If the law is ruled unconstitutional…amen and hallelujah! I’ll be fist-pumping and doing the funky-dance for months. But this issue would become moot for any of our candidates that point.

We still have plenty to work with…like the loss of approximately six million jobs since Obama was elected, the soaring prices of [insert your favorite here], and the points of O-care that will lead to increases in taxes to cover the costs…points that won’t be rolled back just because O-care is ruled unconstitutional or repealed.

We’ll have to see how it goes, but Santorum has been like a bloodhound…once he gets his nose to the scent of a particular social issue, he just doesn’t seem to let go of it. That’s not totally a bad thing, but we do need a more balanced emphasis between the social and economic in order to win in Nov. Whether Santorum can succeed in presenting that balance remains to be seen.

Nothing I can do about it now, and I put up a few words on my blog asking for it to stop (needless to say, it didn’t do much good). I’m tempted to leave him off the poll next time!

With all due respect, how is it that Newt has more experience than Santorum? Newt was a Congressman; he then became Speaker, but that’s still a Congressional position. Santorum, on the other hand, was in the House as well, then went on to the Senate; giving him a higher “position” than Newt, since the Senate is above the House. I’m curious about how Santorum is viewed as having less experience than Newt does. I know that as Speaker one is presiding over the House, but like I said, his position was still that of Congressman.