Just what IS social conservatism anyway?


We’ve been hearing for months (years?) now that social conservatives are ruining the Republican party because they aren’t willing to compromise in order to get things done.  In fact, even Maggie Gallagher, over at NRO’s The Corner, talked a little bit about this perception, and how it has grown from a kernel of truth.

Well, what is a Social Conservative?  How do you identify these people who are refusing to compromise with the rest of the Republican party?  I ask not merely out of whimsy, but because knowing the answer will enable Social Conservatives (amongst whom I count myself) to self-identify, and to clearly delineate who is, and who is not, deserving of the title.
So I figure, there’s probably 10 or 20 good platform positions that make a real social conservative, and if you’re on board with 80% of them, you probably qualify.  After all, to keep the post white, you have to re-paint it every year, so if you’re on board with 80% of the positions, you’ll probably not have deal-breaking objections to the other 20%.  But lets see how this goes.

1) Opposition to government subsidized abortion.  Abortion in and of itself is murder (believes the social conservative), but each of us is responsible for his or her own actions.  But having the government support this is beyond the pale.

2) Opposition to gay marriage.  Our society has endured this long because of traditional societal institutions that we value.  Just because we don’t remember WHY they are valuable, does not mean they are not worth keeping.  Opposition to polygamy would fall under this category as well.  Some social conservatives would oppose “no-fault” divorce laws, but I don’t think that warrants a separate bullet-point.

3) A desire to see entitlement spending by government reduced (ie, welfare, WIC, AFDC, etc), not out of fiscal restraint, but because goverment handouts rob people of their own pride and motivation to succeed or fail on their own.  “The character of America is that every man can make himself.”  Not that the government will take care of you if you make a mess of yourself.

4) A desire to allow free expression of faith in public places, including government buildings and property.  IE, 10 commandments?  Okay.  Prayer in schools?  Okay.  Wiccan gatherings in State parks? Okay by me.

5) A desire to see our borders secured effectively by the government.  The govt. does many things it should not, and even more things it need not.  And it doesn’t do what it should, which is ensure that our borders are secure.  Socially, this encourages respect for the law.  (This point would also be a national security issue for NatSec Cons)  Included in this point would be opposition to Amnesty for illegals currently in-country.

6) Strong support for minimal government regulation.   How much is too much?  Just to propose a rough, silly standard, I’d say that if you can’t print all the regulations that affect your workplace on 150 single-spaced, size 14 Times New Roman font, double-sided pages, then you’re over-regulated.  Thinking “nuclear power plants” = 150 pages, personally.  (I expect that’s really extreme on my part, but it does no good to say “minimal government regulation” if you can’t define what those words mean.  Without definitions, I’m as bad as a democrat and just using weasel words)

7) Support pushing education-system evaluations to the lowest possible level.  Instead of having the stupid Department of Education in DC evaluate my kids school, I think **I** should be the one to evaluate their school.

8) Support for the death penalty as a method of retributive and preventative justice, when applied after thorough and fair review.

9) A Strong desire to see the flag respected and to honor our Armed forces.

10) opposition to legalization of any currently illegal drugs.

11) opposition to legalization of child pornography, prostitution and to explicit sex on broadcast TV.

12) support for tort-reform, if couched in terms of “reducing the sue-happy nature of our modern culture.”

Unfortunately, those are all I can think of so far.  I feel confident there would be at least 20 points, but it’s quite possible that the points outlined above wouldn’t qualify.  I’m interested in your thoughts on the matter, and any points you may have to add.

Category: ,

RSS feed | Trackback URI

4 Comments Leave a comment

Simple version...

rbdwiggins Friday, May 22nd at 3:54PM EDT (link)

Life and Liberty are inalienable rights endowed by our Creator.

The individual is personally responsible for his/her contribution or burden to American society.

The US Constitution was made only for a religious and moral people.

“Well, the trouble with our liberal friends is not that they are ignorant, but that they know so much that isn’t so.” – Ronald Reagan

 

Some tenets that must not be litmus tests and one that should be

Mike gamecock DeVine Friday, May 22nd at 3:55PM EDT (link)

Fred Thompson persuaded me that the best way to make progress on abortion and marriage (GIVEN THE SENATE DEMS) is federalism and that we should not insist on constitutional amendments that have no chance.

Plus, conservatives must, and I think all but a few do, be against judge made law for our preferred position when the constitution leaves matters to the states.

Jeff Sessions will be a great advocate and explainer of this in the hearings to come to replace Souter.

Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” - Andrew Jackson

 

I agree to almost all of them

antisocial Friday, May 22nd at 8:54PM EDT (link)

Here is how I see it:
1>Go get an abortion if you want to. Be sure you pay for it. That is not government’s business. If minor parental consent.
2>Don’t redefine traditional marriage term. Leave it alone. SSM(civil union) is OK with me if there is no indoctrination(keep this out of my child’s class) or glorification.
3>Abandon welfare. Don’t “feel nice” with my money.

I agree with practically everything.

Also I want to see following 100%:
Life, Liberty and pursuit of happiness.
Freedom of speech.
Gun Rights.
Don’t tweak the constitution.

No you can’t - Moe Lane
——————————
The Emperor has no clothes!!!
——————————
Republicans who lost the Crap-and-Raid fight in the House -
Mary Bomo Mac (CA-45)
Mike Castle (DE)
Mark Kirk (IL-10)
Frank A. LoBiondo (NJ-02)
Chris Smith (NJ-04)
Leonard Lance (NJ-07)
John M. McHugh (NY-23)
Dave Reichert (WA-08)

 

#3 is the reason that the overwhelming majority

eburke Saturday, May 23rd at 4:20PM EDT (link)

of social conservatives are also fiscal conservatives (something some of our more socially moderate brothers & sisters don’t seem to understand). I would add to your cogent reason the fact that it is immoral to spend someone else’s money (in this case your kid’s and grandkid’s) for your own money. I think that’s called theft. It is also, IMHO, there is such a dearth of politicians who are truly ’social moderates and fiscal conservatives. In the end, IMO, fiscal conservatism is a moral conviction.

“All that need be done for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.”

“Dead fish go with the flow” ~ izoneguy

“We have a Statue of Liberty not a Statue of Necessity” ~ ColdWarrior

 

Leave a Comment

 

Be respectful, or be banned. No Profanity.