« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Our Lack of a Candidate for 2012

There have been a dozen blogs and thousands of comments across the blogosphere lately bemoaning our lack of a candidate for 2012. Invariably, the ones that start the harsh words and ill feelings are the ones that begin to eliminate possible candidates. I don’t need to go over the downfalls of any of the candidates here to remind anyone of the shortfalls that others see in their personal favorite. I would just like to draw an analogy and suggest a course of action.

In 1939 FDR and others saw our inevitable involvement in what was shaping up to become WW II. With this in mind FDR appointed General George C. Marshall as the Army Chief of Staff with an eye towards preparing us for this future involvement. In 1939 the United States Army consisted of seven Infantry Divisions and One Cavalry Division, for a total manpower of roughly 150,000. By 1941 the Army had 29 Infantry Divisions, 5 Armored Divisions and 2 Cavalry Divisions. In 1945 the Army was at a strength of 67 Infantry, 16 Armored and 5 Airborne Divisions, for a total strength of over 5 million men. General Marshall planned and oversaw this expansion.

Marshall’s previous assignments had provided him a unique view of the resources available in the Army of 1939. The resource that made the difference was his knowledge of the Officers available to help make the change. It is a common rumor in the Army that Marshall kept a “Black Book” filled with the names of Officers he had a place for. Some of those names include…

Dwight Eisenhower, a Lieutenant Colonel in 1939, working for the former Army Chief of Staff, General Douglas MacArthur in the Philippines, Eisenhower was promoted to Brigadier General and assigned to the US Army HQ as the Chief of Plans in 1941. By 1944 he was Supreme Allied Commander of the Allied Expeditionary Force (SHAEF), responsible for the Allied War effort in Europe.

George S. Patton, a Colonel in 1939 due to his familiarity with Tank (Armored) Warfare, played a vital part in the formation of the Armored Divisions and soon found himself picking up the pieces of one of Marshalls other choices, General Fredenall in North Africa. His first Division Command was the 2nd Armored Division, “Hell on Wheels”. (the only Division is US Army history to wear their Unit Insignia over their heart rather than on their sleeve, because General Patton was buried with that patch worn over his heart.)

Omar Bradley, known as “The Soldier’s General”, one time Commander of the 82nd Infantry Division (later the 82nd Airborne Division), and the man who held Patton in rein during the Campaigns in Europe.

These are only a few of those suspected to have received a bit of help from the Chief of Staff, the legendary military leaders who learned their leadership from General Marshall is long and honorable. The invasion of Sicily saw Captain “Jumpin’ Jim” Gavin lead a handful of men to seize a key intersection and hold it till armored re-enforcements arrived. That same man was a Major General when he led the 82nd Airborne Division on their jump hours before the allied landings on June 6th, 1944.

What does all this wonderful history, and these Soldier’s meteoric rise in rank, have to do with the Presidential Elections in 2012 and the arguments that causes here among conservative activists? Everyone remembers a year ago when the conservative movement was declared dead and was in the same undermanned condition as the US Army of 1939. Well, we are now at the 1941 strength and still growing as Obama, Pelosi and Reid continue their progressive socialization of America. This November will see us at our 1945 levels and we are already now a force to be reckoned with.

What we need to do now is what Marshall did, concentrate on the build up and training of our forces and note those who deserve increased responsibility later. Later, because the 2012 Presidential Election is later, our first mission MUST be the election of 2010. Once that is finished and we have every seat we can possibly take, then, and only then, can we turn our attention to the “black book” we have been keeping and begin to propose our candidates for 2012.

We do not have the luxury of a George C. Marshall to have kept that list, but we know who the possibilities are, and still more will arise as we go through the elections and the legislative battles this year. Be patient, our fighting forces cannot be re-built over night, the time necessary will reveal even more good choices and we will have several to choose from before the beginning of the campaign season. Bemoan our lack of choices now, but do not despair a viable candidate in another year. That year will be as revealing as Obama’s first year in office, and we will profit from the revelations!

Follow NessaTMR on Twitter!

COMMENTS

  • acat

    We know who the 2012 candidates are.

    We also know, I hope, that now is not the time to paste a larger target on any of ‘em – the lefties have been sharpening their spears and waiting for someone to stand up – then in accordance with Alinsky’s instructions, they turn the leader into a pincushion.

    Better to have many targets, thus dividing the slings and arrows and, hopefully, pulling off some blue-on-blue along the way.

    Mew

    • nessa

      “Hit the other fellow as hard as you can, where it hurts him the most, when he isn’t looking.” I believe that was Field Marshal Slim, I’m not sure but its sound advice none the less.

  • Common_Cents

    See my signature line.

    • nessa

      …by November third I think we will have suitably demonstrated our ability to elect conservatives. Then we’ll argue. LOL.

  • penguin2

    I always seem to take heart when comparisons are made with those that truly had to fight some battles. I will not despair for where is our George Washington.

    He is the one I am looking for. :)

    You’re right, 2010 first.

    • nessa

      military analogies are the ones I know but they work well for politics. Americans the quality of our Founding Fathers are out there, I’m confident we will find them.

      • mikerazar

        we owe to George Washington, our military traditions must top the list. It is no accident that great leaders are available when needed. If only our commanders in chief had all been worthy of commanding such men…

      • http://thesandsinstitute.org Vassar Bushmills

        Perfect, as well as the comments. I’m keeping my own list close to my chest as well. Just keep in mind Lincoln never had Grant’s name tucked away at any time. I expect to see some strong performances between now and then by people we may not know well.

        Like you, I’m for keeping my eye on the wreckers for the time being.

        Cheers

        • nessa

          don’t let your head swell, its not hard to teach me vocabulary, lol.

          I’m sure we’ll have our share of Gavin’s and Grant’s before this is over, Americans are like that and there’s nothing like a fight for your life to being the cream to the top.

  • Richard Mullins

    and I’m sure he/she will be ready by 2012. We should have some Audie Murphy’s and Alvin York’s around to promote the cause as well.

    • nessa

      I’m not well versed in Naval history but there was no shortage of brilliant Leaders in the Navy and Marine Corps in WW II. When they are needed they will rise to the occasion. As long as he doesn’t wear a funny hat while he’s campaigning.

  • redpens

    until 2012. We have this year to get through, then the mid-terms, if Obama hasn’t declared martial law.

  • LibertarianHawk

    IMO, he’s precisely the sort of candidate that the Republican Party needs…and precisely the sort of president that the United States of America needs.

    I suspect that the eventual 2012 nominee will be somebody who’s been flying under the radar. Mitt Romney’s recent decision to endorse John McCain for reelection, in the aftermath of his poor showing in the CPAC straw poll, doesn’t do much to dampen that suspicion.

    While a lot of people are befuddled by Romney’s decision, I see it as a Hail Mary pass of sorts. He’s going to tack to the center and be that candidate in 2012.

    And, realistically, I just don’t see Sarah Palin happening.

    So where does that leave us? Well, the only other formidable candidate that we know is going to run is Gov. Pawlenty. And he could well be the one that emerges. I can’t say I know enough about him to say one way or another how that would play out.

    But I do know enough about Gov. Daniels’ record in Indiana to say that I think a whole lot of people — conservatives and otherwise — would find things to like about him. And, beyond that, his leadership forte seems to be paring budgets and wooing capital investment.

    Could there possibly be a better fit for what our country needs right now than that?

    • Ann_W

      There are some good points to waiting ’til after 2010 elections.

      I just hope we don’t get Romney or Palin selected for us right after the elections.

      • Ann_W
  • zerodefects

    With the Nobama attack machine on the prowl (i.e., the Lame-stream Media), I don’t WANT the GOP to name their 2012 candidate just yet. Why telegraph our move two-years-out from the elections?

    There’s a lot of time left between now and Nov 2012, and we have the Demo-rats reeling.

    Plenty of time for the Dems to continuously step in it again…and again…and AGAIN!

    Plenty of time for the GOP to get regrouped and organized.

    We’ve shaken things up in Virginia, New Jersey, and Massachusetts. California is next. Followed by Florida. Illinois, anyone? (on a side note, wouldn’t that just be RICH….the Dems losing Nobama’s home state?)

    We have ‘em on the run. We’ll keep them guessing and desperate. Let’s take our time finding a candidate.

  • conservative_faction

    The 2010 elections are what is critical right now. First things first.

  • nessa
  • houstoneagle

    I hereby promise to smile and return the focus to 2010 whenever someone bashes my currently preferred candidates for the 2012 Republican Presidential nomination. I’m swearing off all talk of 2012 until after the 2010 elections, starting now. Thanks for the wonderful history lesson and the wisdom of your analysis, Nessa.

  • nessa
  • nvrepub

    nt