« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

The Case for a Vice-President DeMint

The one name that might be able to seal the election for Mitt Romney is probably one of the only names I haven’t heard even thrown around by pundits on both sides of the aisle.  They seem to be hugely overlooking South Carolina Senator Jim DeMint.  Why is he being overlooked?  He has one of if not the most conservative record in the Senate.  He’s from a Southern state, a demographic that Romney desperately needs.  Most of all, though, DeMint is genuine; a rare quality in politicians today.

His voting record in the Senate is spectacular– voted against Sonia Sotomayor’s appointment to the Supreme Court; against Ben Bernanke’s appointment as Federal Reserve Chairman; voted for a Federal Reserve audit; against Elena Kagan’s appointment to the Supreme Court; against the repeal of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell; voted for a Balanced Budget amendment; voted for the Keystone XL Pipeline Project; and voted for a bill that would prohibit insider trading by members of Congress.  Perhaps most impressively, DeMint led the fight against banning earmarks in 2009-2010.  He was prepared to call for a vote in late 2010, even with the expressive disagreement of Senate minority leader Mitch McConnell, and after hearing the public support for DeMint’s plan, McConnell actually flipped (surprise!).  He announced his support for DeMint’s bill the day before the Senate would vote on it.  That’s the kind of influence DeMint is capable of; he created a bill, got it out there, and people respond positively to it.

Before the 2010 midterm election, DeMint created the Senate Conservatives Fund, an organization that would only endorse truly conservative candidates for the Senate.  Because of the help of SCF, we now have Senators such as Marco Rubio, Rand Paul, and Mike Lee, among many others.

I’m not saying that Jim DeMint is perfect; he is not.  However, I do think he would have a tremendous impact on the Presidential race as Romney’s #2.  Why not?  He’s from a Southern state; he has been in the Senate for eight years, so he has experience; and he resonates with voters.  He’s a genuine person who understands the problems that we are facing.  He doesn’t sit in his office all day and dream up ways to fix the mess we’re in; he goes out and meets with constituents, allowing them to voice their concerns to him, and uses their opinions to create solutions.  What about Jim DeMint makes him an unappealing VP?  Nothing I can find.  I think he’d be one of if not the best possible choice for Romney.  If we want him on the short list, though, we have to push for him.  Feel free to re-print this article on whatever other sites you contribute to so we can spread the word!  (But please link it back to www.nextgenerationvoters.com.)

Jim DeMint would be someone we can count on as our Vice-President.  He’s my top pick for Romney’s running mate.

COMMENTS

  • jdaman

    Mitt Romney needs to alter his VP short list to look like this.

    Bobby Jindal
    Dave Heineman
    Jim DeMint
    Nikki Haley
    Marco Rubio
    Allen West

    Romney needs *somebody* on his team that can appeal to values voters and the Tea Party, any of the above people could do that.

  • Change Jar Conservative

    There is a concerted movement with the Ron Paul people to garner more delegates than he has won in the primaries.

    I know in Georgia that it was at least attempted at the precinct level and we know about Maine, Nevada, and Colorado.

    I think the price to allow Romney to be voted in on the first ballot is going to be a Rand Paul speaking slot or maybe even the VP slot for Rand.

    He wouldn’t be a terrible choice since he is probably the only guy out there that can marshal the Ron Paul and Tea Party forces.

  • conservativerock5

    I have conversed with them often, and they will not support Romney. Whatever, their loss. I mean I hate Romney but I hate Obama far more.

    However I do love Sen. Rand Paul. Now he is someone who actually gets stuff done, not rehearse talking points and show up to vote. He is always introducing bills that defend liberty and filibustering bills that harm liberty. I would strongly support him as a VP pick. Sen. Mike Lee would also be great, though since he is Mormon and Utahan it won’t happen.

    I would also strongly support DeMint being on the ticket. He is anti-establishment and help keep Mitt in line.

  • acat

    The Vice Presidency under Romney doesn’t position Rand for the future, it puts him in lockstep with Mitt, who he clearly disagrees with .. and it also means Dem Gov. Beshear gets to replace Rand in the Senate…. it won’t be someone with an R.

    Further, Kentucky should be solidly in the Romney corner in November; adding Rand to the ticket changes nothing, unlike adding Gov. Martinez or Sen. Rubio.

    Treasury or Fed Chair, though, makes a crazy kind of sense – Ron’s house is built on (misunderstanding) fiscal issues – it’s a natural fit for Rand, and either are a decent springboard for the White House one day.

    Just my $0.01. (inflation-adjusted)

    Mew

  • trimulchio

    I think they will try to go with another Cabinet position for purpose of teh General Election.

  • http://www.unifiedpatriots.com/ pilgrim

    !!

  • conservativerock5

    I think it would be better for his political career if he remained Senator for a while longer.

    Perhaps in Romney’s second term he would take a cabinet position in order to become more well rounded.

  • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

    We don’t need to take a reliable Senator away from the Senate for a Cabinet post, that is a true waste of resources.

  • dbkohl

    … but we still need to keep a count of the number of GOP in the Senate, as well as the number of reliably conservative GOP Senators. We must be careful not to tap to many from the Senate. Who knows who will fill that vacuum.

    But I really really DO like that train of thought.

  • acat

    Treasury or Fed Chair would as well .. the former more than the latter .. but the differences would be more subtle.

    Mew

  • conservativerock5

    Foreign policy is not his expertise, but I agree with his foreign policy views that he has outlined. They are different from his fathers, and also different from mainstream Republicans.

    Rand is generally non-interventionist, however he does not take that principle to the extreme, and acknowledges that Iran is dangerous and we will need to deal with them. Nevertheless he is cautious, which is a virtue. I honestly think his views are the happy medium that many are looking for.

    Some other differences between he and his father:
    *Rand supports Gitmo
    *Rand is closer to Israel
    *Rand is not for closing down all bases, but realizes we need to modernize
    *He understands transition periods. RP is wrong when he says we can “leave tomorrow”
    *Rand is more anti-terrorism

    But he takes the good aspects of some of his fathers views as well: Defense spending must be reduced along with everything else(though not gutted), and he is a strong defender of civil liberties which is essential in order to be a Constitutionalist.

  • acat

    This is the last convention where crazy uncle Ron will have delegates to trade with… and he’s clearly going for broke trying to acquire ‘em.

    Why do that, if he’s going to retire, eh?

    Mew

  • conservativerock5

    So why do it anyways?

    I suspect some other deal will happen, and generally I think it will be a good deal that will make Romney be more conservative, whatever the deal may be.

  • clintonformccain

    If the conservative base sits on their hands in November ( and I don’t think they will), then Romney has no prayer. If it takes picking a VP who hurts with independents in the general is what it takes to solidify the base, then Romney has no prayer.

    He’s got to attract voters from the center to win and I don’t see DeMint helping with that.

  • mikeymike143

    a fired up enthusiastic conservative/tea party base helped mourdock win by a landslide over the moderate lugar. conservatives and tea partiers poured time and energy into the mourdock campaign and the supposedly unbeatable lugar was beaten by 20 points. that is what demint brings to the table!!!!

    and no ticket with two moderates is going to generate a lot of enthusiasm with conservatives and tea partiers. and its all about balance. romney already has the moderate vote locked up, he sure doesnt need help with that. so he should balance the ticket with a principled conservative like jim demint, and mitt will reap a windfall, just like richard mourdock did.

    and dont think that yesterdays big win by mourdock isnt going to influence romney’s people to push for a conservative pick for VP. in fact, i dont think there is any chance that a moderate gets picked. none, not after what happened in indiana yesterday.

  • trimulchio

    Sen. DeMint and includes Sen. Portman and Gov. Daniels.

  • clintonformccain

    a Republican primary race.

  • dbkohl

    … but…

    Romney needs a conservative VP to rally the base. Romney himself will deliver the moderates. But, you are right, we will be competing against votes from democrats in November. Making the conservative VP driving the conservative GOTV even more important. do you really think that Biden would bring the same effect for the other side?

  • http://nextgenerationvoters.com Bethany

    Even yesterday afternoon, he scolded a reporter for asking his position on various social issues. He’s playing to the moderates right now, and if he keeps it up it just might work. That means we need a VP who appeals to the rest of the Republican Party– conservatives, the TEA Party…people like that. I don’t think Romney needs a VP who can appeal to the center. Who would you suggest, though?

  • clintonformccain

    He’s a terrific campaigner. Helps with a key swing state. And, instantly changes the dynamic of the Republican party and Hispanic voters.

  • http://nextgenerationvoters.com Bethany

    although I’m not fond of that idea. I think there are better options out there. He definitely helps energize people, but y’know– I don’t think he helps with a swing state as much as people might think. The people of Florida want him to continue representing Florida in the Senate, continuing to do great things for the state like he has been since he got elected. I do, though, believe he’ll be one of the last couple people they choose from.

    If you’re interested, I wrote a review of my thoughts on him being VP as well :) http://nextgenerationvoters.com/potential-2s-marco-rubio/

  • rightlane1111

    Someone is going to have to drag Romney across the finish line in this election. Let’s just be honest…Romney has a problem with the base and he has a problem with the TPM. Romney also has a big problem with Latinos.

    I know…I know…I can hear you now about the immigration business…but Rubio does have some good ideas. Romney, on the other hand tries to align with the base and PO’s the Latinos…A MUST category for Republicans. Like it or not…if we do not get some sort of Big Tent going on, we’re going down in flames. Know why we need the Latino vote…WOMEN.

    Do you think this War on Women thing is a mistake? I don’t…and women and I am one, think with emotion…they, for the most part, are not pragmatists. So…if they have female offspring…all they want it “more” for them. They don’t think about the ramifications of “more”.

    So…back to Rubio. He is not wooden. He is popular, he is MUCH BETTER at explaining policy than Romney. The South is not in love with Romney either and thanks to his inability to articulate his message on SS/Medicare…and the solution…people in FL (the swing state) think he is going to take away their income (people already on SS). Who was good at telling them that…Obama. Meanwhile WILLARD flew under the radar because he wants to be non-committal.

    For me…it’s a question of the South, Immigration, Popularity, Swing State and Star Status…Rubio has them all…AND ADD THIS…He’s Conservatives…and the Base likes that MEGA BIG TIME.

  • clintonformccain

    by the time November rolls around. When the choice is Mitt Romney versus Barack Obama, the base is going to be plenty enthusiastic.

    The bitterness of the primary race will fade. Heck, even Erick Erickson has gone almost a week without a Mitt-bashing post. And, nobody even really cared that Santorum’s midnight endorsement was tepid and whiny.

  • http://nextgenerationvoters.com Bethany

    is his experience level. While I do think he’s capable in most areas to be President, I think the Obama camp would have a field day with it. We criticized them for putting up a Senator with two years of experience? They’ll say that’s exactly what we’re doing this year (I know it’s not the same since Rubio’d be VP, but you know it won’t matter to them). I think that if possible we need to prevent them from having anything to play with like that. I think our best choices are DeMint, McDonnell, Ryan, and West (I love Huckabee, but I have a feeling Obama might make him look horrible if he was VP).

  • Dave_A

    The worst possible choice, is to put a ‘hard money’ man anywhere near the apparatus that controls our money supply….

  • Dave_A

    Which means it won’t be DeMint…

    If it weren’t for the fact that Walker is needed in WI, I’d put him up as the best possible candidate….