« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Fresh Washington Volatility

Murray Rossi

I still have the Washington Senate race as one of the four closest, despite Republican Dino Rossi taking a decent lead over Democrat Patty Murray in recent polling. This is why: both candidates have been capable of rattling off good polls, and one new result at any time can come out in favor of either candidate.

Rossi had run off three polls in a row if we discount the Elway Poll which has been grotesquely biased toward Patty Murray all year long. Before that Murray had four, again ignoring Elway. I mean seriously, how bad is Elway? At one point it showed Murray +17 when the polls around it showed Rossi +10, Murray +2, and Murray +4.

So some back and forth is to be expected, much as we’ve seen in the Nevada race, the Illinois race, and as we’re starting to see in the West Virginia race. CNN/Time’s new result of Murray 51-Rossi 43 (MoE 3.5) is huge for her, without a doubt, but so was that poll a little while back with Rossi up 6.

That 88% victory chance for Murray will certainly weigh in my next projection, no doubt about it. But unless it’s followed up with a string of similar polls, and not a continued mix of Rossi leads with Murray leads, it in itself is not predictive of a new shift in the race. It takes a trend to do that.

From Unlikely Voter

COMMENTS

  • bobojake
  • reaganauh2o

    way to have King County release their results first on election night. I still have 2004 flashbacks with boxes of uncounted ballots popping up during the re-recount.

    An unbelievable moment in judicial history just happened here (please sit down), the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals UNANIMOUSLY (all 11) decided in Washington State’s favor to uphold its ban on felon voting.

  • ciscoguy

    When you?re fighting the Reds on their own turf, even this year, you?re going to lose some close battles. I?ll be more upset if we lose NV, but I still think Angle pulls that one out. If we lose NV but pick up a WA or CA, it will be a good reminder that electability is going to be key for 2012. It just goes to show that an incumbent buffoon like Reid or Obama can have a fighting chance if your candidate isn?t politically bulletproof. I don?t know that this country can handle another 4 years of this destructive Marxist.

    It stinks that women conservatives need to be held to a higher standard than men, but it?s a point in fact that the media jackals will come after them with a fury if they sense any weakness, whereas they?re more likely to give conservative men a pass. They can?t stand the idea of pro-life women in high office. You really need someone in the mold of a Lynne Cheney to go to battle with those sewer rats.

  • ciscoguy
  • http://itsonlywords55.wordpress.com itsonlywords

    What the polls are saying but I’m just not seeing any enthusiasm here for Murray. I assume she has campaign signs and bumper stickers available but I sure haven’t seen any.

  • IJB

    My take on this is she’s got to gain +4% on that to win this. While I guess that’s happened in WA before historically, I’m dubious in this particular case (in this specific year) that she will – I can see Murray gaining up to 3% on that, but I’m not sure I see her gaining +4%.

    The one useful thing about WA is that the ‘jungle’ primary result represents an actual *election* – I’ll put more weight on that than on poll results every single time. Murray’s primary result is an actual, tangible benchmark.

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    Rossi’s led a bunch of polls lately, and you’re talking about losing?

  • ciscoguy