« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

My California Ballot, June 8, 2010

This is a long ballot, and I won’t cover everything, but there are a few races I’d like to mention, as well as the statewide initiatives we’re faced with this time around.

Governor: There are only two realistic choices of candidates with a chance to win. Neither are pleasant for a conservative. But I’m backing Steve Poizner over Meg Whitman because he seems less of an extremist than she is. His wife donated to Al Gore in his name, but she backed Babs Boxer last time out, which could undercut our nominee this time. This is real hold-your-nose territory either way.

Lieutenant Governor: Abel Maldonaldo is a real piece of work, the culmination of the Arnold “Girly Man” Schwarzenegger alliance with Democrats. We’ve got to strike him down, and Sam Aanestad seems to be leading opponent who’s a mainstream Republican.

Secretary of State: Even if Damon Dunn didn’t seem like an exciting candidate due to his personal story and extensive outreach efforts, Orly Taitz is a total whack job. And by whack job I mean she’s openly a birther, calling her own website the “World’s Leading Obama Eligibility Challenge Web Site.”

Senator: I won’t rehash what’s been said about this race on the front page of Red State over the last year and a half. I voted Chuck DeVore to nobody’s big surprise, though.

United States Representative, District 45: Mary Bono Mack has been shifting left ever since she settled into her DC offices, but opposition to her from the right only began to crystallize when she voted for Cap and Tax. It’s time for her to move on, and go live in Florida and DC with Connie Mack IV of Florida, her husband. I’m voting Clay Thibodeau.

Riverside County District Attorney: Incumbent Rod Pacheco has virtually every conservative endorsement under the sun, while Paul Zellerbach is a judge who once skipped out on a jury in deliberations in order to see an Angels game, and got reprimanded for it. What a flake.

And now onto the ballot measures!

Proposition 13: No, it’s not that Prop. 13, but amusingly enough this 13 also deals with property tax limitations. It prohibits seismic retrofitting from triggering higher property tax assessments. I’m voting Yes.

Proposition 14: Jungle primary. No, no, a thousand times no. An open primary is bad enough.

Proposition 15: Voluntary public financing of political campaigns with spending and contribution limits. It appears similar to the Presidential system in place now. I’d really rather not fund Democrat, Green, Peace and Freedom, and other obnoxious/evil politicians with my tax dollars, thanks. No.

Proposition 16: Current state law lets cities take over electric power in the city for all new power hookups, over time creating a total monopoly held by the city. Proposition 16 would require a vote before the city could do that, with two thirds approval required for passage. I wish we had that in Moreno Valley before they did their takeover. Yes.

Proposition 17: This is a tricky one. As you may not know if you don’t live here, auto insurance is not sold in a free market in California. State law requires you to purchase it to drive in the state if you can’t afford to put up a five figure bond with the state DMV. So the market is tightly controlled by the state Insurance Commissioner and state law. Proposition 17 would allow insurers to give a “discount” according to continuous time insured by other insurers. In effect, this would allow insurers to raise their base prices and then give discounts to select people who are already insured. I don’t like the government allowing these insurers to take advantage of a captive market with more market segmentation than they already get away with. No, though I expect pushback on this one.

COMMENTS

  • JamesSmith130

    but I agree with your votes.

    What is the prognosis on these propositions? Which ones do you think will pass?

  • eastbaylarry

    and my ballot looks much like yours, except I’m in district 13.
    Unfortunately due to the poor choices in some cases and the poor chances of winning in others, I don’t see any real improvements in California politics this cycle.

  • Richard Mullins

    in the form of Orly Tainz. Is she trying the Hamster ads on TV?(In reference to the ones that Debra Medina before the Primary here). All your choices seem good although I don’t live in CA but in North Harris County,TX. I can see why it’s hard to vote for some people.

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    There’s reason to be optimistic though. Republicans have hotly contested primaries for Governor and Senator, but on the Democrat side it’s all wrapped up for Moonbeam and Call me Senator.

    Our turnout might be better.

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    But yes, from what I’ve heard of Medina, they’re two of a kind.

  • Richard Mullins

    It was funny the first time I saw it. I was eating breakfast tacos at Mexican restaurant here in Spring and one of the TV’s was on KHOU. Her was on and immediately I thought that ad could only cost 20 dollars to make. I’m sure that Orly has her version but if some BC that she picked up out of the trash, Dumpster diving here we come. Well at least things are back to normal around here so we can get to do what best, knocking off Dem candidates. Sometimes you have to vote a KBH in order not to have a Barbara Radnofsky.

  • Cheryl

    there are a lot of small cities up north and around the state who provide power to their residents at a lower cost. PG&E is the main supporter and last I looked, I don’t have much choice as to who I pay to provide me gas and power. Geez, talk about the pot calling the kettle black (they’re advertising these poor residents don’t have a choice)!

    I’m supporting Brad Goehring for CA11.

    Damon Dunn spoke at our CRW meeting; I was impressed. He’s been in business for himself and played sports which I consider two very important attributes! I suppose the Stanford degree doesn’t hurt either.

    I’m all in for Chuck DeVore.

    I vote absentee also, will send it it next week.

  • IJB

    ;)

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    Nestande and Emmerson are it for Assembly and Senate.

  • Diogenes314

    I’ll try again in the right thread…

    Governor-Whitman (Poizner is too unreliable on taxes and more likely to help elect Brown in November)
    Lt Governor-Aanestad (Maldanaldo is a tool)
    Secretary of State-Dunn (Taitz is?not a serious candidate. Okay, I?m pretty sure she?s clinically insane).
    San Diego city Council-Lorie Zapf
    San Diego County Sheriff- Jay LaSuer (Appointed incumbent Bill Gore has been endorsed by the former sheriff, the DA, the U/T and all of the law enforcement unions. Plus he?s publicly come out against Arizona?s SB 1070)

    Agree with the OP on all the Props.

    I?m leaning to Weaver for 53rd congressional district, but none of the candidates is either overwhelming or likely to have a chance in November.
    I?m also leaning DeVore for Senate-but I?m not certain he is viable or that voting for him is going to do anything but help Campbell. And by proxy, Boxer.

    I?m leaning for Eastman as Attorney General, but he?s trailing badly and might go with Hartman to keep Cooley out.

    On Superintendent of Public Instruction the only candidates with and traction are Dems. The unions support Torlkson and the bureaucrats Aceves, both groups loath Gloria Romero. That?s probably good enough for me.

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    You happened to hit the two races I filled in last when I had the least time left to research. :-)

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    But I don’t remember what I put in, and now the envelope is sealed and ready to go out today. Not sure if I’ll mail it or just run it to the county today while I’m exchanging the (wrong form factor) memory I got yesterday.

  • Diogenes314

    But I am seriously (not looking for further debate, just waiting to see how things shake out) divided on DeVore/Fioriona.

    As loath as I am in general to vote for Dems, Romero will probably get the nod. The only other time in the last 20+ years I’ve voted D was for Aguirre as San Diego DA last time around-anyone who has both political parties against him (for all the right reasons) gets my approval. He’s not running, but I might just write him in this time around-the current ‘Republican’ DA (another SB 1070 basher) is running unopposed.

    For AG, My heart says Eastman but my head is saying Hartman.

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    I allowed for the option of tactical voting, but in my estimation it turned out not to be needed.

  • theoneandonlyfinn

    So long as NO Republican votes for that tax traitor and weasel, Mike Villines, frankly anyone else on the ballot will suffice.

    I am still torn between Poizner and Whitman for Gov and Devore and Fiorina for Senate…

  • Diogenes314

    If we had instant runoffs, it wouldn’t even be a concern. My main worry was whichever candidate I voted for looking at the polls and deciding to withdraw and endorse the other as soon as I dropped the ballot in the mail.

  • IJB

    I am not exaggerating when I say this may have been the toughest primary ballot I’ve ever had to figure out. Lots of races with lots of candidates… Anyway:

    Governor: Meg Whitman – the two main candidates are liberals AFAIAC, but the difference is Whitman at least mouths the right words (“fighting unions”) while I feel like Poizner thinks people like us are morons who will simply respond to buzzwords (“amnesty”); also somewhat ‘hip’ Whitman will make much a better contrast with ancient and decidedly ‘unhip’ Jerry Brown in the Fall…

    Lt. Governor: Sam Aanstead – there’s no way I’ll ever vote for Abel Maldonado, and the others are all unknowns.

    Secr. of State: Damon Dunn – Orly Taitz would be used by the MSM to tar and feather Republicans across the country.

    Controller: Ted Strickland – I know of him from my days in L.A.; he’s all right.

    Treasuer: Mimi Walters – the only choice! literally!!

    Attorney General: Tom Harman – I like the things I hear about Eastman, but it sounds like Harman has a much better chance to actually *win* this; anybody but Steve Cooley AFAIAC.

    Insurance Commissioner: Mike Villines – I know a little about Villines, and nothing about the other guy.

    Superintendent of Public Instruction: Lydia Gutierrez – this was virtually throwing a dart at the board on this one; at least Gutierrez is a Republican with some experience running for office though…

    Board of Equalization (3rd District): Michelle Steel – I haven’t heard of any reason not to give her a 2nd term.

    U.S. Senator: Chuck DeVore – that said, I’ll have no problem supporting Carly Fiorina in the General.

    U.S. Rep. (53rd District): C. Mason Weaver – I had the hardest time with this race! There are *four* candidates, even though they probably have no chance against Susan Davis in a D+13 district. Mari Fink is obviously self-financing, has spent the most on this race, but has no substantive endorsements that I can see, and is vague on her positions. Matt Friedman actually *called me personally* which impressed me, but he looks short on endorsements too, and his positions seem a little vague to me as well. Michael Crimmins was the ’08 candidate, and I’m not in the mood for a retread, even though Crimmins has the most endorsements – but I found his positions a little vague too, which is inexcusable for someone who ran just 2 years ago. That left Weaver who had the 2nd most endorsements, and the most clearly articulated conservative positions.

    I’ve got no State Senate race this year, and (unfortunately) Nathan Fletcher (who I’ve never been crazy about) is running unopposed for State Assembly.

    San Diego Sheriff: Jay La Suer – vote NO on Bill Gore and Jim Duffy!

    Statewide Propositions:
    Prop. 13: Yes
    Prop. 14: No – If Prop. 14 passes, it’ll be a *disaster* for the State of CA, and will virtually guarantee that a Republican never wins statewide in CA again
    Prop. 15: No
    Prop. 16: Yes
    Prop. 17: Yes

    San Diego Initiatives:
    Prop. A: Yes
    Prop. B: Yes – the Board of Supervisors *desperately* needs Term Limits, even though it may mean a Democrat will grab one of those seats
    Prop. C: Yes
    Prop. D: Yes – keep San Diego’s ‘strong mayor’ system!!

  • IJB

    Scratch Villines. So:

    Insurance Commissioner: Brian Fitzgerald – Villines was indeed behind the 2009 budget deal. So, no.

  • IJB

    I hope you learned your lesson on that one!!

    (He was actually running for City Attorney, and was promptly bounced when he ran for reelection because he was so awful…)

  • Diogenes314

    Except Superintendent of Public Instruction. Neither Gutierrez or any other Republican is going to be close, I’m actually voting for Democrat Gloria Romero based on her history of sticking it to the Unions in the legislature.

    Going with Jeff Olsen for County assessor, Lorie Zapf for City Council and Naomi Bar-Lev for 76th Assembly district.

    I’m not sure about D.A. Either leave it blank or write in “anybody except Dumanis”.

    And I’m no on term limits. That’s just me personally.

  • Diogenes314

    Absolutely horrible. At least Aguirre was an equal opportunity headache for the political establishment.

  • Diogenes314

    Jan Goldsmith. I guess he likes keeping his job, as best as I can tell he’s done absolutely nothing.

  • http://andrightlyso.com/ civil_truth

    If f she wants to “stick it to the unions” she should stay in the legislature and build a coalition there. The superintendents role is to build consensus and act as an advocate for the interests of the children. There’s a limited role for butt-kicking but Romero seems to be of a Pelosi temperment (and too deferential to Washington) that makes her not suitable for Sup’t, Four years of warfare won’t do education any good

    By the same token, I oppose Torlakson because he is a partisan for the major unions, which will lead to similar polarization and political warfare (coming from the opposite direction as Romero) that will just continue the downward trajectory.

    Which reluctantly leaves me with going with Aceves, who offers the best chance of getting some change through without causing nuclear conflict between factions. He may not succeed, but he has the best chance of getting change that may be lasting rather than just the starting point for more conflict.

  • Diogenes314

    The only real ‘change’ he endorses is simple. More money. Frankly, the less he succeeds, the better of we are.

    I’m not sure where the ‘Pelosi temperament’ thing comes from, but I don’t see anything in the record to suggest that. And the primary problem in California education IS the CTA. I’m not suggesting Romero will engage in large scale ‘butt-kicking’, but the first thing needed in any type of real school reform is a willingness to stand up to union management. The fact that she has taken them on in the past (not only in education but with the corrections system) is even more impressive from a Dem.

    The best we can get with Aceves is more of the same-if we’re lucky. Romero is at least worth a shot.

  • Diogenes314

    An interesting article here…

    http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/may/22/moral-vote-group-targets-four-judicial-seats/

    This group http://www.bettercourtsnow.com/ has come out against several of the Judges running for re-election.

    For what it’s worth.

  • IJB

    So there’s no way I’ll vote for one for Superintendent of Public Education.

    Agree with Jeff Olson. Agree with voting against most of the judges running for reelection.

    And I am a *huge* Term Limits backer, and there’s just no excuse for most of these County Supervisors to have had their jobs for over two decades. Those guys have gotten incredibly stale. It’s time to start over with the Supervisors…

  • Diogenes314

    But since it is in effect a three-way race, I’m going with Robert Heinlein’s saying-”there’s not always someone to vote for but there’s always someone to vote against”. I’m voting against the CTA candidate.

    Voting for a Republican you know has no chance of winning in this case is the same as voting Losertarian. And I think this particular position is too important to effectively leave blank.