<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>RedState</title><link>https://redstate.com/neil_stevens/2010/09/29/the-waxman-net-neutrality-bill-should-move-forward/feed/</link><description>Conservative News &amp; Politics</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 03:05:40 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>The Waxman Net Neutrality bill should move forward</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[Update: Waxman is now using Republican opposition to this bill to claim the FCC should now implement the worst case of Internet regulation. Republicans need to get behind a reasonable compromise and we need to commit to outlawing Title II reclassification.  The FCC going on its own would do incalculable damage to the industry going forward.  Action is needed sooner, not later.]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 16:36:40 -0400</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Neil Stevens]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://redstate.com/neil_stevens/2010/09/29/the-waxman-net-neutrality-bill-should-move-forward-n36423</link></item></channel></rss>