« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

California Court ratifies takesies-backsies doctrine

I'm not normally one for lawyer bashing, but...

Most people, when we sign a contract, we understand that we’re supposed to follow through with what we promise. Contracts are one of the pillars of our economy, without which we would have the mess you see in any lawless banana republic.

Alameda County, California is going bananas though, as a county Superior Court judge has ruled that wireless phone service providers may not enforce their contracts with customers, and people are free to wriggle out of them whenever they want, with no termination fee allowed.

Quoting the Mercury-News:

Californians fed up with being charged for ending their cell phone service prematurely won a major victory in a Bay Area court decision that concluded such fees violate state law.

In a preliminary ruling Monday, Alameda County Superior Court Judge Bonnie Sabraw said Sprint Nextel must pay California mobile-phone consumers $18.2 million as part of a class-action lawsuit challenging early termination fees.

Say goodbye to subsidized hardware, folks, if this ruling isn’t smacked down hard. I hope all the people who enjoyed getting an iPhone cheaply are ready their warmest regards to the the California courts if this forces AT&T to charge full price instead of giving you the hardware cheap with a commitment, because if this ruling is the future, that model just became impossible to sustain.

COMMENTS

  • NightTwister

    -nt-

  • aaronbg

    …I mean really why should I have to choose between feeding my kids and following a contract I signed and never intended to honor…you rightwingers are so cruel…don’t you care about the children…/snark

    I hope I can afford a full price iPhone.

  • Neil_Stevens

    He wanted a free communicator with built-in phaser without the Starfleet commitment.

  • ptort

    a lot of contracts up for dispute. Could you now walk away from an apartment lease without a penalty? How about a car lease?

  • MikeO

    It’s a crying shame that the TOS crew had to go out on what was effectively a comedy installment of the movie series.

    VI wasn’t bad, but it wasn’t Wrath of Khan.

    I won’t speak of V except to note that Sybok rhymes with Barack.

  • Neil_Stevens

    … but it was the closest facsimile they could make without putting Khan and Saavik into the plot.

  • NightTwister

    That movie was a crying shame.

    I sure wish they’d put up another trailer for the new one coming up next year.

  • E_Pluribus_Unum

    So how serious did you want their demise to be, exactly?

  • bs

    and mobile phones… three places where contracts mean squat.

  • bs

    and mobile phones… three places where contracts mean squat.

  • Neil_Stevens

    Specifically I talked about how Gene Roddenberry was obsessed with contradicting Christianity with his men-as-gods theories.

    And of course we all know Kirk’s line in V that really sums that up.