« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Checking in on the California Senate Primary

Since my last look at the polling in the California Senate Primary we’ve had no new primary polls, though in the general Rasmussen now shows Babs Boxer running poorly against all three Republicans. +2 over Tom Campbell, +3 over Chuck DeVore, and +4 over Carly Fiorina are not the numbers three term incumbent Democrats should be pulling in a state where Democrats capable of beating Republicans by 19 statewide, as Dianne Feinstein did to Campbell in 2000. This is a race we essentially seem to be able to win with Generic Republican.

That means we’d better make sure that Republican we choose actually is capable of motivating Republicans and keeping us in the race. And if Tom Campbell can’t convince groups like GOProud of his conservatism, how is he going to build momentum into November?

As one might guess, GOProud is a group focusing on speaking out for homosexuals. Only unlike the Log Cabin Republicans who veer far to the left, GOProud is by and for homosexual conservatives. If Tom Campbell were the Reaganite Libertarian that people claim he is, who would back him more than a group like GOProud? But the problem is that GOProud isn’t convinced, and made this little video suggesting Campbell is even worse than Dede Scozzafava:

I’ve already questioned Campbell’s ability to draw on the groups any Republican will need to win in this state, including the Proposition 8 coalition, Tea Party goers, Pro-Lifers, and libertarians. GOProud just helps confirm my theory that Campbell really doesn’t reach out to anyone very well, and that’s why we can’t nominate him in June. We have to make the most of this chance we have to win our first Senate election in California since Ronald Reagan was in the White House.

Of course, that’s if we can even tell which Tom Campbell we’re talking about. Is it the Tom Campbell who said today that he supports the tax cuts signed by President Bush, or the Tom Campbell now who won’t pledge not to raise taxes, or the Tom Campbell in 2000 who ran for Senate against then-Governor Bush’s proposed tax cuts and for a 20% national sales tax?

I can see taking risks in a bad year for Republicans. But not now, not against this weak of a Democrat, not in the best climate Republicans have had in California since 1994. We can’t nominate Tom Campbell. He’s too out of step with the state and too much of a risk on taxes at a time when fiscal matters are driving protests nationwide.

COMMENTS

  • http://www.libertytreehugger.com reverelth

    at a Tax Day Tea Party rally I was at in an undisclosed location.

    Nada for Campbell or Carly.

    Campbell skipped Hannity at the Reagan Library, too. He sure is MIA from the wrong places at the wrong times if he wants to be be taken seriously for walking the walk.

  • joecollins

    Tom Campbell doesn’t get my vote. Chuck gets my vote AND my financial support.

  • thinktank

    Tom actually had a class he was teaching in the law school who employs him. He was not able to make Hannity because he believed his students were more importaint.

  • IJB

    Why is he even still teaching?! He should be campaigning fulltime, if he’s serious about this race.

    If this is the best pro-Campbell spin people can come up with, he’s already lost this Primary…

  • thinktank

    Should Chuck Devore resign from the California State Assembly to concentrate on campaigning if he’s serious about this race?

    Then that would leave Carly in this race since she could take a year off to visit all points in our state.

  • http://www.libertytreehugger.com reverelth

    with volunteers in crisp campaign T-shirts.

    Sorry, in my book, that’s a slam dunk for anyone whose credentials as a conservative are important to him. Once upon a time, Scott Brown got my money. Fool me once.

    Is there a message coming from the Tea Party Tom Cambell doesn’t want to be associated with?

  • Adjoran

    I question his judgment. Not only in the sort of think mentioned above, but his refusal to disassociate himself from Islamic support with ties to the wrong side.

    DeVore would certainly be my first choice, handily so, but Fiorina would be acceptable as well.

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    He’s pro-abort. He doesn’t even deny it.

    He’s anti-marriage. He wrote vehemently about it in Reason.

    He’s pro-open borders. In 2000 he accused Feinstein of being “anti-immigrant” because he was to HER left on the issue.

    He’s pro-tax. He refuses to sign the tax pledge, is constantly proposing tax increases, and refused to vote for the Constitutional amendment for a supermajority to pass tax increases.

    He’s pro-spending. Carly started to hit this in the Demon Sheep ad, but there’s also his Congressional voting record in which he constantly opposed conservative amendments to cut spending, as well as lobbied after his time in Congress against amendments to cut wasteful NSF spending.

    We all know where he stands on Israel and by extension on the need to take a hard line against Islamic terror.

    In what way is Tom Campbell anything but Dede Scozzafava in pants?

  • polaedra28

    Tom is a lack-luster moderate Republican. I am so tired of him and others like him who give us more of the same old, same old.

    Carly was a horrible CEO for HP and while we are used to that sort of competance in public office, I’d like us to stop going there.

    Chuck DeVore is the man, a true conservative and very motivated to be rolling back the progressive slide we have long been on towards marxism and tyranny.

  • jwill555

    Campbell is a RINO. Fiorina has a very spotty record.

    DeVore is a solid conservative. He has my vote, too.