04PM EDT (link)

We’ll undoubtedly find out more when the culprit is inevitably caught, but I wouldn’t assume it was for political reasons. Perhaps someone wanted to put a baby killer out of business. If someone wanted to make a political statement I would think something more dramatic would have sufficed.

The gunman did something illegal. The scariest thing about crime is when someone can rationalize it into being the right thing to do. One purpose of the criminal justice system is to keep that situation from happening by doing the right thing.

———————————
The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race - Chief Justice Roberts

Yeah, he's a terrorist

Neil Stevens Sunday, May 31st at 4:06PM EDT (link)

The guy who shot Tiller is a terrorist.

There’s zero doubt about that.

Which side are you on?

Want to run for conservatives? Give.
There Is No Crisis

On the whole...

tankertodd Sunday, May 31st at 4:52PM EDT (link)

I’m on my side. But then I’ve been reading Ayn Rand lately too.

The guy who did this is a murderer. And Redstate certainly doesn’t advocate murder, or crime. I think that would suffice rather than trying to define terrorism.

Criminal actions must not be advocated by any political or religious groups or officers of the court.

———————————
The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race - Chief Justice Roberts

 

Unfortunately

Karina Sunday, May 31st at 5:31PM EDT (link)

DHS will be all over this if it turns out that this person was a pro lifer. It will give substance to their argument that all prolifers (single issue voters) are terrorists. This person has done more damage to our side with one shot than 1000 pro choice rallies. With the MSM painting pro lifers as dangerous, more people will be leery of calling themselves that and standing up for what they truly believe in. I think with the Notre Dame/Obama debacle, somone cracked.

While I can’t mourn Tiller, I can’t advocate this kind of action. Having it happen at a church makes me ill. Knowing how the media will twist the church angle makes me iller (my comment, my word ; ) )

Stop confusing me with the facts, I’m making up my own imagination. ~My grandmother who voted for Obama

You are so right

WarEagle01 Sunday, May 31st at 6:36PM EDT (link)

Tiller was a dreadful person, but I think the only people “celebrating” his death tonight are the Left. They now have a new martyr and something with which to pummel the pro-Life movement over and over again for years to come. Jesus wept, this is a disaster.

“A wise, doughy leg with rich tingly experiences will always reach better conclusions than will a more tanned, muscular leg that hasn’t felt those thrills.” –Chris Matthews’ Leg

 
 

The word "Terrorist"

MNConservative Sunday, May 31st at 5:59PM EDT (link)

The word “terrorist” has some weighty implications. While it might be true that any one using violence outside of the law to inspire fear could be considered a terrorist, are you also implying that terrorism is always to be condemned?

I respectfully request your opinion, Neil… Is every terrorist throughout history to be condemned, or would you make some exceptions?

Not going into this threadjack

Neil Stevens Sunday, May 31st at 6:01PM EDT (link)

This thread is about this specific murder, not about ‘every terrorist throughout history.’

Not playing that game. :-)

Want to run for conservatives? Give.
There Is No Crisis

Hey I'm not the one

MNConservative Sunday, May 31st at 7:33PM EDT (link)

who started the label game. But you’re right, this is about a specific murder, not terrorism.

Whether this specific murder is morally justified is another question, one you attempted to beg by labelling the murderer a “terrorist”.

 
 

please don't trot out that old saw

David Hinz Sunday, May 31st at 6:05PM EDT (link)

about “One man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom fighter.”

I have seen the lefty talking points about how George Washington was a terrorist to the British — but I have yet to read any histories where George Washington and company targeted British women and children — or cut off heads to instill fear.

Or, for that matter, walked into any church to murder a British soldier — I’m SURE that was not where you are going with that…

Not at all where I was going.

MNConservative Sunday, May 31st at 7:54PM EDT (link)

What do you take me for, some left wing hippie?

My point is why use the term “terrorist” with all its implications, when the term “murderer” or “assassin” is more accurate and doesn’t beg the question of whether the murder was morally justified.

 
 
 
 
 
 

Here's what's wrong with that logic

bk Sunday, May 31st at 5:27PM EDT (link)

It amounts to this: “Until we get the law on our side, we’ll say we’re following God’s Law. Then once we get the law the way we like it, everyone had better follow it or else.” That’s more like the approach we see from the left on many topics - same-sex marriage, you name it.

 

Well, if nothing else your comment has the attention of the nutroot Leftists

bs Sunday, May 31st at 7:04PM EDT (link)

Twitter is lit up like a Christmas tree over this comment. The Leftists are pointing to it as yet another bit of evidence of what idiots we are. I suppose they’re entitled to their opinion, as you are.

It is reassuring to see that most here believe, as I do, that murder is murder, and if killing babies is wrong, so is killing adults. And before someone mentions capital punishment, that’s another threadjack or diary for another day.

Decorum is fo’ suckas

So the twit vote is in? :-) (nt)

Neil Stevens Sunday, May 31st at 7:09PM EDT (link)

Want to run for conservatives? Give.
There Is No Crisis

Hehe...for them, the term certainly applies... -nt-

bs Sunday, May 31st at 7:12PM EDT (link)

Decorum is fo’ suckas

 
 

They're reacting to a *comment*?

Moe Lane Sunday, May 31st at 7:21PM EDT (link)

I thought that the Left-consensus was that this site was meaningless and didn’t matter?

Yeah.

bs Sunday, May 31st at 7:25PM EDT (link)

If you do a Twitter search on “Redstate” (I that search on my Tweetdeck most of the time), you’ll see a number of messages that point directly to TT’s comment.

http://www.twitscoop.com/search?redstate

Decorum is fo’ suckas

 
 
 

Logical Conclusions and Ethics

naugiedoggie Sunday, May 31st at 10:27PM EDT (link)

[You don't really want to read this comment. Enjoy a game of Batoo instead – NS]

Hello,

If the logical conclusion is that it is ethical to kill doctors who perform abortions, then why aren’t you doing it? By your own statement and belief, to allow Dr. Tiller to continue to live was unethical. Out of your own mouth, you are condemned as an unethical man.

The obvious difference between pro-birthers who are quietly celebrating the death of Dr. Tiller, and the resistance movements in Nazi Germany and elsewhere, is that those resistance fighters put their own lives on the line fighting illegitimate government. They were not killing individual citizens (which in most political contexts is called “terrorism”). Unlike the pro-birth movement, they did not depend on semi-educated thugs to commit the acts of violence that they deemed necessary and ethical. They acted on their own with full knowledge and acceptance of the impending consequences.

One of those who died in a Nazi prison was a hero named Dietrich Bonhoeffer, whose book The Cost of Discipleship I recommend you read. (I have.) Obviously, you are not ready pay the cost.

Your hero, Scott Roeder, committed murder in a church. IN A CHURCH. Can there be any greater sacrilege? The Lord said, “as you measure, so shall it be measured to you.” You who today are glorifying this murder in a holy place, will tomorrow be receiving a measure of Justice at His Hand — rather than the Mercy that you will be begging for.

Thanks.

mp

I love America more than any other country in this world, and, exactly for this reason, I insist on the right to criticize her perpetually. — James Baldwin

 

Abortion is legal whether you agree with it or not

argh Monday, June 1st at 1:14AM EDT (link)

[Have some more Batoo, guys. The hidden move plays tend to be so exciting. – NS]

Abortion sucks but it is legal. Murder sucks and it is illegal. You can choose to equate abortion and murder but in the eyes of the law, abortion is not murder.

If you don’t like abortion, and most people don’t, change the law. Murdering a doctor who performs a legal procedure undermines your cause.

*We* did not murder him...get a life

$peciallist Monday, June 1st at 1:18AM EDT (link)

really…get a life

 
 
 

I cannot see how this is a "christian" thing because the hate for Tiller...

JadedByPolitics Sunday, May 31st at 2:33PM EDT (link)

has been around for years and years so if it was a pro-life hit he would have been dead YEARS ago. I will NOT shed tears for this man. He was a MURDERER!

Whoever has his enemy at his mercy &
does not destroy him is his own enemy

 

A sad day for both sides of the issue

Right_Again Sunday, May 31st at 2:46PM EDT (link)

This type of action does nothing to help our cause. Only a crazy person would do something like this.

Removing one abortionist is nowhere close to the answer. This does nothing to bring people closer to understanding our side of the matter. If anything, it justifies the other side in believing that there are all too many nuts on our side.

Foolish, unjustifiable, and very sad.

agreed, if this man broke the law, he should be punished according to the law

Doc Holliday Sunday, May 31st at 3:17PM EDT (link)

to shoot a man in church makes the assassin a horrible murderer. I don’t know Tiller,I do not follow the abortion issue as many here do. I do know that those who praise vigilantes better watch out because they themselves are likely needing of the law.

If anyone blames the anti-abortion movement, they too are crazy and using a horrible crime to score political points. We don’t even know the facts here. There are many killings a day in America, we should wait for the facts.

Anyone who thinks murder is justifiable or “ethical” has a lot of personal issues. We must fight for what we believe in, but as Richard Nixon said: “Always remember others may hate you but those who hate you don’t win unless you hate them. And then you destroy yourself.”

Molon Labe!

I'm with you both on this...they'll make a martyr of him.

penguin2 Sunday, May 31st at 3:59PM EDT (link)

First, vigilante justice is not justice. And while I hated his deeds, and did see him as a “murderer”,I could never see that anyone had the right to kill him. Only the state, and that would be if found guilty in a court of law. Strangely enough, as I have come to examine the pro-life issues, I feel less in favor of the death penalty than I had been before.

Nevertheless, this is a terrible event and will enable the left to use it as a cudgel against us. The discussion of slowing and stopping the killing of the unborn needs to take place; but the MSM will only portray us as radicals-never examining the radicalism of the pro-abortion movement. We must pray for all involved.

Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God.
Benjamin Franklin

 
 
 

Suspect arrested

INC Sunday, May 31st at 3:28PM EDT (link)

in connection with slaying of abortion provider George Tiller.

Press conference at 4.

Kill the murderer

argh Monday, June 1st at 1:18AM EDT (link)

[And more.... – NS]

Isn’t it ironic that the pro-live movement would largely support the murder of a doctor who performs a legal procedure and whose members also largely support the death penalty?
 
 

Tiller is dead...

Jack Sunday, May 31st at 3:30PM EDT (link)

enough said let us move on to bigger and better discussions.

Jack

“If at age 20 you are conservative you have no heart. It at age 30 you are liberal you have no brains.” Sir Winston Churchill

Jack, I think someone needs to look into your posting history

Doc Holliday Sunday, May 31st at 3:42PM EDT (link)

here you implicitly support the death. Recently you had a diary that said Powell F you. You bash Fox news, you call other poster’s the reason why we are a minority party because they do not support Crist. I think you are a moby. You can trick others, but you will know someone gets your game.

Molon Labe!

 

I'm with Doc

Neil Stevens Sunday, May 31st at 3:44PM EDT (link)

G’bye. Go spread your FNC conspiracy theories, your pro-terrorist rants, and your anti-Liberty University silliness elsewehre.

Want to run for conservatives? Give.
There Is No Crisis

 
 

I won't be mourning.

scottbomb Sunday, May 31st at 4:10PM EDT (link)

I don’t agree with the vigilante act but I won’t be shedding any tears for him. I doubt it will happen but I hope his clinic is shut down.

It’s hard enough to comprehend how a baby killer can be comfortable in church. To make matters even more confounding is the minister who allowed him to serve as an usher. Oh well. Neo-nazis, the Klan, and Reverend Wright all call themselves Christians too.

http://www.HowObamaGotElected.com

“The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism. But, under the name of ‘liberalism’, they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program, until one day America will be a socialist nation, without knowing how it happened.” - Norman Thomas, U.S. Socialist Party presidential candidate 1940, 1944 and 1948

Hmm

Neil Stevens Sunday, May 31st at 4:12PM EDT (link)

Tiller was a real sicko, but to take advantage of somebody’s church to commit a cold-blooded murder isn’t exactly showing respect for Christianity either.

Want to run for conservatives? Give.
There Is No Crisis

Even as a prochoicer I'm having problems with this

AKSteveB Sunday, May 31st at 8:13PM EDT (link)

Usual disclaimer, NO I’m not condoning this murder in any way, shape or form. Having said that, Tiller seemed almost uniquely …Satanic, an attention seeker for evil rather than a passive participant. Karma sometimes works in strange ways I guess.

Hell is other people - Sartre

 
 
 

And for the media:

scottbomb Sunday, May 31st at 4:12PM EDT (link)

Here is a statement from Father Frank Pavone, National Director of Priests for Life:

“I am saddened to hear of the killing of George Tiller this morning. At this point, we do not know the motives of this act, or who is behind it, whether an angry post-abortive man or woman, or a misguided activist, or an enemy within the abortion industry, or a political enemy frustrated with the way Tiller has escaped prosecution. We should not jump to conclusions or rush to judgment.

“But whatever the motives, we at Priests for Life continue to insist on a culture in which violence is never seen as the solution to any problem. Every life has to be protected, without regard to their age or views or actions.”

http://www.HowObamaGotElected.com

“The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism. But, under the name of ‘liberalism’, they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program, until one day America will be a socialist nation, without knowing how it happened.” - Norman Thomas, U.S. Socialist Party presidential candidate 1940, 1944 and 1948

Excellent statement by Father Pavone

Jack_Savage Sunday, May 31st at 4:21PM EDT (link)

So true on all levels - nice work by Father Pavone, and thanks for letting us know.

 

Thanks for posting this info

Lammo Monday, June 1st at 1:21AM EDT (link)

Father Frank is one of the few individual voices I would trust for clarity in responding to this incident.

ACORN: Association of Criminals Obama Represented in the Nineties. (jupitersuite)

Don’t be so open minded that your brains fall out. (Fr. John Corapi, SOLT)

Crime never takes a holiday. (Dennis J. O’Shea, R.I.P.)

Unlawful is against the law. Illegal is a sick bird. (Ooold joke)

Outside of a dog, a book is a man’s best friend. Inside of a dog it’s too dark to read. (Groucho Marx)

 
 

updated news

David Hinz Sunday, May 31st at 4:17PM EDT (link)

According to the police report, Dr Tiller was murdered as he was serving as an usher, and as his wife was in the choir. (These details were released and reported, no doubt, to cast the good doctor is the most favorable light, and to highlight how heinous an act the murder really was.)

Degrees of heinous?

SteveLA Sunday, May 31st at 4:52PM EDT (link)

DH

Murder is pretty much the same for me, heinous no matter where it occurs, but in a church is right up there in stratosphere as bad stuff.

I’m all for a swift trial and an even swifter hanging once they catch the piece of human excrement that committed the crime, with no philosophical musings on the matter.

______________________________________

Competency over ideological purity

the aside

David Hinz Sunday, May 31st at 5:03PM EDT (link)

had nothing to do with the crime — but with the MSM portrayal of same. Had you read the comments further up the threads you would note that condemned the act.

Not really sure why the pointy stick, but I hope this clears it up to your satisfaction.

None intended

SteveLA Sunday, May 31st at 5:07PM EDT (link)

No pointed stick intended at all, I totally agree with points you made up tread, murder is murder.

______________________________________

Competency over ideological purity

 
 
 
 

Murder is a sin. This was murder.

Moe Lane Sunday, May 31st at 4:43PM EDT (link)

And to turn a church into a place of violence is especially vile.

 

Unwanted Pregnancy or abortion doctor, murder is not the answer

EagleWatcher Sunday, May 31st at 4:49PM EDT (link)

I guess God is going to have to decide this one. (nt)

kowalski Sunday, May 31st at 4:55PM EDT (link)

But really what should happen

kowalski Sunday, May 31st at 5:02PM EDT (link)

Since he was one of only three abortionists in the United States who worked after the 26th week, is that perhaps someone should really start viewing those doctors who do as a fringe group.

The Washington Post had it right by the way — he performed abortions after Week 26, not 21 as is reported in the AP story. He was a third-trimester late term abortionist.

We have legal oversight options for that

Neil Stevens Sunday, May 31st at 5:05PM EDT (link)

I’m absolutely in favor of people pushing those options hard within the law. Expose the left for what they really want: unfettered abortion up to the moment of birth (and even after, in the case of Obama), without any legislative, judicial, or executive oversight of any kind at all.

Saddam Hussein’s weapons programs got more oversight than what these guys are getting.

I can’t see how it’s at all acceptable for people who murder in churches (could easily have hit a kid with that gun, I’m sure) to attempt to make a point on legal activities.

Want to run for conservatives? Give.
There Is No Crisis

Well the prosecution

kowalski Sunday, May 31st at 5:13PM EDT (link)

The prosecution will have a wide variety of options to pursue, I’m sure, for prosecuting his killer for murder, which is perfectly fine and as it should be. The person who committed the crime is a murderer, and the legal process in this country is going to prosecute them as such.

OK so where do we go from there?

That prosecution won’t have much to say about the legitimacy of performing late-term abortions even though it should. The fact is though that this “doktor” killed thousands of children, many of whom were viable. I’m not sad to see him gone.

I'm sure there will be a lengthy narrative

kowalski Sunday, May 31st at 5:18PM EDT (link)

And a very public court battle but the question of what God is going to decide in this matter is going to have to be left to God. Since I don’t know and I can never know what God is going to decide, I have to tell you and everyone else on Redstate that murder frightens me and is a horrible crime but abortion after the 26th Week is even more horrible.

 

while I think many of us share your

David Hinz Sunday, May 31st at 5:18PM EDT (link)

how shall we say lack of grief for the lately departed, it ill behooves us to dance on his grave.

There is no satisfaction in his death — nothing whatsoever to celebrate. Many, if not most of us here, believe he violated the oath he took when he became a doctor of medicine — not once, but hundreds of times.

Still, there are no winners here…. none at all.

Medical Ethics

kowalski Sunday, May 31st at 5:26PM EDT (link)

There could be sharper distinctions made in medical ethics that would prevent this kind of thing, though. After the 26th week you’re getting right around the realm where the doctor themself is playing God and perhaps it’s time that the medical establishment in this country realized they should outlaw it completely. I don’t see how aborting fetuses at 26 weeks+ is “doing no harm.” It seems to me that it’s a basic violation of the Hippocratic Oath, which most doctors in this country agree with, except apparently for 3 (now 2.)

Yeah this was the problem I had with the whole partial birth abortion issue

AKSteveB Sunday, May 31st at 10:00PM EDT (link)

I’m queasy with the idea of the law getting involved in the specifics of surgical practice, but it seems to me even RvW and Casey v Planned Parenthood would allow for a flat out ban in the third trimester.

Hell is other people - Sartre

 
 
 
 

We won't if FOCA passes. -nt-

Lammo Monday, June 1st at 1:23AM EDT (link)

ACORN: Association of Criminals Obama Represented in the Nineties. (jupitersuite)

Don’t be so open minded that your brains fall out. (Fr. John Corapi, SOLT)

Crime never takes a holiday. (Dennis J. O’Shea, R.I.P.)

Unlawful is against the law. Illegal is a sick bird. (Ooold joke)

Outside of a dog, a book is a man’s best friend. Inside of a dog it’s too dark to read. (Groucho Marx)

 
 
 
 

Gloria Steinam calls this "the worst event in the history of this country"

victor_cocchia Sunday, May 31st at 5:28PM EDT (link)

can you say hyperbole?? seriously…does this women even think before they spew?

I think the murder of this man deserves the punishment to be meted out on the killer. He (the man who pulled the trigger) is a murderer just as Tiller was, and deserves our contempt just as Tiller did. Tiller should have been allowed to pass naturally and face his maker. There is no punishment man could hand out that will rival what he will face on judgement day.

The upshot is that the pro-abortion sect will use this as a catalyst to get even further protection from a very willing democratic led government, who will increase access, at the taxpayers expense, to ghastly procedures like partial birth abortion.

They will dominate the news cycle and use it for their propaganda machine, twisting the facts to persuade another generation of young American girls that abortion is a normal procedure and an out to any inconvenient consequence of random sex.

They will fail to note that this is the 8th (to my liberal friends thats a fact please look it up) “murder” of a pro-abortionist in over 20 years. They will use the MSM to paint this event as something that occurs on a daily basis.

Its a truly sad event for everyone, the family of Tiller and the pro-life movement included.

..but if circumstances should at any time oblige the government to form an army of any magnitude that army can never be formidable to the liberties of the people while there is a large body of citizens, little if at all inferior to them in discipline and the use of arms, who stand ready to defend their own rights and those of their fellow-citizens. This appears to me the only substitute that can be devised for a standing army, and the best possible security against it, if it should exist.
Alexander Hamilton, Federalist Paper No. 29

The murder of one man is worse

Lammo Monday, June 1st at 1:31AM EDT (link)

than the killing of 50 million unborn children? Don’t get me wrong - - this appears to be a cowardly act of an extremist (assuming political motivation rather than Tiller was having an affair with the killer’s wife). It’s just that the outrage over Tiller’s murder, correct as it may be, is almost funny given the attitude of the most outraged about abortion. Maybe, if they hadn’t fought so hard to throw out every slight restriction on abortion, Tiller wouldn’t have been able to engage in the heinous business that apparently got him killed.

ACORN: Association of Criminals Obama Represented in the Nineties. (jupitersuite)

Don’t be so open minded that your brains fall out. (Fr. John Corapi, SOLT)

Crime never takes a holiday. (Dennis J. O’Shea, R.I.P.)

Unlawful is against the law. Illegal is a sick bird. (Ooold joke)

Outside of a dog, a book is a man’s best friend. Inside of a dog it’s too dark to read. (Groucho Marx)

 
 

Sounds like a rightwing domestic terrorist...

jonknee Sunday, May 31st at 5:38PM EDT (link)

Weren’t you guys all up in arms about the report about rightwing domestic terrorists that Napolitano released (and that the Bush admin had actually started)?

I may be wrong, but I seem to remember that the report specifically mentioned people focused on a single issue such as abortion. Looks pretty smart in retrospect, perhaps even something that could use more funding. Funny how that works eh?

I just glanced at your posting history, and I'd give you no better than 50-50 odds when Moe or Neil comes around nt.

redstatebluestate123 Sunday, May 31st at 5:40PM EDT (link)

[G'Bye – NS]

jonknee Sunday, May 31st at 5:43PM EDT (link)

[john was just a fascist who takes a murder and tries to use it for political gain.]

Yawn

redstatebluestate123 Sunday, May 31st at 5:47PM EDT (link)

I didn’t say I wanted you banned. I was simply saying it is likely you will be.

To be honest, I think that RedState moderators ban people a little too often, which is kind of like someone who has never worked in law enforcement saying that the police treat prisoners too roughly. That being said, this ain’t my house, these ain’t my rules.

On another note, “Right-Wing Extremism” or not, this is not a threat to homeland security. Nor do we have enough information to determine for sure whether or not the killing was politically motivated. Nor do the actions of one man reflect upon those who share his political views (unless all vegetarians hate Jews).

Woops. Neil or Moe beat me. nt

redstatebluestate123 Sunday, May 31st at 5:47PM EDT (link)

I'd never compare RS moderation with prison guard duty

Neil Stevens Sunday, May 31st at 5:49PM EDT (link)

While it is true that lefty trolls cowardly post from behind proxies and pseudonyms, posting like they have nothing to lose, refusing to stand behind their words, unlike a prisoner who will be prosecuted for anything he does, there’s no physical danger involved. Fortunately.

Want to run for conservatives? Give.
There Is No Crisis

Bet the prison guard duty pays better in CA...LOL (nt)

SteveLA Sunday, May 31st at 5:51PM EDT (link)

______________________________________

Competency over ideological purity

 

Sorry

redstatebluestate123 Sunday, May 31st at 5:52PM EDT (link)

What I really meant was that it is easy to criticize enforcers when you are not responsible for enforcement. So, while I think that banning people can be a little draconian, I accept that you guys know this stuff a lot better than I do.

Appreciated

Neil Stevens Sunday, May 31st at 5:57PM EDT (link)

If only you knew the number of times I said on our super-secret IM “I want to ban person X…” only later for X to make some really obvious ban-worthy post, completly exposing himself and vindicating my original impulse… :-)

Want to run for conservatives? Give.
There Is No Crisis

You guys have a super-secret IM?

redstatebluestate123 Sunday, May 31st at 6:24PM EDT (link)

Wow…hope I’ve never been on the wrong end of that discussion XD.

 
 
 
 
 

I think he wanted to ban you

kowalski Sunday, May 31st at 5:54PM EDT (link)

Because it doesn’t have anything to do with the thread, a murder, abortion or medical ethics.

I absolutely dispute it as an example of right wing extremism because where I live in Massachusetts and also where I used to live in Chicago there were many, many women and men I knew who were opposed to third-trimester abortions and were very angry about them. From both parties, I can assure you. If anything, the repugnance over this practice in our society is finally leaving the realm where doktors can claim “It’s just a medical procedure that’s widely accepted.” because it never was and it still isn’t.

If you want to talk about the rationale behind killing fetuses after the 26th week of gestation as though there’s something “free” about it, please continue.

 
 
 
 

George

rick554 Sunday, May 31st at 5:55PM EDT (link)

My thinking is that tiller the baby killer’s soul is having a reallllllllly bad afternoon!

Rick554

what is the SPF recommendation

David Hinz Sunday, May 31st at 5:58PM EDT (link)

666 (nt)

Karina Sunday, May 31st at 6:06PM EDT (link)

Stop confusing me with the facts, I’m making up my own imagination. ~My grandmother who voted for Obama

 

Uh, Six hundred Sixty Six???.........NT

USNJIMRET Sunday, May 31st at 6:07PM EDT (link)

are you two an act?

David Hinz Sunday, May 31st at 6:11PM EDT (link)

It was too obvious to miss! (nt)

Karina Sunday, May 31st at 6:15PM EDT (link)

Stop confusing me with the facts, I’m making up my own imagination. ~My grandmother who voted for Obama

Actually, I think Tiller was 668

Lammo Monday, June 1st at 1:34AM EDT (link)

the neighbor of the Beast.

ACORN: Association of Criminals Obama Represented in the Nineties. (jupitersuite)

Don’t be so open minded that your brains fall out. (Fr. John Corapi, SOLT)

Crime never takes a holiday. (Dennis J. O’Shea, R.I.P.)

Unlawful is against the law. Illegal is a sick bird. (Ooold joke)

Outside of a dog, a book is a man’s best friend. Inside of a dog it’s too dark to read. (Groucho Marx)

 
 
 
 

If one does a Google images search for late term abortion

ColdWarrior Sunday, May 31st at 6:38PM EDT (link)

photos, and views only a few of them, no doubt about where Tiller has ended up in the afterlife.

Thank you.

American first, conservative second and Republican precinct committeeman by necessity.

http://www.theprecinctproject.wordpress.com, so you can say, “I became a precinct committeeman before it was cool.”

“Elections have consequences, my friends.” — John McCain

 
 
 

Ironic

slmiller Sunday, May 31st at 6:24PM EDT (link)

Ironically enough, I believe that it will be the far-left abortion activists who will really celebrate George Tiller’s death; for this has given them what they really want and need;

a Martyr

 

About as sad as terrorists getting waterboarded

cmack Sunday, May 31st at 6:25PM EDT (link)

Not all of us on the right are abortionist-murdering terrorists, and I don’t think anybody–not even Olbermann or Garofolo–are stupid enough to believe that. They throw around that accusation to scare us.

I do not advocate murdering abortionists, but I’m not going to fall all over myself pretending his death is sad just to prove that I’m not a terrorist. I don’t give a hoot what the MSM tries to say, it’s my right to be glad there is one less man willing to chop up babies for convenience. I don’t care that it was in a church, the Bible states that the human body is a temple and this man made his living killing there.

Lousy comparison

Neil Stevens Sunday, May 31st at 6:30PM EDT (link)

Waterboarding is not a crime.

Murder is a serious crime.

It’s ridiculous, I think, to compare our servicemen in uniform with a vicious killer who would shoot up a church.

Want to run for conservatives? Give.
There Is No Crisis

I am not comparing waterboarding to murdering abortionists

cmack Sunday, May 31st at 6:48PM EDT (link)

But I am comparing the amount of sadness they invoke in me, and it’s almost equally nonexistant.

And I take issue with labeling Tiller’s killer as a “vicious killer.” From the information I have, he killed one person, who was known for killing many more. We execute murderers sometimes for only killing one grown adult. This man killed defenseless children for profit. Maybe we can compromise and I’ll be willing to label Tiller’s killer a “vicious killer” that kiled an even more “vicious killer.”

Sorry

Neil Stevens Sunday, May 31st at 7:09PM EDT (link)

I don’t hold people who shoot at churches as better than abortionists.

Want to run for conservatives? Give.
There Is No Crisis

 
 
 

You don't think Olbermann is that stupid?

TNJim Sunday, May 31st at 7:32PM EDT (link)

You obviously haven’t watched his show much. I don’t either, but I have watched it enough to know that, whether he is that stupid or not I’ll betcha he’ll be pounding that point into the ground on Monday night’s show, probably all week. He’ll at least do it for his handful of lefty audience members he still has. So will Maddow, Matthews, heck, MSNBC in general will. Of course, Keith will not have anyone from our side for rebuttal, neither will Maddow, and if Matthews has anyone on from our side they will probably be interrupted endlessly when they try to claim we’re not all abortionist mudering terrorists. Garafalo is no better. If she weighs in on this, it’ll be more of the same, “Secretary Napolitano was right!”

Never underestimate the power of human stupidity.

“No. You can’t” -Moe Lane

I said he wasn't stupid enough to believe it

cmack Sunday, May 31st at 8:27PM EDT (link)

But that doesn’t mean he won’t pretend to be that stupid to promote his cause. I think that must be somewhere in the lefty media’s mission statement: “Not stupid enough to believe it, but devoted enough to pretend to be stupid enough in order to convince others.”

But, no, I never watch his show. I’ll take your word for it if you think I’m giving him more credit than he deserves. It’s difficult to avoid with the left.

Duly noted.

TNJim Sunday, May 31st at 11:50PM EDT (link)

The left, which Olbie is a proud part of, has an agenda to push. They never hesitate to paint all of us on the right with a broad brush. It doesn’t matter how many of us here want to see Tiller’s murderer brought to justice, that brush will be swiped back and forth with glee, taking bits and pieces of this thread (and others on other conservative blogs) out of context. It’s already happening on twitter, as bs posted above, pointing to only one comment here (at the time anyway). I briefly went to Kos, and the conspiracy theories already abound.

But, on second thought, sometimes Olbie gets so wrapped up in himself I do think at times he really is that stupid.

“No. You can’t” -Moe Lane

 
 
 
 

May 31ST-A Day of Mourning

molybdanthan Sunday, May 31st at 7:33PM EDT (link)

I just heard about this. What a terrible thing to happen in a church on a Sunday in America. God had to avert His eyes, or it would rain for 40 days.

I propose May 31st as a National Day of mourning for all the victims of Abortion. To include Dr. Tilling. No one should suggest or permit murder of a human in any stage of life. Never. Pro-Life is about all of us living, and keeping it that way.

While I won't approve of the murder of Tiller,

mbecker908 Sunday, May 31st at 7:45PM EDT (link)

it’s an outrage to compare his death to the deaths of 40MM plus unborn. It’s the equivalent of adding Eichmann’s name to the victims in the holocaust museum.

CongressCritter™: Never have so few felt like they were owed so much by so many for so little.

Amen mbecker nt

mom2oneson Sunday, May 31st at 8:38PM EDT (link)

Eichmann's name

molybdanthan Sunday, May 31st at 8:38PM EDT (link)

is certainly found at the holocaust museum. Certainly not listed among the victims. But I’m sure he is mentioned. And Dr. Tiller isn’t a Nazi, the babies aren’t the Jews, and we’re not in Hitler’s Germany.

I think the Pro-Lifers should do something incredible and champion all life. Even the life of one who has strayed so far from the path.

Please let’s take the high road here.

The way you say that...

Neil Stevens Sunday, May 31st at 8:40PM EDT (link)

Are you a pro-lifer?

Want to run for conservatives? Give.
There Is No Crisis

Yes

molybdanthan Sunday, May 31st at 8:55PM EDT (link)

Unequivocally. And since I first heard of the debate, I haven’t wavered.

I wrote this just 12 days ago:
http://www.redstate.com/molybdanthan/2009/05/19/graveyard-of-the-forgotten/

It was briefly in the Recommended Reading list. I was proud of that. What more can I say?

Good to know

Neil Stevens Sunday, May 31st at 8:56PM EDT (link)

Please understand that when I see new posters… I get on edge.

As you were :-)

Want to run for conservatives? Give.
There Is No Crisis

I only want to see the laws come it an end

molybdanthan Sunday, May 31st at 9:46PM EDT (link)

And through lawful means. Not the doctors, the women, the politicians, judges, advocates, or anyone associated with this insidious practice.

Had I the wit of Jonathan Swift, I could write something like ‘A Modest Proposal.’ Something to remind people of the death toll, the sheer and staggering loss of human life, the madness of this time in history.

I once had an interest in John Brown, the Abolitionist. And saw his brief and violent struggle against the Pro-Slavery forces of the 1850s as being analogous to the ongoing Abortion debate. Old John fought and died for his beliefs, but slavery did not end with him. It endured even after the Civil War was decided. Abortion will not end tomorrow, or next week. It may be very possible for us to lament the fifty million dead in the years to come.

I’m calling for Life in order to ensure that Liberty is never taken for granted, or forsaken. It belongs to every person, from conception, not some arbitrary date decided from a bench.

 
 

I remember your diary, it was deeply moving.

penguin2 Sunday, May 31st at 10:32PM EDT (link)

Though you say Tiller “wasn’t a Nazi and the babies weren’t Jews” I don’t think they are that dissimilar. I believe that Tiller saw himself as playing God, and the 40 million victims represent a different Holocaust/genocide. The Germans accepted what Hitler was doing.

That said, I of course know this isn’t Hitler’s Germany, but the fact that we so freely destroy life by abortion must lend some thought to serious issues that ultimately will confront us someday. Remember the rationing of health care will involve end of life decisions made for us by others, even now we have states that have passed laws allowing for euthanasia.

There is nothing positive in what has happened this day. I can’t even comprehend how he considered himself a Christian, nor that our churches condone such atrocities. But you see there are similarities to Nazi Germany…

Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God.
Benjamin Franklin

 
 
 

pro-lifers and liberals

mom2oneson Sunday, May 31st at 8:44PM EDT (link)

are always at there are executions. Personally I’m for the death penalty but I know the pro-life groups protest them too. I believe Mother Thersa and Pope JPII have also spoken for criminals there were going to be excecuted.

correction

mom2oneson Sunday, May 31st at 8:53PM EDT (link)

at their ex…

duplicate comments won’t let me nt it :)
took a nap and my fingers aren’t fully awake yet. :)

 
 

molybdanthan...

mbecker908 Sunday, May 31st at 10:17PM EDT (link)

1. The legal strictures to allow abortion, and for the State to support it, are exactly no different than those enacted in Nazi Germany. In Germany undesirables were simply declared “non-persons”, which is precisely the legal state of an unborn child. One of the points of National Socialism was the elimination of Jews. One of the major points of Margaret Sanger and her acolytes is the elimination of non-whites through abortion and they’re getting there.

2. You second paragraph is simply tripe. The overwhelming majority on the pro-life side, and especially here, do not champion or approve of the murder of Tiller and his ilk. You will find an occasional comment to the contrary but those are immediately refuted by dozens of commenters and the moderators.

CongressCritter™: Never have so few felt like they were owed so much by so many for so little.

Not tripe, I hope

molybdanthan Sunday, May 31st at 11:42PM EDT (link)

It came not from the gut, or perhaps the brain, but from the heart.

All I want is a day for the victims of abortion. Is there one of those now? Maybe in-between World AIDS Day and the International Day of Peace. And why not this date? Either that, or Dr. Tiller’s birthday. We can light candles for the people who never celebrated being born at all. And let those candles burn all the way out.

I know pro-lifers here and everywhere are on record today, speaking out against this criminal act. And none were calling for it yesterday. This is the proverbial bolt from the blue, a terrible shock, like any time a gunshot rings out in a church.

The RedState posts I’ve read today have been praiseworthy, with few exceptions. Several glib jokes, and some bad taste from Liberals being the usual exceptions.

That day already exists

Lammo Monday, June 1st at 1:52AM EDT (link)

and it has happened every January since 1974. It’s called the March For Life and it happens in Washington, DC, on or near the anniversary of the Roe v. Wade decision, There are also many local and state level marches held around the same date and a companion Walk For Life West Coast hs been held in San Francisco for the past 5 years.

All of these efforts have come about due to the organizers respect for ALL life, as my Church holds, from conception to natural death.

What I find curious about this happening on this particular day is that it is Pentecost Sunday, regarded as the birthday of the Church. (Just in case you don’t know, Pentecost isn’t always on May 31. It occurs 50 days after Easter and since Easter moves around so does Pentecost).

Links:
http://www.marchforlife.org/component/option,com_frontpage/Itemid,1/

http://www.walkforlifewc.com/

ACORN: Association of Criminals Obama Represented in the Nineties. (jupitersuite)

Don’t be so open minded that your brains fall out. (Fr. John Corapi, SOLT)

Crime never takes a holiday. (Dennis J. O’Shea, R.I.P.)

Unlawful is against the law. Illegal is a sick bird. (Ooold joke)

Outside of a dog, a book is a man’s best friend. Inside of a dog it’s too dark to read. (Groucho Marx)

Thanks

molybdanthan Monday, June 1st at 2:26AM EDT (link)

For linking up March For Life. I knew about it, but should have mentioned it. I haven’t attended, but now I will next January. I haven’t done enough for the cause of Life. I can do more.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

The rule of law

Adjoran Sunday, May 31st at 7:40PM EDT (link)

is all that protects us from the totalitarians of the left shredding our liberty and confiscating our property. If you doubt how fragile is the tissue of the law, just ask a Chrysler bondholder.

“He needed killin’” is not a defense against murder charges. While Tiller’s life does not inspire me to mourn his loss, I regret deeply that he was deprived of any chance to repent and amend his life.

Oh my Jesus, forgive us our sins, save us from the fires of hell, and lead all souls to heaven, especially those most in need of Thy mercy.

You hit the nail on the head, Adjoran.

Xasteius Sunday, May 31st at 8:22PM EDT (link)

Oh my Jesus, forgive us our sins, save us from the fires of hell, and lead all souls to heaven, especially those most in need of Thy mercy.

“There but for the grace of God go I.”

Don’t leave the party, hijack it back!

Eternal vigilance is the price of freedom.

When I grow up, I don’t want to be Reagan. I want to be Art Chance.
~Aaron Gardner

 

No chance to repent

molybdanthan Sunday, May 31st at 8:41PM EDT (link)

You said it better that I could. That’s the message I wanted to convey.

He had many many many chances.

itrytobenice Sunday, May 31st at 11:08PM EDT (link)

He has murdered these babies for *years*. I don’t believe for one second that he was ever going to change.

If there could possibly be a person too hard hearted to hear the voice of the Holy Spirit, it was Tiller the Baby Killer.

The problem with America is stupidity. I’m not saying there should be capital punishment for stupidity, but why don’t we just take the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?

 
 

Amen. -nt-

Lammo Monday, June 1st at 1:54AM EDT (link)

ACORN: Association of Criminals Obama Represented in the Nineties. (jupitersuite)

Don’t be so open minded that your brains fall out. (Fr. John Corapi, SOLT)

Crime never takes a holiday. (Dennis J. O’Shea, R.I.P.)

Unlawful is against the law. Illegal is a sick bird. (Ooold joke)

Outside of a dog, a book is a man’s best friend. Inside of a dog it’s too dark to read. (Groucho Marx)

 
 

The accused arrested

SteveLA Sunday, May 31st at 7:41PM EDT (link)

CNN and other places reporting that the suspect in this killing has been captured, wonder when the details of this individual will start to be leaked and how the MSM will try to “spin” the details.

______________________________________

Competency over ideological purity

Scott Roeder

Brillo Sunday, May 31st at 9:27PM EDT (link)

I know of this guy, he was through here (Montana) years ago. Militia guy, member of the Freemen. Refused to buy/attach license plates… ended up getting pulled over for it. Police found his car full of bombs, threw him in prison for it.

I’d back away slowly from this guy if I were ya’ll, being associated with, or defending him is not a very good look.

Exactly who is defending him?

Jack_Savage Sunday, May 31st at 9:30PM EDT (link)

I mean, you said “y’all”, which is plural? Is the defense of this person what you are gleaning from this thread?

From Some.

Brillo Sunday, May 31st at 9:38PM EDT (link)

I’ve read the entire thread, and yes, there are a number of people defending him, justifying what he (allegedly) did, or at the very least ignoring what he did and focusing their anger and criticism on the doctor.

My real point though is that from what I know personally, and what I’ve read about this killing this afternoon, there is no need for ’spin’ as the person I was replying to called it. It looks bad on it’s face.

Bull crap

Jack_Savage Sunday, May 31st at 9:43PM EDT (link)

“….yes, there are a number of people defending him, justifying what he (allegedly) did…”

That is a lie. You need to apologize.

And FYI, it IS bad on its face - someone was killed in a church. I am just sorry there are people like you that are standing on Tiller’s body before it is even cold in order to make a political point.

 

Stop right there, Brillo. [Read this.]

Moe Lane Sunday, May 31st at 9:44PM EDT (link)

You have a problem with an individual poster’s response, respond. This is passive-aggressive behavior, and you will stop it if you want to keep commenting here.

You will now say “Yes, Moe” and obey. Next post.

 
 

I thought the plural of "y'all"

Lammo Monday, June 1st at 1:55AM EDT (link)

was “all y’all”. :-)

ACORN: Association of Criminals Obama Represented in the Nineties. (jupitersuite)

Don’t be so open minded that your brains fall out. (Fr. John Corapi, SOLT)

Crime never takes a holiday. (Dennis J. O’Shea, R.I.P.)

Unlawful is against the law. Illegal is a sick bird. (Ooold joke)

Outside of a dog, a book is a man’s best friend. Inside of a dog it’s too dark to read. (Groucho Marx)

 
 

Just the facts

SteveLA Sunday, May 31st at 9:33PM EDT (link)

Brillo,

I’d tread carefully with the y’all, and just about any association of decent people with piece of human excrement. I’m betting that he turns out to be a fringe nut that is a few bricks short of a load.

Every group has them, heck the CA Assembly is full of them…whoops those are Democrats, never mind.

______________________________________

Competency over ideological purity

Ya'll...

Brillo Sunday, May 31st at 9:41PM EDT (link)

I wasn’t addressing the decent people here, I was addressing those here who aren’t.

3 years and 7 months -- al Qaeda should have cells this deep

David Hinz Sunday, May 31st at 9:53PM EDT (link)
 
 

G'Bye

Neil Stevens Sunday, May 31st at 9:41PM EDT (link)

Gee, your first comment is to imply we’re associated with him.

Bye.

Want to run for conservatives? Give.
There Is No Crisis

...Or, alternatively, Neil can just ban you.

Moe Lane Sunday, May 31st at 9:45PM EDT (link)

Ach, well. I’m clearly becoming a softy.

Neil may have run out of patience with trolls for today. NT

redstatebluestate123 Sunday, May 31st at 9:54PM EDT (link)
 

Curious little mole, 43 months with only 4 comments nt

olsmithie Sunday, May 31st at 9:49PM EDT (link)
 
 
 

Vigilantism - what does it mean?

izoneguy Sunday, May 31st at 7:50PM EDT (link)

Taking the law into one’s own hands and attempting to effect justice according to one’s own understanding of right and wrong; action taken by a voluntary association of persons who organize themselves for the purpose of protecting a common interest, such as liberty, property, or personal security; action taken by an individual or group to protest existing law; action taken by an individual or group to enforce a higher law than that enacted by society’s designated lawmaking institutions; private enforcement of legal norms in the absence of an established, reliable, and effective law enforcement body.

The foundation of the American legal system rests on the RULE OF LAW, a concept embodied in the notion that the United States is a nation of laws and not of men. Under the rule of law, laws are thought to exist independent of, and separate from, human will. Even when the human element factors into legal decision making, the decision maker is expected to be constrained by the law in making his or her decision. In other words, police officers, judges, and juries should act according to the law and not according to their personal preferences or private agendas.

Read more: “Vigilantism” - http://law.jrank.org/pages/11129/Vigilantism.html#ixzz0H8Ajp7TZ&A

Before the left goes ballastic on the vigilante killing of Dr. Tiller
let’s take a deep breathe and read that last sentence again very slowly.

In other words, police officers, judges, and juries should act according to the law and not according to their personal preferences or private agendas.

I do not condone vigilante acts by anyone - be it a killer of an abortion doctor or the left trying to take over by ignoring the rule of law and using personal preferences and private agendas to further their pursuit of power.

“When the government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny.”
Thomas Jefferson

 

Let's wait and see. For this to happen right after Napolitano's DHS report seems a bit ... convenient for the Left. [nt]

Martin Knight Sunday, May 31st at 8:30PM EDT (link)



 To me, “consensus” seems to be the process of abandoning all beliefs, principles, values and policies. So it is something in which no one believes and to which no one objects … There are still people in my party who believe in “consensus” politics. I regard them as Quislings, as traitors … I mean it.
      - Margaret Thatcher
NOTE: “consensus” = “Bipartisanship™”/”Centrism™”

Nappy

JLenardDetroit Sunday, May 31st at 8:38PM EDT (link)

you can bet she is running around behind closed doors say “see…. see…. see…. we told you so….”

Had an ELF member shot a Hummer dealer…. well…. no Hate crime or Terrorism there.

(RS:Help) (JLD) (Hollyweird) (Brain-deads) (SPIN-cycle) (Obamaocare) (Party of kNOw) (Conservatism) (TEApeats) (respectful) (Reco) (Quotes) (removeRINOs.com) (RSmas)
+ 0bama Lies & your Bank acct will Die! (4/15 Truthers)
+ Heil “O” Hell No Obamao is NOT MY PRESIDENT! “No U won’t”
+ I want “O” to FAIL (here, here, & whole Diary (Ofail) here, is why)
The first Liberal was Satan” - a Rush caller (other Quotes)

ELF...

Brillo Sunday, May 31st at 9:32PM EDT (link)

ELF has been on the FBI’s list of domestic terrorism groups for years. They just convicted another member a few months back.

 
 
 

Obama's hypocrisy

john_barry Sunday, May 31st at 8:34PM EDT (link)

The Fifth Commandment states “Thou shall not kill”. Abortion is the MURDER of the innocent unborn child in the womb. This killing of a doctor who carried out abortions is also MURDER and it cannot be justified. Tiller was a MURDERER. HE butchered the innocent unborn children. Lets dispense with this nonsense about choice. How can you have a choice to murder your own child? Lets drop the sanitized language about choice. This is used as a cover to disguise the evil of abortion. Lets call a spade a spade. Abortion=Murder.
When we die we must meet our Maker and answer for our actions here on earth.
Interestingly Obama in his condemnation expressed no concern for the innocent unborn children deprived of their right to life by Tiller.

john barry

 

Sounds like domestic terrorism

DemFromNJ Sunday, May 31st at 8:35PM EDT (link)

Many people don’t think that abortion is the evil you all believe.

A doctor, who from their point of view is providing a necessary medical service, is gunned down (in a church of all places). If this shooter is willing to gun someone down in a church, where wouldn’t they be willing to gun someone down? And if the doctor, why not the “patient?”

That’s terrifying.

For some, it will affect their decision to carry on with their own decision to have an abortion or not and they will so “no” because their fear for their safety.

You may all think that’s a good, if unplanned outcome, but it’s terrifying to the woman and her family. It’s always been true I guess, but going forward, it’s got to be on the mind of people that “hey, I may get shot/wounded/maimed/killed if I go to see a doctor for an abortion.”

Sounds like demostic terrorism to me.

We don’t know any real facts as yet. It could be some crazy person, but Tiller has already been shot and his office was recently vandalized. That only makes it worse.

Did you even read the thread?

Neil Stevens Sunday, May 31st at 8:38PM EDT (link)

I smell troll.

Want to run for conservatives? Give.
There Is No Crisis

I'm no troll (or I don't think I am; I may not know what that means here)

DemFromNJ Sunday, May 31st at 8:58PM EDT (link)

Bait or not, I’m serious about my point. Although now that I think about it, there’s nothing to be done about it. He’s been shot dead and people will be terrified or not.

What *is* your point though?

Neil Stevens Sunday, May 31st at 8:59PM EDT (link)

You clearly haven’t read the thread.

Want to run for conservatives? Give.
There Is No Crisis

 
 
 

A child is not "terrifying."

cmack Sunday, May 31st at 8:42PM EDT (link)

It’s the natural outcome of sexual intercourse, it is not some unavoidable freak occurrence. And there are about as many people waiting to adopt as there are abortions every year.

That’s the only bait I am interested in biting.

5 (nt)

Neil Stevens Sunday, May 31st at 8:48PM EDT (link)

Want to run for conservatives? Give.
There Is No Crisis

 

hate to nit-pick, but...

JLenardDetroit Sunday, May 31st at 9:15PM EDT (link)

Abstinence (works every time it’s tried)… but I know…. we are not supposed to pretend that Humankind is a higher form of life than say a Bunny Rabbit with a ruthless desire to breed. Abstinence, of course, has little chance, with the Indoctrination Factories advocating immorality at every turn over the will of Parents.

NOTE: While I am “replying” to cmack it is really, of course, to BOLSTER her point and poke at DemFromNJ

PS: At least he/she has the courtesy of being honest with the Userid and declare as a “Dem” - much appreciated you (DemFromNJ) are NOT here under false pretense.

(RS:Help) (JLD) (Hollyweird) (Brain-deads) (SPIN-cycle) (Obamaocare) (Party of kNOw) (Conservatism) (TEApeats) (respectful) (Reco) (Quotes) (removeRINOs.com) (RSmas)
+ 0bama Lies & your Bank acct will Die! (4/15 Truthers)
+ Heil “O” Hell No Obamao is NOT MY PRESIDENT! “No U won’t”
+ I want “O” to FAIL (here, here, & whole Diary (Ofail) here, is why)
The first Liberal was Satan” - a Rush caller (other Quotes)

 
 

If I may be so curt, what's your point?

aesthete Sunday, May 31st at 8:50PM EDT (link)

n/t

Guilt is a rope that wears thin.
-Ayn Rand

“I am a freeman in a free state!”
-Last words of Dumnorix, chieftan of the Aedui, 54 BC

 

sounds like one of the "twits" came over to post

David Hinz Sunday, May 31st at 8:58PM EDT (link)

Many people don’t think that abortion is the evil you all believe.

Many people deny the holocaust and don’t believe it was the terrible evil that you all believe.

If this shooter is willing to gun someone down in a church, where wouldn’t they be willing to gun someone down?

its hilarious, isn’t it, when a leftist suddenly finds sanctity in a church…sanctimony, yes…sanctity, no!

Sounds like demostic terrorism to me.

No doubt it does…sounds like a government conspiracy to me — what did Obama know, and when did he know it?

 

I agree with DemFromNJ on this point

Jack_Savage Sunday, May 31st at 9:19PM EDT (link)

“Many people don’t think that abortion is the evil you all believe.”

This is exactly the situation, and why the death of George Tiller won’t matter one whit.

“A doctor, who from their point of view is providing a necessary medical service…”

This is all abortion is, and all it will ever be, to a significant portion of the population in America. One of two political parties has made the issue of abortion a non-negotiable, rock-solid part of its reason to exist. There are many who claim to be Republicans who urge us to soften our stance on this issue, to enlarge the “tent” (to call upon a worn-out and pathetic phrase).

The person who killed Tiller is not a hero, and did nothing to slow abortion down. He might have for a day or two, but the killing machine will be cranked up in full force after that, and some overtime at the clinic will take care of any overflow that has been generated by his death. Those who participate will now think of themselves as heroes, risking death in order to kill.

DemFromNJ claims that there will be some sort of “chilling effect” on someone who might require or perform an abortion. There will be no such thing. Late term abortion is the most barbaric, grisly act condoned by any group of people on the face of the earth, and if someone has gone as far as to consider or participate in this in any way, there will be no effect on them whatsoever. Even if there were, how ironic that someone who is headed to a clinic to end the life of a child who is viable outside the womb would be concerned about their own.

If there was a problem, it wasn’t George Tiller. He was just a symptom. The problem is a society that has so lost its way that the “right” to dismember a viable infant inside the womb is a settled issue as far as the law is concerned.

 

So by your own logic

Leopard1996 Sunday, May 31st at 9:47PM EDT (link)

Since Muslim Extemeists took down the twin towers, all muslims are evil right. Stop the B.S with the whole DHS report with this. One guy doing something heinous does not a terrorist make. He is a murdering piece of garbage, who in my opinion once found guilty deserves to be drawn, quartered, and shot.

“The accumluated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the whores and politicians will look up and shout, “Save Us!”….and I’ll look down and whisper, “No”…The Watchmen

I'd settle for lethal injection

Neil Stevens Sunday, May 31st at 9:50PM EDT (link)

It’s less messy.

Want to run for conservatives? Give.
There Is No Crisis

Honored to get a reply from the main man.

Leopard1996 Sunday, May 31st at 9:55PM EDT (link)

But I think sometimes we need a little messy to make a point.

“The accumluated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the whores and politicians will look up and shout, “Save Us!”….and I’ll look down and whisper, “No”…The Watchmen

There was indeed a reason hangings in the old days were public....nt

olsmithie Sunday, May 31st at 10:05PM EDT (link)

I stand corrected

Neil Stevens Sunday, May 31st at 10:05PM EDT (link)

Let’s do this guy in public, then all the 9/11 hijackers.

Want to run for conservatives? Give.
There Is No Crisis

Orthopedic shoes? -nt-

Lammo Monday, June 1st at 2:20AM EDT (link)

ACORN: Association of Criminals Obama Represented in the Nineties. (jupitersuite)

Don’t be so open minded that your brains fall out. (Fr. John Corapi, SOLT)

Crime never takes a holiday. (Dennis J. O’Shea, R.I.P.)

Unlawful is against the law. Illegal is a sick bird. (Ooold joke)

Outside of a dog, a book is a man’s best friend. Inside of a dog it’s too dark to read. (Groucho Marx)

 
 
 

Besides shooting is cheap and considering economic times....

antisocial Sunday, May 31st at 10:55PM EDT (link)

Don’t waste MY money on those ceremonies.

No you can’t - Moe Lane
——————————
The Emperor has no clothes!!!
——————————
Republicans who lost the Crap-and-Raid fight in the House -
Mary Bomo Mac (CA-45)
Mike Castle (DE)
Mark Kirk (IL-10)
Frank A. LoBiondo (NJ-02)
Chris Smith (NJ-04)
Leonard Lance (NJ-07)
John M. McHugh (NY-23)
Dave Reichert (WA-08)

I would like to think shooting is cheap to

Leopard1996 Monday, June 1st at 8:53PM EDT (link)

Until they pass the law jacking ammo up with takes by 500%. Then again govenment entities would probably be exempt.

“The accumluated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the whores and politicians will look up and shout, “Save Us!”….and I’ll look down and whisper, “No”…The Watchmen

 
 
 
 
 

You're absolutely right DemFromNJ, it is domestic terrorism.

mbecker908 Sunday, May 31st at 10:07PM EDT (link)

And the outright murder of over 40MM children for the sake of convenience is an act of terrorism that only Josef Stalin could appreciate. Or maybe Margaret Sanger could, especially since the majority of those children are non-white and her ultimate goal was to wipe out non-whites.

And your party are the enablers who allow it to continue. Your hands are every bit as bloody as George Tiller’s, no matter where you stand on the issue.

CongressCritter™: Never have so few felt like they were owed so much by so many for so little.

 

Just one slight correction

bk Sunday, May 31st at 10:42PM EDT (link)

“Sounds like demostic [sic] terrorism to me.”

Didn’t you mean to say “domestic man-caused disaster”?

 

Why you classify this as terrorism and not a law and order problem?

antisocial Sunday, May 31st at 10:51PM EDT (link)

.

No you can’t - Moe Lane
——————————
The Emperor has no clothes!!!
——————————
Republicans who lost the Crap-and-Raid fight in the House -
Mary Bomo Mac (CA-45)
Mike Castle (DE)
Mark Kirk (IL-10)
Frank A. LoBiondo (NJ-02)
Chris Smith (NJ-04)
Leonard Lance (NJ-07)
John M. McHugh (NY-23)
Dave Reichert (WA-08)

 
 

I don't quite know how I feel about this whole thing

Darin_H Sunday, May 31st at 10:55PM EDT (link)

1. Murder is murder, so I cannot condone what this wackjob did.

2. He did not help his cause (I’m assuming it’s a political statement).

3. I equate it to the Palestinian case. I’ve had many a lefty friend tell me that the Palestinians murdering people as they indiscriminately fire rockets into Israel is okay, because, you see, they cannot bring about their ‘justice’ any other way.

But I keep coming back to number 1 (and it’s why I don’t support the Palestinians, their tactics make it impossible for me to support them).

___________________________________

That's an interesting comparison

bs Sunday, May 31st at 11:03PM EDT (link)

Thanks for bringing up the Palestinian thing - I’ve been accumulating “proof points” on both sides of this, in hopes that I can write something up in the next couple of days. I’m sure there will be much to be said.

Decorum is fo’ suckas

 
 

I've dreaded this day for a long time

Erick Brockway Sunday, May 31st at 11:50PM EDT (link)

I knew one day it would come, and I’d be torn.
My bottom line;
Tiller was a murderer who shouldn’t have been murdered.

Note to lefties;
“Don’t be afraid to see what you see.”
Ronald Reagan


Chip in to get rid of “Babs” (Yes ma’am) Boxer.

^5 Erick

TNJim Sunday, May 31st at 11:58PM EDT (link)

The fact he was murdered in a church just makes it more heinous.

“No. You can’t” -Moe Lane

That building may have been

mbecker908 Monday, June 1st at 8:38AM EDT (link)

“a church”, but I have serious questions - of a theological nature - about whether it qualifies as a “House of God”…

CongressCritter™: Never have so few felt like they were owed so much by so many for so little.

 
 
 

No one should ever have to stop and say, "The ends justify the means."

SoulEspresso Sunday, May 31st at 11:54PM EDT (link)

There is a reason why Martin Luther King Jr. is revered by people of all races: his means were always non-violent.

The pro-life movement must always be non-violent.

The death of Tiller is a terrible tragedy. His hands will no longer dismember infants–but now the pro-choice movement has a martyr, they will be harder to stop, and more babies than ever may ultimately die.

Scott Roeder, if guilty, is not only a murderer, he was a stupid protester. Killing the abortion doctor now means abortion will become easier.

 

The Real Tragedy

JHancock Monday, June 1st at 12:42AM EDT (link)

is that it happened in a Church, and so soon after Pro-Life groups were added to the terrorist watch list…and at a time where polling showed >50% of the US showing anti-abortion sentiments for the first time since RVW. If I was a conspiracy theorist I’d think that a liberal set the gunman up so that Pro-Lifers would all look like Non-Christian anti-American terrorists!!

Freaking moron gunman!! If he just had to go and off Tiller, why couldn’t he do it while Tiller was doing something compromising?? “Abortionist shot watching Tijuanna donkey show” wouldn’t be nearly as damaging a headline to our pro-life cause!!

I doubt this changes much.

jeffreywturner Monday, June 1st at 9:05AM EDT (link)

I don’t really think the pro-life tide in the US is going to be stemmed because of this, as much as Obama and the left would like to tar us all with it.

“Life is too short, can’t we all just eat pork and kill some terrorists?”

 
 

BREAKING: Geraldo: AG Eric Holder orders "protection" for Abortion Clinics across US

JLenardDetroit Monday, June 1st at 1:22AM EDT (link)

that sure doesn’t surprise me any… so what “forces” are Eric Holder mustering?!?!? He getting his old buddies that botched the Branch Dividian Raid that he was #2 to Reno on!?!? Or the Elian Gonzalez crew?

Holder (AG prior judgement?)

(RS:Help) (JLD) (Hollyweird) (Brain-deads) (SPIN-cycle) (Obamaocare) (Party of kNOw) (Conservatism) (TEApeats) (respectful) (Reco) (Quotes) (removeRINOs.com) (RSmas)
+ 0bama Lies & your Bank acct will Die! (4/15 Truthers)
+ Heil “O” Hell No Obamao is NOT MY PRESIDENT! “No U won’t”
+ I want “O” to FAIL (here, here, & whole Diary (Ofail) here, is why)
The first Liberal was Satan” - a Rush caller (other Quotes)

Reno's #2

molybdanthan Monday, June 1st at 1:44AM EDT (link)

I did not know that.

This is another one of those “Rahm Emanuel Crisis” moments, the one you can’t let pass.

Let’s keep an eye on who gets mobilized. And who gets targeted.

That's what was sad about the MSM whitewash of Holder

Lammo Monday, June 1st at 2:33AM EDT (link)

He was knee deep in a lot of the garbage that flowed around during the Clinton years from lying about the presence of armed officers when Elian Gonzales was kidnapped from his relatives to pulling an end run around DOJ on the Marc Rich pardon.

ACORN: Association of Criminals Obama Represented in the Nineties. (jupitersuite)

Don’t be so open minded that your brains fall out. (Fr. John Corapi, SOLT)

Crime never takes a holiday. (Dennis J. O’Shea, R.I.P.)

Unlawful is against the law. Illegal is a sick bird. (Ooold joke)

Outside of a dog, a book is a man’s best friend. Inside of a dog it’s too dark to read. (Groucho Marx)

 
 

I'm so glad he's in charge!

Karina Monday, June 1st at 4:49AM EDT (link)

I feel so much safer now.

Stop confusing me with the facts, I’m making up my own imagination. ~My grandmother who voted for Obama

 

Bear in mind those clinics of death represent 10's of millions in DNC political contributions

olsmithie Thursday, June 4th at 1:57PM EDT (link)

Killing children is a billion dollar business.

Regards

 
 

the Fairness Doctrine will be the next level of protection no doubt

bk Monday, June 1st at 5:13AM EDT (link)

Lets put this back on the Left...

itdiehard Monday, June 1st at 8:12AM EDT (link)

If Kathleen Sebelius would have enforced the law, Dr. Tiller would be a live and living comfortable at the state expense.

 

Certain topics really draw out the trolls don't they?

jeffreywturner Monday, June 1st at 8:56AM EDT (link)

We should have a dummy abortion or affirmative action diary every couple of weeks just to draw the trolls out into the open so we can shoot them like fish in a barrel. They just can’t resist it.

“Life is too short, can’t we all just eat pork and kill some terrorists?”

 

What if we used the Left's logic?

jeffreywturner Monday, June 1st at 9:02AM EDT (link)

Just think of the MORONIC position on abortion that Joe Biden, Nancy Pelosi and other “so-called” Catholics in politics use on abortion, and then imagine if we used that same logic in expressing our condolences to the widow of Dr. Tiler.

“Ma’am, I am personally opposed to murder, so I would like to express my sympathy for your loss, but I wouldn’t want to impose my values on the murderer and deny him his right to choose too kill your husband.”

Sounds pretty stupid and insulting doesn’t it?

It doesn’t sound any more intelligent when the left uses it to justify abortion.

“Life is too short, can’t we all just eat pork and kill some terrorists?”

It's ironic isn't it?

bk Monday, June 1st at 11:32AM EDT (link)

Everyone except one or two nutcases have unequivocally condemned the murder as being wrong. To the left, that’s just hypocrisy and the right really encourages and celebrates such terrorist assassinations (as they describe it).

On the other hand, when a leftist says (wink wink) that they want abortion to be “safe, legal, and rare” we are supposed to believe that they are interested in reducing numbers of abortion to the point of being “rare”, when it’s clear they want abortion to be “safe (for the mother), legal, and unlimited“.

 

Apparently the Catholic Church is pretty clear about this issue

olsmithie Thursday, June 4th at 2:07PM EDT (link)

http://www.scborromeo.org/ccc/p3s2c2a5.htm

Pelosi and Biden and their ilk are willing accomplices, wonder where that leaves them?

Regards

 
 

A serious question

RedKitten Monday, June 1st at 1:07PM EDT (link)

To all of you who denounce Tiller as a murderer, I am going to ask you a serious question, and I would appreciate a serious answer:

If a woman is at risk of dying or being irreparably harmed by the pregnancy, or if the woman is carrying a fetus whose abnormalities are incompatible with life (its intestines have developed outside of its body, or it has no face, or three-quarters of its brain is missing — and yes, this DOES happen) - what should be done?

If you are so opposed to late-term abortion that you feel it should never be performed, then WHAT, in all seriousness, is your suggestion for those situations that I have described above?

I am genuinely, honestly curious to learn what you feel should be done in those particular circumstances, as it seems that I have yet to hear anybody in the pro-life movement even acknowledge that dangerous pregnancies and/or fetal anomalies occur.

So, I’m asking very respectfully for someone to please ponder my question and to answer it seriously: a) what alternative do you suggest, and b) is this an alternative that you would be comfortable with if it was you or a loved one faced with this situation?

And as an FYI, I am not trolling or trying to win a political argument here, I set up this account ages ago and argued once or twice with people here before moving on, but this incident has really struck a chord with me, and I am genuinely trying to understand where other people are coming from on this. So I figured, why not go directly TO the people who are vehemently opposed to late-term abortion?

Thank you.

No, RedKitten, we'll actually back up a bit.

Moe Lane Monday, June 1st at 1:16PM EDT (link)

Why are you contesting that Tiller is a murderer? It is a generally agreed-upon position in American society that third-trimester abortions should be illegal, even among people who endorse permitting abortions earlier; the consensus is that at this point we’re talking about babies.

Why are we required to treat your extremist position otherwise as being mainstream?

To Moe

RedKitten Monday, June 1st at 1:46PM EDT (link)

If you wish to call him a murderer, then that is absolutely your prerogative. I don’t see it that way, but I’m not going to tell you how to feel. I didn’t think that I was pretending that my position was mainstream, and I agree with you that most people are repulsed by the idea of third-trimester abortion. I will also admit that I can understand why, on the surface, people find it repugnant. It’s not a pretty procedure by any stretch of the imagination.

However, none of that addresses the problem I raised: there IS a statistically significant number of women out there who, after the 28 week mark, develop very serious, life-threatening complications, or find out that their child has fetal abnormalities that are incompatible with life. If the only way to save the woman’s life is via a third-trimester abortion, then what? Or what if the woman finds out after her 23-week ultrasound that her baby will never draw breath outside of the womb? Should she be forced to continue on with the pregnancy anyway?

I am currently in my third trimester, and thank goodness, my child is healthy and is developing normally, and my health has been excellent thus far. I have strangers coming up to me in the street congratulating me and asking me when I’m due, if it’s a boy or a girl, if they can touch my belly, etc. etc. If there was something seriously wrong with this baby, where it had no hope of life outside of the womb, I cannot imagine how I would endure being forced to continue with the pregnancy while keeping on a brave face for those unwitting well-wishers — that just seems like the type of thing that would make any woman lose her mind.

Sadly, we humans are imperfect, and not every pregnancy is a healthy one. And sometimes we only find out about problems (or they only develop) later in pregnancy. So if there is no such thing as late-term abortion….then what? I’m genuinely baffled as to what it is that you envision, so I’m hoping you can tell me what you see happening in the circumstances such as I have described.

Thank you,

Your post ignores the fact the he would perform

Vegas_Rick Monday, June 1st at 1:49PM EDT (link)

3rd trimester abortions because the mother was “depressed”.

Nice try though.

“Nothing in this world can take the place of persistence. Talent will not; nothing is more common than unsuccessful people with talent. Genius will not; unrewarded genius is almost a proverb. Education will not; the world is full of educated derelicts. Persistence and determination alone are omnipotent. The slogan ‘press on’ has solved and always will solve the problems of the human race.” Calvin Coolidge.

@Vegas_Rick

RedKitten Monday, June 1st at 2:05PM EDT (link)

Do you have a credible source for this assertion that he was performing late-term abortions for women who were clinically depressed?

From what I have read, Kansas law permits late-term abortion in cases where the mother’s health is in danger, or in cases of severe fetal anomaly, and two separate doctors have to sign off on it before the procedure can be performed. As Kansas is quite a conservative state, I would presume that the law there is quite stringently enforced and observed. I also recall reading that Dr. Tiller was brought to court a few times on accusations of circumventing the law, but that every time, he was found innocent by a jury of his peers. So he was following Kansas law, which makes me question your implication that he was performing abortions for frivolous reasons. However, if you do have a source, I would be happy to take a look at it.

As well, you may want to reconsider putting the scare quotes around “depressed”. Depression is a very real, very devastating illness, and is not something to mock or to make light of.

Abortion is a very real, very devastating process, and is not something to mock or to make light of...

Aaron Gardner Monday, June 1st at 2:10PM EDT (link)

and it leads to depression for many women after the fact, how do you intend to help them?

Aaron’s Archive

conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!

Abortion can also lead to depression of the father

izoneguy Monday, June 1st at 2:17PM EDT (link)

My best friend and his wife aborted their first child in 1980.
My friend confided in me that the abortion was a huge mistake that him & his wife made. He suffered from depression until 1997 when he committed suicide.

“When the government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny.”
Thomas Jefferson

But izoneguy that is ok because male reproductive rights are non-existent...

Aaron Gardner Monday, June 1st at 2:23PM EDT (link)

Seriously though, I am sorry for you loss and theirs.

It is a tragedy that those who wish to legalize abortion in all ways never consider the unintended consequences of their actions.

Aaron’s Archive

conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!

 

@izoneguy

RedKitten Monday, June 1st at 2:38PM EDT (link)

I am very sorry to hear about your friend — that is an incredibly tragic thing to have happened, and you have my sympathies.

Sigh…I wish there was one perfect solution for this where nobody would be hurt, everybody. I really do. Unfortunately, because we’re human beings, things are always going to be complicated. There IS no way to avoid someone being hurt. There IS no way to avoid someone dying. Until extra-uterine gestation is scientifically possible, you’ve got three people here: the mother, the father, and the baby. The baby is depending on its mother’s body for life, but can also pose a great physical risk to the mother. Pregnancy is damn hard on the body, even with an “easy” pregnancy like mine.

So, there are no perfect solutions. Where do we go from here? In my mind, the solution that causes the least damage is to do our best to reduce the number of unplanned pregnancies in the first place, and to improve prenatal care so as to reduce the number of cases where pregnancy endangers a woman’s life. Those two steps would reduce abortions by quite a bit.

But, because of the reasons that I have listed earlier, I’m afraid that safe, legal abortion will continue to be a necessity in our society. I don’t expect you to like that. But the alternative is worse, when you think about it.

 
 

@Aaron

RedKitten Monday, June 1st at 2:25PM EDT (link)

That is a risk, unfortunately. I’m not saying that abortion is something to take lightly, or that it isn’t a difficult decision. Everybody reacts differently — some women are relieved, some are indifferent, and some mourn very deeply.

I do think that there needs to be care given to the woman both prior to and after the abortion, to ensure that she is of sound mind and is making the decision freely and without coercion, and I think that counselling should be made readily available afterwards, to help any women afterwards who are struggling with what they have done.

So you have a double standard then RedKitten...

Aaron Gardner Monday, June 1st at 2:36PM EDT (link)

you are ok with the risk of a woman becoming depressed and suicidal because of an abortion but you are not ok with the risk of depression by having to carry a baby to term.

That is a ridiculous position for you to take.

Aaron’s Archive

conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!

@Aaron

RedKitten Monday, June 1st at 2:45PM EDT (link)

I’m not okay with a woman becoming depressed and suicidal under either circumstance.

However, I think that the risk of that happening would only be exacerbated by the woman having absolutely no choice or control over what takes place when she finds out that having the baby might kill her, or that her baby will die upon birth. If a woman chooses to terminate the pregnancy and becomes depressed, or if the woman chooses to continue the pregnancy and becomes depressed, both are tragic. But what is even more tragic, in my view, is for a woman to not actually HAVE a choice in either circumstance.

I feel like I’m phrasing it awkwardly, but do you see the distinction I’m making here? It’s painful to regret the decision you made. It would be even more painful to be told that you can’t make that decision — that you have to follow a certain path, whether you like it or not, whether it endangers your life or not, and whether it endangers your sanity or not.

the difference RedKitten is...

Aaron Gardner Monday, June 1st at 2:51PM EDT (link)

that in your scenario the baby is guaranteed to die whereas the mother has a chance of dying.

Aaron’s Archive

conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

I have known two women in my lifetime who have

janis Monday, June 1st at 2:04PM EDT (link)

gone through the trauma you describe. One was a mother in my church when I was just a little girl who contracted German measles when she was in her early second trimester. Not believing in therapeutic abortion, she continued to carry the fetus until it was undeniably dead. And, yes, she was haunted by it for years, but she said that she would have been even more haunted if she had had the abortion only to find that the baby was fine and that she had deliberately killed it.

The other situation involved a baby who was diagnosed in the early third trimester with an unfixable heart problem, a baby that would die within 12 hours of being born. The mother and father both chose to carry the child to term, hoping and praying that a solution could be found, but, if not, desperately wanting to hold their little son for the few hours that he was alive on this earth. And so they did. He died within a few hours of birth and his parents held him the entire time until he returned to the Maker from whence he came.

Neither mother found their situation easy or comfortable. Both were heartbroken, but were women of faith and great love.

@Janis

RedKitten Monday, June 1st at 2:21PM EDT (link)

Thank you for sharing those stories. My heart goes out to those women — that must have been such an incredibly difficult situation for them, and not one that I would ever wish upon any family.

However, you imply that both women had the choice to carry to term. I am not going to denigrate their choice, as I have (knock on wood) never been in that tragic situation. Nor would I ever suggest that all women in that situation SHOULD have abortions. Far from it.

However, I still think that in situations like that, it is vital for the woman to be able to MAKE that choice. They chose a certain option. Some women choose otherwise. In a tragic situation like that, what if your friends had been told that they had no choice but to carry to term? If your acquaintances’ lives had been threatened by those pregnancies, and they had had absolutely no legal option to end the pregnancy, your stories could very well have ended not only with two dead babies, but with dead mothers as well.

Finding out that your pregnancy might kill you, or finding out that your baby will likely die upon birth are both incredibly traumatic, horrible situations. Why make it even MORE traumatic for women by refusing to allow them to make their own decision as to how to handle the situation?

Anyway, I’m still hoping that someone will answer my question: if you think that late-term abortion should be outlawed, then what is your alternative for cases where the woman’s life/health is in danger, or when the child has no hope of life? Janis has partially answered, and I really appreciate that.

As I mentioned, I am currently in my third trimester. If (heaven forbid), something serious happened where I either had to terminate the pregnancy or die, would you rather I die?

As to your final question, I would rather you

janis Monday, June 1st at 2:42PM EDT (link)

prayed to God and asked Him for His help in making your decision.
And then do what your heart and soul told you to do.

Let me ask you a question, Red Kitten. What about those babies who were slated for abortion in the 8th or 9th month but were born alive. What would you do about them? Would you leave them to die alone and unloved in a laundry room at a hospital? Because that was what your chosen candidate for POTUS was just fine with doing and voted to continue that practice rather than insist on medical care for those infants. You focus so heavily on the mother’s rights, yet you completely ignore the rights of the baby;

@Janis

RedKitten Monday, June 1st at 2:56PM EDT (link)

I realize that you would rather I prayed to God and did what my heart and soul told me to do. But if third-trimester abortion were illegal, then would there even be a point? I’d have absolutely no choice in what to do, would I? My only choice would be to pray to God that the pregnancy doesn’t kill me.

And there very well may be some women who feel that if they die in childbirth, then it is God’s will. I’m not quite of that persuasion, and regardless of what my choice would actually BE, I’d want to be allowed to actually MAKE the decision, rather than to be told “well, this pregnancy will likely kill you, and you can’t do a darned thing about it. Have a nice day!”

And I’m not following your question…could you be a bit more specific? Are you talking about children with abnormalities whose mothers changed their minds about termination? Under what circumstances were they “slated for abortion but born alive?” I’m a bit confused here.

And like I said — I wish there was some way to completely honor the mother’s rights and life while completely honoring whatever rights you would wish to ascribe to the baby. Unfortunately, there are cases where the only choice is between a dead baby, or a dead baby and its dead mama. And that’s tragic, and I wish it could be avoided, believe me. But it DOES happen, and we can’t pretend that it doesn’t.

I’m sorry, but if my pregnancy became complicated to the point where I would die without terminating the pregnancy, I would choose to live. No good would come about from both me and the baby dying. I would grieve, I would mourn, and I would probably need a lot of support and therapy afterwards. And hopefully, I would someday go on to have more children. Were I dead, well..not only would this baby be dead too, but so would the other child I’m planning to have a few years down the road. So which is the lesser evil?

How do you know no good would come from it...

Aaron Gardner Monday, June 1st at 3:04PM EDT (link)

maybe your aborted baby would have been the one to figure out how to make extra-uterine gestation possible.

The point being that you don’t know…and never will because you would rather kill then die.

Rather selfish.

Aaron’s Archive

conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!

Aaron

RedKitten Monday, June 1st at 3:39PM EDT (link)

Yes, I would rather kill than die. I think a lot of people feel the same way. That’s why, to extrapolate your argument, murder in self-defense is usually accepted by society.

To use your argument, if someone tries to kill me, I should just let them, do it, instead of trying to find something sharp with which to stab my attacker to death, on the off chance that my attacker may someday have a kid who cures cancer.

Now you’re just being silly, really.

Anyway, I’m only going to respond to a few more posts, and then I have to go. Besides, I’m getting the impression that I may be wearing out my welcome here.

RedKitten...nice strawman...

Aaron Gardner Monday, June 1st at 3:48PM EDT (link)

Is the baby really attacking a mother, and if so as your silly analogy infers wouldn’t you be charged with a crime first before you could use the self defense defense.

Where is the due process for the baby?

Aaron’s Archive

conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!

 

"murder in self-defense"? -nt

E Pluribus Unum Monday, June 1st at 4:11PM EDT (link)

Carthago delenda est

ok, the way redkitten frames it Aa and EPU, is quite incompetent

Mike gamecock DeVine Monday, June 1st at 8:52PM EDT (link)

The point is that person has a right to resist their own death, even to the point of killing another, if that other is not intentionally trying to kill them,

so long as

the person defending themself with lethal force did not bring on the circumstances that made self defense necessary.

So, I am not going to be bound by an incompetent advocate of a time honored principle.

Now, why do I think that a common law court would allow it despite the initiation of the availer by getting pregnant?

Because of the legal standard of foreseeability and the miniscule number of instances with modern medicine when delivery actually odes threaten the mother’s life.

Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” - Andrew Jackson

I was just making note

E Pluribus Unum Monday, June 1st at 10:17PM EDT (link)

of the use of “murder” where kitty probably would have been better off using “killing” or “death”.

Since self-defense kind of by definition is *not* murder.

Carthago delenda est

gotcha, by definition (good one) - nt

Mike gamecock DeVine Monday, June 1st at 10:33PM EDT (link)

Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” - Andrew Jackson

 

Good call EPU...I didn't even cath that...nt

Aaron Gardner Monday, June 1st at 10:37PM EDT (link)

Aaron’s Archive

conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!

 
 
 
 
 
 

Most all people favor life of the mother as an exception - many as the only exception, as it

Mike gamecock DeVine Monday, June 1st at 3:53PM EDT (link)

fits in with self defense in ordinary murder law.

Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” - Andrew Jackson

Mike, sorry but I reject the self denfense as a strawman...

Aaron Gardner Monday, June 1st at 3:56PM EDT (link)

first off because in order to use self defense wouldn’t you first have to be charged with a crime?

Aaron’s Archive

conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!

No, of course the act of self defense happens and only then

Mike gamecock DeVine Monday, June 1st at 5:48PM EDT (link)

is the person charged with murder or some lesser included offense.

Now, I recognize that this is not a perfect analogy since, one condition of the use of the affirmative defense of self defense in court is that the defendant not have “brought about the circumstances” necessitating it use, i.e. that they didn’t start the fight.

And so one could logically argue that one that got pregnant should have foreseen the possibility that a pregnancy could be dangerous.

But, at least in the case where the life of the mother is truly threatened, one has a neutral circumstance with regard to life.

Personally, life of the mother (which is VERY rare) is the only exception I favor after conception.

Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” - Andrew Jackson

Mike my point is that in order to use the affirmative self defense you must first end up in court...how do you get there??...nt

Aaron Gardner Monday, June 1st at 8:25PM EDT (link)

Aaron’s Archive

conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!

Depends on what "use" means

Mike gamecock DeVine Monday, June 1st at 8:36PM EDT (link)

Many people that defend themselves are investigated after the homicide. Some get charged with crimes. Some are not.

The point is not when a legal defense is used. The legal defense is based on facts of life and the principle involved. It evolved quite early in the common law based on fact situations.

Abortion is fact situation. Presently, it is legal for at least the first six months, when no defense is needed from a legal standpoint. The courts have decided that none is needed that early based on their fiction that no viable life threatens the mother.

But in the third tri-mester even Casey gives lip service to the threat but then negates it almost utterly with the whole “health” of the mother black hole. But the underlying principle that the state’s interest is based upon in the life of the fetus in late stages produces the dynamic for the self defense defense.

But like I said, even at common law, one cannot use the defense if one initiated the need for same.

It would be an interesting question to see if a common law driven court would find that getting pregnant was such an initiation. I suspect it would not.

Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” - Andrew Jackson

By use I meant in the way that RedKitten tried to use it in the link below..

Aaron Gardner Monday, June 1st at 8:45PM EDT (link)

here

Aaron’s Archive

conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!

I'll read it, but just so you recognize the brilliant and free

Mike gamecock DeVine Monday, June 1st at 8:47PM EDT (link)

legal analysis you are getting here that you failed to acknowledge that I am certain the link will not negate the offense of!

smile

Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” - Andrew Jackson

 
 
 

But Aaron, would you allow DeVine Law to be your lawyer?

Mike gamecock DeVine Monday, June 1st at 8:43PM EDT (link)

I have provided you with the ammo to argue against the applicability of self defense in the case of abortion with the requirement that one not have initiated the upset that makes its use necessary.

That is your argument, not whether it is “used” only in court.

Especially since I have “used” it often to prevent suspects from being charged in the first place.

Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” - Andrew Jackson

Yeah you could be my lawyer anytime..

Aaron Gardner Monday, June 1st at 8:49PM EDT (link)

If you read the comment I made to RedKitten you might see that I didn’t accept that the baby was indeed attacking the Mother and now that you point it out I see how much sillier it is than I first suspected since the Mother initiates the action by getting pregnant in the first place.

At least that is what I go from what you said.

Aaron’s Archive

conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!

No, because the defense is not dependant on the frame of mind

Mike gamecock DeVine Monday, June 1st at 8:54PM EDT (link)

of the one threatening the person’s life.

Moreover, “assault” has a legal definition that does not require intent unlike the implied intent in the word “attack”.

Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” - Andrew Jackson

I didn't say it was dependant on the frame of mind...

Aaron Gardner Monday, June 1st at 9:15PM EDT (link)

I just agreed with you but for some reason you think I didn’t.

And I would never want to go through the first year of law school and be untaught years of observation and study of the human condition interacting with natural law.

Or to say it plainly I don’t want to lose my common sense for the sake of a lambskin with which to browbeat the “unlearned”.

Aaron’s Archive

conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!

Aa', actually you better employ many of the tactics of lawyers better than most

Mike gamecock DeVine Monday, June 1st at 9:24PM EDT (link)

especially in what you don’t say or address!

But, implicit in your objection to viewing the fetus as attacking the mother is the absence of the intent required to “attack.”

And quite frankly, we have reached the point of contention on this issue, and I am quite impressed with your defense of your objection even to the most fundamental of exceptions to abortion.

Job well done.

Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” - Andrew Jackson

I mean exceptions not objections - nt

Mike gamecock DeVine Monday, June 1st at 9:24PM EDT (link)

Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” - Andrew Jackson

 

Not sure if I should take that as a compliment or not Gamecock..

Aaron Gardner Monday, June 1st at 9:38PM EDT (link)

But I will leave it at this…in order for there to be an defense there must first be on offense and if I were on a jury you would have a hard time convincing me that the baby initiated the offense in order to justify the affirmative self defense, especially in the case of the 3rd trimester when the babies and the Mothers life can both be saved due to the new neo natal breakthroughs.

In the 1st trimester the only thing I think would qualify is an ectopic pregnancy, in which the death of the baby is near 100% certain as is the death of the mother.

In the 2nd trimester there may be a possible gray area, I don’t have enough information right now to make that case one way or the other, but I would still err on the side of the child’s safety because I believe that all right are for not if the right to Life is not respected.

Aaron’s Archive

conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!

well, given your criteria (you are sneaky) I agree on all three!

Mike gamecock DeVine Monday, June 1st at 9:44PM EDT (link)

I assumed that we were only talking about 3rd trimester abortions in which the mother’s life was truly threatened.

The self defense to use lethal force is only allowed in that circumstance, so it appears we agree.

I am sorry that the whole issue got initially defined for you by an incompetent! (forgot his name)

Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” - Andrew Jackson

Mike even if we are talking about just the 3rd trimester...in fact especially 3rd trimester...

Aaron Gardner Monday, June 1st at 9:59PM EDT (link)

Due to medical advances in neo natal care babies as young as 22 weeks are able to live outside the womb, and 23 weeks is defined as viability. With this in mind, if the baby was causing issues, whether mental or physical, the baby could be born via c-section, provided neo natal care and given up for adoption or kept depending on the choice of the Mother. In the circumstance that the baby is not wanted and needs to be sustained in neo natal care the gov’t could provide funding for such care with the money it would save from not supporting abortion mills such as planned parenthood.

So to me if you can save the life of both, which we can, at 23 weeks then there is no legal way to justify an abortion due to the health, whether mental or physical, of the Mother.

Doe you agree?

Aaron’s Archive

conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!

yes, I said early on in this discussion that it is VERY rare

Mike gamecock DeVine Monday, June 1st at 10:16PM EDT (link)

for there to be an actual case where it is necessary to kill the baby to save the mother.

amen bro

and to that extent, it is a strawman argument in GENERAL

My main point that has been that in those rare SPECIFIC cases, self defense is not a strawman, based even on common law.

Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” - Andrew Jackson

 
 
 

It was a compliment brother - nt

Mike gamecock DeVine Monday, June 1st at 9:46PM EDT (link)

Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” - Andrew Jackson

 
 
 
 
 

Given your stubborness, I may have to take you through the first year

Mike gamecock DeVine Monday, June 1st at 8:56PM EDT (link)

of law school, but I am game

cock

that is!

smile

btw, DeVine’s are more stubborn than your average gardner

although not the one called Mike!

Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” - Andrew Jackson

 
 
 
 
 

The equivalent of a strawman occurs when doctors would inevitably

Mike gamecock DeVine Monday, June 1st at 5:50PM EDT (link)

use the exception to justify abortions where the life of the mother is not actually threatened, but the law can’t prevent human failings in all instances, obviously.

Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” - Andrew Jackson

Agreed. At least as a society we wouldn't be condoning

6eorge Jetson Monday, June 1st at 5:54PM EDT (link)

a death of convenience.


Hold off on that Mammogram for 10 years

we have condoned millions, but even LOTM, rape and incest

Mike gamecock DeVine Monday, June 1st at 5:56PM EDT (link)

which would also be abused, the number would be drastically cut.

Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” - Andrew Jackson

 
 
 
 
 

I've been gone for the past couple of hours, RedKitten.

janis Monday, June 1st at 4:49PM EDT (link)

It gave me a chance to think about this subject and your questions in more detail. Your position is that if your pregnancy in late term could harm you and lead to your death, then you’d unhesitatingly choose to abort. Given the medical advances in neonatal intensive care these days, that would be a false choice to start with. If you were 28 weeks or more, chances are good that the baby would live barring severe medical problems in utero.

As to my question about children born alive that were intended to be aborted, no, I’m not talking about babies with some defects or abnormalities. I’m talking about babies that were aborted late term for the sake of the convenience of the mother. They could have lived if given medical care, but they were forbidden that care. And Barack Obama as an Illinois State Senator voted to forbid that same care asserting that it was ” an additional burden on the physician and the mother who had already made the decision.”
No mention was ever made that this was to preserve the mother’s life, as far as I am aware. If you never heard of this, then google Obama+ BAIPA+Jill Stanek. (Somebody correct me if I’m wrong on that name.)

The MSM was grossly negligent during the campaign and for all the months since the election, so I’m not surprised if you are an Obama supporter with little or no knowledge of his true beliefs and actions pre-POTUS.

Come on back when you have more info. We are a smart bunch of people with lots of facts to share if you wish to know them. And I will be interested to know what you think about this same situation after your baby is born and you know your child face to face. Those pregnancy hormones don’t begin to compare in potency to the ones that will flood your body and bond you to your baby!

In a particular case, the life of the mother could be threatened. It happens. - nt

Mike gamecock DeVine Monday, June 1st at 9:26PM EDT (link)

Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” - Andrew Jackson

 
 
 
 

So in a nutshell your position is when all else fails kill the baby...nt

Aaron Gardner Monday, June 1st at 2:45PM EDT (link)

Aaron’s Archive

conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!

 

kitten-

mom2oneson Monday, June 1st at 3:14PM EDT (link)

I don’t like to argue about abortion due to the consequences of it because I feel it’s wrong because it’s murder but a late term abortion- a D&E, early labor etc will also be another trauma for the mother. It’s not going to make the pain of an adverse diagnosis/terminally ill baby go away. Some of our children are only with us for a short time and nothing will make that pain go away. Unfortunately suffering and death are part of life and sometimes we say bury our little ones. It is something moms grieve over until heaven, but ending the child’s life early will only give her more trauma. I think it was Dan Quale? (not sure if it was him) but said the same thing about rape victims and abortion not to traumatize the woman 2x. Now I am not comparing an adverse diagnosis to rape I am just saying ending the child’s life early is another trauma and it doesn’t make what the grief she has to suffer through go away, at all.

There is a really good organizaion called http://www.chask.org you should sign up for their newsletter. They try to put expectant parents in touch with parents that have experienced the same thing when they recieve the adverse diagnosis.

mom2oneson

RedKitten Monday, June 1st at 3:34PM EDT (link)

I can definitely see your viewpoint. And I don’t think that it WOULD make the pain go away. I agree that it is likely a very traumatic horrible procedure. And in the case of a severe fetal abnormality, unfortunately I don’t think that either option is really going to make things “better”.

However, I do feel that the pain would only be made worse by telling the woman that she is not allowed to make a decision, that she HAS to carry that baby to term.. I would think that removing that power from the woman would definitely make things worse, and in the case of rape victims, would make them feel victimized all over again.

As I mentioned earlier, it would be as though, in an inverse world, women with fetal anomalies were forced by law to abort. I would be just as vehemently against that. I think that taking away the options from women in these circumstances would very greatly damage their healing process.

kitten-

mom2oneson Monday, June 1st at 3:55PM EDT (link)

Why do you see carrying the baby to term making things harder for her?

Rape victims, they may feel protective of their little one, like he/she was violated too, they do not need to have the “choice” to abort their child. They need an ear and some decaff ;) and reassurance that their baby is ok and safe growing inside of them. :)

 
 
 
 
 

RedKitten you should read the diary posted by Mailloux...

Aaron Gardner Monday, June 1st at 2:06PM EDT (link)

you can find it here.

Aaron’s Archive

conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!

 

Amillia Taylor was a premie born after less than 22 weeks

INC Monday, June 1st at 2:40PM EDT (link)

gestation in October of 2006.

After 28 weeks a child’s chance of surviving outside the womb are excellent. I had two friends with premies born before that time who survived.

As far as babies with disabilities, a few weeks ago the Washington Times had this moving article:

Choosing not to abort babies with disabilities. I highly recommend it. Some of the mothers are reaching out to inform and support others. The articles tells some of their stories and activities.

@INC

RedKitten Monday, June 1st at 3:03PM EDT (link)

Just to clarify something for everybody here. I am not saying that I think everybody should have an abortion. I am not saying that I think that babies with disabilities should be aborted.

Let me make this clear: under NO circumstances do I think that abortions should be mandatory. Ever. Never-ever.

What I am arguing for here is the right for women to choose, with consultation from their doctor, what is best for them.. If a fetus develops with anencephaly, some women will choose to carry to term. I respect their right to make the decision that they feel is best for them. Some women, in that exact same situation, would choose to terminate the pregnancy. I also respect their right to make the decision that they feel is best for them..

Janis, your friends had the CHOICE to carry their babies to term. I would never want to take that freedom of choice away from them. Imagine how awful it would be had the law demanded that they abort. Imagine how nightmarish that would have been for them to be forced into a choice they don’t want, made to abort that baby. So why is it okay when it’s the “other side”?

The American Academy of Medical Ethics

INC Monday, June 1st at 3:31PM EDT (link)

website has an excellent paper I recommend for your reading.

The Woman and the Physician Facing Abortion: The Role of Correct Science in the Formation of Conscience and the Moral Decision Making Process

 

As far as rights go,

INC Monday, June 1st at 3:36PM EDT (link)

I am not a libertarian, but I found some pertinent thinking at Libertarians for Life:

Abortion and Rights: Applying Libertarian Principles Correctly by Doris Gordon who is a follower of Ayn Rand.

In her 1963 article, “Man’s Rights,” Ayn Rand held a single-tier position. “There are no ‘rights’ of special groups,” she said, “there are no ‘rights of farmers, of workers, of businessmen, of employees, of employers, of the old, of the young, of the unborn.’ There are only the Rights of Man — rights possessed by every individual man and by all men as individuals.”4

Rand, whose philosophy of Objectivism helped found today’s libertarian movement, was, however, an impassioned abortion choicer. She called “the unborn…the nonliving,” and in the same breath said, “One may argue about the later stages of a pregnancy, but the essential issue concerns only the first three months.”5 Elsewhere, she said “that a human being’s life begins at birth.”6

(The numbers are footnotes there).

She does not say how Rand explained her later contradiction of her earlier statement; however, Gordon does go on to make what she considers the libertarian case for life.

 

"Choice" or Responsibility?

INC Monday, June 1st at 3:42PM EDT (link)

In another article at Libertarians for Life, Gordon has done some hard thinking about the idea of the “rights” of the mother:

(My emphasis in bold).

The belief that there is a conflict of rights between mother and child still persists, not only among pro-abortionists, but among pro-lifers. I no longer believe such a conflict exists, but it took me three more years to figure out why. I am going to give you some of the reasoning I went through. It may sound complicated and confusing in part, especially if you are hearing it for the first time, but the bottom line is very simple and everyone knows it: There is no conflict of rights between mother (or father) and child because parents have an obligation to care for their children and, therefore, children have a right to that care. Most of us, even pro-abortionists accept this idea about children after they’re born. Even the state acknowledges this is true, for the state compels parents to support their children. If children are children before as well as after birth, then parents have the obligation to care for them, also.

This means women have no right to choose to kill their unborn or to evict them from their bodies. Mothers have the obligation, instead, to house and feed them and protect them in the womb. Perhaps when the pro-abortionists wear their buttons saying “Choice,” we should wear one saying “Responsibility.”

(As a caveat, I did not support Ron Paul, this article was something he discussed in 1979 that is from the Congressional Record).

 

I know you're gone, Red Kitten, and can no longer respond since you got gacked.

janis Monday, June 1st at 5:38PM EDT (link)

But I feel compelled to answer you on something anyway. You made the assumption that the mother I mentioned whose baby died in utero was able to carry the baby to term. She wasn’t. She insisted on carrying the baby until it finally began to affect her own health because the baby had been dead for a while. At that point, although she resisted the idea because she did not believe in abortion for any reason, she finally succumbed and agreed to a therapeutic abortion involving injecting saline and inducing labor.

Regardless of the fact that the baby was already dead before the procedure, she was still haunted for a long time by the experience of the abortion, a procedure she didn’t want but was compelled to have anyway in order to save her own life.

So, there you go– a more or less forced abortion that took the mother years to recover from. The law didn’t demand it, but medical necessity and the needs of her other three children did.

 
 
 

Try again, RedKitten. Next post.

Moe Lane Monday, June 1st at 3:21PM EDT (link)

I repeat: why are we obligated to treat your extreme position on partial-birth abortion seriously?

@Moe

RedKitten Monday, June 1st at 3:28PM EDT (link)

You’re not. I’m not asking you to agree with my position. I’m not trying to change your mind. I was just asking you in all seriousness: if a pregnancy is endangering a woman’s life, and if abortion is not an option, then what IS the option?

You’re not obligated to take my question seriously, but if it’s any consolation, I am doing my best to be respectful and to argue in good faith. If you wish to refuse to take me seriously, then that is absolutely your prerogative. But it does appear that many here are taking the opportunity to engage in a discussion with me, and everybody here has been very respectful to me, which I greatly appreciate.

In that case, bye.

Moe Lane Monday, June 1st at 3:53PM EDT (link)

We’ve no time for advocates of infanticide. Which you conceded being by not trying to convince us otherwise.

 
 
 

well wishers

mom2oneson Monday, June 1st at 3:30PM EDT (link)

Kitten you would handle it!!!!
I will ad done thing, you would be GRATEFUL for the well wishers, because those around won’t know what to say, and nobody will talk to you about your little one. ALL women want that type of baby talk :) it’s still your baby even if he or she is sick. Honestly you are in love with your baby no matter what it’s not dependent on if he or she is healthy or not. It’s scary dealing with the unknown and there is confusion and I will say some perinatologist have awful ways of communicating things I’m not denying that stress, and it is worse because people around you that normal would not will act funny, you will be more put off by those closest to you than strangers, but having someone ask about your baby when he or she has an adverse diagnosis is not the end of the world. You would also learn things to say, either to keep your privacy or to share something like you aren’t sure he will make it. Most ” belly touchers” will understand that. Some may even share their own story with you and will give you some strength to deal with what you need to.

also as far as choice

mom2oneson Monday, June 1st at 3:38PM EDT (link)

I don’t believe this is the gov role but there should be more choice for a woman that does not want an abortion. She should not have to go into some kind of psychological warfare with a practioner just_to_get_care because the practioner thinks she should have an abortion. It’s really horrible out there and in some areas there may not be more than one perinatologist to go to. With situations with an adverse diagnosis even Christian women or those involved with pro-life work like at crisis pregnancy centers will tell a woman to consult with her dr obviously. The woman doesn’t have family or friends or even the crisis pregnancy center counselors to give her an ear or a shoulder. This is why I like Chask so much because there is a big need there to give women some emotional support at the time of diagnosis. I don’t know why but people act funny when you say your baby has ___ or this___ it’s really weird the don’t give women the normal support they would if the baby was healthier.

 

well wishers continued

mom2oneson Monday, June 1st at 3:42PM EDT (link)

Also kitten you woul be so preoccupied preparing for a special needs child (like checking out library books on how to teach them, trying to find information on how to breastfeed a baby with poor sucking, stuff like that)or handling your own grief for a terminally ill baby about to be born that someone asking really won’t be a big deal to you. And like I said above if they are nice and warm you will be grateful because there isn’t alot of that for you when your baby isn’t healthy.

 
 
 
 

RedKitten...if you support 3rd trimester abortions why not support one in the 275th trimester...

Aaron Gardner Monday, June 1st at 1:29PM EDT (link)

I mean I support neither, but I seriously wonder how you can support abortions in the 3rd trimester but you are against the abortion of George Tiller in his 275th trimester.

Aaron’s Archive

conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!

@Aaron

RedKitten Monday, June 1st at 1:58PM EDT (link)

I asked my question in good faith and in all seriousness — I would hope that you would accord me the same courtesy.

I did RedKitten, I seriously would like to know what the difference is in your mind...

Aaron Gardner Monday, June 1st at 2:04PM EDT (link)

at what point should murder become illegal?

Aaron’s Archive

conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!

Still waiting on an answer to this one RedKitten...nt

Aaron Gardner Monday, June 1st at 2:37PM EDT (link)

Aaron’s Archive

conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!

@Aaron

RedKitten Monday, June 1st at 3:24PM EDT (link)

All right, if you were serious in your question, I will do my best to answer it in good faith. And I want to thank everybody here for having been so civil to me. We ideological opponents all too often demonize each other instead of actually TALKING to each other, so this has been really nice.

Okay, so you’re wondering why I don’t support the “abortion” of George Tiller in his 275th trimester (did you actually do the math on this? That’s kind of funny, actually.)

For starters, if you look at the actual textbook definition, it’s not actually an abortion if the person is already outside the womb. So your question is kind of flawed right from the get-go. But I’ll assume that you’re being facetious, and are basically wondering: if I support babies being killed, why don’t I support Tiller having been killed?

For starters, I respect the rule of law. And murder is illegal. Abortion is not. So there is that.

And I’m no fan of babies being killed. I think it’s an awful thing. However, I believe that there truly are circumstances where there is no viable alternative, and that taking away that choice from the parents is not the right way to go. This is why people in the pro-choice movement characterize themselves as pro-choice, not pro-abortion. I just can’t bring myself to eliminate a woman’s options when she finds herself in the difficult situation of an unplanned or unhealthy pregnancy.

Also, I support the right to access to third-trimester abortions not because I think that they’re keen, or because I’m anti-baby. I believe that in certain cases, they are a medically necessary procedure, and thus believe that they should be kept legal and accessible. Dr. Tiller’s killing cannot be characterized as a medically necessary procedure. If even one woman dies in childbirth, when it could have been prevented by Dr. Tiller’s services, then that is one woman too many, in my opinion. And that is more likely to happen now that he is gone, which is why his death is tragic.

At any rate, from having read all of the comments here, virtually ALL of you here have condemned the murderer and his actions. So it appears that nobody here supports the “abortion of Dr. Tiller in his 275th trimester” — only a lunatic WOULD support that, really. So I cannot help but think that you are trying to set some sort of trap for me, which negates your statement that you are arguing in good faith.

But, I’m a guest here, and I’m pro-choice, and so am likely on the lowest rung of the proverbial totem pole here. So, I’m answering your question, as bizarre as it is, the best that I can, and can only hope that you will recognize my attempt to answer you honestly and are not playing some sort of game where you twist my own words against me.

RedKitten- on numerous occasions you have erected

eburke Monday, June 1st at 3:36PM EDT (link)

the argument that no woman should have to forced to die in the 3rd trimester of her pregnancy if carrying the baby to term would kill her.

Since a) in the vast majority of the cases, since the baby can continue to live outside the womb after week 26; and, b) since I know of no pro-lifers who don’t allow hor a ‘life of the mother’ exception, if we took that scenario off the table, i.e. there would be provisions made for a 3rd trimester abortion if birthing the baby or allowing it to go ‘full-term’ would result in the death of the mother - would you still be in favor of allowing abortions in the 3rd trimester of a pregnancy?

“All that need be done for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.”

“Dead fish go with the flow” ~ izoneguy

“We have a Statue of Liberty not a Statue of Necessity” ~ ColdWarrior

 

RedKitten you didn't answer my question at all...

Aaron Gardner Monday, June 1st at 3:38PM EDT (link)

My question was when does murder become illegal.

Now on to something that caught my eye in you last post.

If even one woman dies in childbirth, when it could have been prevented by Dr. Tiller’s services, then that is one woman too many, in my opinion. And that is more likely to happen now that he is gone, which is why his death is tragic.

If one baby could be prevented from dying due to Tillers death would it also make the murder of Tiller a good thing. If I follow you logic it would be.

Aaron’s Archive

conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!

 
 
 

My wife is not a murderer

everytimeicomeherebabyjesuscries Monday, June 1st at 4:59PM EDT (link)

[This guy tells a story which is supposed to defend late term abortion. He might not have have gotten banned except that his user name proves he's here in bad faith. As a result of that, I suspect the whole thing is just made up in order to shill for the radical pro-abort lobby. – NS]

two years ago, she was in the 34th week of pregnancy when we learned our child had encephalocoele with severe microencephaly with a large portion of the brain formed outside the skull. Several doctors told us our son would never be viable outside of his mother’s womb. The “kicks” she had been experiencing were nothing more than seizures. The doctors recommended an intact D&E (no C-section possible - uterine wall was still too thick) as the best option to preserve my wife’s future fertility. 0.04% of all abortions happen in the third trimester and most are for reasons such as my wife’s. Please don’t judge harshly. Our doctor was the director of Reproductive Health and Endocrinology at Washington University. He and his staff probably know a little more than the rest of you here combined. Oh - and doctor Tiller did not need his mother’s womb to keep him alive at the 275th trimester but my son did at the third. So there is your difference. I support a woman’s right to have a third trimester option. This is a privacy issue as the Supreme Court has ruled. Please understand you do not live in a black and white world and since you are a man you will obviously never have to make this choice for yourself so why would you want to make the choice for others?
 
 
 
 

As a Medical Student I can help answer

JHancock Wednesday, June 3rd at 3:25PM EDT (link)

Sure, some 3rd trimester abortions are medically indicated. For example there are some fetal anomalies incompatible with life, these fetuses will die once born. In this case it is often safer for the mother to have a surgical abortion than an induction of labor. Also very rarely a woman might develop Eclamptic Seizures of Pregnancy and failing kidneys at 20 weeks of pregnancy when the baby is not yet able to survive outside the womb. One could try to keep her pregnant until viability, but Eclampsia is caused by dysfunction of the placenta so it is questionable whether the baby would ever be able to mature to the point he could survive outside the womb and the mother could quite possibly die in the intervening 4-8 weeks. In this case it might possibly be acceptable to abort. It’s akin to the case of rescue workers pulling someone out of a wrecked car when bending the metal will kill the other passenger-they still do it because one dead person is better than two. But, I must emphasize that in most cases this is NOT what Tiller was doing abortions for. These cases are vanishingly rare. In almost all other cases past 28 weeks the mother could either deliver or have a cesarean with the result of a living child. And in cases over 24 weeks the child still has a fighting chance. True-he may be deformed, but since when are handicapped people created unequal and undeserving of life??

For example your case of a child with intestines on the outside is called Omphalocele, and it is surgically correctable. Sure the child may have some disability and digestional trouble, especially when young, but many of these children happen and can be successfully delivered by Cesarean and saved. To kill a childlike this because of not wanting a cesarean section or not wanting a disabled child is uncontionable and unethical and is undoubtedly murder.

In the case of a child without a face, there is no such condition, unless you are talking about head non/maldevelopment. In these cases, the brain would not be developed and the child would not be able to survive outside the womb, also as the brain signals would be absent or abnormal these babies are possibly brain-dead (which is legally and medically dead already–we don’t keep pumping hears of brain-dead people because there is no viable functional brain left for the blood to perfuse), however this too was not the controversial case with Tiller.

The controversy of Tiller was his killing of viable babies for conditions where the mother could die (but was more than 70% likely to live), or where he killed viable babies for disfigurement or handicap, or where he killed viable babies for chromosomal anomalies like Cystic Fibrosis, Downs, Duchene’s. Viable children who weren’t killing their mothers and could have lived meaningful, if handicapped and challenging lives. Some severely controversial cases involved killing babies for medically soft calls like depression, which could have been safely (for mother and child) dealt within other ways.

So in short 3rd trimester opponents and other abortion opponents aren’t against saving the mother’s life when she would otherwise die or avoiding painful and dangerous labor when there is 0% chance of survival. What we are about is giving every conceived life a chance, whether or not it is 100& healthy, disabled, handicapped, loved, or wanted.

Here are the facts

-since RVW 1/4 conceived babies has been aborted

-in the next generation 1/5 will be aborted

-1/3 women have had an elective (not medically necessary) abortion

-1/6 have had more than 1

-93% of abortions are purely elective

-6% are medical, but half or more of these are “soft calls” (viable, but handicapped-or increased risk to the mother, but not unmanageable risk)

-1% is for incest or rape (but frankly I don’t see why the baby should suffer for the misdeeds of its father).

So basically 97% of the current abortions taking place are unwarranted, unnecessary, and unethical.

Even in late term where there are a higher % of medically indicated abortions 50% of these or more are not truly to save the woman’s life or to put to rest a non-viable baby.

So did Tiller occasionally do some good or save a life??-Probably
Did he also murder untold handicapped babies and even a few healthy babies??-Undoubtedly

 
 

Leave a Comment

 

Be respectful, or be banned. No Profanity.