« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

MAD

I’m mad!!!!  No, I’m really, really mad!!!! No, I’m furious over the current situation in the Republican Party – but that isn’t what the title of my diary is about.

It dawned on me yesterday that the Republican Party elite – the Establishment – is engaging us conservatives in a game of Assured Destruction.  With Romney as their anointed nominee, they are saying to us that we had better tow the line for him because otherwise we get the destruction of another 4 years of Obama. 

That’s it!!  The ONLY thing we conservatives get out of that deal is NOT Obama.  Do we get Supreme Court nominees that would be assuredly Pro-life?  No!!  How about a constitutional amendment declaring that life begins at conception?  Not a chance!!  Do we get rid of ObamaCare?  No!!  Do we get an end to runaway government spending?  Maybe – probably not!  Is there any part of the conservative agenda that we get?  Probably NOT!  All we get is NOT Obama.

I was in the Navy at one time – aboard an SSBN submarine.  The purpose of that ship and its missiles was to provide a deterrent to the Soviets of an attack on the United States.  The key was the immense destructive power that the ship possessed.  With 24 missiles and multiple warheads per missile, our ship alone could have wrecked such havoc on the Soviet Union that they didn’t dare attack us.  As immoral as it seems to some, by being ready, willing and able to strike, we made it extremely unlikely that the Soviet Union would ever attack us.

You probably can see where I am going with this. Obama is the package of missiles that they (Romneybots) have loaded.  He is assured destruction and we are being told that we had better deliver our votes or the fury of Obama will be unleashed for another 4 years.

Like I said, that is Assured Destruction.  But you see, in the Cold War, there were two sides playing that game.  The problem is that we conservatives have not been playing that game at all.  We’ve been fighting on principle, trying to convince the masses of the wisdom of conservative principles.  And so far it hasn’t worked.  Some days we make progress but the Washington elite – the insiders – keep pushing the levers and the money and the press to put their priorities first. 

As terrible as nuclear weapons are, they are absolutely necessary in a world that already has them.  We have thus far refused to engage in that kind of warfare because we have taken the high moral ground and tried to fight on a playing field that is stacked against us with the equivalent of bows and arrows (of truth) against their nuclear weapons (of might and Obama).

So how can we fight back?  There is only one way to fight this.  There is only one thing we have – one thing that they desperately need from us, and that is our votes.  They cannot survive without our votes. We social conservatives provide the vast majority of the Republican votes.

Are we going to once again cave in to their Armageddon proposal:  Vote for Romney or be destroyed by Obama?

Ah, but it is still March.  Romney doesn’t yet have the nomination sewn up.  The convention isn’t until late August.  There is still time ( but you wouldn’t know that listening to the pundits after Tuesday). 

Would Santorum be acceptable to all sides in our Party?  Yes! He is pro-business, pro-life, and against profligate government spending.  Is he acceptable to Social Conservatives?  He IS our candidate!!  SANTORUM IS THE COMPROMISE CANDIDATE!!

If we had ever had to launch our missiles we would have known that we had failed.  We had to be ready willing and able to do it.  If ordered to do so, we would have done it, knowing full well that there were dire consequences (quite likely death) to us if we did so.  Only through that conviction were we able to convince the Soviet Union that they dared not attack us -and it worked (and still does).

It seems to me, that the only way we can play this game (that they are engaging in) is to declare that the game of Assured Destruction is now a multi-player game.  We need to declare in writing that if they nominate Romney that WE WILL NOT SHOW UP on November 6 – AT ALL.  No votes for your idiot, no votes for your Congressmen, no votes for your Senators.  Nothing!!  Just as in nuclear war, it’s Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD).  You lose everything if Romney is the nominee.  Yes it is MAD!!

That’s how MAD works.  It doesn’t work if we turn around after Romney is nominated and say, “OK, we’ll vote for him anyway.”  They’ve got to know that we have the conviction to follow through and really stay at home if they nominate Obama-lite.  They are going to shrug their shoulders at this and say that we will fall in line after the convention.  Thus, we only have power now.  How can we convince them that we will stay home?  I don’t know the answer to that.

Everyone knows that Romney is a crapshoot at best for knocking off Obama.  So, here’s the grand deal: Nominate Santorum and we will show up – everyone will show up.  Then, even if Obama wins, we then still have the majority in Congress and possibly even the Senate to keep Obama in check.  On the other hand, nominate Romney and then you get Obama on steroids.  Yes it is a terrible threat, but what else can we do?

Help me out here true conservatives.  Do you understand what we must do, or are you going to cave and go vote for Obama-lite if they nominate him?

COMMENTS

  • westcoastpatriette

    is that Santorum is the only compromise candidate. Everything else you have said here is right on the money. But that is part of the problem at this point…all of the anti-Romney conservatives are split between Santorum and Gingrich and many — myself included — feel Gingrich is the superior choice in terms of the kind of skill and expertise that he would bring to the White House (skill and expertise that Santorum lacks). Otherwise, I agree we need to draw the line in the sand now and let the “establishment” know we will not assist them in helping Romney win…period. Now is the time to use the power we have to stand down until Romney backs out of the race.

    • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

      We have to coalesce around the winner of TN before next Tuesday

      • gabs

        Santorum can’t win the general election. He has less support within the Republican Party than Romney, luke-warm as Romney’s support is. Swing States? Kiss them goodbye if Santorum is the nominee.

        • natek58

          Without Romney, at least half of his support goes to Santorum. With Ginrich gone, it all goes there.

          If you listen to that lying sack of s#!^ Romney, Santorum is bad, but its a lie.

          People need to see Santorum to believe in him. His numbers keep goign up until Romney’s sleeze starts to hit him – and it’s wrong. Dead wrong!!

          • gabs

            He can’t win the general. Talking to people confirms what the polls say. He can’t win the general. Romney might not win it, but his chances are better.

          • natek58

            Romney might not win. Are you kidding me – he can’t win. No way can he win.

            So, by your logic you shouldn’t support him either. I think Santorum CAN WIN.

            But I tell you what, let’s stipulate that neither one can win. OK, so which candidate furthers our cause more?

            Presidential campaigns change people’s attitudes. Maybe it doesn’t work out this time, but 4, 8, 12, years later – BANG!! Look at what Goldwater started without winning – Ronald Reagan!!

            Without Goldwater, there would not have been Ronald Reagan in 1980.

          • gabs

            and it’s not over yet.

            As for who does the cause more good, the answer to that isn’t Santorum. Preaching to the choir he’s fine. Winning over hearts and minds, he is counterproductive in the extreme. Since you bring up Goldwater, it opens the door to mention how often I think of (and yearn for) him to be in his prime right now. HE would have a fighting chance. And Santorum is no Goldwater. As many choice words as the late Senator might have about all the candidates, his greatest wrath would be for Santorum.

          • Finrod

            I voted for Newt Gingrich, and if I had to choose between Santorum and Romney, I’d choose Romney.

            Newt Gingrich leaving the race would not substantially help Santorum; in fact it might make it worse for Santorum because then Romney could focus all his PAC money on negative Santorum ads instead of having to divide his fire.

          • natek58

            Most support for Romney is the impression that he is more electable. Santorum (or at least someone other than Romney) is the preferred candidate by large numbers. Of course there are always a few like you, but that doesn’t make my statement wrong.

    • natek58

      He obviously is not my first choice. Santorum is a true social conservative. I’m not sure what we get with Gingrich.

      More importantly: Santorum is way more electable than Gingrich. Just saying.

  • lineholder

    I understand your desire to get Santorum elected, but there’s no way under this sun that I’m going to sacrifice my right to vote in what is likely to be one of the most important elections of my lifetime for the sake of playing what amounts to Russian Roulette with the “Establishment”.

    • natek58

      over the last ten years has gotten us nothing. You don’t forfeit anything if you stay home.

      Until we get a true conservative at the top of the ticket WE HAVE NOTHING. Win or lose, Santorum moves us forward. Win or lose, Romney gets us nowhere.

      And, BTW: it’s your attitude that stands in the way of getting this to work. They know you are a sheep that will follow where-ever they chose to lead you. That gets us NOTHING!!!

  • joeyjojoshabadoo79

    Gingrich and Paul are more like lottery tickets. These are our choices.

  • joeyjojoshabadoo79

    All evidence points to the contrary Im afraid. Loisng by 18 points as an incumbent is only the most obvious example. He’s the default social conservative candidate, and if hed peaked at the beginning hed be long gone by now.