<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>RedState</title><link>https://redstate.com/neil_stevens/2011/06/15/the-california-amazon-tax-violates-props-25-and-26/feed/</link><description>Conservative News &amp; Politics</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 01:42:01 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>The California Amazon Tax violates Props 25 and 26</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[Don&amp;#8217;t our elected officials have access to Ballotpedia?  If the California Democrats did, they&amp;#8217;d know that the Amazon Tax being taken up this afternoon in the legislature is unconstitutional under the state Constitution.  And it&amp;#8217;s not some old, obscure provision that&amp;#8217;s violated either.  It&amp;#8217;s the brand-new Proposition 26, a constitutional amendment passed in November, that the tax violates.]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:30:25 -0400</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Neil Stevens]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://redstate.com/neil_stevens/2011/06/15/the-california-amazon-tax-violates-props-25-and-26-n39367</link></item></channel></rss>