« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Tech at Night: FCC to get grilled, Cybersecurity debate continues

Tech at Night

Darrell Issa’s House Energy and Commerce is going to have a special hearing with all five members of the FCC, including newly confirmed members Jessica Rosenworcel and Ajit Pai. The FCC is expected to be questioned about issues ranging from wired phone competition to spectrum. I hope Mitt Romney’s people are listening, because the hearing should also highlight regulatory reforms needed across the executive branch after the Barack Obama expansions.

Expansions which include yes, picking winners and losers in the marketplace.

Looks like I was right: an early draft ‘compromise’ by Jon Kyl and Sheldon Whitehouse on the Cybersecurity debate int he Senate was too regulatory, and a new draft is coming out. What is wrong with Jon Kyl that he has to go further left than McCain, Murkowski, and others on this?

I begin to think that the radicals equate anything a firm does to improve its competitiveness, with being anti-competitive. I would also suggest that if the radicals want spectrum to be less of a competitive issue that they should open up the secondary spectrum market and get more spectrum onto the market to begin with. The answer is not to make spectrum even more scarce and even more hard to acquire.

Kim Dotcom’s brain must be getting sweaty and feverish under all those layers of fat the man acquired building his multi-million dollar criminal enterprise known as Megaupload, because he really did think Joe Biden was the mastermind of a vast conspiracy against him, now denied by the government and the MPAA. He claims he has more information to back up his allegation but chooses not to release them now. Now, when his life is on the line in the form of criminal prosecutions against him.

COMMENTS

  • utahtim

    Your point about Mr. Dotcom may be correct, but I don’t think your argument is enhanced by an ad hominem reference to his size.

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    An ad hominem would be saying ‘Wow, he’s so fat, he must be wrong!’

    An insult is saying “Hey, look at the fat fatty!”

    Ad hominems are a sign of a weak argument. Insulting online anarchocriminals is fun for all good people involved.

  • CincoSolas_del_Bronx

  • utahtim

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem

    “An ad hominem (Latin for “to the man” or “to the person”), short for argumentum ad hominem, is an attempt to negate the truth of a claim by pointing out a negative characteristic or belief of the person supporting it.”

    That’s what I read you to be saying about Dotcom’s conspiracy theory claim. Just because you’re paranoid doesn’t mean “they” are not out to get you.

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    Don’t tell me you’re butthurt because I’m calling out that scumbag (size XXXXXL) for what he is, now.

    A criminal racketeer who ate lots of Hohos (or whatever they call them in New Zealand) before he got caught.

  • utahtim

    …you’re more effective when you lay off the ad hom. I also think you’re more effective when you lay off ridiculing your readers. Just sayin. As big honcho editor of Redstate, you can obviously say what you want.

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    I *insult* the man as I *expose* his wacko conspiracy theories about Joe Biden, Secret Mastermind.

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    .

  • otis1

    All I know is,that some PARTY or maybe some DC RINOS too,were eager to convert all TV in America to digital with an ON OFF SWITCH. But,extended more than once the deadline for getting your free DC Digital Solyndra Solar Powered Converter Box,until after the 2008 Elections the last time,I imagine so the bitter clingers could still get the straight scoop from ABCBSNBC on their rabbit ears before voting?

    I also know many DEMS want equality/redistribution/radio free Russia, for their many now BANKRUPT FCC LIC. RADIO SHOWS,that can’t survive in OUR FREE MARKET. And Obama says in foreign countries,” I have this one 24hr TV news network?”.

    Do not let DC get their foot and or tax wallets in the door of CYBERSPACE our last frontier,the DEMS/AYERS have already claimed that for our own safety,they need an ON OFF INTERNET SWITCH? This from Ayers,who went to Venezuela to learn from Chavez how to control a post overthrow SCHOOL SYSTEM.

    Our INTERNET PROVIDERS as we speak are mostly owned by who,the same BIG THREE NETWORKS that own most of AMERICA’S TV/CABLE CHANNELS,and some truly ungreatful anti-american geniuses that actually created this INTERNET HERE,and they can and might shutdown much of our INTERNET before the next elections???

    The above is simply FICTION/A CONSPIRACY THEORY/A FUTURE MOVIE?